Look here, cut is not modified in the context off the sites pics. It has no implants no metal not cut in half and opened up like a bannana peel. It is a minor and common thing. I say its still normal. Mine was cut wheni was a kid but id never modify my cock. I know the term literally will incorporate circumcision but it still is not on level with what the group modified has here.
you just hate cut cock. Idk what the big deal is

I'm ending the thread now. I won't be posting anymore.

I want to thank everyone who at least tried to make this a civilised discussion. I'm afraid to say that nobody really raised a decent argument that swayed my opinion. It was mostly appeals to emotion, which are fallacies.

"Matt's Wife": I pity you.

Do you think there´s not enough labeling and thinking in (useless) categories yet?


I am not native speaker and I have thought that "modified" on this site means whatever you have done yourself with your cock to make it look different. But most circumsized men did not choose - that´s the main difference. Do you really want to mix them with some who think it looks good cutting their cockheads into halfs or sticking whatever into their glans until blood runs out? I would not and that´s why I say no. For just one reason: showing respect. And for that I would not need any categories at all.


I know what you want to criticize and basically I am with you. That no young boy (and girl) should be taken the decision if he or she wants to be cut or not if it´s not for a medical reason. Any cultural, national or religious ambitions are just an excuse for - sorry - a violation of a young human being. I am talking about fiction of course, the fiction of being able to choose whatever we want to be and that´s what I would call "freedom". Reality means that every man, cut or not, has the same dignity and the same pride even right NOW.


We´re talking about the same fiction, only the way you want to get there is wrong. That´s all I can say.

No

If you're looking at it from a global perspective, cut dicks are not the norm, so yes, cut dicks are the minority in the vast sea of dicks. Mine's cut and I don't get offended knowing that it isn't all that normal/common. Remember, Scarcity usually adds value...

Hauntedskin never said anything negative about cut dicks, maybe you're having trouble understanding him...People need to chill.

I find this topic fascinating.

It really is interesting when I simply use appropriate descriptions and terminology and people become instantly offended.

I have seen a lot of cut advocates use some very insulting descriptions of an uncut penis, while I just try to describe things as how they are.

As I mentioned before: circumcision is so integrated into many cultures, that to describe it as anything less than "normal" is instantly considered an insult, when in reality it's just the truth.

I was cut at birth, personally i think my right to choose was taken from me, but living in the US this is the norm. personally from the men and women i have know here in the states, they do prefer the cut over the uncut due to looks, which I agree as well, if the foreskin just covered the tip (glan), then they look ok to me, that is the reason most pictures here are always trying to show the head. Being called modified now is the question, isn't wearing clothes being modified, cutting your hair, etc. as far what the true population goes for in the world, this would be a real challenge to find out, because of cultures, religons, etc. play a roll what is done, for a category on something like this you would have cut or uncut, then either one or the other would be looked at, and most people have their own preference, and if someone only wanted to see cut, they would never see yours. I do not look at torture, piereced pic's, but there are those who do, so what you may call modified may not be to someone else, and for me the second i see clothes for example, that is the ultimate in modification, being a die hard nudist that is the biggest turn off for me. I just looked at your photo's, its ironic that out of five photos, four you have your head exposed, sounds modified to me, by the way i am of british decent, first generation american.

I notice, with interest, that a lot of people are automatically taking offence at my comment.

I never said anything to suggest that cut cocks were bad or good, only that they probably should (going by the site's given categories) go under "modified" and not "normal", because they are the former and not the latter.

A cut cock is not a "normal" cock, it is "modified".

It is interesting though, that a simple comment like this can urge people to respond as if they are insulted by the idea of a cut cock not being considered "normal". I guess it shows how ingrained circumcision is in many people's minds and societies as "normal" when in fact it isn't.

Why can't people just accept the truth?

Stop it. Why do some folks have to take the time to split hairs? That depends on your culture, your religion, the region of the world you live in. It is a "social norm" throughout the world. Therefore, any picture of one who has trimmed, shaved, etc. their pubic hair should also be considered modified or some other category. Just our humble opinion.