Page #2
Pages: #1 #2|
Started by #202700 [Ignore] 10,Nov,11 13:04
New Comment Rating: 0 Similar topics: 1.Complimenting women is becoming pointless 2.Native Americans?? 3.New on Netflix: American Circumcision 4.Americans v English 5.Democrats refuse to vote on relief money unless $35 million goes to Kennedy center Comments: | ||
You must be logged in to post here. Log in
I do however know people who advocate the beneficial procedure called circumcision on newborn babies.
Ah I get it you are just another tool who lables circumcision as "mutilation"
You can call it whatever you makes you feel better about yourself old man. But I can tell you one thing that's for sure, the Majority of doctors, nurses, men, women, boys, grils etc. on this planet in no way consider circumcision "mutilation" As a matter of fact it is considered the exact Opposite of mutilation which is commonly known as (beautification).
I've seen so many threads like this one, and they always go south very quickly. Doesn't take much to figure out why.
The Concise Oxford Dict. shows 'mutilation' as 'to deprive and remove' so, routine circumcision clearly IS a 'mutilation' by any civilised standard with over thwo thirds of the most sensitive part of the penis 'removed' and the owner 'deprived' of a large part of his voluptus.
I am well aware that many men here were mutilated against their basic will and human rights and it would be wonderful if this could now stop so that men can make up their won minds once they are ADULTS ....As I have now posted several times; I have no problem with any mans decision to do whatever he wants with his own body.....
.......I see these arguments (on sites such as this) as very important because attitudes need to be changed and the normal condition of having ALL of ones body parts needs defending against the crass stupidity of people like JB.
I personally don't see most circumcisions as an act of mutilation, but I try to respect where other people are coming from who passionately feel that it is. Plus I also acknowledge the medical benefits that can come from circumcision. Both sides have very valid points. But ultimately, I believe it should be an adult male's choice to have it done.
There are some medical circumstances where circ. is deamed to necessary, but it is interesting that in the US where the medical industry is private that the pratice is prevalent.
Circ. as mutilation I'm not sure, if done well it looks fine but there are many cases where the procedure goes wrong and the results can effect a man for life, apart from the pain to the child unless the op is done when a baby where crying babies don't seem to bother parents as they do that anyway?
If kept clean the uncut penis has little to worry most in the western world, in the third world it may and can be used stop the spread of some diseases (if some of the latest theories are correct) but in effect this is to combat a problem where better education over time will have the same effect; circ. at the moment seems to be a quicker option.
In the UK circ. is not common so a circ'd person is the odd one out.
Thats why I choose to start foreskin restoration with the support of my partner, she has no issues either way and I was the first guy she knew who was circ'd.
2.5 years in and I have more to play with and I like the look of the extra skin over my head.
The uncut penis it just the same with the skin retracted so I'm not sure lools are the issue.
When women say they find the natural penis ugly, I'm not so sure they'd feel the same if it was the 'fashion' for men to prefer women with no labia.
Freddy.
One I get my Hard Drive sorrted on my PC I'll post some pics, this postwas from a tablet.
Please excuse any spelling earrors?
There is nothing wrong with male circumcision, and there is nothing wrong with being circumcised, and there is nothing wrong with parents choosing to have there kids circumcised.
The anti side will always try to create reasons as to why being uncircumcised is better than being circumcised, when in reality there aren't any.
I myself was circumcised as an adult, so I personaly know that there is no negative aspect to being circumcised. I know what it is like to be uncircumcised, and I know what it is like to be circumcised. Because of this I have first hand knowledge that 99% of all the theories they develop about being circumcised and how horrible it must be are just that....nothing more than fantastical theories created in order to create a sense of self justification for remaining uncircumcised, when there true desire is to actually be circumcied.
When I got circumcised I did NOT loose anything useful or anything pleasurable. My penis works sexualy just as well after being circumcised as it did before I was circumcised.
Not one single negative theory that the anti-circ side has ever stated about being circumcised has EVER happened to me as a result of getting circumcised.NOT A SINGLE ONE.
It's all made up folks, and I actually know because I have been both ways.
....Are you really going to use his claims to sanction the routine mutilation of tiny infants against their will and without any anaesthetic....??
In fairness to 'JB' he claims to have been cut as an adult after making his own decision,...I have NO PROBLEM with that as it's entirely his own privalege pleasure and free will to do so.......Unlike the many tiny infants who DO NOT have that consideration shown to them.
.....I thought that America was a very clean country where people are taught at an early age to wash themselves....??
.....Apparently not...(?)
New Comment Go to top