| I cannot understand why "porn" is frowned on. By watching we learn new techniques. this must be better than how things have always been. No one tells us or shows us how to get most pleasure from sex. Everything is hidden and never talked about if sex is seen as more open.
Yes, of course there is an age below which we do not want young people indulging in sex - their emotional age is not developed enough for a sexual relationship is often given as a reason. Clearly no one wants pornography to be a source or cause of exploitation of participants or be involved in crime such as kidnapping or slavery etc. Other these restrictions, surely seeing others having sex is very instructive.
In many parts of the world we are free to behave sexually in any way in private. Heterosexual, bi-sexual, lesbian or homosexual. Unfortunately, religion has an overpowering effect on our sexual behaviour and in some parts of the world actually removes an individual's freedom of private action.
See my other post on what SYD has done for me and read my blogs of my accounts of sex with prostitutes. |
Many teens 'know' that its normal/usual to engage in vigorous intercourse with minimal foreplay and that all women like sex to finish, after a fierce pounding, with the mans semen shot in their face....... They know this because porn has taken over where sex education should be.....How else are young men going to learn about sex?
- all participants should do it voluntarily
- no Family members
- no ****
- and the Access should be only for People above 20
and last but not least
- it should be part of your life and not dominate your whole life
Then it is fantastic
As for other comments - I do not think porn is particularly bad for young people.
1. People lived most of their history nude, urinated in front of their living (yes, I happened to see an amazonian tribe village, it stinks, literally) and fucked in front of their chi1dren, since they lived in one room, often even more than one family. So I do not think watching porn is any worse than that. Even if chi1dren see it, still not that bad, though I'm indeed against such exposure.
2. Only couple of past decades TV is censored. Before that even chi1dren were exposed to all kinds of vio1ence on screens. Youth even more so. Do you remember action b-movies of 80es? Yet people live and do not kill each other. No one learned to live like it was in those movies. Actually, I notice that my generation and following exposed to those movies tend to be less violent than the ones who were 10 years older. So why people would learn relationship from porn?
3. You probably know that Indian culture spawned some great texts about sex. Most known is "Kama Sutra". A woman is seen as a respected partner in them. Yet many women could experience how rude and disrespectful with them Indian men are on this very site.
My point is - porn itself does not make men worse than they are. Those people who are stupid and brutal would be stupid and brutal in sex with or without watching porn. And those who are gentle and sensitive would not be spoiled by watching porn anyway.
P.S. I think I've seen some statistics that show that in countries where porn is legal sex crime is lower than in those where it is not.
I agree, porn doesn't make men worse than they are, but most very young men think with their c0cks and forget all about the fact all the acts they see in porn are consentual between the 'actors' and not reality.
I have a strong dislike for the "daddy and son" roleplay porn! I've had messages from young guys on this site saying "Hi daddy". It creeps me out!
New Comment Go to top