Get Paid For Using Social Sites! | Stay Hard as Steel!!! | Tired of ads on this site? | Want a bigger penis? Enlarge it At Home Using Just Your Hands! |
New Comment Rating: 1 Similar topics: 1.The STAR CHAMBER 2.Sneaker Photo Update 3.Why does he keep visiting my page? 4.The perverse joy of getting a member deleted 5.Here's a thought regarding the infamous Star Chamber "message"... Comments: | ||
Yep.
The folks in the Star Chamber are just little rays of sunshine.
NO PLACE FOR HOMOPHOBIA, FASCISM, SEXISM, RACISM OR IDIOTS !
I guess he doesn't live the words he wrote. Disappointing,very disappointing......
Yesterday, a member was referred to the Star Chamber by a guy who accused them of stealing and posting other member's pics. The case was dismissed, because there weren't even any pictures posted on the reported member's page.
Today, the guy who filed the bogus report was deleted...because all of the pictures posted on HIS page were stolen.
Another "interesting" referral to the Star Chamber. Please note the reason the member was referred.... "You may remember the silly tattoo from our last encounter". So the referral was because of the silly tattoo and that the image of her butt was found on imgur.com ( oh my! )
Isn't there some official site rule against posting pics featuring a "silly tattoo"?
What truly puzzles me is why a person who has been deleted for posting "silly tattoo" pics would come back--again and again--and post the EXACT SAME web-derived, "silly tattoo" photos. That's insane!
Don't they understand that we don't like their kind around these parts?
Now that you are keeping a closer eye on the shenanigans that go on in the Star Chamber, there have been fewer bogus reports lately.
Nice work keeping them honest, guys and gals!
There was an interesting referral made today. I'm why not certain why the member was referred, my guess is that the member referring isn't even clear why, otherwise the report would have been more detailed. It will be interesting how the panel members will view this and cast their vote.
He'll never answer the question, though. Transparency/honesty is NOT in his Nature...
[deleted image]
With that said, what's her logic to continually post on a thread that I authored?
Also, her claim that I've posted anonymously on her wall is not true, that's not my style.
There really is a Star Chamber. That's the address right up there. It was intended as a way for voting members to help weed out profiles posting stolen pics and such, but it is frequently misused as a means to push personal agendas and petty grievances. Which is why folks should check it out from time to time.
Again, I'm not quite sure why this issue has to play out here. For a mere twenty points, you can start your own thread to hash this issue out.
If you can't spare the 20 points, let me know. I will gladly pay the points and start a thread for you. Another option would be to just go back over to the "Dafuq" thread and continue this particular gripe session there...
Aug 17, 12:02 admin: sure
Aug 17, 11:06 bella!: Thank you. May I share your thoughts with the voting panel?
Aug 17, 11:01 admin: I would delete 3 pics in question, problem solved.
Aug 17, 10:18 bella!: He's currently up for "evaluation".
Aug 17, 10:17 bella!: Hi. This is a very sincere question, this is a member for 13 months...Would you delete this member or would you give him an opportunity to rectify the problem? I want to be certain that I understand your guidelines correctly /member.php?w=466205
The voting members are not able to embrace the fact that:
ADMIN'S GUIDELINES SAY THIS; If the abuse is not grave please try to convince the member to delete the pics in question before deleting him entirely. Last phrase is meant for profiles posting internet porn as internet porn, i.e. who do not pretend to be people on those photos or friends of those people. It is NOT meant for accounts that start their life on the site posting internet porn pretending it's them.
ADMIN'S GUIDELINES SAY THIS; If it appears later that the member was deleted unjustly - all members who were in favour of the deletion will be deleted and banned from the site.
Apparently, popular opinion is that evaluation matters are all neat and clean and should be resolved in a matter of hours. If the voting members take note of admin's post, these issues can linger up to 10 days! Heaven help the member that doesn't sign on in 24 hours, they can be out of here without knowing what happened. POOF! GONE!
It just amazes me just how thick headed some members will be!
/abuse_reports.php
I'm glad that admin provided the link so that membership can actually see who the site whack-a-doodles really are!
/abuse_reports.php
I have no idea why I didn't do that...
If the abuse is not grave please try to convince the member to delete the pics in question before deleting him entirely Last phrase is meant for profiles posting internet porn as internet porn, i.e. who do not pretend to be people on those photos or friends of those people. It is NOT meant for accounts that start their life on the site posting internet porn pretending it's them.
The same members quickly vote to delete even though there is no deception involved. There was a relatively new voting member that proceeded to vote to delete without allowing the referred member and opportunity to rectify or respond....
/abuse_reports.php
You would think that that was his opportunity to state what he felt was inaccurate about my comment(s). Apparently, he has been very busy gathering and posting photos of members that he enjoys poking at and making fun of.
It is intended to encourage all members to be aware of how the deletion panel works...so that everything can be done openly and honestly.
John has ALWAYS claimed to be against secr*ts here on SYD.
Why would he object to transparency in the Star Chamber?
(It seems like SOMEONE has something to hide.)
DELETE THIS MEMBER 13,Aug 09:07 By ****
A regular fake. It slipped under the radar yesterday. The link above is to the original uncropped version stolen by the fake. Also the message left by **** has been seen and ignored by the fake.
What the voting member failed to mention was that [s]he provided incorrect links to the alleged website(s) to support their claim. So in my estimation, nothing slipped under the radar, it was obvious that someone did do their due diligence and present good information. 👈 To that reporting and voting member, just as I do, you also make mistakes. The difference between us is that you NEVER admit you're wrong.
It is also interesting to observe the referring/voting patterns of the more active panel members.
One guy consistently referred and voted to delete profiles of guys with bigger dicks than his.
Another habitually refers Asian and Indian profiles.
One guy makes insulting comments about referred members quite often.
A handful of people just cast their vote to go along with their posse leader without any thought being put into it.
It can be very entertaining...
Others, sadly, do not.
The more people who check out the link to the Star Chamber on a regular basis--even if they can't vote yet--the better chance we have of keeping things honest.
[deleted image]
--------------------------------------- added after 14 hours
Apparently the poster of the image, which is now removed, had second thoughts. My opinion of the poster and their image, by you posting a vote with the members additional comment only reflects your poor judgment as well as your inability to understand that members do not always share your opinion. And it was solely for that reason, you chastised the member and called him Old Blighty. Poor form on your part, it only makes you look foolish!
--------------------------------------- added after 15 hours
[deleted image]
Oops! The poster is being a bit slippery as he removed the image and added it again dated today.
--------------------------------------- added after 16 hours
Since the poster has changed the category of the image to "friends only" and included a comment directed at me, I will close by saying this;
JohnS GET OVER YOURSELF AND STOP *YOUR* NONSENSE!
JohnS, you and your 60 or so friends enjoy the image.
--------------------------------------- added after 17 hours
JohnS, rather than voting my comment down, why not post your thoughts. Was anything I said inaccurate or are you just being your old and miserable self?
New Comment Go to top