Stay Hard as Steel!!! | Male Multiple Orgasm Discover your full Abilities! | Laughably Small Penis? Enlarge it At Home Using Just Your Hands! | Want a bigger penis? Enlarge it At Home Using Just Your Hands! |
Started by #51055 [Ignore] 28,Jan,10 11:47
New Comment Rating: 0 Similar topics: 1.Your favorite type of porn? 2.What style or type of pics are your favorite? 3.jerking off material 4.Favorite porn. 5.Let's see what everyone's favorite porn is that they watch! Comments: |
Least favorite: bondage
Least liked, I'm not sure I have one, I'm a dirty old man I love all porn.
By contrast, there have been several TV items that I viewed quite innocently and which I found to be a massive turn-on. I saw an episode of 'Moll Flanders', a BBC historical drama, at some friends house where several people were present and i had to get a newspaper in front of flies very quickly despite there being no real nudity! Then there was the serialisation of 'The Camomile Lawn' with several hot sections such as the luscious blond with the husky voice reclining in the bath with her massive big tits hanging over the sides!!!! I also remember coming home for lunch and switching on the TV to see a programme for young mothers about birth control. It got my total attention when an attractive redhead in her late 30's hopped up on the couch and spread her legs to reveal a fantastically beautiful ginger pussy. my omlette was forgotten when the camera got between her spread thighs and watched gloved fingers gently open her labia in and insert a diaphragm!!!!!
Back in the day before camcorders and cheap digital cameras, pretty much the only people making porn were at least semi-professional in their respective fields. Now, though, any drooling moron can do his thing and post it to the internet. And they do. Ad nauseum.
Basic eroticism has given way to idiotic, formulaic sentationalism. For instance, who started the "look-at-the-camera" thing, and why did so many others jump on that bandwagon??
For instance, whenever I see a scene in which a guy is getting head, but the giver is being prompted to constantly look sideways at the camera. Not only does that give the impression that the fellatrice is distracted from the business at hand, it just plain looks stupid.
Cinematography 101: Never EVER acknowledge the camera or anyone or anything off-camera, or you will instantly destroy whatever mood is being "acted" out. The very same thing happens as a result of the camera being constantly jerked around and zoomed in and out. The whole idea is for the audience to NOT be reminded that there IS a camera in the first place! If you want to change camera angles, either turn it off, move it, then turn it back on, or s-l-o-w-l-y and steadily pan it, or just do some serious editing after the fact. People nowdays seem to have forgotten that film/video does NOT have to be shot in "real time." A five-minute scene can be shot over the course of several hours, or even days if necessary, which is the beauty of movie-making in the first place!
I could go on and on (hey, you asked!), but I won't. Besides, I'm convinced that things like aesthetics, subtlty an detail have, for the most part, left the building.
New Comment Go to top