Started by #591921 [Ignore] 06,Mar,20 12:22
 | A Denver council woman posted on her government websites that every registered Democrat that is infected with coronovirus has the patriotic duty to attend every MAGA event and Trump rally they can while infected with the virus. |
New Comment Rating: 0
Similar topics: 1.Super Bowl contest time again! Enter and win a 1 month membership! 2.Stealing is stealing. 3.LET'S HAVE SOME BREXIT JOKES!!! 4.Coronovirus fake reports against Trump admin. 5.democrats refused to vote on relief bill unless $25 million was secured for house paychecks
Comments:
"Babe,I thought you said you loved me?". "Oh I was just being sarcastic".
Just because you offend someone by saying how you feel doesn't mean you should be able to bow out of it by just saying," I was being sarcastic".
Adolf hitler, " I was just being sarcastic,I love the Jews"
Obama,"If you like your plan you can keep your plan,if you like your doctor,you can keep your doctor",
"Oh I was just being sarcastic"
Own up to your fuck ups and move forward.
I just used a couple off the top of my head examples.
There is a fancy name for what you did,using fancy words and new modern terms to amaze and dazzle the reader without making YOUR position any more believeable either.
But I can't think of the word at the moment and it really don't make a bit of differnce anyhow.
Go back to what overeight originally posted: It's NOT true. I have no idea whether the Councilwoman was genuinely being sarcastic or not (and neither do you). Invoking Obamacare or The Holocaust IS a logical fallacy.
The "fancy name" for what I am doing is sticking to what's factually provable.
Sadly, I suspect that you are being intellectually myopic. Your posts show a willingness to believe anyone on the left, politically, is evil. Apply the same standards to everyone and stick to what is true - not what you THINK someone said/wrote. That would be a good start.
This link might help too:
only registered users can see external links
Alternatively, you could just let it slide. Most of the Internet is a cesspit when it comes to reasoned argument, and there's no reason why a cock-flashing site should be some sort of paragon. Have a good Sunday.
You have added nothing to the conversation but to try to make me look dumb with your fancy words like myopic which apparently applys to vision.
Enough of making me look dumb, add something to the original topic,or explain your opionion of the topic.Stop using distractions from the fact that a councilwoman would actually reply to such a statement in any way other than to deter such ideas? The very thought of infecting people with a virus because of who they dislike in the political arena is beyond sick minded.And to respond in any shape or form other than to discourage that mindset is wrong and to a point enabling it because of the fact it has went virul.
Do you think we would even be discussing it had the councilwoman ignored it or discouraged it? NO. The media is helping alot to stir the pot.
Most of the time folks like me "let it slide" because we get tired of trying to mimic the jackass whisperer. There is no "wining" a arguement with folks like you or Two warm, there is just a give the fuck up and hope like hell the world's immune system can handle the leaches disease.
Your type "wins" not because you are right,but because you aggrovate,aggitate,sue intimidate assainate,and otherwise make the opponets so miserable they walk away shaking their heads praying for their nation and their health.
I'll make this simple for you, as that's what you seem to want:
1) The Councilwoman was, at best, being childish and facile (in my opinion).
2) As has always been the case: the reason I originally jumped onto this topic was because I read what overeight posted and thought - "that sounds unlikely". A bit of research showed she did NOT do what was asserted, but something else. Normally I couldn't care less, but there is so much rabid misinformation I felt it should be pointed out that she didn't do what overeight said she did.
3) My opinion, that you seem so keen for, is that all of us (but YOU in particular) do not criticise our friends as often as we criticise our enemies/opponents when they do the same/similar.
For example: I wouldn't mind betting that you would excuse all/most of the posts in the link below.
only registered users can see external links
However, if Bernie Sanders tweeted equivalently I suspect it would be a different story.
Plus I believe that you're a fucking hypocrite. Calling out a Councilwoman for that tweet and at the same time calling for her to be dropped from a plane with a dodgy parachute above an area with coronavirus. Don't BOTH, potentially, endanger life?
If you're calling me a jackass whisperer - fuck you too!
YOU STILL, wont acknowledge the fact the woman should not have replied in such a way. You act like it is ok.
Sometimes people like her,need a awakening. That sickning feeling she would have for a short moment before the second cord worked and the parachute open,would give her a similar feeling that a older person would have had she given them the virus. And since she seemed to think it was ok to spread it, well, she would be where it would be spread. She could feel the fear it is imposeing on alot of people right now.
She had strange reasoning behind her "tweet" I have logical reasoning behind my "tweet"
There is still no proof as to rather or not she is telling the truth when she said she was being sarcastic. She is a fucking communist you know.
No you are not a jack ass whisperer,you are just another modern thinker that is off base ,apparently by living in a totally differnt lifestyle than myself and not seeing the same things I have.. There is hope,as you are willing to discuss things,explain things, listen to others , so there is hope.
only registered users can see external links
He is 100% right about the hatred towards Trump.
To be a Christian,he can not support the lifestyle of the LGBTQ RSTUV commiunity.It would be against his religion. You are supposed to hate the sin,love the sinner.
But if you look at the simple fact to create a family,before adoption came along as a viable option,the family has to start with a male and a female to make a 3rd member.
So Christians can not support the idea of LGBTQUVW and read from the same Bible read from a 100 years ago.
As for my feelings on it,the LGBTQ folks have been here for eons,it just seems lately they use mainstream media to get special treatment and attention.Which none should be nessasary to be happy.IF they are actually being themselves instead of following a trend.
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
She claims she was being sarcastic and what she tweeted was actually: "#solidarity Yaaaaas!!" followed by some emojis.
Or is it "to hell with the facts"?
While we're at it why not provide a link, to a reputable site, that shows that Nancy Pelosi claims the video of her tearing up the speech is fake?
By it's very name "the conservative media" is partial. I agree with you about being held responsible for your actions and not making false/bs statements. However, I think you should hold yourself to that standard too. Your original post is factually inaccurate. It's like claiming a flasher is a rapist - there may be a grain of part-truth in there somewhere, but you are still wrong.
--------------------------------------- added after 2 minutes
BPR news reported it yesterday and so did National Review. I am not very computer savvy so I can't post the articles because I dint have the experience with computers to be able to but both publications did report that yesterday.
No answer to my questions.
only registered users can see external links
The Councilwoman did NOT post what you said she did on government websites. Unless you know better and can provide proof?
Might this be the "real" story?
only registered users can see external links
If so, I think most reasonable people would think she has a point. Particularly given there was that other "doctored" video that made out she was slurring her speech.
New Comment Go to top