Cody8789, plaintiff

v.

Ninadanielle, defendant

________________________________/

.........................COMPLAINT...........................

This Court declares all the statements in this document to be true based on the plaintiff, Cody8789, claims and evidence.

COUNT I. ATTACKING MEMBER(S)

1.The plaintiff Cody8789 was on the chat room of defendant Ninadanielle with member wizzastick.

2. According to the plaintiff, Cody8789, the defendant attacked him and a member wizzastick enjoying a chat with the defendant.

3. The defendant kicked member Cody8789 and wizzstick without a reason. Under the rules of this Court, no member is allow to attack another member in the form of kicking the member out of the chat room.


JUDGE RuFino; Ms. Ninadanielle, this Court has found you guilty of Attacking a Member in a chat room. You will be in probation for 30 days, and you will not be allowed to open another room while you are on probation.

9/4/25

SITO Members,
plaintiffs,

v.

bjuk,
defendant.
___________________/

.......................COMPLAINT........................

This Court declares all the statements in this document to be true based on the evidence of this case.


COUNT I FAILURE TO UPDATE PROFILE

1. Member bjuk has been a member since 2008 with 260 points.
At that time, the defendant posted his profile pics.

2. The evidence shows the defendant has not updated his profile since 2008. The defendant refuses to update his profile, unlike most members of this site.

3. The defendant's age has not been updated since the year 2008.

4. Member bjuk has been verified by 3 members since 2008.
Member bjuk could lose his verification status at any time.


Judge; Fredesbinda; Mr bjuk is time to update your profile. You have been found guilty by this Court for failure to update your profile, and that will include your age, too. You have 30 days to update your profile or be in Contempt of Court.

9/1/25

me too

I was 19 and got fuck by a 21-year-old cute guy. He was uncut with a curved dick.

SITO Memebers
plaintiffs,

v.

bjuk a/k/a bjuka
defendant.
_____________________________/

.....................COMPLAINT.............................

This Court declares all the statements in this document to be true based on the evidence of the case:

COUNT I. ATTACKING A PREMIUM MEMBER

1. The defendant, bjuk was in the char room called; Who want to pass me around on August 27, 2025.

2. The evidence shows that on the above date, the defendant attacked a premium member, Sir-Skittles.

3. The defendant insulted member Sir-Skittles several times. He used offensive and vulgar language on the above member.


COUNT II. CHAT ROOM DISTURBING PEACE

1. The defendant bjuk used attacks against other members in the above chat room.

2. Several members complained about the defendant's rampage as he attacked them verbally.


JUDGE RuFino; Mr. bjuk you are a troublemaker. I found you guilty on both counts. The type of behaviour is not acceptable in chat rooms, especially attacking a premium member. You were out of control in the chat room, according to witnesses who saw the type of language you used to attack a premium member and others. You acted like a child. This Court will monitor your behavior in chat rooms. You will now be on probation for 20 days. I don't want to see yoy back in this Court again.

August 27, 2025

SITO Court Members
plaintiffs,

v.

4438cr,
defendant.
______________________/

......................COMPLAINT>>>>>>>>>>

This Court declares all the statements in this case to be true based on the evidence of the case.

COUNT I. VIOLATION OF THE CLEAN PAGE ACT

1. The defendant has been charged with violation of the Clean Page Act rule. Under the Clean Page Act rule, all members must clean their pages from any negative gifts.

2. The defendant, 4438cr's page, has been filthy for the past 3 days, has ignored this court's request.

3. Defendant has been proven to be a dysfunctional member who doesn't care about maintaining his page clean.


Judge Tomasina; Mr. 4438cr, you are guilty of the above charge. You have 20 days to clean your page or be in Contempt of Court.

August 23, 2025

I am here for you

Clerk of the Court; The justices of the Court will vote to declare member GinDaddy guilty or innocent of the charge of Violation of probation. The defendant GingerDaddy has violated his probation when he left his room on August 20th 2025, without informing his guest in his room.

Judge Rufino...guilty

Judge Clarisbinda....no guilty

Judge Florisbinda....guilty.


Clerk of the Court
The judges have found Ginger Daddy guilty of violating probation. The vote was 2-1

August 21, 2025

I woke up gay this morning.

SITO Members,
plaintiffs,

v.

Yrocs,
defendant.
____________________/


...................COMPLAINT.............................

This Court declares all the statements in this document to be true based on the evidence of the case.


COUNT I. DESTROYING CASE EVIDENCE

1. The defendant Yrocs has destroyed case evidence on his charges under the Clean Page Act rule.

2. The Defendant was scheduled to be in this Court regarding all the dirty gifts on this page.

3. The defendant destroyed all evidence of the case after he cleaned his page the day before.

JUDGE FREDESBINDA: Mr. Yrocs, you are guilty of the above charges. You will now be on probation for 60 days. You should not get involved or attack members in chat rooms, blacklist others without reasonable cause.



8/21.25

keep going to the gym and have fun

I have never received this type of email. Thank you for letting us know.

I use rat repellent for her

SITO Chat Members,
plaintiffs

v.

GingerDaddy,
Defendant

...........................COMPLAINT.....................

This Court declares that all the statements on these documents are true based on the evidence of the case.


COUNT I CHAT ROOM ABANDONMENT

1. The defendant Ginger Daddy has opened 2 chat rooms in the past 2 days and is in violation of RULE: 301.

2. Under rule 301 Chat room hosts are required to tell chat members he is leaving or closing the room.

3. On Sunday and Monday the defendant did not tell chat members he was leaving the room.

4. In addition, rule 301 section 2A the host of the room must designate another host if he is leaving. The defendant violated this section

Judge Rufino's Final Judgement. I found the defendant GingerDaddy guilty of the above charge(s). The Court will monitor the defendant's chat room activities for the next 30 days.
8/18/25

yes it is

Did he cum?

send him back to his country, Argentina

hey guys the Worst Member of August is now open; /polls/5623.html

accidental? It looks more like suicide

dhood Expose; /blogs/52059.html

Clerk of the Court: The defendant CAT52! has been charged with 2 counts of witness tampering.

SITO Court members, plaintiffs,

v.

CAT52!a/k/a Saggy Granny, defendant.
_________________________________________/

...................COMPLAINT...............................

This Court declares all the statements in this document to be true based on the evidence of the case.


COUNT I. WITNESS TAMPERING (member Reaper2402)

1. The defendant, CAT52!, has tampered with evidence in the case of Reaper2402.

2. The defendant got rid of all the evidence on the page of Reaper2402.

3. Defendant CAT52! willfully violated the rules of evidence in a case.


COUNT II. TAMPERING WITH EVIDENCE (Member Tecsan)

1. The defendant has tampered with evidence in the case of tecsan.

2. The defendant deleted all the evidence on tecsan's profile page. Member tecsan's page was dirty with negative gifts.

3. The defendant willfully and intentionally destroyed evidence in a case.


JUDGE RuFino case decision: Ms. CAT52! You are outrageous.
Your actions are not acceptable under Court rules. You have acted viciously in destroying case evidence. There are other options you could use if you care that much for your friends.
You are guilty of both counts I and II. You will be on probation for 60 months.

July 28, 2025

SITO Members, plaintiffs,

v.

Reaper2402, defendant.
__________________________/

......................COMPLAINT.............................

This Court states that all the information provided on this document is true based on the evidence of the case:

COUNT I. VIOLATION OF CLEAN PAGE ACT.

1. The defendant Reaper2402 has violated the Clean Page Act Rule.

2. The Clean Page Act rule says members must maintain their pages clean, free of any negative gifts. Members are responsible for the cleaning.

3. The defendant has had his page dirty for the past 6 months and is showing disregard for cleaning his dirty page


Judge Temp: Tomasina, Mr. Reaper2402, it's time to clean your page immediately; no more excuses. You have 20 days to clean your page or face contempt of Court.


July 27, 2025

I refused to give oral sex to a man who shaves his pubes.

He is a pig

SITO Members, plaintiffs

v.

tecsan, defendant.
__________________________/

.......................COMPLAINT............................

The court declares all the statements in this document to be true based on the evidence of the case.

COUNT I. VIOLATION OF RULES BLOG LANGUAGE

1. The defendant tecsan violated the rules of blogs on this site.

2. The defendant has used language that is vulgar and unacceptable for blogs.

3. The defendant has used language such as 'fuck' and 'motherfucker"


Judge Florisbinda; Mr. Tecsan, you have used language that is not appropriate for a blog. If you are going to write blogs on this site, vulgar language is not the type of language to use on this site. If you are not going to follow the rules, I suggest you refrain from writing blogs. You will be on probation for 30 days. GUILTY

July 16, 2025

Hey faggot, clean your page, is filthy

tecsan you are a coward and a moron

SITO members, plaintiffs,

v.

tecsan, defendant.
__________________________?

........................COMPLAINT......................

This Court finds all the statements in this complaint to be true based on the evidence presented in the case.

COUNT I. VIOLATION OF CLEAN PAGE ACT RULE

1. The defendant, tecsan has violated the Clean Page Act rule, which states that all members of this site must maintain a clean, free of negative gifts their page clean at all times.

2. The defendant's page is filthy with different negative weeks for the past week

3. The defendant has enough points to clean his page.


JUDGE Tomasina; Mr tecsan when do you plan to clean your page? It's disgusting and ugly. Every member's page is their face. This means if your page is filthy, the rest of you is too. You are Guilty of the above charge. You have 30 days to clean your page.

July 13, 2025

Did you make your cousin cum?

She probably got a cash loan

hey you fat coward cow bella! unbanned me so I can reply to your comments. You won't, you old bitch, I know everything you say about me on this site.

A Federal Judge orders DHS to stop immigration arrests without probable cause

SITO Members, plaintiffs,

v.

tecsan, defendant.
___________________________/

.......................COMPLAINT............................

This Court declares all the statements on this document to be true, based on the evidence of this case.


COUNT I. BLOG LANGUAGE VIOLATION

1. The defendant, tecsan has violated the rules of blog conduct.

2. The defendant violated the language that should be used in a blog. He uses the word "fuck" on this blog; /blogs/60106.html

3. The defendant again used the word "fuck" in another blog; /blogs/60104.html

4. The defendant clearly violated the rules of blog conduct and language.


JUDGE RuFino; Mr. tecsan, you have a filthy mouth. You need to control yourself and act like a man, not a child. Your conduct is not acceptable in blogs of this site. You are guilty of the above charges and you are now in probation for 30 days.

July 11, 2025

baby what a nice dick

young and hairy

did any of those kids cum?

her retardation is on display here when she made comments on the forums.

fuck you CAT52 a/k/a saggy granny retire from this site now before somebody else retire

hey Saggy Granny you worry about some member's strange name, what about you having about 11 profiles on this site?

SITO members, plaintiffs,

v.

CAT52!a/k/a saggy granny, defendant.
___________________________________/

....................COMPLAINT.............................

This Court declares all the statements on this complaint to be true.


COUNT I. TAMPERING WITH EVIDENCE

1. The defendant CAT52! has tampered with the evidence of the case of Wellington.

2. On a previous case, Wellington's page was full of negative gifts.

3. The defendant CAT52! used her points to clear all the evidence. This is a violation, and the Court will not tolerate a member tampering with evidence in a pending case before this Court.

Judge Clarisbinda. Miss CAT52, I found you guilty of the above charge, and you will be on probation for 30 days. You also subject to Contempt of Court.

June 28, 2025

CAT52! saggy granny you belly pig fuck you coward and uncouth You are a racist scum

bella! Cowardly filthy cow, you are a feeble-minded. Retire from this site with dignity

saggy granny you are a coward!

it is you, you nasty cowardly Jamie.

Fuck you bella! and CAT52! saggy granny you both are disgusting old bitches and fuckhead. You both also get piss off when some other member blacklisted you. Get ready more mebers will blacklist you both soon!

SITO Members, plaintiffs,

v.

Bella!, defendant.
_____________________________/

.....................COMPLAINT...........................

GThis Court declares all the statements on this complaint to be true based on all of the evidence;

COUNT I. VIOLATION OF FREE SPEECH

1. The defendant has violated the rule of free speech several times.

2. Defendant attacks members who express themselves on forums.

3. The defendant, bella! attacks members on the site groups.

JUDGE RUFINO; Miss bella! You don't have the right to attack members who wish to express their opinion on groups, blogs, and forums. Every member on this site has the right to give their opinions. I suggest if you don't like other members' opinions so don't make groups or forums. I found you guilty of the above charges. This Court will be monitoring your group activities.

June 25, 2025

I am coming after you Wellington you fake cunt

SITO members, plaintiffs,

v.

Wellington, defendant.
________________________________/

.....................COMPlaint.........................

This Court declares all the statements in this complaint to be true based on the evidence in the case.

COUNT I. VIOLATION OF CLEAN PAGE ACT

1. The defendant's page has been cluttered with negative.
gifts.

2. The defendant has the opportunity to clean his page but he refused.

3. The defendant Wellington has violated the Clean Page Act rule, which states that every member must keep clean his/her page clean at all times.


COUNT II. INTERNET PICTURES

1. The defendant has several pictures that he is using on his page from different internet sites.

2. Most of the pictures were stolen from internet sites.

Judge Tomasina's decision. Mr. Wellington I found you guilty of the above charges. This Court ordered you to clean your page immediately. In addition, you must remove all the fake pictures you have on your page. I give you 20 days to comply with this Court order.



--------------------------------------- added after 2 hours

Judge Tomasina:

It has come to our attention that the defendant, Wellington has deleted all his internet pictures. The defendant still needs to clean his page of all negative gifts. If you failed to clean your page, you will be in Contempt of Court.

That's a lot of cum