SITO Members,
plaintiffs,

v.

CAT52!,
defendant.
_______________/

......................COMPLAINT.............................

This Court declares all the statements in this complaint to be true based on the evidence of this case.


COUNT I. POSTING OBSOLETE PICTURES

1. The defendant in this case, CAT52! has posted pictures for more than 10 years.

2. Defendant has posted these pictures on the front page of the site.

3. The defendant has used Photoshop to enhance the photographs to look younger and without a wrinkle body.


JUDGE Florisbinda: Ms. CAT52! Stop posting pictures that are not you. You want to be a 30-year-old woman. You are now in your late 70s and no longer the same body as you were years ago. If you are no longer the same as years ago, don't post obsolete pictures. You are lying to members of this site, especially men. I order you to delete these pictures immediately from the front page.

January 23, 2026

SITO Court case of CAT52!


SITO Members,
plaintiffs,

v.

CAT52!
Defendant.
_________________/
.................COMPLAINT................................

This Court declares all the statements in this complaint to be true based on the evidence of this case.

COUNT I. POSTING OBSOLETE PICTURE(S)

1. The defendant has violated the rules of this Court and site when she posted a picture more than 20 years ago.

2. The defendant has posted a picture of her naked body on the front page of the site with the intent to gain more visitors to her page.

3. The defendant's picture is from July 1990. The picture was taken 35 years ago.


JUDGE RuFino: Ms. CAT52! It's time to take down that picture. You are deceiving members of this site by posting this picture that is not actually the way you look today. You have 20 days to take down that picture of face contempt of Court charges.

Sir-Skittles,
SITO Members
Plaintiffs,


V>

CAT52!
Defendant

.........................COMPLAINT........................

This Court declares all the statements in this complaint to be true based on the evidence of the case.


COUNT I. DESTROYING CASE EVIDENCE

1. The defendant CAT52! destroyed case evidence regarding member tecsan's case.

2. The defendant on Monday 15 of December destroyed case evidence in this Court's upcoming case.

3. Defendant tecsan's page was full of negative gifts. The defendant in this case CAT52! use good gifts to destroy all negative gifts.

4. The defendant violated Rule #500 sec 2A: No member is allowed to destroy evidence on a pending case of another member.


COUNT II. PLAGIARISM

1. December 17, the defendant wrote a blog called "Heading to the off brand mall"

2. The above blog is an exact copy of member Sir-Skittles, call: "A Very Saggy Granny Christmas Special part 7."

3. The defendant changed the names of the characters in the original and used members' names, PITBULL and Sir-Skittles as her own blog.


Judge RuFino. Ms CAT52! you have committed some serious offenses. I order you to delete your plagiarized blog immediately. Do not use other members' blogs as your own blog. You are basically stealing the words of others here, and this is not acceptable. I don't know why you are plagiarizing member Sir-Skittles' blog. Apparently, you don't have the creativity to write your own blogs. I found you guilty of the above charges. You have 20 days to delete that blog.

December 19, 2025

SITO Members,
plaintiffs,

v.

CAT52!
defendant.
_________________/

...................COMPLAINT........................

This Court declares all the statements in this complaint to be true based on the case evidence.


COUNT I. VIOLATION Tecsan SPAM ACT RULE

1. The defendant CAT52! violated the tecsan Spam Rule.

2. On a case law member tecsan spam all blogs on this site.

3. The defendant CAT52! spam the following forums of members Sir-Skittles and PITBULL, flooding their forums

COUNT II. ATTACKING A PREMIUM MEMBER

1. It's a violation of the Court rules to attack, harass and defame a member.

2. The defendant violated the above rules when she attacked member Sir-Skittles on this site.

COUNT III. OBSTRUCTION OF FREE SPEECH

1/. The defendant violated the free speech rights of members Mongo and Pitbull.

2. The defendant obstructed the right of the above members when they were trying to comment on the defendant's forums.

3. For 5 days, the defendant blocked and banned the above members' right of free speech.

COUNT IV. POSTING OBSOLETE PICTURES

1. Defendant has been posting obsolete pictures on the front page and Best Member/Image

2. Defendant posted the first picture on the front page. The picture is from the 1990s. She intentionally posted this picture, knowing it was from those years.

3. Defendant's page on the Best Member/Image is from the 2000s.


JUDGE Fredesbinda: Ms. CAT52! I found you guilty of the above charges. I order you to delete these pictures. In addition, I order you to clean members' Sir-Skittles and PITBULL forums.
You are not a good member of this site. You attack members, and you don't care. You are a woman full of hate.

December 10. 2025

Clerk of the Court: The Court will dismiss the charges of RACIST CONDUCT against the defendant CAT52! without prejudice.


SITO Members,
Plaintiffs


v.


CAT52!
Defendant
.............................COMPLAINT.......................

This Court will show, based on the evidence of this case, that the defendant committed these actions:

COUNT I. SPONSORING A SEXUAL PREDATOR

1. The defendant's husband Charlie a/k/a Woody, was convicted of sex charges in the state of Florida.

2. This Court ordered the defendant's husband to delete his profile. Woody complied with this Court order

3. The defendant CAT52! has pictures of her husband on her profile page. This is a Violation of the Court rules, sponsoring or promoting a convicted felon.

JUDGE RuFino Final Judgement: Ms. CAT52! This Court ordered you to remove all pictures of your convicted husband. You have 20 days to remove any images, blogs, and other means of communication using his profile. Those are not acceptable anymore since he is no longer a member of this site. You are outrageously posting pictures of him, a convicted sexual predator.

December 4, 2025

SITO Members,
plaintiffs,

v.

CAT52!,
defendant.
_________________/

......................COMPLAINT..........................

This Court declares all the statements in this document to be true based on the evidence of the case.

COUNT I. POSTING A FAKE PICTURE

1. The defendant has posted a fake picture on the front page of this site.

2. The picture in question is from 1995. The picture does not accurately represent the defendant's actual appearance.

3. The defendant altered the picture using an application called RETAKE.


COUNT II. DESTROYING CASE EVIDENCE

1. The defendant, CAT52! destroyed case evidence of member bjuk.

2. The defendant posted gifts and deleted negative gifts. This is basically witness tampering.


JUDGE FREDESBINDA: Ms. CAT52, I have found you guilty of the charges listed above. You will now be on probation for 30 days.

November 8, 2025

SITO Members,
plaintiffs,

v.

CAT52!
defendant.
____________________/

......................COMPLAINT...........................
This Court shows the statements in this document to be true based on the evidence of the case.

COUNT I. PROMOTING A SEXUAL PREDATOR

1. The defendant's ex-husband was a member of this site under the name "woody". His first legal name is Charlie.

2. The defendant's former husband committed sexual crimes against a minor child. He was in jail and on probation.

3. CAT52! has posted a picture of his former on the defendant's profile page.

COUNT II. DESTROYING CASE EVIDENCE.

1. The defendant has destroyed case evidence on the page of member Montanaman.

2. Under the Court rules, no member is allowed to destroy evidence in a future Court case.

3. The defendant, CAT52!, has willfully decided to take evidence and destroy it.


JUDGE RuFino's case judgment: Ms. CAT52! here we go again. You will never learn from your past transgressions. You have disobey this orders from this Court, and you don't care about the consequences. Your seditious conduct is not acceptable on this site. You are now in a gag order by this Court.

November 20, 2025

SITO members,
plaintiffs,

v.

bella!,
defendant.
___________________/

.......................COMPLAINT............................

This Court declares all the evidence of this case to be true based on the evidence of the case.

COUNT I. DESTROYING CASE EVIDENCE

1. The defendant, bella! has been destroying evidence in the case of member, tecsan.

2. On November 12, 2025, the defendant destroyed all the negative gifts from the page of member tecsan.

3. The defendant intentionally and willfully destroyed case evidence with the intent to justify the defendant's conduct in a case.

Judge RuFino: This Court takes very seriously the destruction of case evidence by members. Your conduct is outrageous. I found you guilty of the above charge. You will be on probation for 30 days.

November 18, 2025

SITO Members,
plaintiffs,

v.

CAT52!,
defendant.
__________________/

.....................COMPLAINT............................

This Court declares all the satements on this document to be true based on the evidence of the case.

COUNT I. VIOLATION OF THE TECSAN ANTI SPAM RULE

1. The defendant violated the Tecsan Ant Spam rule.

2. Under the above rule the defendant spam the following forum; showitoff.org/forum/thread/php?id=31377.

3. No meber is allowed to spam forums wit the intent of attacking others.

COUNT II. PLAGIARISM

1. This Court takes very serious plagiarism. Once a member decides to copy other members comments constitutes a vioaltion inder the plagiarism rules of this site.

2. The defendant plagiarized member Sir-Skittles on the following blog; /blogs/60299.html
Skittles new car blog.

COUNT III. CONTEMPT OF COURT

1. This has issued a gag order against the defendant on October 18, 2025.

2. At the above time the defendant violated her probation by this Court.


JUDGE RuFino; Ms. CAT52! your conduct on this site is disgusting. You continue to attack others here daily. I suggest to stop writing blogs here. I want you to shut your mouth. I found you GUILTY of all 3 charges.

November 11, 2025