That's funny. I know the UK's more than just Britain, but a majority of the times I'd seen/heard the word (before this site) in my life was from someone British, or an actor playing someone British.

Complimenting with any of those phrases/words doesnt overly both me. I do find it strange that those in the uk refer to it as cock and those in the US , generally , as dick.
What i find crude ( and sometimes downright nasty ) is those that , after initial contact , go on to say how they want me to act is if i am r.aping them or attacking them...and want me to describe what I'd do in graphic detail. I am not in the slightest bit interested about sexaully attacking someone and can not fathom why any woman would even want that

I grew up talking to girls about their tits using the word "tits" since I was 11, and they've always smiled and blushed and liked hearing it. Teachers never tried saying I should watch my mouth when hearing me say the word. It's never seemed any worse than boobs, or as offensive/silly as knockers, titties, or Hooters, and that last one's a restaurant chain, family-friendly. (Still not a word I say to most people I just met, though, just in case they don't like it.)

Okay, that's cool. Not the last part, I'm definitely sorry if I've shared anything with anyone that I shouldn't have. I only assumed I was in the handful because we were talking more than just on here. Of course you don't owe me a response or anything, but I appreciate that you did here, thanks for that.

that's kind of scary actually.

What kind a warning? That he may compromise your camera? On PC or a cell phone? If someone can see you over your device without you confirm the view... how we call that? Oh yeah ... hacking your device.

My name aint Skippy! good Peanut butter though! heheh

The issue is Nothing to do with racism for me and alot of other folks. No one I know is asking for MLK to be removed.And frankly if the folks that support him would get educated, they would find he was a republican that was refused a concealed carry permit. Probably because of his color or choice of profession.that we will never know for sure but as racism was rampant at that point in time so it was probably for the obvious reason
.For myself and others to ask for that portion of history to be removed would be, DUH< racist! We would be stooping to the level of the liberals.
A confederate solider was not a traitor to HIS country at the time he fought and or died. His country was the Confederate states of America,for which he fought and gave his life for.
So no accuracy in him being a traitor at the time of his death. Just because the government of the US did not recognize the country does not mean it was not real,it had a flag and a government.And it was not because the yankees beat us to death and enslaved the entire south to be their cotton field does not devalue his life in anyway either.
I have studied the war some,not enough, no one can study anything enough, and it is my understanding that alot of the history is being rewritten to help in this recent movement. A friend has some books that were written by veterans of both sides of the civil war and the whole mess came about when Washington dc wanted to charge a big tax for the south to send cotton to europe. The slave issue came into play 2 years into the war.
What you read here on the net of course,is different.That goes to another subject mentioned here. Books and library's being a good place for "history" Not if the books are sold off for a .25 and then a row of computers put in their place to let you read what "they" want you to read. "they" as in the liberals. Preserve the books,the old books,the 1's that may not say what you want them to say to push your cause. There is where the least biased history is.
I notice you didn't respond to what I said about Sherman. Hum.You must think he did a great thing? Surely not,you are more human than that even if you despise the air I breath.
In America all are supposed to be equal. but look around. How many people are where they are because of their own actions and not that of anyone else?
Some people are to lazy to work to be equal. They want equality handed to them instead of working for a pay check and paying their fair share of taxes.

read here to get some history and some revised history.
Kinda of a fun fact that the UK and France both made it so they could do "business" with the south. DUH! Show me the cotton!,that is what they wanted.
only registered users can see external links

And 1 last issue. The cost of a slave.which averaged around 800 bucks in 1860. Alot of folks **** all southerners because "we owned slaves". Yea right. Most of my ancestors were poor people that hoed cotton right along side the freed blacks in the late 1800's.

@ Alex, Be more specific. Are you asking the overall moral due to Trump or the disrespect of the flag?

@ Will. Yes your absolutely correct. Same as you have the choice to follow whatever God you want or choose not to follow one at all. I understand the rights I have faught for. However, I feel that an over paid jock who has been handed everything since he was old enough to catch a football, should carry themselves more professional then they have. I know there is a whole nother conversation on whether pro athletes should be role models or not. But I won't get into that. I understand they are the ones in the spotlight, who hopefully make a stand. But to take a knee during the anthem, even though it's their right to do so. I believe it's a slap in the face of the men and women who faught for their right to collect millions to play ball. I'm not necessarily saying that they are disrespecting their flag or country. But the ones who have given their all to protect this country. I believe there was other ways for them to protest. Before 2003 most NFL teams would still be in the locker room during the anthem. It was made mandatory for them to be on the field in 2003. I would be ok with the teams doing that. And if some of the players want to come out for the anthem then they could. I would be ok with them all standing on the sideline interlocking arms to show a sign of unity. Or to even stand holding hands. Don't you think by doing something like this would show what they are standing up for. But taking a knee, is just a straight out direct slap in the face. All it has done is cause us to divide even more. And the NFL to lose money. I just think you can protest your beliefs without disrespect.

--------------------------------------- added after 14 minutes


In other words, these punks who collect millions to play a game. Piss me the fuck off when they take a knee during the anthem. Until you have seen your buddies laying in pine boxes being loaded on a plane to head home to their final resting place. That flag that is draped over that pine box is what they lost their life for. I don't expect many to understand. But that flag means something to us. It's not Republican or Democrat, it's not North or South, it's not black or white, and it damn sure not racist. It's what we are.