Page #27
Pages: #1... #22 #23 #24 #25 #26 #27 #28 #29 #30 #31 ...#42
New Comment Rating: -9 Similar topics: 1.Does it actually matter? 2.SYD is a great place 3.Trump/Pence or Biden/Harris...Which do you feel will prevail??? 4.Kneeling before the American Flag during the National Anthem... 5.༼☯﹏☯༽ Comments: | ||
You must be logged in to post here. Log in
only registered users can see external links
At least there is 1 judge that is asking the same questions as alot of the citizens about fair treatment.
well at least we know where they stand on the issue.
Next time 1 of their stores gets robbed, perhaps a social worker will counsel the family's of the employee's shot and killed or robbed.
Both of our countries need more social workers, because preventing people going into crime is always better than trying to repress crime after the fact. Prevention is also cheaper. Less crime means you need less police (aka 'defund' the police).
Another way to 'defund' the police is legalizing and regulating most drugs and legalizing and regulating prostitution. If criminals can't make a profit on it, than it doesn't result in crime and you don't have to pay the police to protect you from that crime.
BUT sending a social worker to a bank robbery is NOT a good idea.
And domestic disputes become violent QUICKLY as in POOF!
Social worker armed with words and a bottle of coke and a pack of cheese crackers aint gonna cut it.
As for legalizing drugs, holy shit batman, we need to SOLVE problems ,not make them easier to create!.
I do think the drug trade is dealt with backwards from the way it should be.I understand why,MONEY.
IF you arrest a drug dealer,you get to auction off his boat,his car,his watch,etc.and you GET MONEY>
And he goes back to dealing as soon as you turn him loose.
I say jail the end USER> eliminate the market. It is not as profitable as arresting the drug dealers but it makes the street safer.The dealers typically don't use their product,so they are not as much a danger to society as the end user riding around high on some drug.
What you propose about drug legalization is exactly the opposite of what we are trying to do away with. I don’t know how old you are but in the late 50’s, the 60’s, the 70’s and part of the 80’s, the Feds insisted that the end user be arrested. This caused an overpopulation of quasi-criminals in our prisons. Now, we accept drug addiction to be a decease. You are always so concerned about “the money”. I don’t believe in legalizing most drugs and I certainly don’t want dealers to have a pass. On the other hand, certain drugs could be legalized in small quantities like pot. Users, the ones totally hooked, may commit petty crimes, but they are not a danger to society.
Legalizing pot does not mean that everyone can just grow pot however they want and sell it to whoever they want. You legalize, TAX and REGULATE. Then it will just be a business like alcohol and cigarettes. Criminals can sell to anyone, but a business has to abide by rules.
You have tried criminalization for decades and it didn't help at all. Are you going to stick with an idea that doesn't work and just fills up prisons?
Every study shows legalizing or decriminalizing drugs is the best way to reduce drug addiction. Criminalizing alcohol, drugs or prostitution has never worked to reduce their use, unless maybe if you're willing to use the methods of Duterte in the Philippines. But that is curing the decease by killing the patient. Duterte has basically unleashed vigilante murder clubs on his country. Would you like that?
Black matters live.
Truth #1 All lives matter.
Truth #2 Black lives matter
If taken as a whole idea, they both go together. If there's a conflict between these truths, then it's a scary topic to discuss. Originally, you were non-comital. Why? And are you still so?
They painted over the george floyd shit in their country.
only registered users can see external links
I got to thinking about it and I understand now a bit better .Liberals' like terrorist groups ,such as the Taliban. They control people with a strong hand just as liberals like to do ,Mandate this and Mandate that. they destroy history and religious objects other than islam. something liberals hate worse that being hungry.
As for similarities between the Taliban and liberals,
Both hate religion.
May I ask, who took the Bible from the schools back years ago?
It was a liberal, a extreme 1.
Madalyn Murray and her two sons, William and Garth, stood in front of the Supreme Court on the day their case was heard. Murray, an atheist who worked for the Communist party, was an unlikable woman who alienated even her supporters.
Who destroyed The Buddha's?
But in 2001, the Taliban destroyed the Buddhas by bombing them over several weeks. The destruction followed a command by spiritual leader Mullah Mohammed Omar ordering the destruction of idolatrous statues in Afghanistan.
--------------------------------------- added after 8 minutes
The biggest lie you alluded to is that bombs at the beginning of the Afghan war would have made a difference. That country has some of the most inhospitable terrain in the world. It’s the type were boots-on-the-ground is the only posible way to dominate it. And that is almost impossible.
--------------------------------------- added after 9 minutes
What’s more, they did destroy art objects
And liberals hating religion is also nonsense. Many are religious themselves. Liberals believe in freedom of religion (any religion), as long as your freedom of religion doesn't interfere with the freedom of anyone else.
Conservatives just like their own freedom, but they also love to interfere with the freedom of anyone else.
Staying there would make the US more similar to the Taliban. You were an occupying force, just like the Taliban is.
only registered users can see external links
Majority rules.
But, I'm sure you shouldn't show your white face in some areas, if you like living.
But you're actually helping my point; why are there black majorities in US townships, while they are 13% of the country? It's because your government put them all in one place, because the white people didn't want to live among them. The fact that there are now white people living among them, is because the poor can only afford houses there.
Did you know houses of black people get appraised up to half the value of houses of white people? And I'm talking about the same houses. They did a study where they had the same houses appraised multiple times. When they pretended to be white owners, the houses got appraised much higher then when they pretended to be black owners.
It differed between -25% and -50% for the pretended black owners.
However, when black people try to BUY a house from white owners, they pay the same or more or just don't get the deal.
That's how you keep all the black people in one place. And then you pay less for the schools in that township, so they can never develop enough to get out of there.
And when people say they don't get ahead because of discrimination, you just say the blacks are lazy. That's why some want to kill you, when you walk in their open air prison.
You can also not choose the environment you are born into. Some people have all
the luck, to be born in an environment of opportunity. Some get the short straw,
which means the system is stacked against them.
If the system is stacked against you from the environment you are born into, you're more dependent of you're other biological traits, you get at birth. When you are blessed with looks, your talents will matter less. When you have talents, you will be able to use them to escape the limitations of your environment. When you are blessed with exceptional physical potential, you have a change to develop them to exceptional sports abilities and use them to your advantage.
When you've had no luck at birth, it will be hard to succeed in a system of competition. Most people will try as hard as they can to improve their life in an honest way. Only perseverance and luck determine whether they succeed. Most of them will never be rewarded for their hard work.
Some will try to get ahead less honestly. If they're really stupid they resort to crime and get punished, if they're a bit smarter they start exploiting gullible people in a 'legal' way. They can become quite successful, because the system doesn't restrain them at all. Too bad people like that do so much damage to the rest of humanity.
Some of those people become right-wing politicians or start working in right-wing media, so they can indoctrinate gullible people, to perpetuate the system that extorts them, to the advantage of people without morals, who had just enough intelligence to escape their disadvantages by using exploitation.
Someone that is speaking the truth.She left that company and founded her own. Best I can tell it had to be after the company spoke out about racism.
Racism shouldn't be tolerated, from anyone.And as the lady said in her email,BLM is the actual racist
--------------------------------------- added after 9 hours
Rich
The constitution is based from these simple 10 rules... The democrats and Rhino Republicans want to destroy our land and our freedoms. WHAT IS SO HARD TO FIGURE OUT?
1. Treat the Earth and all that dwell theron with respect.
2. Remain close to the Great Spirit.
3. Show great respect for your fellow beings.
4. Work together for the benefit of all humankind.
5. Give assistance and kindness wherever needed.
6. Do what you know to be right.
7. Look after the well-being of mind and body.
8. Dedicate a share of your efforts to the greater good.
9. Be truthful and honest at all times.
10. Take full responsibility for your actions.
Capitalism is only about making money. None of these points ever get any consideration. Even if companies ever give the appearance of respect for any of these commandments,
it's only for marketing purposes, so they can make more money.
Your constitution is indeed based on some of these values, but how much is your life still determined by these values and how much is your life determined by capitalism?
If you go to work, how much democracy are you experiencing?
Are you not working in a dictatorship from your employer?
Are you not depending on capitalism to survive?
Democracy is useless in supporting these commandments, if you democratically decide to relinquish all power to your capitalist system.
An example you might care about: How much democratic right do you still have to not get vaccinated, if all employers require you to vaccinate or get fired?
Therefor I do not agree with your conclusions. Before we can be on the same level of judicial knowledge I suggest you familiar yourself with the terms Utopia, Justice, Democracy, morality and ethics.. You confuse money with rrightousness and by far you are not even close.
You're right that democracy is not based on material possessions, because it deals with power, not ownership. So whether there is egoism or altruism under a democracy, depends on the voters. Also whether democracy constitutes righteousness depends on the voters. If the voters in majority elect a party that promises to conquer the neighboring country and perform genocide, that's democracy, but not righteousness. Voters could also decide to elect a party that violates every single one of the 10 commandments you shared previously.
In my opinion the US came pretty close to doing that, when Trump got elected.
Your constitution describes a good method for realizing democracy, but it can be organized in many other ways. As long as the citizens have control over the practice of the representatives, it's a democracy.
Capitalism, socialism and communism are dealing with ownership. While the principle of capitalism consists of a hands off approach and letting everyone compete in acquiring whatever wealth and property they can, socialism is a hands on approach, to assure equality of ownership for everyone and communism is also a hands on approach where the government has ownership of everything, but assures equality of wealth for everyone.
I'm not claiming any of these systems were ever successful in their pure form,
I'm just explaining the principles behind them.
So please show your level of judicial knowledge, by explaining why you consider socialism and communism, which are systems intended for sharing of resources
(not egoism), to be comparable to capitalism, which is a system intended for competition (egoism).
Democracy can only exist if everyone is taught with their true growth potential especially with children. The structure of parenting and teaching nneeds to be authentic.
So when I illustrate the 10 commandments it is goals for our desires of creating one perfect union.. Thus on the path to rightousness and of course on the path of democracy..
The education system is so corrupt that they don't teach children knowledge but propaganda. The media is essential for truth and this is the utmost worst I've seen. Its all political and money. The united states education system is not even in the top 20.. So we are not a democracy. Now with the covid political hacks it is further. Whey you create an unsovereign border to inport drugs and human trafficing that is not democracy.
Communism and socialism are when the govt has more control while people get brainwashed from childhood. There is no liberty or justice.. Poverty, much.. hate and crime.Disunity.. Democracy is union, unity, opportunity, bonding.. Together. Everyone comes together as one unit. That is its idea...
1. Treat the Earth and all that dwell theron with respect.
2. Remain close to the Great Spirit.
3. Show great respect for your fellow beings.
4. Work together for the benefit of all humankind.
5. Give assistance and kindness wherever needed.
6. Do what you know to be right.
7. Look after the well-being of mind and body.
8. Dedicate a share of your efforts to the greater good.
9. Be truthful and honest at all times.
10. Take full responsibility for your actions.
There should be no need for charity. You can have capitalism and democracy and still make sure companies don't poison the air and water, treat people with respect, build a better civilization and give people help when they have bad luck.
That's what those 10 commandments are all about.
Why would you even share those 10 commandments, if you don't agree with them?
You know why you even have the constitution?
Because whiny liberal bitches fought conservative assholes, to get you those rights.
At least know some fucking history.
When have conservatives ever thought up new legislation that benefits the general public? Conservatives want to either keep the existing laws in place, no matter how bad they are or cut laws that are beneficial to the general public.
And you think it was the conservatives who thought up such a large cohesive set of democratic rights and not even include anything from the bible? Don't be ridiculous!
a fair election and if he looses it was because of fraud?
Or that he called election officials to 'find' him enough votes to win?
Now, you think Biden has the mental capacity to think up a giant fraud scheme?
But, we were talking about who created the constitution 230+ years ago, not how Donald Trump wiped his ass with it.
The constitution was founded by liberal politicians. And your only attempt at rebuttal is unrelated, bogus 'whataboutism'.
Neither Trump or Biden are very liberal. They are both quite conservative old guys and both are very corrupt. Biden just knows that he has to do something for the voters that elected him or the Republicans will win again and completely destroy democracy for ever. People would still be able to vote, but the governors of red states will just overturn it, if they loose. At least this time the Republican election officials had some integrity left and denied Trumps demands for election fraud.
At least I won't have to talk to you anymore.
New Comment Go to top