Recent Posts of member Ananas2xLekker

Topics:

Car porn 23,Aug,25 10:36
YouTube can be educational too (let's share videos) 27,Sep,24 08:09
Let's help Elon make twitter great 02,Nov,22 05:44

Posts:

By Ananas2xLekker 25,Jun,26 05:25
They are not talking shit about Jews, they are done with ISRAEL.
Wanting to stop a genocide and land grabbing is not antisemitic.

If your side didn't want 'that Muslim' coming in, your side could have given citizens
what they are asking for, which is to stop people going desperately poor.
It was Trump's choice to do that. People liked the slogan MAGA, but everyone but you understands now that it was just a stupid fucking lie.

These are Trump's most recent poll ratings:
30% approves
67% disapproves

Trump is stealing from the people and taking it for himself and his wealthy buddies.
He wants to increase the war budget to $ 1.5 TRILLION, after he promised "no more stupid wars!", and then cut their healthcare, education and everything else they need
to survive the modern world. What do you expect? There is a limit to even the stupidity of Americans. Your side has failed them just too fucking much, or they would not be happy to vote for a MUSLIM SOCIALIST!!!



By Ananas2xLekker 25,Jun,26 05:21
The truth is leaning left.
The right is completely preoccupied with nonsense and lies.
AI is logical, that is why Elon is struggling so much to turn it right-wing.



By Ananas2xLekker 24,Jun,26 17:37
In New York, progressives/leftists/socialists basically won everything that they could win. They have seen Zohran Mamdani and now they want more of it.

New York's 7th Congressional District (Parts of Brooklyn and Queens):
Progressive Winner: Claire Valdez
Endorsed by Zohran Mamdani.
Valdez is a democratic socialist and former United Auto Workers (UAW) labor organizer who campaigned closely alongside Mayor Mamdani.
Defeated Establishment-backed Candidate Brooklyn Borough President Antonio Reynoso. Reynoso was the institutional favorite.

New York's 10th Congressional District (Manhattan and Brooklyn):
Progressive Winner: Brad Lander
Endorsed by Zohran Mamdani.
Defeated Establishment-backed two-term incumbent Rep. Dan Goldman. Goldman had strong backing from the Washington establishment, including House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, who actively campaigned against Mamdani’s slate.

New York's 13th Congressional District (Upper Manhattan and the Bronx):
Progressive Winner: Darializa Avila Chevalier
Endorsed by Zohran Mamdani. Chevalier, a democratic socialist community organizer, was Mamdani's most fiercely defended and polarizing pick on the slate.
Defeated AIPAC-backed incumbent, Rep. Adriano Espaillat.

New York's 17th Congressional District:
Combat veteran Cait Conley won the primary to challenge GOP incumbent Mike Lawler. She ran a campaign centered on working-class affordability.

The Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) ran their largest-ever coordinated slate on the exact same night for the New York State Legislature. Despite center-left Super PACs spending nearly $10 million to stop them, a wave of progressive challengers won their primaries, including:
- Aber Kawas (State Senate)
- Samantha Kattan (State Assembly)
- David Orkin (State Assembly)
- Eon Huntley (State Assembly)
- Christian Celeste Tate (State Assembly)
- Illapa Sairitupac (State Assembly)



By Ananas2xLekker 24,Jun,26 12:30
That is not unbiased media, that is pure Trump propaganda.



By Ananas2xLekker 24,Jun,26 12:24
I'm not saying that, you can listen to whatever media you want.
You're making yourself stupid by doing it, but that's your right.

I don't like either liberal media or right-wing media, I want OBJECTIVE media. There is less of it every day, because you let corporations and wealthy people buy up all the media, which means that they turn into propaganda for the wealthy.

If you are referring to media which has been shut down by algorithms like google, you're talking about the worst misinformation that ever existed. Regular right-wing nonsense gets incredible preferential treatment by Google, YouTube and Facebook. The algorithms actively suppress left-wing ideas, no matter how factual they are.
Anyway, that's not Government censorship, that's corporations deciding what they like to prop up and cut off.



By Ananas2xLekker 24,Jun,26 10:29
Funny how you say that, while you once defended Christian morality.
How do I define Christian morality? Following the teachings of Jesus himself.

Let's score Jesus, Trump and Mamdani on the virtues that Jesus professed:

Humility
Jesus: 95%
Trump: 15%
Zohran Mamdani: 65%

Care for the poor
Jesus: 98%
Trump: 35%
Zohran Mamdani: 90%

Compassion
Jesus: 95%
Trump: 30%
Zohran Mamdani: 85%

Mercy and forgiveness
Jesus: 98%
Trump: 20%
Zohran Mamdani: 75%

Service to others
Jesus: 97%
Trump: 35%
Zohran Mamdani: 85%

Inclusion of outsiders
Jesus: 95%
Trump: 25%
Zohran Mamdani: 90%

Skepticism toward wealth and status
Jesus: 99%
Trump: 5%
Zohran Mamdani: 85%

Avoidance of self-glorification
Jesus: 90%
Trump: 10%
Zohran Mamdani: 70%

Peacemaking
Jesus: 90%
Trump: 45%
Zohran Mamdani: 75%

Love of enemies
Jesus: 99%
Trump: 10%
Zohran Mamdani: 65%

Self-sacrifice
Jesus: 99%
Trump: 20%
Zohran Mamdani: 70%

Strict sexual morality
Jesus: 95%
Trump: 20%
Zohran Mamdani: 40%

Religious devotion
Jesus: 99%
Trump: 35%
Zohran Mamdani: 70%

Obedience to God
Jesus: 99%
Trump: 25%
Zohran Mamdani: 65%

Evangelism / spreading a religious message
Jesus: 98%
Trump: 20%
Zohran Mamdani: 30%

Traditional family and marital commitment
Jesus: 60%
Trump: 35%
Zohran Mamdani: 80%


Raw average score:
Jesus: ~90%
Trump: ~25%
Zohran Mamdani: ~73%

Similarity to Jesus:
Jesus → Jesus: 100%
Zohran Mamdani → Jesus: ~80%
Trump → Jesus: ~27%



By Ananas2xLekker 24,Jun,26 09:43
And of course that inflation spike was global and resulted from the pandemic.

Biden can be praised for listening to experts and signing the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) in 2022, allowing a historic release of oil from the SPR in 2022 to temporarily cool soaring gasoline prices, and allowing the Federal Reserve to aggressively raise interest rates to cool demand. The last was a difficult decision, because it didn't make him popular, but it was necessary according to the experts.

Trump can be criticized for raising inflation, by starting a tariff trade-war, that most experts were warning against. Tariffs can be a legitimate tool against unfair competition. However, Trump turned them into a blunt instrument and starting a trade war that resulted in exploding costs of living for Americans, retaliatory tariffs against U.S. exports, billions in farm bailouts, and increased economic uncertainty.
And when a president repeatedly makes market-moving announcements in an unpredictable way, while unusually well-timed trades appear around some of those announcements, people are inevitably going to ask who knew what and when.
There is no publicly proven insider trading by Trump or his family (yet), but he created
exactly the kind of opaque, volatility-driven environment that invites those suspicions.



By Ananas2xLekker 24,Jun,26 08:26
Suggesting your media is 'unbiased' is the funniest thing you ever said.

You once supported completely unlimited freedom of speech and now you are OK with taking away the rights of media that you consider biased. Previously you were OK with your media verifiably lying, and now you want unbiased media?
I say you're gaslighting; you see that there is someone in power now who can crush the speech of the other side, so you flip from your original position.

You keep saying "for me". You're not the only American CITIZEN.
Women, protesters, everyone using the media, everyone voting
and every American who needs a lawyer is a CITIZEN too.
How many lawyers does your president need?

I'm asking you for the third time:
Why do you think that you have more right to rights than other people?
If 'people' is too broad for you, OK limit it to 'citizens'.

Obviously, you think that non-citizens aren't people who deserve rights.
Your Constitution says otherwise, but we both know you don't care.
At least Republicans have stopped pretending they care about the Constitution.
There is a limit to gaslighting that even your side thinks is too much.

Democrats are citizens too. If you think they should lose their rights, don't cry when they take your rights, when they are in power again.



By Ananas2xLekker 24,Jun,26 06:22
Extreme, record-shattering heat is gripping Western and Central Europe, with hundreds
of national and all-time temperature records falling. Countries facing the most intense conditions and unprecedented early-summer heat waves include France, the United Kingdom, Spain, and Italy.

Why temperature records are being not only broken but smashed
only registered users can see external links

Richard Betts, head of climate impacts research at the Met Office and a professor at the University of Exeter: "I've been a climate scientist for 33 years and we're seeing exactly
the kinds of things that we were warning back then... [although] these records are perhaps more extreme and coming sooner than we had expected".

"If someone beats a world record in high jump, you would expect them to beat it by one centimeter and not suddenly by 20, 30 centimeters and the same holds for the weather" Erich Fischer, professor at the Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science at ETH Zurich in Switzerland, told BBC News.
"If the record is broken after 100 or 150 years of measurements, you would have probably expected it to be broken by a tenth of a degree and not suddenly by two degrees or three degrees", he added.



By Ananas2xLekker 24,Jun,26 05:34
Steyer carried a negative net rating, with 39% viewing him favorably and 43% unfavorably (-4 net rating). Steyer's history as a hedge fund manager and his unprecedented $216 million self-funding blitz caused significant unease among voters who felt he was "buying the election".

A poll showed that self-identified progressives broke heavily for Becerra, with 39% backing Becerra and only 29% preferring Steyer.
Progressive voters preferred Becerra's decades of institutional experience, specifically his 122 lawsuits defending liberal policies against the first Trump administration, over Steyer's outside corporate outsider platform.

When Swalwell dropped out, tracking polls showed that Becerra was widely viewed as the "least objectionable" second-choice alternative for mainstream Democrats.
A poll (CEPP) also showed that as trailing candidates like Katie Porter lost steam, a higher percentage of their voters strategically migrated to Becerra (37%) rather than Steyer (31%) to prevent a worst-case scenario where two Republicans advanced to November.

Voter trust was the single biggest obstacle Tom Steyer faced, and a widespread skepticism about whether a billionaire hedge fund titan would actually keep his populist, tax-the-rich promises ultimately tanked his campaign.

Current polls show Democrat Xavier Becerra with a commanding, double-digit lead
over Republican Steve Hilton.



By Ananas2xLekker 24,Jun,26 05:15
The following rights that i addressed are definitely related to CITIZENS:

1) Demonstration and protest rights
This directly implicates the First Amendment.
The key debate is whether the administration's actions target unlawful conduct or whether they chill protected speech and assembly.

2) Freedom of the media
Freedom of the press is explicitly protected by the First Amendment.
The disagreement is over whether Trump's actions merely criticize the media or whether government pressure creates a chilling effect.

3) Freedom of lawyers and legal advocacy
This implicates rights of association, petition, due process, and the independence of legal representation.
The legal controversy exists precisely because constitutional rights may be involved.

4) Voting access
Voting is a fundamental right of citizens.
The dispute is not whether voting rights matter, but whether stricter verification requirements are legitimate election-security measures or unjustified barriers.

5) Birthright citizenship (attempted)
Citizenship itself is one of the most fundamental legal statuses in the US.
Trump is trying to turn CITIZENS into immigrants.



By Ananas2xLekker 24,Jun,26 04:49
Even if the US funded my country for 100%, it is still a nonsense argument.
How is it an argument to all Muslims being a danger or not???

Lookatmine2 didn't have a counter argument to what I said about Muslims
and Christian Nationalists, so he attacks with irrelevant nonsense.

My argument is that the US is much closer to becoming a theocracy, by the actions
of Christian Nationalists, than by the actions of Muslims, with very similar repression
of freedoms, and I see no one making an argument against it.
My political ideas or my country's finances are irrelevant to that argument.



By Ananas2xLekker 24,Jun,26 04:09
I'm not a Christian, but Trump calling himself a Christian offends me;
I think it's blasphemy. Zohran Mamdami makes a better Christian than Trump.
--------------------------------------- added after 8 hours

Zohran Mamdami even looks much more like what Jesus probably looked like.
The image of the white, blonde, blue-eyed hippie, is just a fantasy from white people.


--------------------------------------- added after 8 hours

If Jesus returned to the US right now, he would be deported by ICE in a hot minute.



By Ananas2xLekker 23,Jun,26 12:05
For the Southern Men
only registered users can see external links



By Ananas2xLekker 23,Jun,26 12:04
This is why my very capitalist government, who likes how our former prime minister Rutte, who is now the secretary general of NATO, is sucking up to Trump,
has blocked an American company taking over a Dutch data company.
Here is an American investigating it and being shocked about the implications.
only registered users can see external links
(He's not a very political person)



By Ananas2xLekker 23,Jun,26 10:16
There is a difference between withholding your trust and assuming the worst.



By Ananas2xLekker 23,Jun,26 05:20
Are we waging wars on 'hopes' now?
Your own words show Trump's utter incompetence.

Trump did NOTHING to prevent Iran from having nukes.
He only showed them that they desperately need them, for self defense.

Are the Iranian people freed of their dictatorship? NO!
Are we sure that Iran doesn't make nukes? LESS SO!

Trump is now negotiating with the very people he taught not to trust him.

Trump killed Iran's pragmatists and strengthened the hardliners who argued
that America could never be trusted.

The very Iranians who dreamed of freedom and looked to America for help, have buried family and friends, watched hope give way to fear, and may emerge from this crisis less free, more fearful, and more distrustful of the United States, than ever.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If the criterion is "which arrangement appears better for preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon?", then most nonproliferation experts would currently rate the 2015 JCPOA's published verification regime as stronger and more proven than the publicly known terms of the 2026 framework, because the newer framework's inspection and enforcement details are not yet fully public.

🟩 = Better for Western nuclear security
🟥 = Worse for Western nuclear security

1) Nuclear inspections and verification

🟩 Obama JCPOA (2015):

Extensive monitoring by the IAEA.
Continuous surveillance of key nuclear facilities.
Detailed procedures for investigating suspicious activities.
Verification provisions were written into the agreement.

🟥 Trump Framework (2026):

Publicly known inspection provisions are less detailed.
Many verification mechanisms are still being negotiated or have not been released publicly.
It is not yet clear whether inspections will be as intrusive as under the JCPOA.
2) Limits on uranium enrichment

🟩 Obama JCPOA (2015):

Enrichment capped at low levels suitable for civilian use.
Clear numerical limits on enrichment and stockpiles.
Breakout time (time needed to produce bomb fuel) was significantly extended.

🟥 Trump Framework (2026):

Public descriptions have been inconsistent regarding whether Iran may retain any enrichment capability.
Final enrichment limits are not yet fully defined publicly.
3) Limits on enriched uranium stockpiles

🟩 Obama JCPOA (2015):

Strict caps on how much enriched uranium Iran could possess.
Excess material had to be shipped out or diluted.

🟥 Trump Framework (2026):

Discussions include reducing or removing highly enriched stockpiles.
Publicly available details are less specific and less developed.
4) Confidence that Iran is not secretly building a bomb

🟩 Obama JCPOA (2015):

Relied on a large inspection and monitoring infrastructure.
Created a structured system for detecting violations.

🟥 Trump Framework (2026):

There is currently less publicly available information demonstrating an equivalent monitoring system.
Confidence depends heavily on provisions that have not yet been fully disclosed.
5) Economic concessions to Iran

🟩 Obama JCPOA (2015):

Sanctions relief was phased and linked to verified compliance.
Benefits were tied to specific nuclear obligations.

🟥 Trump Framework (2026):

Potentially larger economic benefits, including discussion of a fund reportedly around $300 billion and broader sanctions relief.
Critics argue this provides more upfront leverage to Iran for fewer publicly known nuclear restrictions.
6) Ballistic missiles

🟨 Obama JCPOA (2015):

Did not eliminate Iran's missile force.
Missile restrictions were mostly handled through separate UN measures.

🟨 Trump Framework (2026):

Does not appear to require immediate dismantlement of Iran's missile arsenal.
Future missile limits may be negotiated.

Result: Roughly a tie from a nuclear-safety perspective.

7) Overall nuclear safeguards

🟩 Obama JCPOA (2015):

Fully negotiated.
Detailed technical annexes.
Years of implementation experience.
Clear verification architecture.

🟥 Trump Framework (2026):

Still evolving.
Many key technical details remain unclear.
Public information does not yet show safeguards that are demonstrably stronger than the JCPOA.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Overall score (nuclear-security perspective only)

Obama JCPOA (2015):

🟩 Inspections
🟩 Enrichment limits
🟩 Stockpile limits
🟩 Verification confidence
🟩 Compliance-linked sanctions relief
🟨 Missiles

Trump Framework (2026):

🟥 Inspections
🟥 Enrichment clarity
🟥 Stockpile controls
🟥 Verification confidence
🟥 Economic concessions
🟨 Missiles



By Ananas2xLekker 23,Jun,26 05:17
Most of my list was ABOUT CITIZENS.



By Ananas2xLekker 23,Jun,26 05:07
No billionaire becomes a billionaire from their own labor.
Slaves had plenty of jobs too. Under feudalism, people worked 10-14 hrs/day
and were still starving and dying from the common cold.
People escaped their exploitation by resisting it.
You are doing the opposite.

They are not MAKING that kind of money, they are EXTRACTING IT.
People like you are turning everything into wealth transfer to the 0.1%.

You are defending a guy becoming a trillionaire from electric cars and space,
which are things that you considered completely useless before, and is funded
by tax-dollars for a big chunk.



By Ananas2xLekker 23,Jun,26 04:55
It would help a lot if you didn't assume the worst, by default,
for every person who you consider different.

We came back from a week of vacation in Germany, at around 19:00 hrs.
Our Muslim neighbors brought as food, as soon as we came home,
saving us the trouble of arranging something to eat ourselves.



By Ananas2xLekker 22,Jun,26 13:56
You are just assuming something and then you claim it as fact. It's wrong.

"How often do Muslim people in the U.S. report suspicions of terrorism or extremism?" Neither the FBI nor major academic studies appear to publish a comprehensive count
of such reports.

What researchers have found is that Muslim-American communities have frequently cooperated with law enforcement and have sometimes played a significant role in identifying or disrupting extremist activity:

A major study by researchers at the Triangle Center on Terrorism and Homeland Security found that Muslim-American organizations and community leaders have engaged in "self-policing" practices, including reporting concerns about potentially radicalized individuals to law enforcement, excluding extremist preachers from mosques, and confronting people expressing support for terrorism.
Researchers and law-enforcement experts have argued that cooperation from Muslim communities has been important in preventing attacks and identifying suspects.
The same body of research notes that violent extremism involving Muslim Americans has historically involved a very small number of individuals relative to the size of the Muslim-American population. For example, one annual report identified 25 Muslim-Americans associated with terrorism cases in 2014, with only 6 involved in plotting or engaging in violence in the U.S. that year.

The difficulty is that most tips to law enforcement are not publicly categorized by the religion of the person making the report. So we can say:

Muslim Americans do report concerns about extremism and suspicious behavior.
Researchers have documented this cooperation as a meaningful factor in counterterrorism efforts.
There is no authoritative nationwide figure showing what percentage of all terrorism tips come from Muslims or how often the average Muslim-American makes such reports.

only registered users can see external links



By Ananas2xLekker 22,Jun,26 08:46
Elon Musk is now the first trillionaire. He has been for a while, but only when he sold some SpaceX stock, do we know that the value of his share is about 1 trillion dollars.

Understand that the passive income of a trillion dollars is $137 million per DAY. That means that he can buy 350 average American houses per DAY. He is not doing that, he prefers to buy companies, which increase his influence in the world. Other multi-billionaires are indeed buying houses and farms.

Just six years ago, the wealthiest man in the world was Jeff Bezos. He owned $100 billion in assets. Today, the wealthiest man in the world owns at least TEN TIMES as much.

Did your wealth grow by ten times in the last six years?

In another six years, will the wealthiest man in the world own $ 10 trillion?
And 12 years from now? Will the wealthiest man in the world then own 100 trillion dollars?

The total value of everything in the US is estimated to be around 200 trillion dollars.
When do you think this will be owned by just a few wealthy men?
What will become of you, if everything in your country is owned by a few wealthy men?
Do you understand the power that they will hold over you?



By Ananas2xLekker 22,Jun,26 04:27
You have to ridicule what I'm saying, because you know it to be true.
If you had real arguments, you would use them.

"my insane ideology"?
Explain what you think that I want and why you think that's insane.

I don't want a small group of people dominating me. Is that insane?

'They' are the ridiculously conservative people who call themselves Christian and want to push their doctrine onto all Americans. They are only a small group in your country, but they have LOTS OF MONEY, and they are USING IT to buy politicians. You are most likely not part of that group, but you are allowing them to do it, by looking away. You better open your eyes, before it's too late.

Trump is openly proposing to make 'Anti-Christian' actions 'terrorism'.
Explain that please.

Republicans have repeatedly pushed federal legislation that would require age verification for adult-content websites nationwide. Recent examples include the 'SCREEN Act' and the 'SAFE for Kids Act', both of which would require websites hosting significant amounts of sexually explicit content to verify users' ages before granting access.

They will eventually pass a law that make you verify your age, by registration. Only liberals, leftists and principled privacy respecting Republicans are voting against it.
MAGA politicians don't have principles. They just do as they are told, or they get expelled. Marjorie Taylor Greene actually believes in protecting young women from the abuse of dirty powerful wealthy men, and you saw what became of her.

Meanwhile, Palantir has received substantial federal contracts under the Trump administration, including defense, intelligence, health, and civilian-agency work. Public contract records show ongoing awards, and reporting indicates federal spending on Palantir increased significantly in 2025–2026.

In 2025, reporting indicated that a Trump executive order promoting data sharing across federal agencies was being implemented using Palantir's Foundry platform in some agencies. This could make it easier to combine data that had historically been kept in separate government silos.

Civil-liberties groups, watchdog organizations, and some lawmakers have expressed concern that:
- Multiple agencies may be able to access and analyze larger pools of personal data.
- Data from different federal systems could be linked together more easily.
- The public has limited visibility into how the systems are used and what safeguards exist.

You don't even need some big evil agency to record every move you are making, because all the social media are already doing that, under the argument of making money from advertising.



By Ananas2xLekker 22,Jun,26 04:20
All in my head?
Are you even listening to your president and his people when they speak?

The first thing they do is make you register yourself when you want to watch or share material of a sexual nature. Simultaneously, they are setting up a mass surveillance system, to record everything that you're doing.
Tell me that you don't see that happening...

Where do you see 'my type' doing that?



By Ananas2xLekker 22,Jun,26 04:08
Do you even know what Sharia is?

It's laws that are introducing religious doctrine into law and restricting personal freedoms. That is exactly what your Christian Nationalists are asking for,
and Trump is letting them have lots of it, completely violating the Constitution.

These are the categories of law that both define Sharia Law and the goals of Christian Nationalists:
1. Restrictions on Female Freedom and Autonomy
2. Harsh, Religious Morality-Based Punishments
3. Restrictions on Criticizing Religion
4. Eradication of Sexual Freedoms and Bodily Autonomy
5. Criminalization and Erasure of LGBTQ+ Identities
6. Religious Control over Public Education and Science
7. Legal Privileging of the Dominant Faith (Religious Caste System)
8. Totalitarian Infiltration of the Civil Bureaucracy

Things that the Trump administration already did:
- Abortion restrictions: Trump appointed Supreme Court justices who were part of the majority in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, which overturned the constitutional right to abortion established by Roe v. Wade. Critics argue this reflects conservative Christian moral views influencing law.
- Religious exemptions and conscience protections: His administration expanded protections for religious organizations and individuals who objected to certain requirements (for example, contraception coverage or participation in same-sex weddings). Supporters viewed this as protecting religious freedom; critics viewed it as allowing religious beliefs to limit others' rights.
- LGBTQ-related policies: Critics cited policies such as restrictions on transgender military service and some education-related positions as reflecting traditional religious views on gender and sexuality.
- School prayer and religion in public life: Trump frequently advocated a larger role for religion in public institutions and criticized what he saw as hostility toward Christianity in public life.
- Support for displaying religious symbols and expanding faith-based initiatives: His administration generally favored broader accommodation of religious expression in government-connected settings.

You challenged me to give just one example, I'm giving you the complete picture.
This is what is happening:
- government enforcement of religious morality,
- privileging one religion,
- linking religious identity with citizenship and patriotism,
- suppressing criticism of dominant religious views,
- and concentrating power in leaders who claim to represent the nation's true religious values.

That's the actions that a government will take to change a democracy to a theocracy.

You seem to take your sexual freedom seriously, but you are defending a government that WILL call your freedom 'perverse' and punish you for it.



By Ananas2xLekker 22,Jun,26 03:25
If Obama is guilty of doing anything like Trump did,
liberals and lefties would not vote for him.
You voted in the most crooked president ever.

The result is that your president is doing the bidding of Putin and Netanyahu,
because YOU voted in a president who can be blackmailed easily.

It's not America first, it's Russia, Israel and Trump's money first.
America comes dead last in his priorities, and it shows.



By Ananas2xLekker 22,Jun,26 03:17
During multiple rallies, Trump said that Democrats would start a war with Iran,
and he promised to not start wars like that.

You can try to defend it, but he broke that promise.
And he broke several more promises.
Unlike Democrats who break promises, Trump didn't even try to keep his',
he actively did the opposite of what he promised.

In any case, his war with Iran is your worst failure in decades.
He didn't achieve ANYTHING that he presented as goals for it.



By Ananas2xLekker 22,Jun,26 03:10
Like I said; you only care about YOUR freedoms and rights.
Why do you think that you have more right to rights than other people?



By Ananas2xLekker 13,Jun,26 17:25
Ken Paxton's own lawyer endorses James Talarico
only registered users can see external links



By Ananas2xLekker 13,Jun,26 11:36
Pure fantasy!

You are the one voting in the fascists. Your president is literally quoting Hitler, dining with Nazis, retweeting KKK-propaganda and calling neo-Nazis "fine people". They are little busy with putting immigrants in concentration camps, reinstating Jim Crow laws and planning criminalization of gays, but they will surely get back to killing Jews, as soon as they have created the promised land. They don't believe that the promised land belongs to the Jews, it's intended for Christians, after the Rapture.



By Ananas2xLekker 13,Jun,26 11:13
Graham Platner - Donald Trump Said This About Me
only registered users can see external links



By Ananas2xLekker 11,Jun,26 10:11
"I will be a senator for the people who cannot afford to buy a senator!" Graham Platner



By Ananas2xLekker 11,Jun,26 04:42
I Don’t Want to Miss a Thing - Aerosmith
only registered users can see external links

I could stay awake just to hear you breathing
Watch you smile while you are sleeping
While you're far away and dreaming
I could spend my life in this sweet surrender
I could stay lost in this moment forever
Where a moment spent with you is a moment I treasure

Don't wanna close my eyes
I don't wanna to fall asleep
'Cause I'd miss you baby
And I don't wanna miss a thing
'Cause even when I dream of you (even when I dream)
The sweetest dream would never do
I'd still miss you baby
And I don't wanna miss a thing

Lying close to you, feeling your heart beating
And I'm wondering what you're dreaming
Wondering if it's me you're seeing
Then I kiss your eyes
And thank God we're together
And I just wanna stay with you in this moment forever
Forever and ever

I don't wanna close my eyes
I don't wanna to fall asleep
'Cause I'd miss you baby
And I don't wanna miss a thing
'Cause even when I dream of you (even when I dream)
The sweetest dream will never do
I'd still miss you baby
And I don't wanna miss a thing

I don't wanna miss one smile
And I don't wanna miss one kiss
And I just wanna be with you
Right here with you, just like this
And I just wanna hold you close
I feel your heart so close to mine
And just stay here in this moment
For all the rest of time
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah

Don't wanna close my eyes
Don't wanna fall asleep
'Cause I'd miss you baby
And I don't wanna miss a thing
'Cause even when I dream of you (even when I dream)
The sweetest dream would never do
I'd still miss you baby
And I don't wanna miss a thing

I don't wanna close my eyes
I don't wanna fall asleep
'Cause I'd miss you baby
And I don't wanna miss a thing
'Cause even when I dream of you
The sweetest dream would never do
I'd still miss you baby
And I don't wanna miss a thing

Don't wanna close my eyes
I don't wanna fall asleep, yeah
And I don't wanna miss a thing



By Ananas2xLekker 10,Jun,26 17:24
Your freedom? Below is a list of freedoms that Trump is stealing.
Why do you think that you have more right to rights than other people?

Abortion and reproductive autonomy
• Reinstated policies limiting federal funding for abortion-related services.
• Reversed some Biden-era reproductive health policies.
• Critics argue this reduces women's ability to access abortion, particularly for lower-income patients.

Asylum and immigration protections
• Expanded deportation efforts and narrowed asylum eligibility.
• Critics argue this limits due process and the practical ability to seek refuge in the United States.

Rights of transgender people
• Federal policy has been changed to recognize only male and female biological sex in many contexts.
• Protections and recognition for transgender people have been reduced in areas such as federal documentation, education, and some government programs.

Demonstration and protest rights (particularly on campuses)
• The administration has directed agencies to take stronger action against certain campus protests, especially those connected to allegations of antisemitism, and has supported investigations and immigration consequences for some non-citizen protesters.
• Critics argue these measures chill political expression and assembly protected by the First Amendment, especially when based on political viewpoints. Supporters argue they target unlawful conduct or harassment rather than peaceful protest.

Freedom of the media
• President Trump has continued to publicly attack major news organizations and has pursued policies such as attempting to end federal funding for NPR and PBS, arguing they are politically biased.
• Critics contend these actions, together with lawsuits and regulatory pressure on media organizations, risk undermining press independence and creating a chilling effect, even though no general censorship law has been enacted.

Freedom of lawyers and legal advocacy
• Executive actions have targeted several major law firms by restricting access to government facilities, contracts, or security clearances because of their clients or prior work.
• Many legal scholars and courts have questioned whether these actions infringe First Amendment rights and the independence of the legal profession.

Voting access
• The administration has supported stricter voter eligibility verification measures, including proof-of-citizenship requirements for some registration processes.
• Critics argue these rules could disproportionately burden minority voters, including Black Americans, although they do not explicitly deny voting rights based on race.

Diversity and equal opportunity programs
• Federal DEI initiatives have been dismantled or prohibited in many agencies and grant programs.
• Critics argue this restricts efforts to remedy historical discrimination; supporters argue it removes preferential treatment and restores merit-based decision-making.

Birthright citizenship (attempted)
• The administration sought to limit automatic citizenship for some children born in the United States through executive action.
• The policy faces constitutional challenges and has not been definitively upheld.

Civil service independence
• Reforms have expanded presidential control over parts of the federal bureaucracy and reduced some protections for career officials.
• Critics argue this weakens institutional independence and could discourage dissent within government.



By Ananas2xLekker 08,Jun,26 12:58
When the only thing you can think off is that you don't have to listen to a female president laughing annoyingly, it means that you're showing him to be correct. You have nothing.

You say you FEEL that you're better off now than you were.
Facts don't care about your feelings. You're duped!



By Ananas2xLekker 08,Jun,26 12:54
A Deserved Downfall
only registered users can see external links



By Ananas2xLekker 08,Jun,26 12:18
HONEST QUESTION, Is Anything Really Better Now?
only registered users can see external links



By Ananas2xLekker 08,Jun,26 11:07
The SAME belief?

You call yourself a Christian, don't you?
The Ku Klux Klan (KKK) is a Christian organization.
Do they have the SAME belief as YOU?

First of all, we call the religion of the 9/11 terrorist "Jihadist" for a reason, it's because
they hold convictions that are different from what Muslims believe.
In fact, most Muslims find them both repulsive and blaspheme.

Everyday Muslims use the following terms for extremists:

Kharijites (Khawarij) — "The Outcasts"
It is a severe theological judgment meaning: "You have departed from the true path of Islam and are repeating an ancient, corrupted error."

Ghuluw — "Extremism/Exaggeration"
The Prophet Muhammad explicitly warned his followers against ghuluw (religious extremism or overstepping the bounds). In Islamic jurisprudence, practicing ghuluw is considered a major sin because it distorts God’s message

Fasad fil-Ard — "Corruption on the Earth"
The Quran heavily condemns creating fasad (moral corruption, chaos, or ruin) on Earth. Mainstream Muslims view terrorist acts—such as bombings, destruction of property, and killing innocents—not as holy war, but as fasad. Under Islamic law, committing fasad is an egregious crime against society and God.

Do you hear Christians using terms from the Bible to condemn extremists?
If there aren't even Christian terms for that, that makes you MORE the same.

Phart is literally justifying everything that the Christian nationalist are doing.
These people are pushing their religion onto everyone; pushing THEOCRACY.
In fact, it's the closest real thing to the fear of SHARIA getting pushed on you.
It's going on right now, 24/7, while you are focusing on the Muslim scare.

What is Sharia?
- Religious law over above secular law
- Fusion of religion and state
- Women having no rights other than serving men
- Getting banned if your religion doesn't agree with theirs
- Women being forced to cover themselves up
- Complete sexual repression
- Violence towards LGTBQ
- Horrible punishment for crimes
- Censorship of culture and education
- Claims that the nation has a special divine mission (God's plan)
- Preference for strong leaders who claim to defend religious values
- Prioritizing religious community norms above personal freedom

This is EXACTLY what is pushed by Trump's cronies now. ALL OF IT!
Pete Hegseth is openly pushing Sharia-like ideas and a HOLY WAR.

I don't see you denouncing that or calling it blasphemy.
You must have the same belief!

Has Zohran Mamdami said or done anything to make you think that he is letting
extremist Jihadist or even standard Muslim ideology guide his actions?

Damn, these propagandists play you like a fiddle. Take back your brain!



By Ananas2xLekker 08,Jun,26 09:06
Warnings about the collapse of the working class are now getting trough to corporate media. They are presenting the history and current state of Jackson Hole, Wyoming,
as an example of what working class people will face everywhere.

‘Billionaire CRISIS’: How the country's wealthiest are 'bankrolling' U.S. politics
only registered users can see external links



By Ananas2xLekker 08,Jun,26 08:39
Is that the plus in LGBTQIA2S+ ?

The contest itself is not sexual, but I imagine that the 'afterparty' is.
I never heard of this kink before, but there are also people dressing up like horses,
so it doesn't surprise me one bit.



By Ananas2xLekker 08,Jun,26 04:13
In his Fiscal Year 2027 executive budget (released in May 2026), Zohran Mamdani allocated $26 million annually for the Office for the Prevention of Hate Crimes, describing it as fulfillment of a campaign pledge to increase hate-crime prevention funding by more than 800%.
only registered users can see external links

This will help Jewish New Yorkers through prevention, victim support, education, community partnerships, and coordination across agencies, rather than primarily through increased policing.

Some examples of what the city's hate-crime prevention offices already do:
- Work with Jewish organizations and other community groups to identify threats and respond to incidents.
- Support victims of antisemitic incidents and improve reporting of hate crimes.
- Fund community projects, interfaith initiatives, and educational programs intended to reduce antisemitism and other forms of bias before they escalate into crimes.
- Coordinate responses among agencies such as the NYPD, Commission on Human Rights, schools, and district attorneys.
- Improve hate-crime data collection, training, and outreach to communities that may underreport incidents.

Mamdani explicitly justified the increase by noting that Jewish New Yorkers suffer a disproportionate share of the city's hate crimes.



By Ananas2xLekker 05,Jun,26 11:15
Many economists now see inequality increasing, and are predicting abject poverty
for most people. It's just the continuation of a trend that you'd have to be willfully blind
not to notice. Gary saw it happening, and made money betting on the collapse of society.
He is now feeling guilty, and he is doing what he is doing, because he is expecting
that future suffering people will ask him: “Did you try and do anything?”.

"I've seen the tsunami coming"
only registered users can see external links

If you don't agree with his prediction, why not?
- Are you OK with most people living in abject poverty again?
- Do you think he is wrong? If so, why? What are you seeing, that I don't?
- Do you think he is lying? Why? What's in it for him?



By Ananas2xLekker 05,Jun,26 09:57
Screwworm In Texas Cattle Could Drive Up Beef Prices
— After DOGE Axed Prevention Efforts.
only registered users can see external links

The U.S. eradicated screwworm in 1966 through the sterile insect program, then spent decades maintaining a containment barrier in Mexico, Central America, and Panama.
only registered users can see external links

There are recent reports and political accusations that DOGE-related cuts or other Trump-administration reductions weakened monitoring, staffing, or parts of the prevention effort.

A screwworm case was confirmed in a Texas calf in 2026, the first such Texas case in decades. However, Mexico and Central America have already recorded more than 171,700 animal cases and over 2,070 human cases during the current northward-moving outbreak.
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links

Is your administration doing something or will they wait until it's a huge problem
and then throw some subsidies to the affected farmers?



By Ananas2xLekker 05,Jun,26 08:38
And what is your horribly corrupt and stupid president doing?
- First he cancelled Offshore wind project, costing the tax-payer roughly $2 billion in total and robbing them of cheap electricity.
- Then he is investing about $700 million of your tax-dollars in coal, which is a bad investment (even ignoring climate damage).

1) Coal is more expensive than alternatives, because coal plants have high fuel, labor,
and operating costs, while wind, solar, and natural gas are now cheaper to build and run
in nearly every U.S. region.

2) Coal plants are aging and require costly upgrades, because most were built 40–60 years ago and need expensive maintenance, retrofits, and pollution‑control equipment,
just to stay operational.

3) Private investors have abandoned coal, because the sector has high bankruptcy rates, shrinking demand, and poor long‑term profitability, making coal a classic “stranded asset” risk.

4) Coal cannot compete with natural gas, because gas plants are cheaper to build,
more efficient, and far more flexible for modern grid needs.

5) Coal plants are slow and inflexible, because they are designed for steady baseload operation and cannot ramp up or down quickly, which makes them poorly suited for
today’s variable electricity demand.

6) Maintenance and safety costs are high, because coal mining and coal power require heavy machinery, complex safety systems, and expensive waste‑handling infrastructure that remain costly, even when plants run at low capacity.



By Ananas2xLekker 05,Jun,26 06:37
Of course wildfires are adding to smog and unhealthy air.
Do you know what study you need to know that? Seeing the smoke.

And wildfires are indeed ALSO increasing the global CO₂ emissions
AND reducing natures capacity to ABSORB CO₂.

"Now if they would study volcano's impact..."
WHAT "IF"? ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME!?!
That you can still say something THIS IGNORANT, after so much discussion on this topic, that really baffles me.
Scientists are studying the effect of volcanoes DILIGENTLY.
A detailed atmospheric study of the 2021 Fagradalsfjall eruption found that fine particles and sulfur dioxide, SO₂, increased significantly even 300 km away from the volcano.
They did not create global smog.

Smog is mostly related to the burning of fossil fuels. Don't you remember the news during Covid lockdowns? Cities like Delhi, Los Angeles, and Beijing reported clear skies for the first time in decades. This happened because traffic and industrial activity collapsed, not because of changes in natural emissions.

Volcanoes are about 1% of the global CO₂ emissions, see below.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Now what is causing all those wildfires?
How about forests turning to a extremely dry tinderbox regularly?
Wildfires are indeed adding to the global CO₂ emissions. The frequency of wildfires is increasing, BECAUSE of climate change. Over the past two to three decades, CO₂ emissions from forest wildfires have surged dramatically. Global CO₂ emissions from forest fires have increased by 60% since 2001. Emissions from vast northern boreal forests (spanning Eurasia and North America) nearly tripled between 2001 and 2023, largely due to increasingly hot and dry conditions.

Based on the most recent global wildfire CO₂ datasets, the year with the largest global CO₂ emissions from wildfires in the satellite era (2003–2025) is 2003, with global emissions peaking at roughly 4.6 billion tonnes of CO₂. Human activity emitted about 27.64 billion tonnes of CO₂ in 2003 from fossil‑fuel combustion and industrial processes.
From 2003–2025, global wildfire CO₂ emissions averaged about 2.1–2.3 billion tonnes CO₂ per year, while human activity averaged about 34–36 billion tonnes CO₂ per year. Wildfires therefore contributed roughly 6–7% of annual anthropogenic emissions over this period.

The International Association of Volcanology and Chemistry of the Earth's Interior (IAVCEI) is the primary global professional association for volcanologists. Under its umbrella operates WOVO (The World Organization of Volcano Observatories). WOVO links together all the localized volcano observatories on Earth (like the USGS, Italy's INGV, or Indonesia's PVMBG). They manage WOVOdat, a massive global database that compiles tracking data—such as seismic activity, gas emissions, and ground deformation from active volcanoes to help scientists spot patterns and forecast future eruptions.
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
When looking at the graph, you will notice a massive spike in the number of recorded eruptions as you approach the 19th, 20th, and 21st centuries. Volcanologists emphasize that this spike does NOT mean the Earth is experiencing more volcanic activity. Instead, it represents our dramatic improvement in OBSERVATION technology, including global satellite tracking, seismology networks, and global communication, which allows us to document smaller, remote eruptions that would have gone completely unnoticed in ancient history.

Volcanoes impact the climate by spewing sulfur dioxide into the upper atmosphere, which combines with water to form sulfate aerosols that reflect sunlight back into space. This causes short-term global COOLING (e.g., eruptions like Mount Pinatubo dropped global temperatures for a year or two). Volcanic eruptions spew out lava, carbon dioxide ( CO₂ ) ash and particles. The average volcanic CO₂ emissions are less than 1% of emissions from current human activities.

I have shown you the IPCC Assessment Reports before. It deals with volcano activity in multiple sections.
only registered users can see external links

They present their 'studies' of ALL the possible natural causes and ALL the possible human activity related with climate changes, as far back as there is evidence related to all of those causes. Of course, they don't have to assess the impact of human activity from periods that humans were basically living like animals. Human activity only became a factor at the earliest around 8000 years ago, when human populations started to clear forests for primitive agriculture. However, back then, the global human population was roughly 5–20 million people, we are now with about 8.30 billion people, and we have Energy production, Industry, Agriculture, Transportation and Land‑use change, which accumulate to about 90% of the global human emissions of greenhouse gasses. And that global effect of humans DWARFS ALL the natural effects on the climate. Only the sun and the orbit of Earth around the sun can have larger effects, but scientists can very accurately measure this, and they know 100% sure that this is NOT causing the current climate change.

Basically, the global average temperature of Earth is governed by a simple energy-balance equation: energy absorbed from the Sun vs. energy emitted back to space.
The energy that is produced by the sun is pretty damn stable in general. It is only changing over many millions to billions of years. Besides that, it has a cycle, which is has been studied for a very long time. It also has slight variations and outbursts, which are also studied and recorded in high accuracy. Then we have the orbit of Earth around the sun. Earth’s orbit has caused major climate changes in the past, including the pacing of the Ice Ages, through what scientists call Milankovitch cycles. These factors are one of the best‑measured and most accurately predictable components of the climate system. Scientists can both reconstruct them FAR into the past and predict them FAR into the future, with extraordinary precision because they are governed by celestial mechanics, the same physics that lets us predict eclipses centuries ahead. The last time that the orbit was significantly changed was 4.5 Billion years ago, when a Mars-sized protoplanet, commonly called Theia, collided with the young Earth, resulting in the formation of the Moon.

How much of the energy of the Sun, that has reached Earth, is absorbed by Earth vs emitted back into space is completely dependent on JUST TWO things:
1) Planetary albedo (how much sunlight is reflected)
2) Greenhouse effect (how difficult it is for infrared radiation to escape)

1) Earth's albedo is dependent on:
-1 Clouds (largest)
-2 Snow and ice
-3 Atmospheric aerosols
-4 Deserts and bright land surfaces
-5 Ocean reflection
-6 Vegetation
These are all factors that scientist have accurately measured. Human activity influences all major contributors to Earth’s albedo:
-1 Aerosol pollution can change cloud brightness, lifetime, and coverage.
-2 Human-driven warming reduces snow cover and melts glaciers and sea ice
-3 Human activity can affect ocean reflectivity indirectly through changes in sea ice, biological productivity, and surface conditions
-4 Industry, transportation, agriculture, biomass burning and deforestation by fire emit particles that can reflect sunlight directly and modify clouds indirectly.
-5 Deforestation, urbanization, agriculture, and desertification change surface reflectivity
-6 Deforestation, afforestation, agriculture, urbanization

2) The Greenhouse effect is dependent on:
-1 Water Vapor (H₂O)
-2 Carbon Dioxide (CO₂ )
-3 Methane (CH4)
-4 Nitrous Oxide (N₂O)
-5 Ozone (O3)
-6 Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs)

There are well studied natural effects for all these factors, although several of them are affected by human activity:
-1 Water Vapor (H2O)
• Ocean evaporation
• Plant transpiration
• Volcanic eruptions
-2 Carbon Dioxide (CO2)
• Respiration by plants and animals
• Decay of organic matter
• Volcanic eruptions
• Ocean-atmosphere exchange
• Wildfires
-3 Methane (CH4)
• Wetlands and swamps (microbial decomposition)
• Termites and wild ruminants
• Wildfires
• Permafrost thaw and methane hydrates
-4 Nitrous Oxide (N2O)
• Microbial activity in natural soils
• Ocean nitrogen cycles
• Wildfires
-5 Ozone (O3)
• Chemical reactions of sunlight with natural volatile organic compounds (from plants/trees)
• Chemical reactions of sunlight with natural nitrogen oxides (from lightning/soils)
• Stratospheric air downwelling
-6 Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs)
• No significant natural effects

AND there are also well studied HUMAN ACTIVITY effects for ALL these factors, although several of them have interactions with natural processes:
-1 Water Vapor (H2O)
• Anthropogenic climate warming (the positive feedback loop: human greenhouse emissions warm the air, causing more ocean evaporation)
• Large-scale crop irrigation
• Fossil fuel combustion (minor direct byproduct)
-2 Carbon Dioxide (CO2)
• Combustion of fossil fuels (coal, oil, and natural gas for energy, heat, and transport)
• Deforestation and land-use changes (clearing forests for timber or urban development)
• Industrial processes (primarily cement manufacturing and chemical production)
• Agricultural and biomass burning
-3 Methane (CH4)
• Livestock farming (enteric fermentation from ruminants like cattle and sheep)
• Fossil fuel operations (leaks from natural gas extraction, coal mining, and oil refining)
• Rice cultivation (flooded paddies creating oxygen-depleted soil conditions)
• Municipal solid waste landfills and wastewater treatment
-4 Nitrous Oxide (N2O)
• Agricultural soil management (overapplication of synthetic nitrogen fertilizers and animal manure)
• Chemical industry manufacturing (production of nitric and adipic acids for fertilizers and nylon)
• Commercial, industrial, and vehicular fuel combustion
• Domestic wastewater treatment
-5 Ozone (O3)
• Photochemical smog reactions (sunlight interacting with human-emitted pollutants like nitrogen oxides and volatile organic compounds from vehicles, power plants, and industrial solvents)
-6 Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs)
• Refrigeration and air conditioning systems (coolant leaks and disposal)
• Industrial aerosol propellants
• Foam blowing agents used in insulation manufacturing
• Specialized electronic and industrial solvent cleaning systems

ALL of these effects have been studied by an army of scientists, in public service and in the private sector, all over the world, for decades.
The reality of human-caused climate change is backed by one of the most rigorously tested and cross-verified consensus positions in modern scientific history, built by thousands of experts across 195 countries who have reviewed tens of thousands of peer-reviewed studies. Rather than relying on a single theory, this conclusion is proven by independent lines of evidence that completely converge. From ice cores archiving 800,000 years of ancient air, to modern networks of satellites, ocean buoys, and ground thermometers that all paint the exact same warming picture. Scientists have even tracked this down to the atomic level, showing that the specific carbon isotopes clogging our air match fossil fuels perfectly, while satellites measure a direct drop in escaping heat at the exact wavelengths of greenhouse gases. Because even decades-old internal research from private oil companies independently arrived at these same results, the reality we observe today is not a matter of debate, but a directly measured fact verified across the fields of physics, chemistry, and geology.



By Ananas2xLekker 05,Jun,26 03:17
"Real men serve others. Weak men serve themselves." - James Talarico 2026



By Ananas2xLekker 04,Jun,26 05:10
Good for you! I cannot say that I ace all of them. If my girlfriend wouldn't tell me that my clothes are fading or my shoes are falling apart, I would wear them way too long.
My negative outlook is fully dependent on the topic. In every day life, I only talk about how "the world is fucked", when it comes up. In my work and social life, I'm very much a positive guy. I am flexible enough to adjust to anything. When I'm raising concerns, it's not for me, because I will make sure that I'm alright, I'm just warning for the damage people are doing to themselves and humanity. When it comes to leisure time, I want to go to different restaurants, different recreational activities and different vacation destinations every time. I'm not an early adopter of all technology, but I'm the person who people ask for help if they get stuck with technology.

But, good tips! Most of them probably think that they don't need to be attractive to women anymore, because they already have one, but you want to keep making an effort for your wife or girlfriend of 25+ years, if you want her to keep making an effort for you too.

However, some women are comfortable with, or even encourage, their partner's lack of grooming or attention to appearance, because they see reduced attractiveness as a way to minimize romantic competition from other women.



By Ananas2xLekker 03,Jun,26 12:47
Here is what ChatGPT created after some discussion on the topic:

People who become deeply committed to a political movement, religious group, ideology, or even a cult are usually not there because something is inherently wrong with them. Human beings are social creatures whose beliefs are influenced by identity, belonging, emotions, incentives, and social environments as much as by logic.

Whether someone becomes deeply attached to a movement is rarely explained by a single factor. It emerges from an interaction between circumstances, individual characteristics, group dynamics, and chance.

High-control groups and strongly identity-based movements often use mechanisms such as:
- Gradual escalation of commitment.
- Providing community, purpose, and belonging.
- Creating a strong distinction between insiders and outsiders.
- Encouraging loyalty to the group or leader.
- Framing criticism as hostile or illegitimate.
- Increasing the psychological cost of dissent.
- Normalizing ideas or behaviors that initially seemed extreme.
- Rewarding conformity and punishing deviation socially.

Personal addition:
Trump is using these mechanisms to perfection. He is probably not doing it all deliberately, the behavior may arise naturally from his personality, instincts, worldview, and interpersonal style, rather than from a calculated plan.

These mechanisms can produce behavior that outsiders find puzzling. Members may defend actions they once condemned, overlook contradictions, or reinterpret events in ways that protect the group. This is not necessarily because they are unintelligent. Similar tendencies appear in many human groups.

At the same time, susceptibility is not entirely random. Some factors can make a person more resistant:
- Comfort with disagreement.
- Strong independent social networks.
- Tolerance for uncertainty.
- Habitually questioning authority figures.
- Willingness to revise beliefs when evidence changes.

Yet even these traits do not create immunity. Highly intelligent, educated, skeptical, and independent-minded people have joined cults, political movements, ideological causes, and organizations that later proved harmful.

When people observe strong loyalty to a leader—whether in MAGA, a revolutionary movement, a religious sect, or another cause—they often conclude that supporters must possess some defective character trait. Usually the reality is more complicated. What often looks like a character flaw from the outside can emerge from ordinary psychological processes such as identity formation, social belonging, fear of exclusion, confirmation bias, motivated reasoning, and sunk-cost thinking.

That does not mean all movements are equally healthy or equally prone to these dynamics. Some organizations and movements encourage independent criticism more than others. But the existence of intense loyalty, rationalization, or hypocrisy by itself does not prove that members are fundamentally different kinds of people. More often, it shows how powerful group identity can become when personal identity and group identity start to merge.

So if a movement exhibits cult-like behavior, the most useful explanation is usually not that its members possess a special "cult member personality." Rather, it is that ordinary human tendencies—belonging, loyalty, conformity, identity protection, and motivated reasoning—have become unusually strong within a particular social and political environment.



By Ananas2xLekker 03,Jun,26 09:16
The Manosphere Isn't About Men. Or Women
only registered users can see external links



By Ananas2xLekker 03,Jun,26 08:55
The Manosphere Isn’t What You Think
only registered users can see external links