Your Republicans in Florida won with the slightest margins from 2 Democrats who had almost NO money for their campaigns, while the GOP spent tens of millions of dollars in media buys, ground operations, and digital advertising
to protect their incumbents.
Even in your beloved Florida, Democrats would have won, with just a fair game.

They all fit Trump like a glove

Eight-year-old bullies on the playground have better comebacks than you.

I'm not the one who doesn't understand the difference
between upper middle class and billionaires.

About the Supreme Court; that branch of government is broken, and Republicans destroyed it. We can all see clearly how they corrupt the meaning of the Constitution, just to favor the wealthy elites who pay them off. That blatant corruption needs to end, by any means necessary, and I fully support the Democrats in fixing it. Call it whatever you want, I call it saving the system.

This is why you calling it 'political revenge' is so hypocritical; you constantly defend a rule of law with harsh punishments for regular citizens. Whenever someone is killed by the police or ICE, your immediate justification is that they should have complied. You also blamed a black teenager for getting shot, just for ringing the wrong doorbell at night. Your demand for flawless compliance applies to everyone you don't like.
But when it comes to Donald Trump or his cronies, your entire philosophy vanishes. Suddenly, holding a man accountable for a decade of crimes, corruption and trying to overturn an election is labeled as 'revenge'.
You want strict compliance for the powerless, but absolute immunity
for the people you like. I'm not having it.

Your side baselessly accuses independent prosecutors like Jack Smith of weaponizing the law, while Trump openly orders the DOJ to hunt down his political enemies. He literally used Truth Social to command Pam Bondi to prosecute Adam Schiff, James Comey, and Letitia James. When career prosecutor Erik Siebert refused to bring baseless charges due to a lack of evidence, Trump fired him and replaced him with his own defense lawyer to force the indictments through. We just watched his administration send federal agents to raid the home of Representative Ilhan Omar. He even uses DOJ officials and billions in campaign money to sue the media for his personal hurt feelings, all while lying about private citizens every single day. ‘Revenge’ is a massive understatement, for Trump acting like a rabid dog biting at everyone around him.

Democratic leadership like Hakeem Jeffries is focused on governance,
so I don't have any confidence that they are going to do what is needed
to restore the rule of law. Crying about 'political persecution' the moment Trump is held to the same standards as everyone else is pathetic.
Cry me a river!

Your exchange with AI made me laugh, it completely rejected your framing. You’ll probably cry bias, but that’s exactly what AI is built to prevent. If I try to make it accept a biased angle, I get the exact same objective results.
AI operates on facts and logic, not partisan echo chambers. It didn’t take your bait, because reality doesn’t support your narrative.
I use AI to eliminate biases from my argumentation and check facts.
You should try it sometimes to prepare a message before you send it.

So what is the problem, the plane or the young female pilot?
It was the same plane, but in both cases the young female pilot was NOT flying. She is only the co-pilot, responsible for confirmation and communication with the tower. The actual flight controls are operated by the pilot. He decides to change height and do that, not her.
Changing height to avoid icing and turbulence is not out of the ordinary. It does show that the weather was particularly bad, but the weather is bad more often and still no Learjet 60 has ever dropped out of the sky like that one.

I understand that coincidences exist and happen all the time.
But the Palm Beach Jet Crash is a perfect example of multiple incredibly low chances occurring simultaneously. That is not the case in your example.

Did you see the video in the 'YouTube can be educational' topic, about Christians saying that evolution is mathematically impossible? That's based on a misunderstanding of chances and thinking that the process of evolution is dependent on incredibly unlikely chances. When I say that the Palm Beach Jet Crash has a mathematically very unlikely possibility, that's NOT a misunderstanding of chances. It really needs to be calculated by multiplying several very small chances, resulting in a highly unlikely occurrence:

Total Probability = P(Unique Crash Mode) × P(Active SHORAD) × P(Trump's Presence) × P(Exact Coordinates in the US)

Using standard historical aviation and logistical data, we can estimate the four individual probabilities to see how they multiply.

1. P(Unique Crash Mode) — The Mechanical Failure
* The Baseline: Over the last two decades, there have been roughly 20 million to 30 million global business jet flights per year. Fatal accidents occurring during the cruise phase (at 35,000+ feet) account for less than 5% of all accidents.
* The Model: The Learjet 60 had flown for decades without ever suffering a spontaneous high-altitude structural failure or unrecoverable vertical plunge while cruising under normal operations.
* Estimation: The odds of an aircraft experiencing a catastrophic high-altitude stall/structural event of this magnitude on any given flight is roughly 1 in 10,000,000 (10^-7).

2. P(Active SHORAD) — The Military Variable
* The Baseline: Short-Range Air Defense (SHORAD) systems like the AN/TWQ-1 Avenger are almost exclusively deployed in active war zones or permanently around major national command centers (like Washington, D.C.).
* The Deployment: Deploying these active systems to a temporary civilian residence due to a specific drone threat environment is an incredibly rare event. If we assume such highly advanced systems are active at Mar-a-Lago for perhaps a cumulative total of 4 weeks (28 days) out of a multi-year period:
* Estimation: The probability that these systems were active on any random day is roughly 28 days out of 10 years, which is about 1 in 130 (7.6 x 10^-3).

3. P(Trump's Presence / Air Force One Window) — The Timing Window
* The Baseline: Official tracking shows Donald Trump spends roughly 65 days per year at Mar-a-Lago during the social season.
* Calculation: 65 days of presence divided by 365 days in a year means he is physically there ~17.8% of the time
* Order of Magnitude Estimation: 1 in 5.6 (1.78 * 10^-1)

4. P(Exact Coordinates in the US) — The Macro-Location
* The Baseline: Calculation by the ratio of flight hours spent inside that specific 7-mile circle compared to all other US flight hours.
* With roughly 3,300 local flight hours out of 20,000,000 total national flight hours per year, this represents the exact physical exposure within the macro-location of the US.
* Estimated as 1 in 6,000 (1.67 * 10^-4)

THE GRAND TOTAL (Multiplying the Chances)
When we run these order-of-magnitude estimations through the formula:

Total Probability = P(Unique Crash Mode) x P(Active SHORAD) x P(Trump's Presence) x P(Exact Coordinates in the US)
Total Probability = (10^-7) x (7.6 x 10^-3) x (1.78 * 10^-1) x (1.67 * 10^-4)

The resulting combined probability is approximately 1 in 4.42 * 10^13
1 in 44.2 trillion YEARS. The universe has existed for 13.787 billion years now.

CONCLUSION
This astronomical number is exactly why this case is mathematically almost impossible. This is not a misunderstanding of chances. When a coin lands on heads 50 times in a row, a statistician doesn't say "well, coincidences happen". They immediately check if the coin is rigged.

Can you fault that calculation?

Do you understand the difference between someone making $400,000 a year and a billionaire? Don't be daft.
You can make $400,000 a year without exploiting anyone, you CANNOT become a billionaire without exploiting lots and lots of people.

I'll look at the rest later. Until then, go sit in the shame corner for this oblivious argument.

No, none of the factors that made the first incident curious are repeated here.
This is a completely different case:
• Location: The crash happened in New Smyrna Beach, over 160 miles north of
Mar-a-Lago, completely outside any security zones.
• Aircraft Type: Unlike the Learjet 60, this was a small, single-engine light aircraft, which carries a much different safety profile. These crash all the time.
• Flight Profile: It wasn't a mid-air disintegration from 35,000 feet, but a low-altitude crash near a local airport where the fuselage remained largely intact, which occurs significantly more often.

Florida is one of the busiest states for private aviation; linking two entirely different aircraft types hundreds of miles apart is just a coincidence, not a pattern.

Do you even check anything, before you react to it? Even if you don't trust ChatGPT, ask Grok.

If those were actual Democratic goals? These ARE!!! They represent the EXACT framework the party has voted for, attempted to pass, and consistently fought for over the last DECADE. While political rhetoric can often cloud the core message, the actual legislative record shows a sustained effort to enact these exact policies, with about half successfully made into law and the other half actively blocked by Republicans.

When Democrats held the majority, they successfully passed massive, tangible pieces of legislation directly matching these points:
• Rebuilding Infrastructure: They passed the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law to modernize roads, bridges, and secure clean drinking water.
• Lowering Drug Costs & Healthcare Premiums: They passed the Inflation Reduction Act, giving Medicare the power to negotiate lower prescription drug prices and expanding subsidies to lower family premiums.
• Protecting Supply Chains: They passed the CHIPS and Science Act to bring vital microchip and high-tech manufacturing back to American soil to protect local industries.
• Expanding Veteran Care: They passed the PACT Act to deliver healthcare and benefits to veterans exposed to toxic environments.

For the remaining items on the list, Democrats have repeatedly drafted and introduced legislation, only for these goals to be blocked by Republican opposition and split party control:
• Raising the Minimum Wage: House Democrats repeatedly passed the Raise the Wage Act to lift the federal minimum wage to $15 an hour, but it consistently failed to clear the Senate due to unified Republican opposition.
• Capping Childcare & Paid Leave: National paid family leave and federal caps on childcare and eldercare costs were originally central pillars of the Build Back Better framework, but they were entirely blocked and cut during fierce Senate negotiations to pass the final bill.
• Border Technology & ICE Accountability: Democrats have routinely introduced funding for advanced fentanyl-detection scanners and extra immigration judges, alongside proposals from progressive factions for mandatory ICE bodycams and judicial warrant enforcement.

However, these specific measures have been repeatedly blocked or stalled as part of the broader, ongoing partisan deadlock over comprehensive border security and immigration reform.
The list isn't just a wishlist; it is a direct summary of the exact legislative blueprint the Democratic Party has spent the last ten years fighting to implement, succeeding where they had the votes and being blocked where they did not.

How many more billions do those high earners NEED to have an incentive? What incentive do you have left after you earned your 100th million, or your 10th billion? Why do want to reward them so much, while your only incentive for the working class is avoiding hunger?

You clearly don't understand tax brackets. You don't take home less money than your neighbor by crossing into a higher bracket. That is a total myth. You and your neighbor pay the exact same rate on the first $340,000. You only pay the higher rate on the extra money above that line. You always make more by earning more. Your investment in college still entirely pays off.

As for prices going up if we tax the rich? Corporations are already charging record-high prices right now while hoarding record profits. Fair taxes don't cause inflation; they fund the infrastructure, public schools, and healthcare that actually lower the cost of living for the rest of us.
Donald Trump passed huge tax-cuts for the wealthy. Did it lower inflation?

You are complaining about taxing the person making $375k, while completely ignoring that multi-millionaires and billionaires don't even pay income tax.
Their wealth is tied up in stocks and assets, meaning they pay next to nothing.
Because the ultra-rich pay so little, the well-doing American who actually went to college and invested in themselves has to pick up the TAB and pay MORE.
Your side literally caused the exact problem you are accusing Democrats of. Republicans talk big about cutting spending, but they always blow up the deficit by cutting taxes for the top 1% and giant corporations, leaving the hard-working professional to pay the bill.

Someone has to pay for all your wars and presents to the wealthy. You are on your last leg, so they cannot squeeze you any further. So, they look at the exact person you say to worry about.
Trump squeezed those people like no other actually. He made healthcare even more expensive, put tariffs on almost everything, and created massive inflation by blowing up the national debt. Your costs shot up, but did your income?
Then he let corporate interests run wild, doing absolutely nothing about Big Oil companies making record profits over the backs of hard-working citizens.

Your side makes them angry about paying taxes, but because of Trump's federal debt explosion, skyrocketing health insurance premiums, student debt interest, the absolute minimum income a family needs just to start a baseline middle-class life anywhere in America has shot past $100,000. People used to be well off at that income, and Trump is turning them POOR.

Is evolution mathematically impossible? (for if you don't understand why)
only registered users can see external links

The oldest sign of a liar is their refusal to justify their claims.

The oldest sign of a liar is their refusal to justify their claims. A person telling the truth welcomes evidence because facts back them up. A liar throws a tantrum, demands blind trust, and claims they 'don't have to show proof', because they know their lies cannot survive inspection. Your anger and refusal to provide facts is your confession.

She's laughing now, dumbass!

You just went from making up lies about Ilhan Omar to making up lies about the US Constitution. There is absolutely no 'constitutional rule' forcing people to move based on their vote.

Also, your math on Florida doesn't hold up. The 2026 midterm results show that the Republican governor only won Florida with a razor-thin 50.02% against 48.71% for the Democrat. Half the state voted against your nonsense.

By the way, you might want to look up what 'holding the bag' actually means.
It means being left stuck with a failure or a massive loss while everyone else gets away. If you're waiting for the whole country to move to Florida so you can 'hold the bag,' you are accidentally predicting your own financial ruin.

What's the argument, that there are other horrible famous people?
Sure, and there are also lots of decent and even exemplary celebrities.

If there were even the slightest reasons to suspect Clinton of a fraction
of what Trump is investigated for, I would indeed be just as angry.
Honestly, probably even angrier. I hold my political allies to a much higher standard of morals and ethics, than I do my political opponents.
Clinton is hardly an ally by Dutch standards, but the US only has 2 choices.

I expect representatives of my own party to not lie ever. That doesn't mean that I would force them to resign on the first lie that I catch them in, but I would certainly push a complaint up the ladder of responsibility. Meanwhile, we have become used to seeing politicians from the other side lie with total impunity, and their base doesn't seem to care at all. That is the real double standard.

My standards of evidence are the same for everyone. Facts and reason!
My trust in different sources is NOT the same for all. I evaluate a source based on its track record, whether their arguments and data are independently verifiable, and if they provide transparent evidence to support their claims in the first place.
A 'trust my words' attitude is an immediate red flag. Furthermore, I strictly look for financial or political conflicts of interest, a willingness to openly correct mistakes, and whether the claim can be verified by other credible, independent sources.

Have you seen Trump saying what he was going to do for the American people?
He was just talking about his ballroom, his reflective pool and renaming shit.

And why would I even answer that question, if the American people were of
zero concern to you while Trump was in office?

And I in fact DID answer your question, because I explained that the Democrats cannot do SHIT to help the American people, unless they act in a way that you consider 'taking revenge on Trump'.

But OK, I'll answer your question (again).

First of all; Democrats can walk and chew bubblegum at the same time.
Maybe Republicans make it look hard to actually do shit, but it ISN'T.
The struggle is purely on getting corrupt politicians to agree with it.

However, there is a real problem: Democrats cannot do much or anything to help the American people, as long as Trump is in office, because Trump just said that he would VETO everything. That means that getting Trump and all his cronies out (which you think is revenge) is the ONLY thing that Democrats can do to help the American people.

Understand that I have zero confidence in Democrats actually showing a pair,
and going after all the perps of the incredible corruption and crimes, but they SHOULD, or the next chance Republicans get, they will destroy democracy for ever. Also, if the Democrats fail to do that, the current MAGA system will be able to block everything, the American people see no results for their votes, and too much of them can sadly be stupid enough to vote for Republicans again in 2028.

What Democrats COULD do, when Trump doesn't veto it, or is in prison,
are the next Core Democratic Legislative Goals:

* Rebuilding Domestic Infrastructure: Modernizing American roads, bridges, and energy grids creates stable, well-paying blue-collar jobs that cannot be outsourced, while ensuring local communities have safe drinking water and reliable power.

* Expanding Veteran Care: Providing comprehensive healthcare, mental health resources, and housing assistance guarantees that those who served the country receive the benefits they earned.

* Upgrading Border Technology and Personnel: Providing the U.S. Border Patrol with advanced fentanyl-detection screening at ports of entry, hiring more high-tech law enforcement personnel, and funding additional immigration judges to process backlogs ensures the physical border is secure and lethal drugs are intercepted before entering American communities.

* Securing Retirement Benefits: Protecting Social Security and Medicare from future budget cuts ensures that working-class Americans who paid into the system during their careers receive their full retirement checks and medical coverage.

* Lowering Prescription Drug Costs: Authorizing the government to negotiate directly with major pharmaceutical companies slashes the out-of-pocket price of essential medicines for families and seniors.

* Targeting Transnational Crime and Fentanyl: Directing ICE resources strictly toward dismantling drug cartels, human traffickers, and fentanyl smuggling networks focuses federal law enforcement on the actual security threats that devastate American communities.

* Mandating Law Enforcement Bodycams: Requiring ICE agents to wear bodycams protects innocent American citizens from cases of mistaken identity, provides clear evidence during operations, and holds federal agencies accountable.

* Enforcing Judicial Warrants: Ensuring that federal agents must secure a judge's signature before entering properties upholds the Fourth Amendment right to privacy and protects the homes and businesses of all Americans from government overreach.

* Raising the Federal Minimum Wage: Increasing the baseline hourly wage ensures that full-time American workers can afford basic necessities like housing and groceries without relying on government assistance.

* Capping Healthcare Premiums: Expanding federal health insurance subsidies limits out-of-pocket insurance costs for families, ensuring that a medical emergency does not lead to household bankruptcy.

* Investing in Local Public Education: Directing federal funding toward local public schools and vocational training boosts math, science, and technical education, preparing American children for high-paying domestic jobs.

* Capping Childcare and Eldercare Costs: Creating a federal cap on the cost of childcare and eldercare ensures that working parents and families do not have to choose between keeping their jobs or paying exorbitant fees to care for their loved ones.

* Protecting the Domestic Supply Chain: Expanding federal incentives to bring back the production of vital goods—such as microchips, steel, and essential medicines—to American soil prevents global supply shortages and keeps critical industries safe from foreign control.

* Expanding Paid Family and Medical Leave: Establishing a baseline requirement for paid family and medical leave allows American workers to take time off to care for a newborn or recover from a serious illness without losing their income or risking their job security.


How It Is Paid For:

* Raising Corporate Tax Rates: Increasing the minimum tax rate on large corporations and closing loopholes that allow major companies to legally avoid paying federal taxes.

* Taxing High-Income Earners: Applying the Social Security payroll tax to incomes far above the current cap, ensuring the wealthiest individuals contribute the same percentage of their total earnings as working-class families.

* Imposing Penalties on Offshoring: Charging fees and removing tax breaks for American companies that move their factories and jobs to foreign countries.

* Leveraging Medicare Savings: Using the billions of dollars saved by negotiating lower drug prices with pharmaceutical companies to directly fund federal healthcare services.

* Closing Offshore Tax Havens: Ending legal loopholes that allow corporations and individuals to hide profits in foreign banks to avoid domestic taxes.

Does that answer your question?

To be clear, I don't think that impeaching Trump for anything right now is a good strategy. They should definitely file multiple articles of impeachment, but then investigate the shit out of Trump, his family, all his cronies, Elon Musk and DOGE. They will find so many crimes, that they can probably completely end all of the Republican party and its enablers.

How useless are you then, for being unable to present ANY verifiable fact
that clearly contradicts my claims. That should be EASY.

Obviously people don't believe your shit, because they just voted her in again
with roughly 76.5% of the total vote share.

If there is no accountability, Republicans will do/try this again.
For the protection of democracy, lots of them need to go behind bars.
That's the ONLY thing that can FIX your democracy.

Everything makes it appear like a complete systems failure.
That doesn't just happen. There is also talk about Directed-Energy Weapons.

There were no radio communications about hijackers.
That would be the absolute first thing that a pilot would report.
It's very simple; if we see a cover up on this incident,
you can bet a lot of money on your regime being involved in it.

There is NO evidence that Ilhan Omar's father is associated with this academic publication.

What famous people talk about wanting to fuck their daughter and organizing
teen beauty pageants to peep on them? If this was any other person than Trump,
you would condemn them to hell.

I don't care that he's an asshole, I care that he is now associated with r@ping
an EIGHT YEAR OLD GIRL. He is the exact type of ped0phile elite cabal monster that QAnon was going mental about. I thought they were crazy, but it all turned out to be true, only about Republicans and not Democrats. Maybe even the satanic part will leak eventually. That would make it complete.

Any look into the history of Trump instantly reveals what a horrible man he has been for all of his life, and you lot are loyal like dogs to him. Why do you like evil people?

Meanwhile you need to pretend that your political enemies are evil people on no evidence whatsoever, while you reject mountains of evidence about the politicians that you keep supporting, for no good reason at all.

What reason do you have to lie to yourself?

"Concede is a French word. What are you, French?"
only registered users can see external links

The Palm Beach Jet Crash: How Could a Learjet 60 with a Flawless Cruise Record Drop Like a Bomb?

Facts That Support the Suspicion that Trump's air defense is responsible:

• Extreme Proximity and Timing: The Learjet 60 crashed a mere 7 to 9 miles from Mar-a-Lago, Donald Trump’s private residence. The impact occurred approximately one hour after Trump departed the immediate area aboard Air Force One.

• Unprecedented Military Activation: In the weeks directly leading up to the crash, the Secret Service and the Pentagon had officially deployed advanced short-range air defense systems and electronic countermeasures around the Mar-a-Lago perimeter to counter drone threats.

• Anomaly in Aircraft Safety Record: Proponents of this theory point out that in the entire operational history of the Learjet 60, no aircraft of this model has ever suffered a spontaneous, catastrophic mid-flight structural failure or an unrecoverable vertical plunge while cruising at 35,000 feet under normal operations.

• Abrupt and Violent Flight Path: The aircraft experienced an immediate, catastrophic departure from controlled flight, transitioning instantly into a near-vertical dive with terminal descent rates accelerating from 10,000 to over 22,000 feet per minute.

• Witness and Authority Descriptions: First-hand eyewitnesses and official state updates described the aircraft's final trajectory as looking "like a missile going down," matches the visual profile of a kinetic intercept or total control surface locking.

• Midair Disintegration: Physical debris was scattered across a wide area before the main impact, with initial findings confirming the airframe began breaking apart at high altitude, a characteristic shared with catastrophic external impacts or sudden explosive decompression.

Tell me why ALL of the news outlets are dismissing this as conspiracy theories, while this list of hard, verified facts points to a scenario that is mathematically and physically far too unlikely to be a simple stroke of bad luck.

So here is a challenge to you: provide me with a list of verifiable facts, just like mine,
for any one of the things that you believe the governments and media are lying about.

Pick any theory you firmly believe in, and I disagree with, and give me at least four hard, undisputed, globally documented physical facts that directly connect the dots. No hearsay, no 'someone said on a podcast,' and no screenshots of anonymous social media posts. Just pure, verifiable anomalies. I bet that you cannot find anything close to what I just provided on this 'accident'. That means that you should not believe that this jet just dropped out of the sky.

Your government just murdered nine innocent people, just to be on the safe side,
and protect your corrupt, criminal, dying, demented, treasonous, ped0phile president.

OMG the projection is stunning; Trump is the biggest crook in your political history.
He is openly breaking the law and pissing on The Constitution.

That's certainly an interesting collection of allegations, but I noticed something:
where is the independently verifiable evidence?

The article relies heavily on unnamed sources, family friends, Facebook connections
and photographs. It produces a British marriage certificate, but that document, even if authentic, doesn't independently establish that the father named on it was Ilhan Omar's father.

And even if all the alleged family relationships were true, how exactly does that establish that Omar is an illegal immigrant?

The article doesn't provide ANY evidence that she entered the United States illegally, committed immigration fraud or obtained citizenship unlawfully.

There is a difference between a sensational story, an allegation and a proven fact.
If someone wants to accuse a person of immigration fraud, they need evidence of immigration fraud.

You're just confusing an intriguing family mystery with proof of a crime.

The article relies on the connection between these names:
Nur Omar Mohamed - Name used in US reporting and his obituary
Nur Said - Name used in Somali community accounts
Nur Said Elmi - Name appearing on the alleged British marriage certificate

These name combinations are very common in the Middle East.
More than 24.5 million people named Mohamed.
More than 3.4 million named Omar.
More than 1.6 million named Said.
More than 3.3 million named Nur.
About 137,618 people named Elmi as a surname, but there is no evidence to tie that name or that British marriage certificate to Ilhan Omar's father.

Always the same nonsense. Without evidence that the judge made the right or wrong call, their political affiliation says NOTHING to me. The fact that they are not being transparent is more evidence of meddling than the politics of a judge.

When I e.g. call Aileen Cannon partial to Trump, I have REASONS. You don't.
Her conduct was Highly irregular, Legally flawed and Obstructive.

Similarly, there is still no LEGAL justification provided for why that judge signed the search warrant. Trump's DOJ, Todd Blanche, is refusing to release the warrant application and supporting affidavit. I think that says enough.

Old:
There are three important facts:
1. Wisconsin Elections Commission administrator Meagan Wolfe announced on October 1, 2020, that no Wisconsin absentee ballots were among the recovered mail.
2. One of the photographs released later appeared to show a Minnesota ballot.
3. Subsequent reporting connected the discarded mail to two men from Minnesota who had stolen mail in a postal crime spree. They were subsequently prosecuted.
The distinction matters: the original reports described absentee ballots among the mail, but there was no evidence that Wisconsin voters' ballots had been lost or deliberately targeted.
Potential impact What the evidence shows
Wisconsin votes lost: No Wisconsin ballots were involved, according to the state election administrator.
Election results changed: No evidence that this incident changed any election result.
Voter fraud: No evidence of a politically motivated scheme.
Public perception: Yes. The incident was widely amplified and used to question mail-in voting.
Political campaigning: Yes. President Trump publicly referred to discarded ballots during the 2020 campaign.

New:
- 92 undelivered mail-in ballots were found in a dumpster near Golden Gardens Park, close to Seattle.
- These were ballots that had been mailed to registered voters but had not reached them.
- King County election officials reported the discovery to Seattle police and the U.S. Postal Service.
- All 92 ballots were invalidated.
- Replacement ballots were issued to the affected voters.
- These were unreturned ballots, not completed votes that had been removed from the count.
- A person finding or possessing a blank ballot cannot simply submit it as a valid vote.
- Returned ballots undergo voter-registration checks, duplicate-vote screening and signature verification.

Risks of in-person Election Day voting:
• Long queues and congestion: Heavy turnout can cause delays and, in extreme cases, prevent people from voting before polls close.
• Equipment failures: Electronic voting machines, ballot scanners and electronic poll books can malfunction.
• Human error: Poll workers can make mistakes checking registration, issuing ballots or recording voter information.
• Voter intimidation: People may encounter intimidation or improper campaigning near polling stations.
• Accessibility: Illness, disability, transport problems or work commitments can prevent people from reaching polling stations.
• Physical security: Polling locations and election workers may face threats or disruptions.
• Voter-roll purging and incorrect registration removals: Eligible voters may be wrongly removed from voter registration lists, sometimes without their knowledge or adequate notification. They may only discover this when they arrive at the polling station on Election Day. Correcting the error can be difficult, time-consuming or impossible before polls close, potentially resulting in their legitimate vote not being counted.

Republicans have tried to make in-person Election Day voting for voters in blue areas
as difficult as possible. That's why masses of people voted early and checked that their ballots have been received and accepted.

Present that paperwork then.

You have no defense of Trump other than attacking the messenger. WEAK!

Direct quotes by Trump:

1. About Jeffrey Epstein (2002)
"I've known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy. He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side."
— New York Magazine, 2002.

2. About entering beauty pageant dressing rooms (2005)
"I'll go backstage before a show, and everyone's getting dressed and ready and everything else, and you know, no men are anywhere, and I'm allowed to go in because I'm the owner of the pageant and therefore I'm inspecting it."
"They're standing there with no clothes. And you see these incredible-looking women, and so I sort of get away with things like that."
— Howard Stern Show, April 2005.

3. About his 17-year-old daughter Ivanka (1999)
"She's 17 and doing great — Ivanka. She made me promise, swear to her that I would never date a girl younger than her. So as she grows older, the field is getting very limited."
— Howard Stern Show.

4. About Ivanka's appearance (2004)
"Yeah."
— Trump's response when Howard Stern asked whether Ivanka could be described as a "piece of ass."

5. About Ivanka's breasts (2006)
"She's actually always been very voluptuous. She's tall, she's almost 6 feet tall, and she's been, she's an amazing beauty."
— Howard Stern Show.

6. About dating 21-year-olds (2002)
"Over the past couple of years, I'd go out with somebody and she's like 21, and she's talking about, you know, 'What are you doing?' and she's studying algebra."
— Howard Stern Show.

7. About women aged 24 (2006)
"Oh, absolutely. I'd have no trouble."
— Trump responding to Stern asking whether he could be dating 24-year-olds.

8. About Lindsay Lohan (2004)
"She's probably deeply troubled, and therefore great in bed."
— Howard Stern Show, discussing Lindsay Lohan, who was 18.

9. About women and sexual entitlement (2005 recording, released 2016)
"I just start kissing them. It's like a magnet. Just kiss. I don't even wait."
"When you're a star, they let you do it. You can do anything."
"Grab 'em by the pussy. You can do anything."
— Access Hollywood recording.

10. About two 14-year-old girls (1992)
"Wow! Just think — in a couple of years I'll be dating you."
— Reported remark to two 14-year-old girls, attributed to Trump by contemporary newspaper reporting.

Your side called Biden a ped0, for supposedly smelling a girl's hair.
Trump's behavior is much much worse. These are JUST his own WORDS.

She is fighting for healthcare, education, housing and food programs,
and you call he 'evil'. She is the literal representation of ALTRUISM.

OMG, you're sounding like a mentally ill homeless guy.

No she didn't, she became a US citizen as a teen, because her father became a US citizen.

The specific law that allows foreign-born children to automatically become U.S. citizens when their parents naturalize is the Child Citizenship Act of 2000 (CCA), which is codified under Section 320 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA).

She could have lied about her age, but this (above) is what happened.
That's even the official story of your Trump regime. The rest is bullshit.
I expect this case to crumble, like most of Trump's cases.

Anyone of you following his case against the BBC?
"A Florida federal court recently issued a stern warning that the entire case could be dismissed due to his legal team's failure to cooperate with the discovery process." That's because in discovery, all evidence that Jack Smith collected about Trump's attempt to steal the election would be added to the case. That's all evidence that the BBC didn't engage in defamation, because their representation of his actions are entirely based on reality, even if they edited the video. It didn't impact Trump's reputation, because that's all on him.

Because accountability is important for protecting democracy.

You answered your own question: "It has no cash value".

A mail carrier or a thief cannot buy a sandwich or pay their rent with a ballot, because it has no cash value. Stealing one ballot has almost zero benefit to the person doing it.

• Ballots are strictly tracked: Mail-in ballots use specific barcodes (like tracking a package). Voters can look up exactly where their ballot is online, from the moment it is mailed out to the moment it is received and counted by election officials.

• Tamper-evident envelopes: Ballots are sent in heavy, official envelopes. If someone opens it or messes with it, it is immediately obvious to the election workers who receive it.

• Signature verification: Even if someone did manage to steal a ballot, they cannot just fill it out and send it in. Election officials verify the signature on the outside of the envelope against the voter's signature on file. If they do not match, the ballot is flagged and rejected.

• It is a federal crime: Stealing or tampering with mail is a felony, but tampering with an election carries even harsher federal prison sentences and massive fines.

Here are the key points to list that explain exactly how the system prevents and catches mass ballot theft:

• Unique, Localized Designs: You can't just print fake ballots in bulk. Every single county—and often individual precincts—uses highly specific ballot layouts, paper weights, colors, and exact dimensions. A machine will immediately reject an outside or duplicated ballot.

• The Envelope is a Security Device: Ballots must be returned in official government-issued envelopes. They feature specialized logos, strict design standards, and high-visibility identifiers (like the USPS Official Election Mail Logo). A random stack of plain envelopes would be instantly flagged.

• Individualized Barcodes: Every outbound and return ballot envelope features a unique Intelligent Mail barcode (IMb). If a criminal stole 100 ballots from a neighborhood, the moment they tried to submit them, the system would flag them because the individual barcode must match a specific registered voter on the state enrollment list.

• Immediate Deactivation: Because voters can track their ballots online, if a voter realizes their ballot never arrived, they report it. The election office instantly deactivates the stolen barcode and issues a new one. Even if the thief tries to mail the stolen one in later, it’s already dead in the system.

• The Signature Bottleneck: To steal ballots in large numbers, a criminal would have to successfully forge the unique signature of hundreds of different people. Election offices use automated and bipartisan human review teams to check every single signature against the voter's official file (like a driver's license signature). Massive batches of forged signatures are incredibly easy to spot.

In short: Stealing one ballot is useless, and trying to steal a thousand triggers an overwhelming amount of digital and physical alarms.

Republicans are spreading this message, that is objectively not true, for political reasons;
it allows them to take actions like cutting early voting periods, reducing the number of polling places or drop boxes, and implementing stricter ID requirements.
These restrictions disproportionately impact specific groups of voters (such as hourly workers, students, and minorities), making it physically or logistically impossible for some citizens to cast their ballots. By creating barriers that successfully block eligible citizens from participating, these actions fit the definition of preventing people from voting for their chosen representatives.

It's not even benefiting Republicans anymore. But they drilled that idea into your head,
and now they can't take it out, especially not with Trump attaching his entire identity to election fraud.

It also gives Trump the ultimate fallback: he can claim the Democrats cheated if he loses, while framing any of his own rule-bending as just preventing them from cheating.

Legally and constitutionally, Canada cannot become a full member of the European Union under the bloc's current framework, nor does it desire to do so.

• Canada is on the wrong continent: To join the EU, a country must be located in Europe. Canada is completely in North America. They are separated by the Atlantic Ocean, which instantly disqualifies Canada based on geography.

• Canada doesn't want to follow Europe's rules: Joining the EU means letting leaders
in Europe make a lot of your laws. Canada would have to change its laws to match Europe’s rules on things like courts, taxes, and trade. Canada is an independent country and has zero interest in giving up its power to European politicians.

• The "Open Borders" problem: Full EU members must allow citizens from any other EU country to move in, live, and work without a visa. Canada wants to keep control over its own immigration laws and borders rather than opening them up to all of Europe.

• The EU is not accepting new members easily: Changing the rules to let a non-European country join would require all 27 EU countries to vote "yes." Many European countries (like Germany and France) already blocked the mere idea of calling Canada an "associate member" because they didn't want to complicate their system.

If Democrats even stop things turning worse, that is progress.
It's impossible for them to do a worse job than Trump.

Anyway, I hope that they will spend lots of time on REVENGE.
It's justified, because Trump has used his presidency to keep him out of prison.
But unlike Republicans, they actually have plans to make things better.
You just don't like those things. You are very clear that you want life to suck.

'Bimbo Harris' is completely made up to justify voting for PED0PHILE TRUMP.

My evidence for calling Trump a ped0phile: Trump sues the shit out of everyone,
except the people who call him a ped0phile. That's because in discovery he has to release the remaining Epstein files, where his name occurs more often than Jesus
in the bible. The remaining files should be called the 'Trump files'.

Ted Nugent: Buyer’s Remorse?
only registered users can see external links

Maybe people checked TWO boxes?

Yes, corporate media! Which party destroyed all public and independent media, and gave all media a profit incentive? Which party did it's best to provide objective media, without a profit incentive, but with a system that supports journalistic integrity as much as possible?

AOC is NOT a millionaire and Nancy Pelosi is FAR from being a socialist. Pelosi is a corporate centrist Democrat, who takes lost of campaign donations from the wealthy. She hates progressives, leftists and socialists just as much as any Republican, because they are a threat to her wealth, that is based on corruption.
Just don't think that Pelosi's corruption is worse than any Republican's.

"Change is supposed to come from the top"? Who told you that? In history, change has almost always been fought, bled and died over. The only time you could say something like that was when your founding fathers wrote The Constitution, but don't think that the working class had nothing to do with that. People were fed-up with a ruling class sending them off to die in wars, and the elites were afraid to end up at the end of a pitchfork.

I am not against the EU in principle, but I am very much against how it is organized to favor the wealthy and corporations. The Socialist Party is also
not against European cooperation, but we fight against the EU power grab constantly, and fight for countries to retain their sovereignty and self-determination.

You are right about people's selfish nature. So, what makes people give up
their "what's in it for me?" reasoning, when they want to give up all their rights
as workers, their pension, their social safety net, to further enrich some wealthy assholes who think that they deserve everything they take, and YOU deserve nothing?

You might be smarter than you think, because you ask better questions than most. Your thoughts are very anti-establishment. I can relate to that, but why do you think that AOC is the establishment? She was despised by both parties, when voters made her a representative. Remember how she was dismissed as a stupid waitress? They spat on her as a peasant. And now she has some money, she is the establishment? Who told you this nonsense?

Let's say AOC will keep her current function for the next 40 years. Elon Musk makes the same money in 7 minutes and 46 seconds. And he went on stage
with a chainsaw joking about cutting government money. Since then, he got
$38 BILLION in total government funding, loans, subsidies, and tax credits.
AOC would need to keep her function for 218,391 years to earn that.

Your people are trapped by poverty, that is impossible to escape.
Your ideas are keeping lots of people in a state of survival, instead of a state of thriving. That doesn't just hurt them, it hurts your country. Poor people don't create wealth for your country and they don't consume a lot. The products that they do consume are mostly low quality, unhealthy food, which only benefits some producers and resellers, but those don't add much to your economy either.

This doesn't just make something more expensive when you go outside of the US.
It will make every product more expensive that isn't made in the US, or that was made with raw materials from outside of the US.

On top of that your president added the tariffs. It can be a good idea for products that you want to make in the US, but there are so many raw materials and products that you just don't have. That is hurting consumers and it is hurting manufacturing. It's making American products more expensive, which is impacting your export.

Republicans; free money for billionaires.

Humans would have been long extinct, if we hadn't worked together.
Our strength lies in solidarity. It's what makes us human.

First of all, Turning Point doesn't agree with you that high turnout is good for you. Turning Point's leadership has explicitly stated that their data shows general, untargeted high turnout is unpredictable. Instead, their entire multi-million dollar midterm strategy is focused on low-propensity voters.

Turning Point Action does not release formal statistical probability models. They are 100% an opinion based medium. They don't predict the election with percentages,
they are framing the midterms as an 'absolute emergency' for the MAGA movement.
That means that they are very worried.

That is completely the opposite of all historical data. Republicans always benefit
from low turnout and Democrats always benefit from high turnout.
That's why Republicans always try to limit voter turnout, by:
1. Limiting Mail-In and Absentee Voting
2. Implementation of Strict Photo ID and Citizenship Mandates
3. Aggressive Voter Roll Purges
4. Adjustments to Polling Access

Trump is now polling around 32% approval and 65% disapproval.
Traders place the probability of Democrats winning the House at 90%.
There is a 63% probability of a total Democratic Sweep.
Trump has a roughly 9% to 22% chance of keeping his full majority.

Inflation isn't the only mechanism at play in the loss of value of the dollar.
Besides inflation, there is also 'depreciation'; loss of value against other currencies.
Inflation means that you can buy less for your dollar in the US.
Depreciation means that you can buy less for your dollar outside of the US.
The dollar lost more than 10% of value against a broad basket of major global currencies since President Trump took office for his second term on January 20, 2025.

Yes, activism helps. Not a lot on a global scale all at once, but a lot of small changes make a massive difference to real people. I see this firsthand as a member of a small party here; we punch way above our weight because we actually mobilize people.

Everything you said about the IMF, debt traps, and the global economy has truth
to it. But treating it like an unchangeable 'death cult' means giving up before the fight even starts. Change has never come from the top down; it’s always pushed from the outside. The labor rights we have, environmental regulations, local consumer protections, none of that was handed down by benevolent bankers.
It was clawed back by cynical, tired voters who still chose to do something rather than shrug and say 'it's all a cartel.' Cynicism feels smart because it's never wrong about how bad things are, but it never built anything better either.

If they didn't think that your opinion matters, and they had it all in the bag, they wouldn't spend so much money on campaign ads for Republicans and corporate Democrats. They also wouldn't have the corporate media attack the left constantly. There's a good reason why the left is their enemy, and it's not to defend the rights of working people.

And why did you vote for Trump then, if everything better is impossible?
Trump promised to change EVERYTHING. If you really believed that nothing will help, why did that message resonate with you?

Or was it only that Trump shows his hate for all the people you hate?

You think that the government needs to spend NOTHING on average people and give the billionaires full control over everything, to punish people, if they
are not working hard enough. Where does that leave YOU?