| I was on a chat room early this afternoon and 2 members were having an argument about "minor children pics". One of the members was posting pics of very young people. In my opinion, they were not minor pics. The pics were young guys with shaved pubes hair but no minor. The member rejecting the pics was saying to other member to stop posting minor children's pics. I tried to settle the feud but not success.
The member posting the so-called minor children's pics claim the pics of the guys were 18 yrs old.
I would like to know what are minor children's pic
for you |
Members should aware that he was previously deleted by admin because he claimed to be under@ge. Maybe a more appropriate profile name should be Badluck!
--------------------------------------- added after 18 hours
It's laughable that Youngluck would blacklist me and write this reason.
• Trailer trash that talked about sex with her father and it grossed me out enough i blacklisted her after she continued even after i asked her to stop, I blacklisted her now she blacklisted me idc Seriously Grow up
Perhaps admin would verify that I have NEVER chatted with you. Youngluck, are you a confused little boy who likes to play games or are you simply a liar?
One is a bona fide artistic photographer whose work includes nudes, including nude children. This person is seeking guidelines to be sure his work doesn't cross over into pornography. Look up Jock Sturgis.
The other is pornographers who wish to make their work look "artistic" to avoid arrest.
I stay away from any "****" sht adverts or links!
--------------------------------------- added after 22 hours
A person claiming to be a paralegal (oops another lie) asking that question...
But they are being portrayed in 'typical' daily activities, and nothing sexual, in any way!
Personally I think nudist pics like this should never be published at all because you never know where these pics end up. But if they were to be published, then only when the persons have become of age and gave their explicit permission for publishing.
If their pictures are titled as such, saying they are under 18 OR they tell you in a conversation that they are under 18, then for all purposes, they are under 18 and should not be here. If you have knowledge that a member is under the age of 18, it is your responsibility to report that member.
/blogs/28976.html
/blogs/45442.html
--------------------------------------- added after 3 minutes
Sorry but I believe this is the "correct" information that you were intending to bring to attention.
only registered users can see external links
note that minor is defined as "under 18".
Current member: Youngluck2020 detected as possible previously banned members:
May be
Youngluck (#617664):
Deleted by admin, User claims to be under@ge
The other day you reported a member for comparing his manhood to that of a 13 year old. Three people voted to delete the guy based on your referral. I came along and disagreed. Members should not have to worry about being deleted for saying they are hung like a 13 year old. It's no different than someone saying they are hung like a horse or that they have balls the size of a bull. I also added that it was YOUR profile that was deleted by admin because of your claims to being under@ge.
You blacklisted me and called me "Trash". Whatever! Members need to be aware of YOU and be careful how they interact with YOU. YOU seem to be stirring things up and trying to entrap members into saying something that you could report them for. I can't imagine positive outcomes of members that interact with you.
TO ALL MEMBERS, BEWARE OF Youngluck2020
In the case of online websites, you must ab-hear to the rules of whatever country that website is hosted in. Also keeping in mind the laws of your own country.
Here is an article for you from us justice department - only registered users can see external links
New Comment Go to top