Page #31
Pages: #1... #26 #27 #28 #29 #30 #31 #32 #33 #34 #35 ...#43
New Comment Rating: -4 Similar topics: 1.American men? 2.nude 3.Donald Trump 45th President of United States 4.🎆 🇺🇸 HaPpY BiRtHdAy America!! 🇺🇸 🎆 5.The Nobel Peace Prize 🏅 Comments: | ||
You must be logged in to post here. Log in
Aubrey O'Day Reveals She Had Sex with Donald Trump Jr. for the First Time
in a 'Gay Club Bathroom'
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
So when we blame joe for jacking up gas prices, here is why we were and still are right to do so
edit and he is continuing that same shit,it is time to get A republican, hopefully Trump, back in the white house
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
and his weight as 215 lbs. That's obviously bullshit.
At his peak fitness, Muhammad Ali was 6'3 and his weight as 216 lbs.
On a photo, Trump is the exact length as Obama; 6'1.
New York Police reveal Donald Trump's weight is 270 lbs.
That's believable. But Trump lies about everything, even something this petty.
Trump is really a child for thinking anyone believes his nonsense.
But why should a County jail officer be allowed to record false data?
Would they record your height and weight according to your wishes?
Imagine the body cavity search, they will do to you, after you asked them.
to be such a childish liar?
So, you think Trump has the physique of Derek Carr?
only registered users can see external links
Nothing decent came from hollywood in years.
AI can come up with new topics, new looks new designs,unlike holywood that is reimagine,reboot,rewrite,rerun, screw em.
As for a living wage,quit trying to live above your means.
These living wages, the money comes from somewhere,not from the sky.So you make 20 bucks a hour bagging grocerys, it won't buy but the same amount of grocerys for your table that 5 bucks bought 2 years ago.
Case in point,a small can of mushroom peices and stems I bought yesterday for some spagetti sauce, was .62 cents a can last year, 1.62 now for the same damn amount,same qualtiy, but I guess the box handler got a .25 raise, the cashier got a .25 raise, and now we all INCLUDING THEM,have to pay more than double for the same can of mushrooms. Change mushrooms to dog food, bologna , gas,The money comes form somewhere.
And believe me, what AI will ever be able to create is boring as fuck.
Creative work will be the last thing that gets ever replaced by 'robots'.
But, we should make sure that not just the billionaires will benefit, when workers get replaced by robots. How do you propose to solve that problem? The way you handle it now, will result in pure luxury for a few and abject poverty and famine for the rest.
Would it be 'woke', to say to Hollywood: "I'm not watching your AI created garbage,
I'm just watching productions from real writers and real actors!"?
Or if this was 'woke', would you then say: "Fuck people, I'll watch that AI stuff, that only enriches two programmers and the CEO!"?
Any job that doesn't pay a living wage, should not exist. Why even have grocery baggers? Put your own damn groceries in a bag. Use the labor of people to do more meaningful things than something you can do yourself. Those prices of food are not caused by higher wages, but by food shortages. But, even if they were, I want the people making and transporting my food to be able to buy food too and a own a table in a home, where they can eat it. The fact that you have a problem with those high prices, is because the same people who are screwing low wage workers, have screwed you too. Everyone, no matter if they are able to work or not, should be able to live a decent life.
Please Show where it is written that you are "entitled" to a decent life"?
Animals born into the wild, must learn to walk,forage for food, find shelter, reproduce, all without help from other species or whatever.
It only seems humans are the 1's thinking they "deserve, or are entitled" to everything laid before them.
Help me out here.
They didn't even understand that slavery is a crime against humanity.
It's the enlightenment period and philosophy when humanity started to understand human value. I base my principles on humanism. That has no relation with religion, it is based on REASON.
It's very simple; I want a meaningful life. Other people are the same as me. Humanity has progressed enough to provide that meaningful life to everyone. Because we all share a common goal of a meaningful life, humanity has the responsibility to provide it to everyone.
Is this helpful to you? If not,:
- Do you NOT want a meaningful life?
- Do you NOT think other people also want a meaningful life?
- Do you think that humanity has NOT progressed enough to provide
that meaningful life to everyone?
- If humanity has progressed enough, does it NOT have the responsibility
to provide it to everyone?
only registered users can see external links
That answers my question:
"Or if this was 'woke', would you then say: "Fuck people, I'll watch that AI stuff, that only enriches two programmers and the CEO!"?"
I would certainly want to 'cancel' AI, if it destroys many jobs.
It looks like those writers are worried about AI taking their jobs,
but it's not in any way relevant yet. They are complaining about:
"I've been sellin' my soul, workin' all day"
"Overtime hours for bullshit pay"
only registered users can see external links
Gee I wonder why?
I think Trump would have done nothing to support Ukraine
and Putin would have just taken Ukraine and would have
murdered or imprisoned every Ukrainian who opposed him.
There is no reason for Putin to abandon his plans over Trump.
"Gee I wonder why?" Well, why do you think?
Just like the guy in the video, you have no reason.
You're just in a cult that idolizes a narcissist buffoon.
You accredit everything good that just happened, to him
and you deny anything bad that happened clearly due to his fault.
That is for females,not males.
Actually, it would be very interesting to see how medical science is progressing.
She went through enough pain to earn the identification of woman.
By the way, no one is claiming her sex is now women. We're talking about gender.
I know you don't understand the difference, but you don't understand many things.
You think this is an unfair contest too? If you want your ugly ass to contest those babes, I'm not stopping you. At least with sports you have a point. That requires rules.
Think about this: some of you are saying "Boys have a penis, girls have a vagina!".
Now surgeons can turn a penis into a vagina, it's the prostate that matters.
Until we find out they remove the prostate, then it doesn't matter anymore.
Then you will switch to genetics or whatever, which is also not accurate.
EVEN IF sex WAS 100% accurate, we are talking about SEXUAL EXPRESSION!!!
You would have to deny the existence of everyone who doesn't fit your definition of sex, in their sexual EXPRESSION, to make reality make sense.
If we medically examine you, you might be 100% male by all characteristics. BUT, you are still here, on a website showing off your genitals, to mostly other men. How is that MALE sexual expression? Are you sure that your behavior is not partly consistent with some of the 'alphabet'?
I think my medical examination would determine me 100% male too, but not all of my behavior is consistent with your interpretation of the sexes. At least one of those 'alphabet' letters applies to me, at least partly. I don't care much, but I understand that other people have one or several of those letters fit more or fully for them. It doesn't require me to assume they're all crazy or lied to, or whatever you lot are thinking.
like you.
Personally, I don't give a shit about Miss elections, but it's nice that this annoys
the crap out of right-wingers.
And yes I know I spelled them wrong
--------------------------------------- added after 73 seconds
You know who else thought that same way
Joe Biden
And even if it had, Freedom is worth it.
Yeah his thinking is sharp
of Clinton, it's Trump.
You all knew Trump was/is a record pervert, but voted for him anyway.
If you don't care about perverts being presidents, don't use it as an argument.
You started it. I'm just showing your hypocrisy.
The officials that allowed a trans to enter the contest need to be drug out into the street ,tarred and feathered and sent out of town on the back of a rabid horse.
A simple dna test would show, x and y or x and x.
a xy should not be in a contest with xx's. DUH.
She entered the contest as a transgender and probably has XY. Why do a test then?
Is that you admitting that you can only see the difference with a chromosome test?
Your arguments don't make sense. We know and we don't care.
Make an argument for why we should care.
Women have screamed equal rights for generations. Look at the debacle in Afghanistan with women's rights. But it's ok to put a man in a competition with women?
If women and men were the same there would have never been any division in the first place.
That was very clear in what I said.
Your argument is based on a premise that transgender women are men.
And you refer to chromosomes as a basis for your premise.
My argument is; they are women, despite having XY chromosomes,
XY chromosomes are related to biological sex and not sexual identity.
Make an argument for why I should care about XY chromosomes.
You're twisting women's rights too. Women's rights are HUMAN rights.
Whatever women's rights I support are based on human rights, which are
exactly the same, no matter your sex, gender, sexual identity, sexual orientation, chromosome composition, etc.. Those are EQUAL rights!
The human right I refer to is the right to not be discriminated, period.
There are differences between men and women that should be taken into account, to prevent discrimination, like physical strength, which differs IN GENERAL between the biological sexes, but those do not apply to a beauty pageant.
And your argument is bullshit; why would a 'man' have any advantage
in a competition on FEMININE BEAUTY? Are you mental?
Sex and gender have been the same thing for decades. Only recently has it be altered to fit the new agenda.
'Gender' is not an agenda, it's just listening to people.
Your side have called homosexuality a mental disease for ever.
It's not, it's just a biological variation that exist in nature.
only registered users can see external links
Biological identity is also a biological variation. We cannot ask animals
what gender they feel like, but we can observe that they behave differently
than other animals with the same sexual genetic characteristics.
That's why I don't care about XX and XY chromosomes, because they don't account for the variation in sexual orientation and sexual identity.
They are not even accounting fully for the sex organs.
You guys keep denying reality and refuse to even learn something.
That's why your arguments fall flat; they are based on ignorance.
And it's ignorance that you refuse to fix, by learning things.
You want to stick with your 1950's biology, when everything was simple.
Make it even easier for yourself, go back to alchemy and the four elements.
"The term gender had been associated with grammar for most of history and only started to move towards it being a malleable cultural construct in the 1950s and 1960s. Sexologist John Money introduced the terminological distinction between biological sex and gender as a role in 1955."
It's true that "up until the 2010's in the general populace, gender had an identical meaning to sex. Gender meant sex.". But people don't know anything.
That's why civilization developed science; to improve knowledge.
that you are desperately denying. You choose to reject facts.
" I don't care about XX and XY chromosomes"
THAT is the SCIENCE. Why are YOU in denial?
That is the concrete solid evidence.
not studys needed, the difference is obvious.
The brain and what it thinks, could be because it is deformed or something.
Some knowledge plateaued years ago and science proved there are 2 different sexes.
Why when they did up old bones do they not find a man trapped in a womans body?
it is male or female based on the makeup of the dna
only registered users can see external links
And they do not account for sexual orientation and sexual identity.
The genes for male sex organs aren't even located on the Y chromosome. That's why you can have XX males with all the male parts. However, They lack the azoospermia factor (AZF) region of the Y chromosome, which is essential for spermatogenesis; thus, they are incapable of producing sperm and are infertile. There are also XY females, and most of them are infertile too, but not all of them.
Chromosomes are about 98% accurate in determining sex.
Yes, the variations are rare, BUT SO ARE TRANSGENDER PEOPLE!!!!
Sexual orientation and sexual identity are not brain deformations, they are biological variations. Biological variations are a necessity for evolution.
But, you don't understand that either, so stop thinking you can make arguments based on science, if you don't understand any of it.
They do find bones of men with women's clothing or other attributes.
They do find bones of women in male clothing or armor too.
However, The biological differences in the brain between the sexes are tiny,
so you cannot determine the sex or gender from a bunch of bones.
The differences in the brain associated with SEX are ALSO NOT consistent. Sometimes they show the characteristics of a female, for a male person (sex by genitals or chromosomes) and sometimes the other way around. But when they investigate the brain of a transgender, their brain ALWAYS aligns PERFECTLY with the sex they identify with. That's absolute proof that the brain determines your sexual identity and not your chromosomes, genitals or gametes.
A transgender female has a female brain and a transgender male has a male brain. They literally have the wrong brain for the body they were born with. Can't you imagine how fucked up it would be, to be dealt that card?
If YOU are not interested in a video from a SCIENTIST, don't expect me to listen to grifter Ben Shapiro. If he's not straight-up lying, his arguments suck balls. That's why he speaks at 200% of normal speed, so you don't have time to think about his fallacious arguments.
You can recognize if someone speaks truthfully, when they are actually intending you to understand it. If you learn just 1 thing from my whole comment, this last tip would be in the realm of possibilities, I hope.
--------------------------------------- added after 13 hours
Ben Shapiro's RANK Hypocrisy EXPOSED
only registered users can see external links
while acknowledging the variations.
Are you able to listen to someone who explains his informed opinion?
Or will you continue to speak without any knowledge?
only registered users can see external links
You would have to say that there are several sexes, if you don't used 'gender' as a separate term.
Because then you could say: "This person is a male (sex) woman (gender), because she has XY chromosomes, but also looks like a woman and has a vagina, breast and a womb and she only found out that she's biologically male, when she had a chromosome test at age 50."
Otherwise you would have to say that there are male men, who look like a woman and have a vagina, breast and a womb.
It would have made her (or then his) husband gay, unknown to him.
Even if you don't agree, at least understand the arguments correctly.
New Comment Go to top