Become an expert in
pussy licking!
She'll Beg You For More!

Tired of ads
on this site?

Male Multiple Orgasm
Discover your full Abilities!

Get Paid For
Using Social Sites!

YouTube can be educational too (let's share videos)

Discussion Forum on Show Your Dick

Page #1

Pages:  #1   #2   #3   #4  

Started by Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 27,Sep,24 08:09  other posts
YouTube is the number one video-sharing platform in the world with more than 95% of the internet population using it. It provides videos ranging from silly pranks, heartwarming stories, news about the latest global issues, people's personal interests, information about cutting edge science, genuine debates between people who disagree but want to understand each other, lies to serve a political agenda, the ramblings of mentally ill people and everything in between.
YouTube has an algorithm that focuses on overall audience satisfaction, over providing people with a neutral, objective or balanced perspective on the world. It suggests videos based on how users with similar viewing patterns to your own reacted. It personalizes its recommendations based on channels to which you’ve already subscribed. This poses a risk of limiting people's access to information, that they didn't know they would have wanted to know.

I created this topic to exchange informative and educational videos with other people, who might have been algorithmically limited to other content than I am myself. I do suggest to limit this topic to informative and educational content, because there are already enough other topics for fun and questionable stuff.
Although politics and climate change can be categorized as informative and educational, there are already enough other topics debating politics and climate change. Science in general isn't political, neither is (or should) philosophy. Religion is associated with politics, but honest debates on this topic are not political, in my opinion. If you think these subjects are all terribly boring, I don't agree, but then this topic is not for you. That's OK.

New Comment       Rating: 0  


Comments:
By phart [Ignore] 07,Nov,25 19:11 other posts 
only registered users can see external links


By phart [Ignore] 06,Nov,25 12:18 other posts 
only registered users can see external links


By leopoldij [Ignore] 24,Oct,25 19:40 other posts 
Ananas2xLekker, I'm going to written the scope of this thread, if I may, and include items beyond YouTube.

Educational new article:
Has the Anthropocene Been Canceled?
by Ian Angus

Ian Angus illuminates the politics behind the decision by the International Union of Geological Sciences not to recognize the Anthropocene as a formal geological epoch. In recounting the debate, Angus explores how the organization undermined the conclusions of top scientists to oppose the establishment of the Anthropocene, and its implications for the public debate about the planetary crisis.

Link
only registered users can see external links

YouTube link
only registered users can see external links
--------------------------------------- added after 38 seconds

typo: written should be WIDEN
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 25,Oct,25 17:14 other posts 
Since this is more political than scientific, I think we shouldn't discuss it here.
For billions of years, we had ice ages and warm ages. The holocene and pleistocene were just the last ones. We should be heading towards an ice age, but the earth is warming. That is now called the Anthropocene. Denying it is political, not scientific.
By leopoldij [Ignore] 25,Oct,25 20:03 other posts 
My bad then. I found it interesting.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 26,Oct,25 07:20 other posts 
It's very interesting, but I just deleted phart's comment for it being too political.
I have to be unbiased.
By phart [Ignore] 26,Oct,25 08:16 other posts 
An·thro·po·cene
/ˈanTHrəpəˌsēn/
adjective
adjective: Anthropocene

relating to or denoting the current geological age, viewed as the period during which human activity has been the dominant influence on climate and the environment.
"we've become a major force of nature in this new Anthropocene epoch"

noun
noun: Anthropocene

the current geological age, viewed as the period during which human activity has been the dominant influence on climate and the environment.
"some geologists argue that the Anthropocene began with the Industrial Revolution"
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 27,Oct,25 06:21 other posts 
It's related to your own argument against climate change, which you have repeated several times: the average temperature of earth has been higher and lower many times, for billions of years.

Yes, we know. There were interchanging ice ages and warm periods, that scientists have several levels of evidence for. I will not go into all the evidence now, I will just mostly talk about the periods.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The first hot period of earth was 2 billion years long. That's when the earth was formed and after a collision with another planet, leaving it extremely hot, and creating the moon from the rubble in orbit colliding. The average temperature is estimated to be 160–210 °F (70–100 °C). It had intense volcanism, frequent asteroid impacts, and a dense greenhouse atmosphere (mainly CO₂, methane, and water vapor).

[The earliest signs of life are chemical signatures, microbial fossils, and geological structures, aging between 3.5 and 4.2 billion years ago. The earliest widely accepted, or "strong" evidence for life comes from microbial fossils found in rocks in Western Australia that are approximately 3.48 billion years old. This evidence consists of fossilized structures called 'stromatolites', which are layered rock formations created by communities of microorganisms.]

[Before the Great Oxidation Event, the sun was significantly less luminous. The planet was kept warm by an atmosphere rich in methane, a greenhouse gas many times more powerful than CO2.]

During the Great Oxidation Event (about 2.4 to 2.1 billion years ago), the emergence of photosynthetic cyanobacteria introduced free oxygen into the atmosphere. This triggered a chain of events that drastically reduced atmospheric methane concentrations. This resulted in the first ice age, during the Paleoproterozoic Era, called the Huronian glaciation "Snowball Earth".

During "Snowball Earth", there were less bacteria able to use photosynthesis, but there were already bacteria that could use oxygen. There was even some more complex life, like sponges. The periods of low oxygen, then the influx of oxygen from photosynthesis devastating anaerobic life, then ice covering the oceans and making photosynthesis hard, and the ice cap closing off the oceans lowering oxygen again, all forced life to constantly evolve.

After 300 million years, in local pockets of oxygen-rich water, newly adapted aerobic microbes, early eukaryotic cells and methanogenic microbes (converting hydrogen and carbon dioxide into methane and water), together with volcanic activity, the ice melted. It exposed darker surfaces (ocean and rock) that absorbed more solar heat, further accelerating the warming. This created a runaway greenhouse effect that rapidly ended the deep freeze.

The geological record immediately following the glaciation is marked by distinctive cap carbonates, layers of rock that indicate a sudden and drastic shift from extreme cold to a period of intense greenhouse warming. This "hothouse" phase was short-lived on a geologic timescale, as the increased weathering from the newly exposed land eventually helped draw down CO2 levels, allowing the climate to stabilize once again.

The end of the post-Huronian hothouse marked the beginning of a long period of planetary stability known as the "boring billion," which lasted until about 720 million years ago.
Life was then still mostly confined to the oceans and still consisted mostly of microscopic organisms. Life existed only on the edges of land near water, as bacteria and algae formed extensive mats in shallow marine environments. There was some forms of complex life, such as seaweed.

Then the Earth completely froze over again, the second "Snowball Earth" event, called the Sturtian glaciation. It was likely caused by a combination of factors. Continental breakup (the supercontinent Rodinia began breaking apart around 750 million years ago). This triggered large-scale erosion of newly exposed continental rocks. Weathering processes consume atmospheric carbon dioxide. A period of unusually low volcanic activity, further reducing the amount of CO2 being released into the atmosphere, contributing to the cooling effect.
Life continued to exist in deep ocean hydrothermal vents and possibly in meltwater pools or thin areas of sea ice.

The Sturtian glaciation, which occurred from approximately 717 to 660 million years ago, ended due to an extreme buildup of volcanic carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. Weathering of rock was suppressed, because of the ice.
The CO2 concentration reached extremely high levels, perhaps as much as 350 times present-day levels. This trapped an immense amount of heat, eventually overwhelming the ice's high albedo (reflectivity) and causing the planet to thaw.

Afterwards the CO2 plunged Earth into a period of intense heat. The post-Sturtian hothouse, was caused by a "supergreenhouse" climate. Earth's average global temperatures were extremely high, with some estimates suggesting average global temperatures soared to around 122°F (50°C). This period was eventually brought to an end by accelerated silicate weathering, which removed large amounts of CO2 from the atmosphere. The climate did not settle into a long, stable warm period but eventually slipped into the next major "Snowball Earth" event.
Marinoan Glaciation (around 650–635 million years ago).

Then Ediacaran Period (635–541 million years ago): A warmer, more stable period followed the Marinoan glaciation, allowing for the diversification of the first complex, multicellular organisms.

Paleozoic Icehouse (around 450–420 million years ago): A brief but intense glacial period during the Ordovician and Silurian periods, likely caused by a combination of continental drift and plant evolution pulling CO2 from the atmosphere. This the first time that life on land acted on the climate, instead of only the land (silicate weathering) itself.

Devonian Period, a "greenhouse" period (420-360 million years ago). The continents were first colonized by small plants and arthropods, but by the end of the period, the first forests had appeared, and the first vertebrates began to emerge from the water. The iconic Archaeopteris, a progymnosperm, grew into large trees with conifer-like trunks and fern-like leaves. It formed the first forests, with some trees reaching heights of 30 meters (98 feet). Other significant groups that appeared included lycophytes (clubmosses), horsetails, and ferns. By the end of the period, the first seed-bearing plants had also evolved, enabling them to reproduce more easily away from water. The increasing plant life, with its new root systems and decaying organic matter, created the first true soils, fundamentally changing the landscape. Animal fossils from this period include mites, spiders, scorpions, and myriapods (relatives of centipedes and millipedes). The oldest known insect fossils also date to the Early Devonian.
CO2 levels dropped steeply throughout the Devonian, partly due to the expansion of land plants, which sequestered carbon.

Late Paleozoic Icehouse (around 360–260 million years ago): This long icehouse included the Carboniferous and Permian periods and was characterized by lower atmospheric CO2. Unlike the "Snowball Earth" events of the Cryogenian period, the Late Paleozoic Icehouse was not a period of complete global glaciation. Regions closer to the equator, such as what is now North America and Europe, remained moist and tropical. These areas were dominated by vast rainforests, which later became the coal beds for which the Carboniferous period is named.

Mesozoic Hothouse (around 251–66 million years ago): A warm, ice-free period, primarily caused by high levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases, which trapped heat and drove global temperatures approximately 11 to 16°F (6 to 9°C) warmer than it is today. It was the era of the dinosaurs.

Approximately 66 million years ago, a 10-kilometer-wide asteroid struck Earth in the Yucatán Peninsula, creating the 200-kilometer-wide Chicxulub crater. The impact contributed to the mass extinction with global wildfires, massive earthquakes and tsunamis and extreme acid rain. The immediate effects were devastating, but the longer-term environmental consequences proved fatal for most life on Earth. The impact ejected immense amounts of dust, debris, and ash into the atmosphere, creating a thick, planet-encircling shroud. This blocked sunlight from reaching Earth's surface for months or even years. The blockage of solar energy caused global temperatures to plummet. Some studies indicate that average global temperatures dropped by as much as 47°F (26°C). It's important to distinguish this event from the long ice ages driven by changes in Earth's orbit and atmospheric gases. The impact winter was a brief but catastrophically intense event that happened over years, not millions of years.

After the devastation, life entered a new era of opportunity and recovery, leading to the rapid diversification of surviving groups. The disappearance of the dinosaurs left many ecological niches vacant, which paved the way for mammals and other organisms to flourish.

Cenozoic Icehouse (around 34 million years ago to present): Earth's current climatic state, characterized by polar ice sheets and glacial cycles. It was initiated by tectonic shifts that caused the formation of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current and the uplift of mountain ranges, increasing weathering and pulling CO2 from the atmosphere.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I now described the whole of Earths history in which the climate fluctuated over billions of years, hundreds of millions of years and tens of millions of years, due to geological effects on greenhouse gasses, combined with very long term effects of primitive life that did not evolve into a stable ecosystem. The climate of Earth was dominated by those early geological effects, that have mostly come to rest now.
Today's biosphere plays a powerful role in regulating the climate through the carbon cycle. Plants and soil act as important carbon sinks, taking in CO2, while other biological processes release it.
In summary, the transition from geological to biological dominance of climate was a long, complex, and chaotic process. Early life repeatedly caused catastrophic climate changes, showing a lack of stabilizing feedback. It was the evolution of more complex, integrated ecosystems over billions of years that led to the kind of biological balance we see today, though this balance is now being rapidly disrupted by human activity.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Modern Ice Ages (last 2.6 million years to present): A series of glacial and warmer interglacial periods driven by Milankovitch cycles (Earth's orbital variations). We are currently in a warmer interglacial period. Those periods are not measured in billions of years, hundreds of millions of years and tens of millions of years.
These cycles of glacial advance and retreat have occurred approximately every 100,000 years.

Last Glacial Period (c. 115,000 to 11,700 years ago): The most recent major cold period saw massive ice sheets cover much of North America, Europe, and Asia.

Current interglacial: Holocene Epoch (11,700 years ago to present).
This is the warm, stable interglacial period we live in today, following the retreat of the last great ice sheets.

The whole evolution of humans into a civilization has been going on in this stable interglacial period. All of the history, with extreme cold and extreme heat has been occurring at a pace of about 1000 times slower than the 'Modern Ice Ages', which
by itself are 10 times slower than the complete history of human civilization.
And now finally, we come to the Anthropogenic influence, the effect of human activities on the environment and the climate. About 10,000 years ago the effect of humanity was negligible, because there were between 1 and 10 million people. They did some agriculture and deforestation. The Earth's CO2 concentration was mostly very stable, around 275 ppm to 280 ppm.

Still, our effect on the Earth increased, due to our CO2 emissions. The population around 1600 AD was approximately 545 to 579 million people. Then around around 1610 AD, there was a sharp, short-lived dip in global CO2 levels, called the "Orbis spike" caused by the Great Dying, the massive depopulation of Indigenous peoples
in the Americas due to European colonization, disease, and conflict. The resulting reforestation of former agricultural lands absorbed significant amounts of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.

Scientists can measure this very accurately, with Antarctic ice core sampling,
because it's such recent history on a geological timescale. The CO2 concentration dropped from 285 ppm to below 275 ppm. This effect is pinpointed as the start of
the Anthropocene epoch, because it allows science to clearly measure the effect
of human activity.

only registered users can see external links

Scientists can also clearly measure the effect of the Industrial Revolution, starting around 1800 AD. The Ice core analysis clearly shows the massive CO₂ increase from fossil fuels. The global average CO2 concentration in 1800 AD was approximately 280 ppm. By 1850 the CO2 concentration was 290 ppm and by 1900 it was 295.7 ppm. By 1950, the CO2 concentration start to accelerate. It was 310 ppm on 1950, but the next 50 years it rose to 369 ppm. We are now in 2025 and the CO2 concentration today is 426.24 ppm.

The last time the CO2 concentration was over 425 ppm was roughly 3 million years ago during the Mid-Pliocene Warm Period. Humans created that in 75 years.

Humans are a biological organism. If we emit CO2, which is changing the climate,
that is just as valid of an 'epoch' as when primitive microorganisms emitted O2, causing the Great Oxidation Event (about 2.4 to 2.1 billion years ago).

There is nothing political to any of this, this is just science.
If there are now pressures to cancel the Anthropocene as a recognized epoch,
that in my opinion is political, which is why I cannot discuss it here,
because I would be violating my own terms of this topic.
By leopoldij [Ignore] 26,Oct,25 12:58 other posts 
I'm laughing out loud that phart reacted by saying "it's too complicated" and that i should link "normal" things.

I honestly don't know what he means by normal and honestly don't find articles like this complicated. All you need is English reading skills and ability to concentrate for a few minutes.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 27,Oct,25 07:59 other posts 
I can agree that this topic is pretty damn complicated.
But TOO complicated? For what? It's not 'rocket science'.
This is what ChatGPT says about its complexity.

Elementary School (Grades K–5)
Level: Basic conceptual understanding
Focus: Observations and simple cause-effect ideas
Explanation Level: Students can understand that the Earth’s temperature can change over time.
They learn simple ideas like “the Sun warms the Earth,” “plants and animals depend on certain temperatures,” and “pollution can make the air dirty and affect the planet.”
Teachers might introduce the greenhouse effect as a “blanket” that keeps Earth warm.

Middle School (Grades 6–8 )
Level: Intermediate understanding — introduction to systems
Focus: Earth systems and feedback loops
Explanation Level: Students can begin to understand greenhouse gases (like CO₂ and methane) and how they trap heat.
They’re introduced to the carbon cycle (how carbon moves between air, water, plants, animals, and rocks).
Geological history can be introduced as “Earth has had warmer and colder periods in the past” — e.g., ice ages, volcanic activity, and asteroid impacts.
Can handle simple charts showing CO₂ and temperature correlations over time.

High School (Grades 9–12)
Level: Advanced — systems-level understanding
Focus: Quantitative and process-based reasoning
Explanation Level: Students can study the greenhouse effect in detail (infrared absorption, radiation balance, albedo).
They learn geologic time scales and how events like volcanic eruptions, continental drift, and mass extinctions affected global climate.
Biological feedbacks (e.g., photosynthesis lowering CO₂, ocean acidification) can be explored.
Students may look at data analysis: ice core records, CO₂ trends, isotopic evidence of past temperatures.

College Level (Undergraduate Earth Science, Environmental Science, or Geology)
Level: Full systems complexity
Focus: Interdisciplinary, modeling, and quantitative analysis
Explanation Level: Students learn about climate modeling, paleoclimate reconstruction, plate tectonics and CO₂ cycles, Milankovitch cycles, and biogeochemical feedbacks.
They can integrate geological, chemical, and biological processes to understand Earth’s long-term temperature regulation.
Understand how greenhouse gases, biological productivity, and tectonic activity jointly determine Earth’s average temperature.

What we are discussing is at maximum High School level.
By leopoldij [Ignore] 27,Oct,25 21:40 other posts 
Thanks for checking and for confirming what I said. I didn't expect phart to react this way. In any case, when I post something I don't really consider the possibility that phart may find it complex..
By phart [Ignore] 28,Oct,25 08:34 other posts 
Well, part of the reason it may seem complicated to me is alot of this stuff i am not interested in, therefore i don't take time to study it. literature and environment stuff, is of little practical use in daily life.
How often does a person use Shakespeare in daily life for example? Or i could fart in a jar and eat tofu and drink spring water and the air i breath will still be polluted from Canadian forest fires. nothing i can really do for it so why worry about it or study about it?
By phart [Ignore] 26,Oct,25 08:17 other posts 
leo, honest question here, have you ever found anything NORMAL to be interesting?

You know,something useful,like how to build a better bridge or something?

Everything you link to is complicated literature or words that folks have to google to just know what they mean.
By leopoldij [Ignore] 26,Oct,25 12:54 other posts 
I don't find anything i link too complicated. I don't now what complicated means. If it's Chaucer-era English, sure, it can be complicated. But everything i post is pretty straightforward English that can be read by anyone with school knowledge. Keep in mind that English is not my native tongue, so what you consider complicated may not be the same as what I do.

Moreover, I posted a good Bridge, as you call it. I repeat it:

---

Ian Angus illuminates the politics behind the decision by the International Union of Geological Sciences not to recognize the Anthropocene as a formal geological epoch. In recounting the debate, Angus explores how the organization undermined the conclusions of top scientists to oppose the establishment of the Anthropocene, and its implications for the public debate about the planetary crisis.

---

This says it all. It's about a geological period, the current one, and how some people don't recognise it. When you read this blurb you immediately recognise what the article is about. When you read the article you get more information. Pretty straightforward.

Also, you have the option not to read.
There are many 'normal' things that I find interesting, like what programs as
'How It's Made', 'MythBusters', 'Dirty Jobs', car shows, creativity competition shows, many home renovation shows, cooking and baking shows, some traveling shows, some gameshows, a little bit of sports occasionally (Formula 1, snooker, darts) and some business shows (mostly on BNR radio during commuting). And on Youtube, several gaming channels.

I just like a lot of things that might be less 'normal' for most people, like discussions
on religion, politics, economics and philosophy (specializing on logical reasoning)
and developments in science in many fields, but not all.

I just want to know how the universe and the world works.
It's also goal of self improvement, and to improve the world around me.
By phart [Ignore] 27,Oct,25 10:16 other posts 
I can agree with some of what you post, but poor ol leo, sometimes i wonder if he is the 1 guy in the neighborhood that is dressed for the renaissance festival 365 days a year and speaks to people like he is reciting Shakespeare while sipping on a 8 dollar cup of coffee from starbucks.
it's like he has no curiosity adventure seeking in his gut. Has poor ol leo ever changed a light bulb or does he call his landlord at 2 am?
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 27,Oct,25 11:08 other posts 
If I look at his personal page, I see a lot of curiosity adventure seeking.
By phart [Ignore] 27,Oct,25 12:43 other posts 
well,in regards to 1 subject.

I haven't had any adventures in a long time. and like i mentioned before, i don't know if i can trust anyone to ever go that far again after my past experiences. i know i am missing out and i am sure leo would fill me in on what, but some of our discussions here are NOT sex related and that was where i was going with my statement.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 05,Nov,25 11:34 other posts 
I think leopoldij is curious about more things, because he demonstrates knowledge on many subjects. That doesn't just happen.

I hear the loss of trust in humanity in everything you say. You will not learn to trust people again, while staying away from everyone, as much as you can.
There are lots of good people everywhere. It's worth the risk to try to meet them.
Just understand that people don't like you, if you show them that you don't like them. Approach people in a friendly, open manor and most of them respond friendly and openly.

I became active in politics, as much for self improvement as for improving the world around me. I have always been an introvert, but my job taught me to deal with it. The challenges of political activities have taught me more. I will never become an extrovert, but I can put myself in a more extrovert state of mind.

Maybe you could find some Rotary Club, Lions Club, Community garden, hunting/fishing club, local hiking or survival group. There is a movement growing of Men’s sheds, spaces where men do woodworking or repair projects together. There are also clubs where people tinker with old computers. Most of those places are not ideal to meet women, but it starts with meeting people. You need to be around people to start trusting them again. Social circles are better places to find reliable women, because the 'bitches' get kicked out of social circles. If you try to find a woman on the internet, it could be one of those 'bitches', who is looking for another man to scam or abuse.
By phart [Ignore] 05,Nov,25 14:08 other posts 
That's why I don't curse you and call you bad names Ananas, you are logical in alot of ways.
I do have a small circle i travel in you could say but most have always been older than myself up until recently.
So many people i have interacted with and considered good friends are now dead sadly.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 06,Nov,25 11:38 other posts 
Thanks. I try to be logical, as much as possible, except for some presuppositions (fundamental, foundational beliefs). Those presuppositions are not supernatural, but I cannot prove them to be objective truths or facts. Everyone has them.
The most basic one is accepting that reality is true. We all could be brains in
a vat or code on some computer. It's impossible to disprove those things, but
I presuppose that they are not, or it's impossible to have any opinions or goals
in the world we find ourselves in, at all.

Sad to hear that your circle is shrinking. Do you think any of my proposals are viable?
By phart [Ignore] 06,Nov,25 11:46 other posts 
some yes, But until my health improves ,hopefully after about this time tomorrow, i will remain less interactive with others.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 06,Nov,25 11:55 other posts 
Tomorrow? Best of luck to you.
I hope you can report a vast improvement of your quality of life, very soon.


By phart [Ignore] 04,Nov,25 18:00 other posts 
only registered users can see external links
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 05,Nov,25 10:38 other posts 
Do I need to care about his story? This happens all the time now.
But, that's too political to talk about here.
By phart [Ignore] 05,Nov,25 14:11 other posts 
it's not the "story" persay I want you to at least glance at as much as the point he is making about the fact money is being drained from people under the guise of a cause that is not applied towards the cause but being crammed in pockets
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 06,Nov,25 10:07 other posts 
Your whole legal system is riddled with questionable laws related to money being drained from people under the guise of a cause. Read about your bond system
and asset forfeiture. You support those systems.

Why do you accept ideas from him, that you reject from anyone else?
By phart [Ignore] 06,Nov,25 10:32 other posts 
No i do not accept asset forfeiture in most cases unless a serious crime has been commited.
MY point is these laws need to be changed.But liberals would never think of doing that because it would cut off their gravy train of easy money.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 06,Nov,25 10:50 other posts 
The problem with asset forfeiture is that it happens in most cases BEFORE the crime has been proven in court. Cops take advantage of it, by taking stuff from suspects, that they don't even have to return after the suspects has been found NOT GUILTY.

This article from 2017, that claims that Attorney General Jeff Sessions returned to a practice of aggressively pursuing asset forfeiture cases.
only registered users can see external links

Many instances involve no conviction. For example: “In turn, 77 percent of those [federal cash] seizures were accomplished through a process that does not require either an arrest or a conviction.”
only registered users can see external links

December 12, 2024, U.S. Senators Cory Booker (D-NJ) and Rand Paul (R-KY) introduced the Fifth Amendment Integrity Restoration (FAIR) Act to reform civil forfeiture laws and protect Americans’ rights from government abuse. If it had passed, it would have overhauled the federal civil forfeiture regime. The FAIR Act would raise the burden of proof for forfeitures, end the “equitable sharing” program, redirect forfeiture proceeds, provide more due-process protections, etc.
only registered users can see external links

Don't point to liberals without evidence. We are not doing politics here. This topic is about facts, evidence and logical argumentation. If you are just making political claims without any factual support, I will just delete it.

Jeff Sessions is a Republican, who used this "gravy train of easy money".

I support a very simple principle; People are not punished for a crime, until a judge finds them guilty. If there is a risk that a suspect will flee or commit other crimes,
they should await trial in jail. I see no reason to make their freedom until that time dependent on how much money they have.
If there is a suspicion of criminal proceeds, there is a good case for seizure of the assets, but those should be secured until a judge decides if these are indeed criminal proceeds or not. If there is no good case for the assets being criminal proceeds,
they should be returned in full. Stealing is wrong, so the government should not steal.
By phart [Ignore] 06,Nov,25 11:33 other posts 
I can't totally disagree with your statements, we could easily find middle ground on that subject forfeiture.

What bugs me is if I have more than 2 months earnings in my pocket during a traffic stop it can be "arrested" and taken under the guise of me being a drug dealer. and it cost alot to get the money back ,which deters most people from trying. I prefer to pay cash for stuff,as i did my last truck purchase and etc.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 06,Nov,25 11:50 other posts 
That's you being treated like a criminal, before a court finds you guilty.
We have been talking about 'Due Process' before.

The principle that a person is presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law is a fundamental concept in the U.S. criminal justice system. While not explicitly stated word-for-word, it stems from the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution.

The Fifth Amendment requires due process from the federal government, while the Fourteenth Amendment extends this requirement to state and local governments. The Supreme Court has interpreted "due process" to mean the government must prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, establishing the presumption of innocence. The burden of proof is on the prosecution, and the defendant does not have to prove their innocence.

The relevant portion of the Fifth Amendment states that no person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.
Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment, applicable to state and local governments, states in its relevant part that no State shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.


By phart [Ignore] 06,Nov,25 11:44 other posts 
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links


By leopoldij [Ignore] 05,Nov,25 19:05 other posts 
only registered users can see external links

This video, aimed at beginners in Hegelian philosophy, does a marvelous job of elucidating some of his principal ideas. Hegel’s most recondite and formidable conceit resides in the dialectical auto-unfolding of Geist, wherein each ostensibly antithetical moment is not an aberration but a sine qua non in the teleological actualization of Reason. The manifold phenomena of reality are subsumed within a self-mediated totality, whose intelligibility is apprehended solely through the reflective peregrinations of thought, whereby thesis and antithesis are inexorably sublated into synthesis, culminating in the apotheosis of the Absolute.


By phart [Ignore] 04,Nov,25 16:02 other posts 
Well, here is how your mail order girl friend is made!
only registered users can see external links

Doesn't appear to be very serviceable because the voice box is embedded in the tits before they are molded!
By leopoldij [Ignore] 05,Nov,25 01:57 other posts 
I didn't know that this is the way melania trump was made!
Very interesting. Do they need a back office worker for innovation?
They could do so much more with the electronics. I guess they are not cheap,
so you would expect at least the functionality of a $100 Xiaomi tablet.
I would have so many ideas to improve their products.

Still, I wouldn't mind owning one, but they are a bit difficult to hide, if you already have
a girlfriend.
By phart [Ignore] 05,Nov,25 14:29 other posts 
Yes,I agree there is SO much more could be done with these and I think Real Dolls in California does alot more as they have AI interaction and the dolls can interact using the internet as a source of info to carry on conversations and such. I could never afford 1 but if could i would rather wait until they were more robot than doll. "come to me darling". or "babe,can you bring me a glass of milk?". "can you change into your Daisy dukes and let's go for a drive?"
that type thing. More fun, instead of just a woman shaped thing to hump


By CAT52! [Ignore] 05,Nov,25 13:39 other posts 
He doesn’t give a crap about us.
only registered users can see external links


By Lookatmine2 [Ignore] 29,Oct,25 15:33 other posts 
only registered users can see external links
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 31,Oct,25 03:49 other posts 
It saddens me that you consider this educational,
but it saddens me more that I must agree.
By Lookatmine2 [Ignore] 31,Oct,25 05:06 other posts 
Don’t be sad. Be happy. You learned something new.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 31,Oct,25 05:10 other posts 
True, I don't know anything about firearm maintenance.
I hope to never need it either, but the future isn't bright.
By Lookatmine2 [Ignore] 31,Oct,25 05:31 other posts 
“It’s better to be a warrior in a garden, than it is to be a gardener in a war.” - Sun Tzu
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 31,Oct,25 06:26 other posts 
Like I said, the future isn't bright, but envisioning a dark future
creates a self-fulfilling prophecy.


By Lookatmine2 [Ignore] 31,Oct,25 05:10 other posts 
only registered users can see external links
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 31,Oct,25 05:17 other posts 
Do you watch other videos on YouTube, than everything gun related?
I see you live in the US, but in The Netherlands, people who become fascinated
by gun videos would be a source of concern to their families.


By phart [Ignore] 28,Oct,25 08:36 other posts 
only registered users can see external links

I just learned the reason wood is pinching my blade, the rising plate is missing! i rebuilt both of my table saws from salvage units and didn't realize it was missing. off to ebay i go to find 1.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 29,Oct,25 07:40 other posts 
That's a very useful instructional video for table saws. Thanks!

Personally, I don't have a table saw. I let the Hardware store cut the wood for me, or I go to my brother, who has a professional table saw, for fabricating frames, doors and furniture.
But anyone who touches one, should watch your video first, at least.

The most important safety instruction for table saws, is to never lose your focus
on what you are doing. If you are too sleepy, sick or stressed out, better not use it, because that's when accidents happen.
By phart [Ignore] 29,Oct,25 08:34 other posts 
yep,when i got the first 1 finished rebuilt, i had a board fly back at me, missed me by 1/2 inch, woulda punched me right in the side of my chest,
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 30,Oct,25 13:22 other posts 
Was it lack of experience or lack of focus?


New Comment   Go to top

Pages:  #1   #2   #3   #4  



Show your Genitals