I would have chosen a different picture (like the two left-side pics in row 10 of your album), but here goes.

Cock: Smooth shaft; the head is a bit short from tip to ridge, but the ridge is nicely defined; erection could be stronger. Grade: A-

Composition: Focus and lighting are excellent; cropping should be just a bit tighter; angle of view could be better (e.g., side view with shirt pulled up). Grade: A-

Cock: Powerful shaft, nicely smooth; appears to have a side-bend, which detracts; head is nicely shaped but a bit narrow in proportion to the shaft; strong erection. Grade: A-

Composition: Focus, lighting, and angle of view are all just a bit off; cropping is good. Grade: B

Have I graded yours already, or was that thanks in advance?

Cock: Attractive shaft that shows better (smoother) in the second pic than the first; proportional head with a prominent ridge; strong erection. Grade: A

Composition: Focus and cropping are very good; lighting a bit dim in places; angle of view is fine (but a side-view would be better). Grade: A

Cock: Attractively smooth and hefty shaft; slight side-bend detracts a bit; head is well-shaped, but not completely proportional to the thick shaft; bonus for trimmed hair. Grade: A-

Composition: Lighting and cropping are excellent; focus is a bit soft; angle of view is ok, but a side-view would show you better. Grade: A

Cock: Sturdy shaft with interesting veining; perfectly proportioned head, with a sharply-defined ridge; strong erection, with an attractive upward arc; bonus for shaved hair. Grade: A+

Composition: Excellent angles of view; lighting is dim on the first pic but excellent in the second; cropping should be a bit tighter; focus is soft. Grade: A-

The picture quality makes it a bit difficult to judge, but here goes.

Cock: Powerful and attractive shaft; head is nicely proportioned and has a well-shaped ridge; strong erection; bonus for trimmed hair. Grade: A+

Composition: Angle of view is good; lighting is ok; could be cropped tighter; focus is quite soft. Grade: B

Judging this one:
[deleted image]

Cock: Beautiful smooth shaft; the head is perfectly shaped and perfectly proportioned, with an excellent ridge; bonus points for shaved hair. Grade: A+

Composition: Focus, angle of view, and cropping are all excellent; lighting is ok, but some shadowing detracts just a bit. Grade: A+

I don't generally grade soft cocks, and I'd want to see the head regardless. Please submit a different pic for me to judge. Sorry!

Cock: Shaft is attractively smooth and robust; side-curve detracts slightly; head is nicely-shaped, but it's not quite proportional to the thickness of the shaft, and the ridge could be more pronounced. Grade: A-

Composition: Lighting is good; focus a bit soft; cropping is ok but could be tighter; a side-view would be a better angle. Grade: A-

I'm getting this message when I try to see it full-size: "This is a private image meant not for you, so you cannot see it."

Sorry, but I can't judge your cock fairly. (Looks like it might score quite well, however.)

Cock: Smooth sturdy shaft; head is perfectly proportional and has a well-defined ridge; seems to be a very strong erection (especially for an oldster!), but a hands-off shot would prove it; bonus for the clean-shaven look. Grade: A+

Composition: Focus, lighting, and angle of view are all excellent; cropping is good, but could be a bit tighter. Grade: A+

Looks like it would score quite high, but none of your pics show the whole cock clearly enough to judge. Sorry!

Judging this one:
[deleted image]

Cock: Exceptionally attractive shaft - especially the veining; head is nicely shaped and proportional, but the ridge could be a bit more prominent; very strong erection (though a hands-off shot would confirm it). Grade: A+

Composition: Focus, cropping, lighting, and angle of view are all excellent; a hands-off shot, without the prop, would be better. Grade: A

Powerful shaft, smooth and attractive; nicely shaped head that's well-proportioned to the shaft (though the ridge could be a tad more prominent); strong erection. Grade: A (Probably an A+ if I could see it with better focus.)

Composition: Lighting and cropping are quite good; angle is a bit confusing (are you lying down?); focus is soft. Grade: B+

Since some of the pictures in your album aren't you, I'll comment on this pic:
[deleted image]

Cock: Nice smooth shaft, with subtle veining; head is well-proportioned and attractively shaped, with a prominent ridge; bonus for shaved hair. Grade: A

Composition: Lighting, cropping, and angle of view are all good; focus is quite soft. Grade: A-

None of your pics has a good view of your whole cock, but here goes.

Cock: Smooth and robust shaft, with nice veining; points deducted because the head is hidden behind the foreskin; a bit of hair-trimming would show you a lot better. Grade: B

Composition: Some shots have good lighting and focus, but the angles of view don't show your cock at its best. If you take more pictures, go for a side-view of your fully-erect cock (foreskin retracted) while standing or kneeling. Grade: B

Cock: Attractive thick shaft; head is nicely proportional and has a prominent ridge; bonus for shaved hair; deduction for less-than-full erection. Grade: A

Composition: Very good lighting; cropping could be a bit tighter; focus is soft; angle doesn't show you as well as in the last pic of your album. Grade: B

Black guys are biggest, on the average; but black cocks are no more and no less handsome than other races. If someone is primarily interested in size, they're going to be big fans of black cock.

I'm attracted to aspects of a cock's appearance besides size. So a shorty can get a very high grade from me on this thread because of such things as symmetry, the head being a classic shape with a prominent ridge, and the erection pointing up at a high angle. Conversely, a very large cock might get a lower mark for having a curve, a less-than-full erection, or a head that's small in proportion to an impressively-thick shaft.

Thanks!

Commenting on this one:
[deleted image]

Cock: Nice sturdy shaft, smooth, with good veining; head is nicely shaped, with a prominent ridge, but it's not proportional to the thickness of the shaft; seems to be a strong erection (though I can't tell if it's >90 degrees of elevation because of the angle of view). Grade: A

Composition: Very good lighting, cropping, and focus; angle of view is fine, but a side-view would be nice; a larger-sized pic would show you better. Grade: A

Cock: Attractive smooth shaft, nicely erect (especially for an oldster!); head is well-shaped, proportional to the shaft, and has a nicely-defined ridge. Bonus points for a strong erection at age 73. Grade: A+

Composition: Good angle of view and cropping; some glare detracts a bit; focus is soft. Grade: A-

Click on "show it in a blog or forum" and cut&paste the "UBB code". Like this:

[deleted image]


Cock: Attractive smooth shaft with interesting vein structure; head is well-formed, with a good ridge, but could be just a tad wider for best proportion with the shaft; good erection in some pics. Grade: A

Composition: Lighting and angles of view are generally good; cropping is ok (except for leaving in the pizza box!); a side view of a strong erection would be welcome; focus is a bit soft on most. Grade: A-

Cock: Exceptionally robust shaft that's nicely smooth and subtly veined, but not completely symmetrical along its length (slight bulge at the center); head is well-proportioned to the thick shaft, with a nicely defined ridge; strong erection; bonus for shaved hair. Grade: A+

Composition: Lighting, cropping, and angles of view are all quite good; focus is just a bit soft. Grade: A

I would have chosen a different picture from your album - specifically the first one - but that's ok.

Cock: Attractive smooth and sturdy shaft; head has a nice prominent ridge, but the overall shape is partially obscured by your thumb. Grade: A-

Composition: Good lighting and cropping; focus is a bit soft; angle of view is ok, but I prefer a side-view; hands-off would have been better. Grade: A-