Page #100
Pages: #1... #95 #96 #97 #98 #99 #100 #101 #102 #103 #104 ...#200|
Started by #610414 [Ignore] 14,May,20 02:51
New Comment Rating: 3 Similar topics: 1.Food stuff 2.STUFF, JUST STUFF 3.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF 4.A Forum Topic 5.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF II Comments: | ||
You must be logged in to post here. Log in
only registered users can see external links
"Some prosecutors and law enforcement leaders argue that the shift away from a more punitive approach for juveniles toward intervention programs and rehabilitation has gone too far.
Bronx District Attorney Darcel Clark, a Democrat — who once supported a 2017 New York law ending the automatic prosecution of 16- and 17-year-olds as adults, raising the age to 18 — now wants to prosecute more gun possession cases in criminal court."
only registered users can see external links
Traditional discipline has widened inequities. Black children often are suspended or expelled at rates far higher than white children. Research has found that these discipline disparities can have lifelong consequences for children, such as worsened educational outcomes and higher rates of incarceration.
CAT
What truth exactly? The fact that traditional discipline makes it worse? The fact that WOKE methods brought forth by liberal thinking educators are the way to go? Tell us, Phart. Tell us your truth.
👿
Remember all the crime?
Somethings not working and it's high time the liberals understood that villages don't put out the best results either.
Why should your child be disruptive, attack the teacher or whatever, which in turn disrupts my child's education ,be allowed to sit right back down and there be no accountability?
the facts are the children being born now are of over medicated and doped up parents and have mental issues born right in. They will never integrate with society regardless of a punishment method. Kick em out ,leave em out and virtual home school them instead.
Not to change the subject, but, how many children dou you have, Phart?
MORE found by the DOJ!
Um, how long can the white house run with the umbrella over his head before it trips and biden gets wet?
"“took for further review personally handwritten notes from the vice-presidential years,”
only registered users can see external links
Here's ye proof that conservatives have a sense of humor!
only registered users can see external links
It's getting soooo tiring. One more time. When will we get deliverance.
only registered users can see external links
showing women without and with makeup.
Well, in many cases I like them without makeup.
I don't understand why they have to hide their natural looks.
I'm much more attracted to natural and ordinary looking women.
Makeup has unhealthy stuff in it to.
And bondo as I call it,don't help some people regardless of how much they put on.
only registered users can see external links
Mi piacce la musica! Grazie.
only registered users can see external links
He's over the Moon. 🤣😈
I couldn't read the page you sent, it requires an app and I won't download an app,
but I found the news elsewhere.
His wife, Anca Faur, about 63 years old.
30 years difference. Good age gap.
only registered users can see external links
Wow.
But on the subject, why even bother at his age?
--------------------------------------- added after 97 seconds
BTW. I married Charlie in 1971 and we are still together. We had some rough times along the way, but, here we are.
why not?
I also agree with simple partnership.
Even animals, especially primates, get married (have partnership). Since we are animals marriage is a natural process. It's great to feel close to someone and take care of him/her. The more one gives to another person, the more balanced he or she is.
As for Buzz, finding someone to be close to you at this age probably prolongs his life by virtue of the fact that he is loved and he loves. Provided, of course, that it is not a fake marriage.
Humans need humans very very much. Friends and partners. I have dozens of them, in real life, and almost nobody on the Internet.
the article does make it clear there is no evidence yet of hunter seeing the paperwork but there is evidence he was able to pass out drunk with in a few feet of them while being paid millions from the chinese.
Why is it taboo think something is amiss here?
She's giving me a show here
and I'm about to fuck her
[deleted image]
My intention in asking the question below whether you should shoot the 6 year old kid who's about to shoot you was in order to make you, American friends, realise that when you live in a dangerous country with more guns than people then guns can be found in the hands of everyone, adults, kids, good guys, bad guys and guns will be used to shoot innocent people and lead to fucking ridiculous situations where a toddler shoots a teacher. I asked the question "should she shoot or not" to see your reactions. In the end, you couldn't just focus on giving an answer per se but you were itching to justify the fact that the situation arose by blaming the parents, the upbringing, the disobeying the laws,... anything BUT the proliferation of guns and the fact the you've made your country very very dangerous but are unable to see reality.
Situations such as a kid killing a teacher a student killing a couple of dozen students and teachers, a church goer shoots other church members in a church, a policeman raids a random house and kills people, and so on, are natural consequences of the way you decided to live, by having guns everywhere and accessing them at any time.
--------------------------------------- added after 5 minutes
So, go ahead and shoot your brains out. Kids shoot kids and adults, keep the warzone like situation in schools. The point of my question was for you to see that the answer to the question "kill the kid?" poses a huge moral dilemma, a dilemma you find, and you will find, yourselves in because you have millions and millions of fucking guns.
So go ahead and shoot yourselves and your kids.
The "you" in the above, was meant to be for the ultra-far right wingers.
You refuse to accept the fact that the GUN in and of it's self is not the problem.
You refuse to accept the fact we need to at causes for the violence.
Your idea of a solution is to remove 1 tool from a tool box.
Many a cemetery is FULL of people who died from lesser tools than a gun.
Accept the fact that you may have to face the dilemma
whether to shoot a 6-year old or not.
And, as I said many times in the past, I, too, would
probably have been forced to have a gun when every home
around me has more guns than family members. This is unique
in two countries: US and Yemen, except that Yemen is nowhere close to the US.
only registered users can see external links
--------------------------------------- added after 24 minutes
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
--------------------------------------- added after 26 minutes
AND HERE IS HOW THE US COMPARES WITH OTHER CIVILISED COUNTRIES
only registered users can see external links
--------------------------------------- added after 30 minutes
I'LL MAKE IT EASY FOR YOU.
HERE WE GO.
I HOPE YOU CAN UNDERSTAND ELEMENTARY STATISTICS
only registered users can see external links
--------------------------------------- added after 33 minutes
A 2021 RAND CORPORATION STUDY FOUND THAT PEOPLE
WITH MENTAL HEALTH PROBLEMS ARE NO MORE LIKELY TO
ENGAGE IN GUN VIOLENCE THAN OTHERS,
IN FACT PEOPLE WITH MENTAL HEALTH PROBLEMS ARE
MORE LIKELY TO BE VICTIMS OF VIOLENCE THAN
PERPETRATORS.
IT’S WORTH NOTING THAT OTHER COUNTRIES HAVE
SIMILAR RATES OF MENTAL ILLNESS BUT
***NOWHERE NEAR THE SAME LEVEL OF GUN DEATHS AS THE US.***
only registered users can see external links
(Forget it, I know you don't. You're just
an extreme-right wing guy with anti-democracy obsessions
and know absolutely nothing about how the world views
your country or how other countries operate.)
probably have been forced to have a gun when every home
around me has more guns than family members. This is unique
in two countries: US and Yemen, except that Yemen is nowhere close to the US.
He understands what the problem is
but he avoids admitting it.
So, as usual, he shifts the subject
to something else.
That's why it's impossible to converse
with phart. He doesn't know the way to do that.
****************************************
* Most [Americans] live a lifetime
* without ever coming face-to-face
* with a gun wielding person.
* But, we all live with the fear
* that it could happen at any moment.
****************************************
only registered users can see external links
Phart, are you really going to compare gun deaths with other forms of homicides? That fucking "tool" does more harm than ALL other forms of weapons. I understand that, as a partially disabled person, you would be at a much bigger disadvantage to protect yourself and because of your condition, you would be more of a target. I can see why you carry,
I posted something and you or cat neither 1 have took a moment to reply. I will repost it again so you might spot it.
It was on another thread post so it is logical you may have just missed it not meaning to,
and it was also pointed to Ananas, another 1 that seems to think the earth should be a free for all chaotic place
Copy and paste,
Ok,I found a good situation here we can discuss as for "punishment"
only registered users can see external links
If caught,how do you ananas and others feel these men should be punished?
GIve them stock options in the company and a credit card?
20 years prison?
what do you think?
It just urks me that when i go in to this store I have to use the lowes card to save 5% then later pay it,or pay cash for whatever items i need.
And these folks just feel like they can go in and steal what they want.
IF there shouldn't be a deterrent to this kind of action, we should all be able to just walk in and walk out with whatever we want.
Edit
my visit to my local Lowes just this morning, cost me 73 bucks to get what I needed. there was about 3 women near the exit, 1 was hardly able to walk, so chances are I coulda made it out the door with a bag of bolts and a gallon of spar varnish but you know what? The fact that I could risk going to jail for getting caught trying to steal, deterred me from running ,or in my case a fast waddle out the door.
What is wrong with harmless deterrents like that? the idea works ?not to mention saves 1000's in court cost and material loss's.
--------------------------------------- added after 13 minutes
If you really want to know how I feel about it, I think they should face jail time, but, not a possible lifetime because of it. I get the impression that you equate deterrence and punishment as being the same. They are not even if they are intertwined. Punishment is what you make a person go through for some offence. Deterrence is what you HOPE some action will produce. Here's a real deterrence. If you are 14 yrs or older and you are involved in any type of crime, you get the Death Penalty with summary execution within six months.
Isn't that obvious? I don't understand
why you're even asking.
as per your inability to understand
that drifting away is a ridiculous
tactic.
I gave able evidence of how the US
is so dangerous and you end up
asking what should happen to those who steal.
If no one commited crimes, people would feel safe,and perhaps the need for protection would be much less.
Then we agree. The US is the most dangerous place on earth.
only registered users can see external links
New Comment Go to top