 | We have members that feel they have to delete other members that show internet pictures. Personally I don’t care, it doesn’t bother me, I only delete more serious offenders. Some claim they don’t want to look at them, that’s what the blacklist is for. I voted alone not to delete a member for posting internet pics because it’s not really a big deal, what does it really hurt. But you all do what you want to do and feel better about yourselves. Next photoshopping will get you deleted, then what’s next. I’m not mad at you all, just alittle concerned that it should matter. |
New Comment Rating: 0
Similar topics: 1.Multiple accounts 2.fake accounts 3.Calling out fake accounts 4.Fake accounts 5.Fake accounts
Comments:
besides, without this site, i would have never dreamed there was so many idiots in the world.
I kinda feel that this saying fits this issue. I believe that it is;
If you are not part of the solution then you are part of the problem.
Why point the finger and insinuate that it is “his” fault or “her” fault. Using that logic, when “you” join in, then “you” become part of fault. In this situation perhaps if you choose to ignore the post or the poster, soon they may choose to go a different route.
only registered users can see external links
Of course I understand this sounds rather alarmist because that is not the case.
Of my 3036 posted photos exactly 0 are from the Internet. Of course I have a lot of photos of my friends but these are taken and posted with their permission.
If you want to look at Internet photos there are hundreds, thousands or hundreds of thousands of sites to choose besides this one. Perhaps "Internet photos" could be a category where people could post their favourite Internet photos.
With regard to creating a specific INTERNET category, I kinda believe that admin really does not want that. This was established as an amateur site and my guess is that he’s hoping that it remains an amateur site.
What I have a difficult time with are the verified members that post internet pics. I don’t give a rat’s ass that they don’t “claim ownership”, I just feel that verified members should be the example and set the example.
It is my understanding that this site was established with the intent that the run of the mill, average person would post their original amateur content. I don’t believe that it was his intention that SHOW YOUR DICK or SHOW YOUR PUSSY would ever be a site that would become a site to repost commercial internet pictures.
A hundred years ago, there were members that were keen on searching for and reporting any members that posted OR SENT (via private conversations) internet pictures. I know, I for one, debated with the voting members involved in the EVALUATION PANEL regarding the deletion of members that indeed posted internet pictures. There are two types of members that will post internet pictures, 1) there’s the member that is attempting to deceive the membership and 2) there’s the member that posts to pay homage. I believe that admin clarified his position regarding internet pics some time ago and my takeaway was this;
• an OCCASIONAL pic would be acceptable as long as the posting member did not claim ownership. Example, I could post an internet picture of “so-and-so” and possibly say, “she has the best boobs”, “love the girth of his cock” I could NOT claim this picture as a photo of “my boyfriend/girlfriend/fuck buddy, etc”. Prior to pressing the upload option, admin has some verbiage that addresses ownership of said picture.
• it is MY UNDERSTANDING that admin prefers that new members/new profiles begin their relationship with SHOWITOFF.org by following the site guidelines by posting their original and amateur content .
Although I understand your point of view regarding internet pics, I kinda wonder what the mindset of the member is. Here are a couple of examples, photo contests and what about the member that uploads internet content with the intent to deceive the membership whether it be a male or female behind the screen.
Forgive me for bringing this up in THIS thread, YOUR thread, recently there were two EVALUATION PANEL deletions involving an 8 year member and a 15 year member. Those members were not deleted because of internet pics, they were deleted because of the fricken IGNORANT, “SNOW FLAKE”, NINNYHAMMER voters lacked “common sense”. In my opinion, admin should allow members to report and delete members for being MORONS!
That you can trust. That way just any one can vote to delete..
I don't really trust anyone. I don't even trust myself on many things.
I am waiting for the response with popcorn and cold drink in hand as i think that definition will be fluid depending on the leanings of that person.
BUT to get the discussion started, here is Grok's answer.
what is a moron
A moron is a term used to describe someone perceived as very foolish, stupid, or lacking in intelligence. Historically, it was a clinical term in psychology (early 20th century) for a person with a mild intellectual disability, but this usage is now outdated and considered offensive. Today, it’s mostly a derogatory insult, often used to criticize someone’s actions or decisions as idiotic. Context matters—calling someone a moron can be playful or deeply insulting depending on tone and intent.
The 8 year member spoke about sex in her bio and apparently that was deemed offensive OR illegal by the reporting member. REALLY? So the frick what! That’s kinda like the members that were reported for deletion because they posted pictures that featured marijuana plants. If “we” are no more than the “morality police” who are so easily offended, perhaps we are on the wrong site. As far as “sexually pleasing”, you want to know what I don’t understand? Too bad, I’m going to tell you……BDSM, pissing one’s self, golden showers, etc. Let’s get rid of those types of members. Have they broken any laws? Have they breached site guidelines? NO! So I just move along. So with respect to the female member that said something in her bio about “that will cost you”, who knows, maybe she is or was a sex worker in Amsterdam that sits in a window who is advertising herself, available for sex. Just my opinion, she never should have been deleted for something as weak as that. Unfortunately the highly moral and astute voting members are NOT consistently applying their moral values for all situations.
Regarding the 15 year member that went POOF! Was he really “self harming” himself or was his 12 year old picture a “fantasy” picture? I don’t know! And since the member had not been online in over 30 days, I went directly to admin and explained what was going on and he made the decision to delete the reported pictures. Did that stop the member from being deleted? Heck no, there were 2 additional NINNYHAMMER voting members that apparently lacked “common sense” that proceeded to vote to delete because “Susie” reported it so it must be so……. That’s the thing that I’ve noticed with the Evaluation Panel voters, there is absolutely no forgiveness. There seems to be the mentality of, “You broke the rules as I know them and even though the offense was remedied, no soup for you, you are outta here!”.
The dick, tit, pussy, ass pics are pretty much those of me and mine...
It's pretty easy to tell when someone is posting fake pics.
What I really don't like and/or stand for are the folks who are posting fake pics and CLAIMING it's them or their own.. That's not right.
Cunts know when it is an Internet pic.
Posting pics from the net that any fool can find on their own is just a waste of time.
I would agree with some memes and signs that might be amusing.
And every pic on my page is 100% me!
I will add that in the chat rooms, posting any kind of pic adds to the value of the chat.
New Comment Go to top