Page #2
Pages: #1 #2
New Comment Rating: 0 Similar topics: 1.Multiple accounts 2.fake accounts 3.Calling out fake accounts 4.Fake accounts 5.Fake accounts Comments: | ||
You must be logged in to post here. Log in
New Comment Rating: 0 Similar topics: 1.Multiple accounts 2.fake accounts 3.Calling out fake accounts 4.Fake accounts 5.Fake accounts Comments: | ||
Of course I understand this sounds rather alarmist because that is not the case.
Of my 3036 posted photos exactly 0 are from the Internet. Of course I have a lot of photos of my friends but these are taken and posted with their permission.
If you want to look at Internet photos there are hundreds, thousands or hundreds of thousands of sites to choose besides this one. Perhaps "Internet photos" could be a category where people could post their favourite Internet photos.
With regard to creating a specific INTERNET category, I kinda believe that admin really does not want that. This was established as an amateur site and my guess is that he’s hoping that it remains an amateur site.
What I have a difficult time with are the verified members that post internet pics. I don’t give a rat’s ass that they don’t “claim ownership”, I just feel that verified members should be the example and set the example.
The 8 year member spoke about sex in her bio and apparently that was deemed offensive OR illegal by the reporting member. REALLY? So the frick what! That’s kinda like the members that were reported for deletion because they posted pictures that featured marijuana plants. If “we” are no more than the “morality police” who are so easily offended, perhaps we are on the wrong site. As far as “sexually pleasing”, you want to know what I don’t understand? Too bad, I’m going to tell you……BDSM, pissing one’s self, golden showers, etc. Let’s get rid of those types of members. Have they broken any laws? Have they breached site guidelines? NO! So I just move along. So with respect to the female member that said something in her bio about “that will cost you”, who knows, maybe she is or was a sex worker in Amsterdam that sits in a window who is advertising herself, available for sex. Just my opinion, she never should have been deleted for something as weak as that. Unfortunately the highly moral and astute voting members are NOT consistently applying their moral values for all situations.
Regarding the 15 year member that went POOF! Was he really “self harming” himself or was his 12 year old picture a “fantasy” picture? I don’t know! And since the member had not been online in over 30 days, I went directly to admin and explained what was going on and he made the decision to delete the reported pictures. Did that stop the member from being deleted? Heck no, there were 2 additional NINNYHAMMER voting members that apparently lacked “common sense” that proceeded to vote to delete because “Susie” reported it so it must be so……. That’s the thing that I’ve noticed with the Evaluation Panel voters, there is absolutely no forgiveness. There seems to be the mentality of, “You broke the rules as I know them and even though the offense was remedied, no soup for you, you are outta here!”.
The dick, tit, pussy, ass pics are pretty much those of me and mine...
It's pretty easy to tell when someone is posting fake pics.
What I really don't like and/or stand for are the folks who are posting fake pics and CLAIMING it's them or their own.. That's not right.
Cunts know when it is an Internet pic.
Posting pics from the net that any fool can find on their own is just a waste of time.
I would agree with some memes and signs that might be amusing.
And every pic on my page is 100% me!
I will add that in the chat rooms, posting any kind of pic adds to the value of the chat.
New Comment Go to top