Page #1
Pages: #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9 #10 ...#841
New Comment Rating: 11 Similar topics: 1.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF 2.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF II 3.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF III 4.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF,, ANY STUFF III 5.NEW MONGO STUFF, OLD MONGO STUFF, ANY MONGO STUFF III Comments: | ||
You must be logged in to post here. Log in
Euro 95 (E10 Regular): $11.75 per gallon (€2.690/liter)
Euro 98 (E5 Premium): $12.71 per gallon (€2.910/liter)
Diesel (B7): $11.97 per gallon (€2.740/liter)
LPG: $5.46 per gallon (€1.250/liter)
Chihuahua, I blocked you for only one reason. When I unblock you you trash my gallery page. That's it. If you would only have verbal attacks I wouldn't like them but I can live with that if they are reasonable.
Here's your chance to be unblocked. Agree to no trashing of my page and I'll unblock you. Answer here through one of your friends.
--------------------------------------- added after 2 hours
This is Pitbull‘s answer:
“ Saggy granny says she will unbanned if I don't trash her page. Fuck you pig don't put demands. You are a coward. If you can clean tecsan's page you can clean your own page
Fuck you belly pig 🐖”
And that’s why I won’t unblock him.
Piss
Fuck
Cunt
Cock suck
Motherfucker
Tits
--------------------------------------- added after 10 hours
*Cocksucker
A legendary example occurred in 2006 on the Dutch late-night talk show Jensen!. Host Robert Jensen bragged to his guests, Steve-O and Chris Pontius from Jackass, that the Netherlands has no bleeps or filters, telling them: "You can say whatever you want, you can even show your cock".
Taking it as a challenge, Steve-O immediately exposed himself on camera. True to Dutch broadcasting practices, the network aired the episode completely uncensored, resulting in no fines or regulatory penalties. This event highlighted the contrast with American broadcast standards, demonstrating the Dutch system's reliance on viewer discretion rather than government censorship.
In the Netherlands, the government does not police "moral decency" (swearing, nudity, or shock value) on television. If viewers don't want to see a naked body
or hear profanity, they are expected to change the channel.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
However, deliberate lying, propaganda, and state-sponsored disinformation are viewed as a direct threat to democratic stability. Free speech covers expressing opinions, but it does not protect intentional, malicious fraud designed to manipulate the public or undermine democracy.
How the System Works
Instead of a government agency (like the U.S. FCC) fining channels for saying bad words, the Dutch system uses a combination of media law and independent oversight:
- The Press Council (Raad voor de Journalistiek): This is an independent self-regulatory body. It maintains a strict Code of Journalism Ethics focused on truthfulness, verification, and fairness. While it primarily handles complaints via public accountability rather than legal fines, violating these standards ruins a network’s credibility.
- The Dutch Media Authority (Commissariaat voor de Media): This official regulator enforces the Dutch Media Act. While they strictly respect editorial independence from the government, they enforce rules regarding transparency and unlawful content.
- The Ultimate Red Line (Sanctions & Bans): A channel will not get banned for a shock stunt. However, if a broadcasting entity systematically acts as a funnel for covert foreign propaganda or coordinated malicious disinformation, such as violating national security laws or international sanctions (like the ban on Russian state-funded media outlets following the invasion of Ukraine), the government and the European Union have the authority to pull their broadcasting license and ban the channel entirely.
Glad I don't watch yawl's tv, I don't want to hear a bunch of cussing and crap on tv when i simply want to be entertained,
You won't get damaged from some naughty words or some nudity.
Just because it's allowed, doesn't mean that it happens all the time.
The average American show contains more bad language than most of ours.
We just don't have a list to sanction people for.
Dutch people are direct, without the need for profanities.
There are some reality shows with vulgar people on it.
These programs are announced with a warning for bad language,
so people will know to change the channel. The system is called 'Kijkwijzer' (literally meaning "Viewing Indicator").
only registered users can see external links
Unlike violence or fear, coarse language does not automatically result in a program receiving a higher age rating (such as 12 or 16) under the Kijkwijzer system.
You seem to be worried about some naughty words and nudity, but violence or fear are generally much more traumatizing. I grew up in a time that the average TV-commercial contained nudity. The result is that I didn't grow up to be a prude.
However, I had bad dreams from seeing Gremlins and Ghostbusters too young.
Both movies were on TV at rating 9+ or 12+, but they were shown at a children's birthday party of a friend, when I was 11. My parents didn't let me watch movies
or series with violence or scary scenes, so some scenes bothered me. I saw those movies again later, and wasn't shaken at all, but for a child that can be frightening.
only registered users can see external links
"Another disgusting picture of CAT52! showing her deteriorated cunt. It's disgusting. So much for a grieving mother that lost her son to cancer."
-------------------------------
Cat52!
Chihuahua, you don't get to tell me how I handle my grief. Nor, do you have any right or reason to mix your pathetic existence with mine.
👿
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
I wrote this blog story nine years ago and I don't doubt for a second that Canadians would react the same under similar circumstances today.
Please take a moment to read it and reflect on the historical relationship between Canada and the United States. Tom Brokaw also did a couple of excellent articles about the relationship between Canada and the US as well as operation yellow ribbon.
/blogs/32585.html
This is the only time that article 5 of the NATO constitution was instituted:
An armed attack on one NATO country is considered an attack upon them all.
That is how all 30 (at the time) NATO countries got involved in the Afghan war.
Oh, CANADA! Much respect and love to our neighbors to our north!
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
Modern education is a joke.
More like rolling down the hill ass over teacup!
only registered users can see external links
"Meaning: Pleasing to look at, hear, or think about .Example: The mountain scenery was very beautiful .Synonyms: Gorgeous, attractive, lovely, and pretty. Antonyms: Ugly and unattractive."
We're now in the "Good times create weak men" phase of civilization, soon to be followed by the "Weak men create bad times" phase.
only registered users can see external links
/groups.php?id=6823
I think I'm going to try to join the group established for the gay men, but as you may have guessed, lix is the moderator for that one, too.
--------------------------------------- added after 4 minutes
Nope, I cannot join that group either! /groups.php?id=132
Look at the groups that begin with an asterisk (*) and she is the moderator. She is moderator of over 400 groups.
Take a look for yourself, anything prefixed by her signature * is a group that she is the moderator of.
/groups.php
I joined the American group before and was kicked out by her. Crazy me, I wondered what an Australian could add to a group dedicated to and established for Americans and in taking my concern to admin, his suggestion was that I start suggested that I my own group. I just wonder why admin gives her so much latitude.
Exactly same happens with power in real life. If you don't care about something and don't want to spend your time on it - it often ends up in control of people you don't like. And then you are suddenly not happy.
Personally I don't care who runs the groups, I only care that someone does so I don't have to monitor them for some fishy activities. I did nothing to help lix get control of those groups, which means she got them simply because she was more interested in groups than any other member. So I don't see why I should do anything about this.
When I joined United States group, I responded to 3 inquiries made but did not see anywhere where she made a contribution.
Sorry, admin, I think you are wrong to allow her this much authority and control.
--------------------------------------- added after 17 minutes
Please speculate on why I was tossed out.
"You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time."
I know that YOU know that this particular post is about licksipsuckit. If you had any doubt, all you needed to do was to gaze upwards by a few posts from your initial comment of; "What is in it for the moderator?". Surely you did NOT miss seeing her name in BOLD BLUE PRINT.
you are both always nice to me. be here to look at cunts and cocks not worry abot things you cant conrtrol
If she doesn't blacklist you, ask her for the *United States* group, too!
New Comment Go to top