NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF. POST WHAT YOU LIKE, ASK WHAT YOU LIKE, LEAVE MSGS HERE. PLEASE BE CIVIL. IF YOU ARE GOING TO BITCH, DO IT WITH SOME CLASS. IF YOU LIKE WHAT'S WRITTEN,COMMENT. IF YOU DON'T LIKE WHAT YOU SEE, COMMENT. ALL I ASK IS PROOF.
muslim for mayor in a city that was terrorized by muslims just 24 years ago. That clearly indicates any empathy and sorrow felt for New yorkers during that tragedy was wasted. They didn't learn from any of it.
Is Sharia law “sanguine"? The penal codes (known as hudud punishments) associated with some interpretations and applications of Sharia in certain countries (such as amputation for theft or stoning for adultery) are often considered harsh and "bloody" by Western standards. These specific punishments, however, make up a very small part of the entire body of Islamic law and are applied in a minority of Muslim-majority countries.
It is important to understand that there is no single, static, or monolithic Sharia law; its interpretation (fiqh) varies widely across different cultures, times, and Islamic schools of thought.
CODY, don’t include all Muslims everywhere. --------------------------------------- added after 2 minutes
Pope John Paul II made many apologies. During his long reign as Pope, he apologized to Jews, women, people convicted by the Inquisition, and almost everyone who had suffered at the hands of the Catholic Church over the years.
Fuck you saggy granny CAT52!. YOU ARE RACIST PIG. You were a member in Florida of white supremacy groups. I will come after you here every day. Nobody wants to see your smelly aunt. Lick my 2 chihuahuas.
You know, new yorkers must be the dumbest people, in 2001 a group of muslims killed 0ver 3000 people in new york,and more elsewhere, and then they elect 1 for mayor only 24 years later. what do they expect to happen? they failed to destroy it the first time,and the second time in 2001, now they have a plant running the city.
Leo is just reminding us all of the hypocrisy,
if leo likes the guy,he can interact with who he wishes, if not, then he is a racist bastard, aint that how it works?
The KKK is not limited to being a bit racist, it's a racist terrorist group.
You are putting FOUR fallacies in just one argument, WOW:
1. Tu quoque (appeal to hypocrisy)
“You can’t criticize Trump for a family history with the KKK, because Biden has also been racist in some ways.”
2. False equivalence
You equate:
- The KKK’s systematic, ideologically central to racism.
WITH
- Minor or incidental acts of discrimination by Biden.
3. Conceptual stretching / motte-and-bailey definition shift
Redefine “racism” so that everyone is racist, and therefore the KKK isn’t uniquely bad.
Motte: the safe, broad claim (“everyone is racist in some way”), difficult to refute.
Bailey: the controversial claim (“therefore the KKK isn’t particularly bad”), smuggled in under the broad definition.
4. Whataboutism
When this is done strategically to deflect moral responsibility by bringing up unrelated wrongs, it’s also a form of whataboutism, a rhetorical tactic rather than a logical refutation.
Nice how I get to use my Motte and Bailey Fallacy picture from Aug 6:
In what sense?
If you're talking about the maga people, not only will they be discouraged but they'll be empowered when they realize that the trumps have a long history with kkk and nazis.
Yes, I was talking about MAGA. They are whitewashing the KKK, or blaming the Democratic Party for it, but meanwhile they love everything the KKK still stands for.
This kind of language and behavior is unheard of in progressive circles. That's why I say that the far right isn't a political entity but a mafia organization,
an entity that's closer to the
underworld than any human society.
It's not even part of our civilization as humans.
Did the Mafia help the US in WWII?
Italian Americans were very helpful in the planning and execution of the invasion of Sicily. The Mafia was involved in assisting the U.S. war efforts. Luciano's associates found numerous Sicilians to help the Naval Intelligence draw maps of the harbors of Sicily and dig up old snapshots of the coastline.
only registered users can see external links
Mafia, unlike street gangs and its thugs, doesn't do unnecessary violence and usually tries to avoid collateral damage,
Mafia does kill, and so does street gangs. But mafia kills (mostly) other gangsters and doesn't deliberately targets innocent civilians
Not really defending, just bringing up your hypocrisy again. Even the Mafia has done good in the world.
You just can't accept the fact that Trump is doing more good for our nation in the long term than short term.
When you as a human get help from a dr, sometimes the treatment hurts, takes time to recover from the surgery or side effects of medicine.
When America as a nation finally gets help, it will take time for markets to correct,jobs to return, some pain will be felt, but for the LONG TERM GOOD of our nation, Trump was the better choice. We will have less bums in our country, more jobs, better quality goods and a more equal trading relationship with other countrys because they will be buying our products as we buy theirs.
Killing is illegal,what part of that is obedience?
stealing is illegal,what part of that is obedience?
Just 2 examples.
just recently in my state, we have had so many criminals turned loose to commit more crimes until finally they kill and get kept inside for a while after that.
Who is talking about killing and stealing? Yes, that is wrong.
When people break the law, we have police to arrest them, and prosecutors,
lawyers and judges to determine guilt or innocence and punishment, if applicable.
That the system of law and order that I support.
You are however supporting that your law enforcement breaks the law. That's wrong.
It's wrong to fight crime with crime. It destroys the legitimacy of the state. It makes the state more dangerous than the criminals, because the criminals don't have the power of the state. If you get attacked by a criminal, you have the right of self defense, but if you get attacked by law enforcement, you don't. That means you are at their mercy.
When you allow law enforcement to break the law against criminals, you also allow them to break the law against everyone else. That means that you support law enforcement to enforce obedience, rather than the law.
ok so how would YOU catch a speeder?
How would you catch a child predator on the internet?
How would you find the criminals in a town without blending in with them?
What the fuck are you talking about? Since when does the police need to break laws to catch speeders, child predators, or any criminal?
Even if there are undercover cops, 'blending in' with organized crime, they are STILL not breaking the law. There are laws that allow them to 'blend in', up to a point.
They cannot of course kill some innocent bystander, to protect their cover, but there are laws for what police can do undercover, which would be against the law if they are not. It's all documented and afterwards defended in court.
You are again doing the Motte and Bailey Fallacy, by suggesting that all the cops ever do is break the law a bit, when they are undercover, to deny the ridiculous lawlessness of your 'law enforcement' under Trump. It's your favorite trick.
Larry Bushart Jr., a retired cop, spent more than a month in jail for posting a meme
of Trump saying "We have to get over it!" on the Facebook page of Charly Kirk.
only registered users can see external links
This guy looks like dgraff. Was he mistaken for an illegal immigrant?
Now tell me that you are NOT supporting enforcing obedience.
Just in general; older, grey, hairy, white man, with marks of weathered resentment
in their face. That guy would be a Republican, if Trump hadn't turned it to fascism.
It's very much possible that he is a fan of Charlie Kirk, and just didn't like how Trump doesn't give a fuck about his murder, except for using it to his political advantage.
"According to the Perry County Sheriff's Office website, Bushart was arrested the following morning on a charge of Threats of Mass Violence on School Property and Activities, a class E felony punishable by between one and six years in prison and up to a $3,000 fine. Worse, Bushart's bail is set at an astonishing $2 million."
Where are the Threats of Mass Violence?
Not long ago, phart defended the free speech of Julie Sweeney, a 53-year-old
from Cheshire, who was jailed for 15 months after posting on Facebook:
“Don’t protect the mosques, blow the mosque up with the adults in it”.
I accept nothing but a defense of the free speech of Larry Bushart Jr.
Your president only allows free speech for HIM and people who parrot him.
People are getting jailed for criticizing your president.
That's what the 1st Amendment was created for, to prevent.
Trump is literally making law against 'Anti-American' and 'Anti-Christian' speech.
Show how thick your double standards are, by supporting THAT.
Because a woman was elected as governor of Virginia.
Why is trump fuming?
Because a woman was elected in New Jersey.
Why is trump cantankerous?
Because an immigrant was elected in new York.
I'm so sorry.
Now, if you see this message and are a fascist, don't reply.
It is important to understand that there is no single, static, or monolithic Sharia law; its interpretation (fiqh) varies widely across different cultures, times, and Islamic schools of thought.
CODY, don’t include all Muslims everywhere.
--------------------------------------- added after 2 minutes
Pope John Paul II made many apologies. During his long reign as Pope, he apologized to Jews, women, people convicted by the Inquisition, and almost everyone who had suffered at the hands of the Catholic Church over the years.
Elections are, after all, part of a democratic society and, as you know, democracy is viewed as a problem by the thugs and sub-thugs and their cult.
only registered users can see external links
“Sir-Skittles mentioned you in a comment in the blog.”
If you had anything between your legs, you would post it here.
Number of members whom PITBULL has blacklisted: 0
and I meant Chemo-Sabe- yer retarded son
Yeah, whatever, Chihuahua.
As forest gump said,, stupid is is stupid does.
only registered users can see external links
--------------------------------------- added after 25 seconds
KKK and trump
Leo is just reminding us all of the hypocrisy,
if leo likes the guy,he can interact with who he wishes, if not, then he is a racist bastard, aint that how it works?
Does Biden have a Family’s History with the KKK?
But please give me some examples of Biden being racist, and I raise you a Trump.
I'll draw a nice one for you, just to start off:
Trump on black supporter: "Look at my African-American"
only registered users can see external links
Let's play 'Racist Spades'.
You are putting FOUR fallacies in just one argument, WOW:
1. Tu quoque (appeal to hypocrisy)
“You can’t criticize Trump for a family history with the KKK, because Biden has also been racist in some ways.”
2. False equivalence
You equate:
- The KKK’s systematic, ideologically central to racism.
WITH
- Minor or incidental acts of discrimination by Biden.
3. Conceptual stretching / motte-and-bailey definition shift
Redefine “racism” so that everyone is racist, and therefore the KKK isn’t uniquely bad.
Motte: the safe, broad claim (“everyone is racist in some way”), difficult to refute.
Bailey: the controversial claim (“therefore the KKK isn’t particularly bad”), smuggled in under the broad definition.
4. Whataboutism
When this is done strategically to deflect moral responsibility by bringing up unrelated wrongs, it’s also a form of whataboutism, a rhetorical tactic rather than a logical refutation.
Nice how I get to use my Motte and Bailey Fallacy picture from Aug 6:
I said: trumps have a history with kkk.
I never said Biden is not racist. He is. This does not contradict my statement.
Biden is a racist.
The Trumps have had kkk connections for long time.
If you're talking about the maga people, not only will they be discouraged but they'll be empowered when they realize that the trumps have a long history with kkk and nazis.
I only pointed out a fact.
an entity that's closer to the
underworld than any human society.
It's not even part of our civilization as humans.
Did the Mafia help the US in WWII?
Italian Americans were very helpful in the planning and execution of the invasion of Sicily. The Mafia was involved in assisting the U.S. war efforts. Luciano's associates found numerous Sicilians to help the Naval Intelligence draw maps of the harbors of Sicily and dig up old snapshots of the coastline.
only registered users can see external links
Mafia, unlike street gangs and its thugs, doesn't do unnecessary violence and usually tries to avoid collateral damage,
Mafia does kill, and so does street gangs. But mafia kills (mostly) other gangsters and doesn't deliberately targets innocent civilians
You just can't accept the fact that Trump is doing more good for our nation in the long term than short term.
When you as a human get help from a dr, sometimes the treatment hurts, takes time to recover from the surgery or side effects of medicine.
When America as a nation finally gets help, it will take time for markets to correct,jobs to return, some pain will be felt, but for the LONG TERM GOOD of our nation, Trump was the better choice. We will have less bums in our country, more jobs, better quality goods and a more equal trading relationship with other countrys because they will be buying our products as we buy theirs.
so I will just say this and move along!
Yidla amabhulukwe ami amafushane
only registered users can see external links
(This is not political, it's more a warning and a stock trading advice)
only registered users can see external links
Oh and the "trait" is authoritarian .
I guess if we all wanted a free for all circle jurk world where no one owns anything and has no privacy ,no security ,nothing, libs would be happy?
Authority can be abused, no doubt, but without SOME , the world would be chaos.
or at least not when your side breaks the law.
stealing is illegal,what part of that is obedience?
Just 2 examples.
just recently in my state, we have had so many criminals turned loose to commit more crimes until finally they kill and get kept inside for a while after that.
When people break the law, we have police to arrest them, and prosecutors,
lawyers and judges to determine guilt or innocence and punishment, if applicable.
That the system of law and order that I support.
You are however supporting that your law enforcement breaks the law. That's wrong.
It's wrong to fight crime with crime. It destroys the legitimacy of the state. It makes the state more dangerous than the criminals, because the criminals don't have the power of the state. If you get attacked by a criminal, you have the right of self defense, but if you get attacked by law enforcement, you don't. That means you are at their mercy.
When you allow law enforcement to break the law against criminals, you also allow them to break the law against everyone else. That means that you support law enforcement to enforce obedience, rather than the law.
Is that making sense for you at all?
How would you catch a child predator on the internet?
How would you find the criminals in a town without blending in with them?
Even if there are undercover cops, 'blending in' with organized crime, they are STILL not breaking the law. There are laws that allow them to 'blend in', up to a point.
They cannot of course kill some innocent bystander, to protect their cover, but there are laws for what police can do undercover, which would be against the law if they are not. It's all documented and afterwards defended in court.
You are again doing the Motte and Bailey Fallacy, by suggesting that all the cops ever do is break the law a bit, when they are undercover, to deny the ridiculous lawlessness of your 'law enforcement' under Trump. It's your favorite trick.
of Trump saying "We have to get over it!" on the Facebook page of Charly Kirk.
only registered users can see external links
This guy looks like dgraff. Was he mistaken for an illegal immigrant?
Now tell me that you are NOT supporting enforcing obedience.
in their face. That guy would be a Republican, if Trump hadn't turned it to fascism.
It's very much possible that he is a fan of Charlie Kirk, and just didn't like how Trump doesn't give a fuck about his murder, except for using it to his political advantage.
"According to the Perry County Sheriff's Office website, Bushart was arrested the following morning on a charge of Threats of Mass Violence on School Property and Activities, a class E felony punishable by between one and six years in prison and up to a $3,000 fine. Worse, Bushart's bail is set at an astonishing $2 million."
Where are the Threats of Mass Violence?
Not long ago, phart defended the free speech of Julie Sweeney, a 53-year-old
from Cheshire, who was jailed for 15 months after posting on Facebook:
“Don’t protect the mosques, blow the mosque up with the adults in it”.
I accept nothing but a defense of the free speech of Larry Bushart Jr.
People are getting jailed for criticizing your president.
That's what the 1st Amendment was created for, to prevent.
Trump is literally making law against 'Anti-American' and 'Anti-Christian' speech.
Show how thick your double standards are, by supporting THAT.
New Comment Go to top