NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF. POST WHAT YOU LIKE, ASK WHAT YOU LIKE, LEAVE MSGS HERE. PLEASE BE CIVIL. IF YOU ARE GOING TO BITCH, DO IT WITH SOME CLASS. IF YOU LIKE WHAT'S WRITTEN,COMMENT. IF YOU DON'T LIKE WHAT YOU SEE, COMMENT. ALL I ASK IS PROOF.
Apparently tourists were disrespectful towards locals, ignoring dead bodies, damaged property, burnt cars, etc. The cartoon is from a German magazine that I sometimes read, but it was pointed out to me by an American friend.
That is kinda difficult to believe and quite a stretch being the LAND OWNERS can not even get to their own homes,or what's left of them,without going thru checkpoints.
Good. Maybe he should. But what did this have to do with the cartoon? Nothing.
It's so annoying talking with people like you who take EVERY SINGLE SUBJECT and always alter it, steering away. That kind of childish tactic doesn't work. It's easy to spot.
great video thank you for sharing it I needed a good laugh this morning --------------------------------------- added after 5 minutes
I seen another video clip of Michael pumping iron at the gym and his junk was showing through his sweat pants he has quite the package Barak Obama is a lucky guy to be getting railed with that
Ha haha little mike Obama finally learned to dance
Totally unaware he was showing what’s in his pants --------------------------------------- added after 62 seconds
Thank you so much tecsan I’m having so much fun with this
Yes, there are two. Both are implied, but, here goes. What business is it of yours what is under a woman’s pants? Why the fuck do you care if an ex-President is getting it up the ass?
I do want to know what is under a woman's dress if I am trying to get under that so called dress. A cock = a dude, bottom line CAT . You know I like pussy.
Unlike your activist ex-president, I do not want it up the ass.
Exactly. I said the same. I don't know what kind of genitals Michell O. has but it's irrelevant. Even if she has male genitals, so what? How does this change anything? I really can't understand.
And so what? The democrats kept the fact that our First Lady was a man and president Obama was our first gay president don’t you think the outcome of that election might have been different had the public known we might have had our first woman president instead of coarse Hillary had a build that was very questionable to
Even if Michelle Obama is a biologically a man what's the issue? I guess her husband has no problem with it. Maybe he likes trans people and decided to marry one. I don't think she was forced in any way. No law has been breached.
That is a title BESTOWED on a First Lady as a courtesy and respect. It means nothing at all unless you want to be like the last Clown and grab his/her package without consent.
Exactly. And what if the president is a man married to a man? And what if he's trans? It's all fine.
Of course, we all know that a large number of Americans, like phart, won't accept any non-male, non-christian, non-gun lover president. Fascistoid Americans won't let that happen because they don't like pluralism, they don't like democracy.
And what if the president is married to a man? Like the prime minister of Ireland. Then there would be no first lady. There would be a first gentleman. Or a first partner. That's fine, isn't it?
Why isn't it fine in the US to have a male president married to a man or a female president married to a woman or a trans president married to nobody? I can't see what the problem is. Can you please explain?
I can't see the problem with at least 1 tradition staying the same instead of being corrupted by liberal change.Bill Clinton was our first "black" president,obama was our first half black.
Why the need to get some one that is "different" in the office? It is difficult enough to get someone in there that can rub 2 pennies together and not think he has 3
You're fucking stubborn conservative ultra right wing bigot.
Other countries have gay people as presidents and they have no problem with that. In fact, the Americans I know don't have a problem. Only the fascist sub-population does.
Kinda sad when our own CURRENT government can't even protect the constitution.
only registered users can see external links
This is kinda sad for America, biden took a oath "
""I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."
So uh, what say ye now? Your president has violated All Americans rights to free speech.
This pertains to primarily social media sites and government agencies.
"We find that the White House, acting in concert with the Surgeon General's office, likely coerced the platforms to make their moderation decisions ... and significantly encouraged the platforms' decisions," the three-judge panel wrote."
Where did they violate EVERYONE'S right of free speech? And, why do you think that happened? You do know that in time of a national emergency, martial law can be established? Think about that
Well if you can't post a link to a website that opposed the governments view to facebook for example,that is affecting your freedom of speech. So many people had issues with face book banning links and such.'
Martial law was not in place during the "covid" chapter of American history.May as well have been.
I am not on facebook,but family members are and they spent alot of time in "facebook" jail for posting info that was against the narrative.This website is far more effective and works much better than face book.
You might do some googling and find discussions about it. Alot has been scrubbed from the web lately.
Ok here are a couple examples of "farcebook" removing post. under the guises of misinformation. OK, so what person or entity decided what was false?? It would be a safe assumption it was the GOVERNMENT would it not? Who else would do it? And who told the government it was false? And was it really true and just against the narrative? We can't tell now because everything is white washed.
Trump has violated his own free speech. For example, he would love to say he doesn't give a fuck about god, but he violates his free speech and will and says he loves god. And, as you very well know, he made everything he could to show how devout he is.
The ultimate form of violation of free speech is not when you suppress others but when you suppress yourself.
Well you complain to me about doing that. so why not me complain to him? tit for tat. besides, he is loving watching America fall apart.
So are most Europeans. They don't like the fact our ancestors left their miserable little continent and made it good over here. They don't like that their poisonous liberalism is meeting so much resistance.
Why do you have to go into the past? You really think Europeans really give a fuck about what happened several centuries ago? Europe is a very vibrant group of nations with an economy that, collectively, matches ours.
Europe does have one trait that you’ve got completely wrong. As a whole, it’s one of the most conservative areas of the world. They value their history and moral compass in a way that this country will never have. This conservatism is not what we call our brand of conservatism. It’s based on true social problems and the corresponding possible solutions.
The only resistance we have in this country, is that to education and freedom for all.
Unfortunately, there's a lot of fascists in Europe these days, at the same level of even worse than in the US (in Poland, in Hungary, in Italy, etc). There are people like you, people who like to be slaves and associate themselves to thugs.
only registered users can see external links
I don't believe in anything, unless there's ample evidence for it.
It's so annoying talking with people like you who take EVERY SINGLE SUBJECT and always alter it, steering away. That kind of childish tactic doesn't work. It's easy to spot.
--------------------------------------- added after 5 minutes
I seen another video clip of Michael pumping iron at the gym and his junk was showing through his sweat pants he has quite the package Barak Obama is a lucky guy to be getting railed with that
Totally unaware he was showing what’s in his pants
--------------------------------------- added after 62 seconds
Thank you so much tecsan I’m having so much fun with this
/member.php?w=309537
/member.php?w=575453
/member.php?w=99987
And this web page. Some women have pronounced pussy lips
and some have a pronounced labia minora.
only registered users can see external links
And I’m not even going to show you women wearing sanitary napkins under their panties
You guys should really grow up. You sound like a teen first hearing the word “pussy” in a conversation. 😈
--------------------------------------- added after 2 minutes
And you’re blaming poor phart and he didn’t even comment on this
You did great thanks again
Unlike your activist ex-president, I do not want it up the ass.
Who brought the subject of race up, was not me.
What if the president is a lesbian married to a lesbian?
Of course, we all know that a large number of Americans, like phart, won't accept any non-male, non-christian, non-gun lover president. Fascistoid Americans won't let that happen because they don't like pluralism, they don't like democracy.
Why the need to get some one that is "different" in the office? It is difficult enough to get someone in there that can rub 2 pennies together and not think he has 3
Other countries have gay people as presidents and they have no problem with that. In fact, the Americans I know don't have a problem. Only the fascist sub-population does.
only registered users can see external links
This is kinda sad for America, biden took a oath "
""I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."
So uh, what say ye now? Your president has violated All Americans rights to free speech.
only registered users can see external links
"We find that the White House, acting in concert with the Surgeon General's office, likely coerced the platforms to make their moderation decisions ... and significantly encouraged the platforms' decisions," the three-judge panel wrote."
Where did they violate EVERYONE'S right of free speech? And, why do you think that happened? You do know that in time of a national emergency, martial law can be established? Think about that
Martial law was not in place during the "covid" chapter of American history.May as well have been.
You might do some googling and find discussions about it. Alot has been scrubbed from the web lately.
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
Ok here are a couple examples of "farcebook" removing post. under the guises of misinformation. OK, so what person or entity decided what was false?? It would be a safe assumption it was the GOVERNMENT would it not? Who else would do it? And who told the government it was false? And was it really true and just against the narrative? We can't tell now because everything is white washed.
The ultimate form of violation of free speech is not when you suppress others but when you suppress yourself.
Think (I know you can't) about it.
So are most Europeans. They don't like the fact our ancestors left their miserable little continent and made it good over here. They don't like that their poisonous liberalism is meeting so much resistance.
Europe does have one trait that you’ve got completely wrong. As a whole, it’s one of the most conservative areas of the world. They value their history and moral compass in a way that this country will never have. This conservatism is not what we call our brand of conservatism. It’s based on true social problems and the corresponding possible solutions.
The only resistance we have in this country, is that to education and freedom for all.
New Comment Go to top