Page #3
Pages: #1 #2 #3 #4
New Comment Rating: 0 Similar topics: 1.who likes sex outdoors 2.who likes sex outdoors 3.What's the dirtiest thing you've done? 4.Cock Site Court of Law in Session 5.Supreme Court horror stories Comments: | ||
You must be logged in to post here. Log in
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
v.
CAT52!, defendant.
__________________________/
.....................COMPLAINT.......................
COUNT I. Violation of Free Speech
1. The defendant has banned members from making comments on her page. This is a clear violation of free speech.
2. The defendant has banned members; PITBULL and Sir-Skittles from making comments on her page. This is a violation of free speech.
COUNT II. Stealing member's Video
1. The defendant has stolen a video from another member and using it on her page.
2. The defendant claims the member on the video is making a tribute to her. This is completely false.
COUNT III. Violation of Forum Rules.
1. The defendant has used foul language when chatting on forums.
2. Defendant violated the following rule; No member is allowed to use foul language that is offensive to others.
3. The defendant has used 'fuck' during statements she made.
COUNT IV. Violation Clean Page Act
1. The defendant's page is filthy with negative gifts for the past 2 weeks.
2. The defendant has violated the Clean Page Act which states; Each member must maintain their page clean at all times. It is the responsibility of every member to keep in the page clean.
JUDGE RuFino; Ms. CAT52! You have some serious charges. I order you to clean your page. You have 20 days to clean your filthy page. A gag order will be imposed to prevent you from making statements using foul language. You must remove the video of the member you are using on your page. Stop banning members from making comments on your page.
SITO Members, plaintiff,
v.
GingerDaddy, defendant.
______________________________/
..................COMPLAINT...........................
This Court declares all the statements on this document to be true based on all the evidence.
COUNT I. CHAT ROOM ABANDONMENT
1. The defendant opened a chat room on February 20, 2025.
2. The Defendant left his room by 5:30 PM without any departure announcement. The defendant never came back.
3. Under the Rules of Chat Rooms the host must notify all members he is leaving or taking a break. The defendant failed to follow the rules.
JUDGE Clarisbinda; Mr. GingerDaddy it looks like you want to be above the law. You must follow the rules if you want to open chat rooms. It is plain rude to leave a chat room without notifying all room members. I will place you in a 2-week suspension of opening rooms.
...............NOTICE OF CONTEMPT OF COURT...............
Defendant GingerDaddy has ignored a previous order from this Court from open Chat Rooms with the intent to abandon leaving guests without a chat room host. You are now in a Gag order by this Court.
Judge Tomasina
2.23.25
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
v.
CAT52! a/k/a saggy granny, defendant.
______________________________________/
This Court declares all the statements on this case to be true based on the evidence;
.....................COMPLAINT.............................
COUNT I. POSTING PICTURES OF CONVICTED CRIMINAL
1. The defendant has posted a picture of the following member woody on her page. Woody was convicted of a felony in Florida.
2. This Court will no allow pictures of convicted criminals on this site.
3. The defendant is on violation of the rules of posting pictures of criminals with the intent to defend that said criminal.
COUNT II. VIOLATION OF THE CLEAN PAGE ACT.
1. The defendant page is dirty with negative gifts
2. The defendant has expressed no intention of cleaning her page.
3. The defendant is violating the Clean Page Act rule.
JUDGE RuFino; Ms. CAT52! You are a hostile member of this site. You continue to violate the rules of this site. You think you are better than the rest of the members of this site. I ordered you to clean your page within 30 days. You are guilty of the above charges.
A total loser.
May get deported
--------------------------------------- added after 395 hours
Cat going crazy with my latest blog and pic
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
v.
cdwank, defendant.
___________________________/
.....................COMPLAINT...................
This Court declares all the statements on this complaint to be true;
COUNT I. CHAT ROOM ABANDONMENT VIOLATION
1. The defendant cwank has violated the rule of Chat Room abandonment.
2. Under this rule a chat room host must announce to his member guests that he is leaving the room. This room includes the host; leaving for the bathroom or any other activities that are not longer than 10 minutes.
3. On January 18, 2025, the defendant, cdwank had a room called; Naked Chat Room Here. The defendant left his room without announcing he was not returning.
Judge RuFino's decision; Mr.cdwank you are a rude host. You left your room without telling your guest you weren't coming back. You are now on probation for 30 days and are not to open chat rooms during the probation period.
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
v.
GingerDaddy, defendant.
___________________________/
..........................COMPLAINT........................
This Court declares the following statements to be true;
COUNT I. CHAT ROOM ABANDONMENT
1. The defendant GingerDaddy, has violated the Chat Room rules when he abandoned his chat room.
2. Under the rules and law a a chat room host is said to abandon his room when he doesn't tell members about his departure.
3. The defendant has done this kind of action several times, disregarding members in his room.
Judge RuFino; Mr. GingerDaddy you are rude and you don't care about members in your room. This kind of conduct is not acceptable. While most chat room hosts decide to follow the rules you decided to make your own rules here. You are not above the law. You are now prohibited from open chat rooms for the next 30 days.
is now a defendant under the rules and laws of this Court. She has been charged with the following;
VIOLATION FREE SPEECH
ATTACKING JUDICIAL SYSTEM
Judge Clarisbinda will be presiding over this hearing.
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
v.
CAT52! defendant.
_____________________________/
..............COMPLAINT>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
This Court declares all the following statements to be true.
COUNT I. VIOLATION FREE SPEECH
1. The defendant has violated free speech when she blocks others from making comments on her page.
2. The site's free speech is fundamental under the free expression of every member of this site. It is the right of every member.
3. The defendant's actions on free speech are outrageous.
4. No member of this site should not block others from making comments. The defendant has done that.
COUNT II. ATTACKING JUDICIAL SYSTEM.
1. The defendant attacked the Chief Justice of the Court, Justice Rufino.
2. The defendant has mocked and attacked the entire judicial system.
3. The defendant CAT52! has shown no respect for our judges of this Court.
Judge Clarisbinda; I ordered you to stop blocking others for making comments on your page. Ms. CAT52! You have a filthy mouth that should be sealed with glue. You now will be on probation for 30 days.
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
v.
Celestial, defendant.
___________________________/
......................COMPLAINT.........................
This court declares the following statements to be true;
COUNT I. TAMPERING WITH EVIDENCE
1. The evidence shows the defendant, Celestial tampering with evidence in the case of CAT52!.
2. Member CAT52!'s page is filthy with negative gifts.
3. The defendant sends her gifts to cover her page from any negative gifts. Under the rules of this Court, the defendant maliciously tampered with evidence.
JUDGE RuFino's Sentence: Mr. Celestial, it is unlawful to help others tamper with evidence. Stay from other member's business and don't help others with their crimes. You will be on probation for 30 days.
BRIBERY
VIOLATION OF CLEAN PAGE ACT
SITO MEMBERS, plaintiffs
v.
CAT52! defendant.
__________________________/
.........................COMPLAINT.........................
This Court declares all the statements on this complaint to be true;
COUNT I. BRIBERY
1. The defendant solicits members to verify her in exchange for gifts.
2. The defendant has solicited about 10 members of this site, but most refuse to verify the defendant. CAT52!
3. The defendant requested that member, Celestial, clean her page for the exchange of gifts.
COUNT II. VIOLATION OF THE CLEAN PAGE ACT RULE
1. The defendant has violated the Clean Page Act rule. Under this Act, all members must maintain at all times a profile page free of negative gifts.
2. The defendant refused to clean her page by accepting member Celestial clean her page.
Judge Sentence;
Ms. CAT52! You are becoming a nuisance on this website. You can't keep your page clean, but you want others to clean your page. You are outrageous. I ordered you to clean your page within 20 days. You are also guilty of bribery. This type of conduct must be stopped now!
Chief Justice; RuFino
cat52!
SITO Members, plaintiffs
v.
CAT52!, defendant.
_________________________/
.......................COMPLAINT............................
This Court declares all the statements on this complaint to be true.
COUNT I. BRIBERY
1. The defendant CAT52! has been soliciting other members for verification.
2. In exchange for verification the defendant has accepted gifts from other members.
3. She also wants other members to donate points to her. This is a clear violation of bribery.
COUNT II. VIOLATION OF THE CLEAN PAGE ACT RULE
1. The defendant's page is filthy with negative gifts.
2. The defendant immediately received notice about cleaning her page, but she refused.
JUDGE CLARISBINDA'S Sentence; Ms. CAT52! You have some serious charges. Your filthy page is a big violation of the rules of this site. You don't care about the welfare of new members when they look at your page. Regarding the charges of bribery, you have acted with malice and is outrageous. You are now in probation for 30 days on the above charges.
SITO members, plaintiffs,
v.
GingerDaddy, defendant.
____________________________/
......................COMPLAINT...........................
The Court declares all the statements on this complaint to be true;
COUNT I. CHAT ROOM ABANDONMENT
1. The defendant GingerDaddy has violated the Chat Room rule of abandonment.
2. Under the rules and laws the defendant has violated this rule several times when he left his room without any announcement to the chat room guest.
3. Any member who leaves his chat room without any official farewell violates this law. The law also says any member under this violation shall not open a room for a period of 30 days.
4. Defendant GingerDaddy has violated this rule 3 times during the past 6 days.
Judge RuFino; Mr. GingerDaddy you have shown disregard for the members of this site. Every time you leave your room without any anouncement it shows disrespect for all the memebrs in your chat room. A chat room is a very important institution of this site. You have abuse the previliges of having a free chat room but you have missused. You don't care about the well-being of your fellow members. I ordered you from refraining any chat room for the next 30 days.
SITO members, plaintiffs,
v.
reaper2402, defendant.
______________________________/
.....................COMPLAINT..............................
This Court declares all the statements on this complaint to be true;
COUNT I. VIOLATION OF CLEAN PAGE ACT
1. The defendant reaper2404 is on violation of the Site Clean Page Act rule.
2. Under the Act, all members must maintain at all times their page clean of any negative gifts. The Defendant has violated this rule more than 3 times.
3. This Court has contacted the defendant about his page status.
COUNT II. ATTACKING IMMUNITY MEMBER
1. The defendant, reaper2402 has violated the Immunity Member Act rule. Under this rule, any SITE member is found being attacked such as blacklisting, atc has violated this rule.
2. The defendant has attacked the following Immunity member; Sir-skittles.
JUDGE Decision; Mr. reaper2404 you are a filthy person. Have you looked at your page lately.? You should be ashamed of yourself. Does this is the way you are at your home? living like a pig. Not in this site. here you must follow the rules and laws. I ordered you within the next 30 days to clean your page or be in Contempt of Court. Stop blacklisting and face the enemies that you have made on this site.
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
v.
4438cr, defendant.
____________________________/
.....................COMPLAINT........................
This Court declares all the statements on this complaint to be true;
COUNT I VIOLATION CLEAN PAGE ACT RUlE
1. The defendant was ordered to clean his page 30 days ago.
2. The defendant refused to clean his page as ordered by this Court and is now in Contempt of Court.
3. Defendant 4438cr page is filthy in defiance of this Court order.
COUNT II. VIOLATION OF GAG ORDER
1. The Court ordered this defendant to stay silent in chat rooms but he refused therefore he is now in Contempt of the Court.
2. The defendant violated the Gag Order when he left comments on blogs.
3. Defendant refused to stay silent in chat rooms and blogs
4. The defendant violated the Gag Order when verbally attacking members Sir-Skittles and Pitbull.
Judge Fredesbinda; Mr. 4438cr you are a nasty person. It is not only nasty but also hostile to our judicial system. I found you guilty of the above charges.
Another old rat
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
v.
CAT52!, defendant.
__________________________/
........................COMPLAINT...........................
This Court declares all the statements on this complaint to be true;
COUNT I POSTING OBSOLETE PICTURES
1. The defendant has posted pictures of herself for over 10 years. This action is deceiving members of this site.
2. The defendant knew her pictures were more than 10 years old. She will not post photos of her as she looks today.
3. The pictures in question;
showitoff.org/mhOea3vbmt5epic.html
showitoff.org//ngapry3qmw25pic.html
4. The defendant refused to delete the above pictures from her profile page.
Judge Fredesbinda's decision; Ms. CAT52! I don't understand why you post pictures that don't look like you anymore. Why you are deceiving members of this site with your obsolete photos? This Court condemns your activities here when it comes to updating your profile with pictures of you now. This Court ordered you to delete those pictures.
Saggy's fraud! A disgusting display indeed!
It would take an crate of Viagra for anyone to get hard with her current pictures!
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
v.
bjuk, defendant.
_____________________________/
This Court declares the following statements to be true:
COUNT I. VIOLATION OF GAG ORDER
1. This Court placed The defendant in a GAG ORDER to remain silent in the chat rooms.
2. The defendant, bjuk has made rude and obscene conversation while in the chat rooms.
3. While in a chat room, the defendant has been involved with verbal fights with other members, violating a GAG ORDER.
JUDGE Rufino's decision: Mr. Bjuk you can keep your mouth shut. Attacking verbally other members in a chat room is not acceptable. This Court will be monitoring your behavior when you are in a chat room.
SITO Members, plaintiffs
vs.
GingerDaddy, defendant.
___________________________/
.......................CONTEMPT OF COURT....................
1. This Court charges the defendant GingerDaddy with contempt of Court.
2. The defendant violated an order from this Court on CHAT ROOM ABANDOMENT.
3. This Court orders this defendant from opening chat rooms for 30 days.
Judge Rufino's decision; Mr. GingerDaddy you are a hostile member of this site who shows disregard of this Court order. You now will be on probation for the next 30 days.
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
v.
bjuk, defendant.
____________________________/
.........................COMPLAINT..........................
This Court declares all statements on this case to be true.
COUNT I. CHAT ROOM CONDUCT VIOLATION
1. The defendant bjuk has violated the rules of the Chat Room.
2. On one occasion the defendant insulted members of the chat room using his middle finger.
3. Sometimes the defendant uses indecent words when referring to other members of the chat rooms such as; fuck you",
gift
COUNT II. VIOLATION OF THE CLEAN PAGE ACT
1. The defendant bjuk's page is filthy with negative gifts.
2. His page has been dirty for the past 3 weeks and the defendant refused to clean it.
JUDGE Rufino's decision of the case: Mr bjuk you are a hostile member of this site. You have plenty of time to clean your page. Just because you have been on this site for a long time doesn't mean you are above the law. I will give you 30 days to clean your page. And for your obnoxious conduct in the chat room, you have 20 days of probation. This Court will monitor your conduct in the chat rooms.
SITO MEMBERS, plaintiffs,
vs.
GingerDaddy, defendant.
__________________________/
This Court declares all the statements on this case to be true;
COUNT I. VIOLATION OF PROBATION
1. The defendant has violated Article 3 of this Court which states that the court has the right to charge a member with violation of probation when he/she violates a Court order.
2. The defendant's case and actions of November 11, 2024, put him in Contempt of Court. On that day the Court ordered him not to open any chat rooms.
3. The defendant ignored the Court order when he opened a chat room in recent days; in November 14, and 15. This is a clear violation of probation. His probation was for 30 days on the charge of Chat Room Abandonment.
CHief Justice RuFinos' Verdict; Well Mr. GingerDaddy I see you don't care about the judicial system. Willfully disobeying a Court order. You think you are above the law, but you are not. You have opened chat rooms day and night and always left the chat rooms without informing your guests. That's rude, Mr. GingerDaddy.I will place you now on 45 days probation, starting today. I don't want to see you on this Court again. You are guilty of the above charges.
This is yer ONLY warning!
Fuck you Saggy Granny!
SITO Members, plaintiffs
vs.
tj8077, defendant.
__________________________/
This Court declares all the statements on this case are true based on the evidence.
COUNT I. ATTACKING AN IMMUNITY MEMBER
1. The defendant tj8077 has attacked the following Immunity Member, Sir-Skittles several occasions.
2. The defendant blacklisted him without a valid reason.
3. Under the law, any Immunity member who harasses, bans, attacks, or blacklists the defendant violates this law.
Judge Fredesbindan's verdict; Mr tj8077 I order you to remove member tj8007 from your blacklist immediately.
Failure to do so will result in Contempt of Court. You are guilty of the above charge.
Date; November 16, 2024
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
vs.
GingerDaddy, defendant.
_____________________________/
This Court declares the following statements to be true;
COUNT I. CHAT ROOM ABANDONMENT
1. The defendant Gingerdaddy on November 11, 2024 opened a chat room with the name; 'daddy loves cock'.
2. In the room were about 8 members according to the evidence.
3. The defendant abandoned his chat room by 7:42 p.m. He didn't even tell the members of his room that he was leaving.
COUNT II. CONTEMPT OF COURT
1. The defendant ignored this Court's previous order regarding abandoning a chat room.
2. The defendant has become hostile and mocking this Court.
Justice RuFino's case decision; Mr. GingerDaddy here we go again. You were in this Court about 22 hours ago for the same thing. You also decided to ignore this Court, when we told you to stop leaving the chat room. There is something wrong with you or you just want to mock this Court. Now you will be on probation for 30 days. During those 30 days, you are not allowed to open Chat Rooms with the intent to leave the room any time you want. As a chat room host is your duty to keep your guests when would you leave and closed your room.
New Comment Go to top