Page #4
Pages: #1 #2 #3 #4 #5
New Comment Rating: 0 Similar topics: 1.who likes sex outdoors 2.who likes sex outdoors 3.What's the dirtiest thing you've done? 4.Cock Site Court of Law in Session 5.Supreme Court horror stories Comments: | ||
You must be logged in to post here. Log in
SITO Members, plaintiffs
v.
CAT52!, defendant.
_________________________/
.......................COMPLAINT............................
This Court declares all the statements on this complaint to be true.
COUNT I. BRIBERY
1. The defendant CAT52! has been soliciting other members for verification.
2. In exchange for verification the defendant has accepted gifts from other members.
3. She also wants other members to donate points to her. This is a clear violation of bribery.
COUNT II. VIOLATION OF THE CLEAN PAGE ACT RULE
1. The defendant's page is filthy with negative gifts.
2. The defendant immediately received notice about cleaning her page, but she refused.
JUDGE CLARISBINDA'S Sentence; Ms. CAT52! You have some serious charges. Your filthy page is a big violation of the rules of this site. You don't care about the welfare of new members when they look at your page. Regarding the charges of bribery, you have acted with malice and is outrageous. You are now in probation for 30 days on the above charges.
SITO members, plaintiffs,
v.
GingerDaddy, defendant.
____________________________/
......................COMPLAINT...........................
The Court declares all the statements on this complaint to be true;
COUNT I. CHAT ROOM ABANDONMENT
1. The defendant GingerDaddy has violated the Chat Room rule of abandonment.
2. Under the rules and laws the defendant has violated this rule several times when he left his room without any announcement to the chat room guest.
3. Any member who leaves his chat room without any official farewell violates this law. The law also says any member under this violation shall not open a room for a period of 30 days.
4. Defendant GingerDaddy has violated this rule 3 times during the past 6 days.
Judge RuFino; Mr. GingerDaddy you have shown disregard for the members of this site. Every time you leave your room without any anouncement it shows disrespect for all the memebrs in your chat room. A chat room is a very important institution of this site. You have abuse the previliges of having a free chat room but you have missused. You don't care about the well-being of your fellow members. I ordered you from refraining any chat room for the next 30 days.
SITO members, plaintiffs,
v.
reaper2402, defendant.
______________________________/
.....................COMPLAINT..............................
This Court declares all the statements on this complaint to be true;
COUNT I. VIOLATION OF CLEAN PAGE ACT
1. The defendant reaper2404 is on violation of the Site Clean Page Act rule.
2. Under the Act, all members must maintain at all times their page clean of any negative gifts. The Defendant has violated this rule more than 3 times.
3. This Court has contacted the defendant about his page status.
COUNT II. ATTACKING IMMUNITY MEMBER
1. The defendant, reaper2402 has violated the Immunity Member Act rule. Under this rule, any SITE member is found being attacked such as blacklisting, atc has violated this rule.
2. The defendant has attacked the following Immunity member; Sir-skittles.
JUDGE Decision; Mr. reaper2404 you are a filthy person. Have you looked at your page lately.? You should be ashamed of yourself. Does this is the way you are at your home? living like a pig. Not in this site. here you must follow the rules and laws. I ordered you within the next 30 days to clean your page or be in Contempt of Court. Stop blacklisting and face the enemies that you have made on this site.
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
v.
4438cr, defendant.
____________________________/
.....................COMPLAINT........................
This Court declares all the statements on this complaint to be true;
COUNT I VIOLATION CLEAN PAGE ACT RUlE
1. The defendant was ordered to clean his page 30 days ago.
2. The defendant refused to clean his page as ordered by this Court and is now in Contempt of Court.
3. Defendant 4438cr page is filthy in defiance of this Court order.
COUNT II. VIOLATION OF GAG ORDER
1. The Court ordered this defendant to stay silent in chat rooms but he refused therefore he is now in Contempt of the Court.
2. The defendant violated the Gag Order when he left comments on blogs.
3. Defendant refused to stay silent in chat rooms and blogs
4. The defendant violated the Gag Order when verbally attacking members Sir-Skittles and Pitbull.
Judge Fredesbinda; Mr. 4438cr you are a nasty person. It is not only nasty but also hostile to our judicial system. I found you guilty of the above charges.
Another old rat
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
v.
CAT52!, defendant.
__________________________/
........................COMPLAINT...........................
This Court declares all the statements on this complaint to be true;
COUNT I POSTING OBSOLETE PICTURES
1. The defendant has posted pictures of herself for over 10 years. This action is deceiving members of this site.
2. The defendant knew her pictures were more than 10 years old. She will not post photos of her as she looks today.
3. The pictures in question;
showitoff.org/mhOea3vbmt5epic.html
showitoff.org//ngapry3qmw25pic.html
4. The defendant refused to delete the above pictures from her profile page.
Judge Fredesbinda's decision; Ms. CAT52! I don't understand why you post pictures that don't look like you anymore. Why you are deceiving members of this site with your obsolete photos? This Court condemns your activities here when it comes to updating your profile with pictures of you now. This Court ordered you to delete those pictures.
Saggy's fraud! A disgusting display indeed!
It would take an crate of Viagra for anyone to get hard with her current pictures!
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
v.
bjuk, defendant.
_____________________________/
This Court declares the following statements to be true:
COUNT I. VIOLATION OF GAG ORDER
1. This Court placed The defendant in a GAG ORDER to remain silent in the chat rooms.
2. The defendant, bjuk has made rude and obscene conversation while in the chat rooms.
3. While in a chat room, the defendant has been involved with verbal fights with other members, violating a GAG ORDER.
JUDGE Rufino's decision: Mr. Bjuk you can keep your mouth shut. Attacking verbally other members in a chat room is not acceptable. This Court will be monitoring your behavior when you are in a chat room.
SITO Members, plaintiffs
vs.
GingerDaddy, defendant.
___________________________/
.......................CONTEMPT OF COURT....................
1. This Court charges the defendant GingerDaddy with contempt of Court.
2. The defendant violated an order from this Court on CHAT ROOM ABANDOMENT.
3. This Court orders this defendant from opening chat rooms for 30 days.
Judge Rufino's decision; Mr. GingerDaddy you are a hostile member of this site who shows disregard of this Court order. You now will be on probation for the next 30 days.
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
v.
bjuk, defendant.
____________________________/
.........................COMPLAINT..........................
This Court declares all statements on this case to be true.
COUNT I. CHAT ROOM CONDUCT VIOLATION
1. The defendant bjuk has violated the rules of the Chat Room.
2. On one occasion the defendant insulted members of the chat room using his middle finger.
3. Sometimes the defendant uses indecent words when referring to other members of the chat rooms such as; fuck you",
gift
COUNT II. VIOLATION OF THE CLEAN PAGE ACT
1. The defendant bjuk's page is filthy with negative gifts.
2. His page has been dirty for the past 3 weeks and the defendant refused to clean it.
JUDGE Rufino's decision of the case: Mr bjuk you are a hostile member of this site. You have plenty of time to clean your page. Just because you have been on this site for a long time doesn't mean you are above the law. I will give you 30 days to clean your page. And for your obnoxious conduct in the chat room, you have 20 days of probation. This Court will monitor your conduct in the chat rooms.
SITO MEMBERS, plaintiffs,
vs.
GingerDaddy, defendant.
__________________________/
This Court declares all the statements on this case to be true;
COUNT I. VIOLATION OF PROBATION
1. The defendant has violated Article 3 of this Court which states that the court has the right to charge a member with violation of probation when he/she violates a Court order.
2. The defendant's case and actions of November 11, 2024, put him in Contempt of Court. On that day the Court ordered him not to open any chat rooms.
3. The defendant ignored the Court order when he opened a chat room in recent days; in November 14, and 15. This is a clear violation of probation. His probation was for 30 days on the charge of Chat Room Abandonment.
CHief Justice RuFinos' Verdict; Well Mr. GingerDaddy I see you don't care about the judicial system. Willfully disobeying a Court order. You think you are above the law, but you are not. You have opened chat rooms day and night and always left the chat rooms without informing your guests. That's rude, Mr. GingerDaddy.I will place you now on 45 days probation, starting today. I don't want to see you on this Court again. You are guilty of the above charges.
This is yer ONLY warning!
Fuck you Saggy Granny!
SITO Members, plaintiffs
vs.
tj8077, defendant.
__________________________/
This Court declares all the statements on this case are true based on the evidence.
COUNT I. ATTACKING AN IMMUNITY MEMBER
1. The defendant tj8077 has attacked the following Immunity Member, Sir-Skittles several occasions.
2. The defendant blacklisted him without a valid reason.
3. Under the law, any Immunity member who harasses, bans, attacks, or blacklists the defendant violates this law.
Judge Fredesbindan's verdict; Mr tj8077 I order you to remove member tj8007 from your blacklist immediately.
Failure to do so will result in Contempt of Court. You are guilty of the above charge.
Date; November 16, 2024
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
vs.
GingerDaddy, defendant.
_____________________________/
This Court declares the following statements to be true;
COUNT I. CHAT ROOM ABANDONMENT
1. The defendant Gingerdaddy on November 11, 2024 opened a chat room with the name; 'daddy loves cock'.
2. In the room were about 8 members according to the evidence.
3. The defendant abandoned his chat room by 7:42 p.m. He didn't even tell the members of his room that he was leaving.
COUNT II. CONTEMPT OF COURT
1. The defendant ignored this Court's previous order regarding abandoning a chat room.
2. The defendant has become hostile and mocking this Court.
Justice RuFino's case decision; Mr. GingerDaddy here we go again. You were in this Court about 22 hours ago for the same thing. You also decided to ignore this Court, when we told you to stop leaving the chat room. There is something wrong with you or you just want to mock this Court. Now you will be on probation for 30 days. During those 30 days, you are not allowed to open Chat Rooms with the intent to leave the room any time you want. As a chat room host is your duty to keep your guests when would you leave and closed your room.
SITO members, plaintiffs,
vs.
GingerDaddy, defendant.
____________________________/
This Court declares all the statements are true based on the evidence of this case;
COUNT I. CHAT ROOM ABANDONMENT
1. The defendant, GingerDaddy on November 9, 2024 opened a chat room called; Where are the wild things are.
2. The chat room has more than 10 members at the time.
3. The defendant left the room without a valid reason. This constitutes Chat Room Abandonment.
4. Under the rules of this Court, no chat room host should leave the room without announcing it to the guests.
5. The defendant closed his chat room by 9:30PM without being present.
JUDGE RuFino's decision. Mr. GingerDaddy you are now officially charged by this Court for Chat Room Abandonment. Your actions are outrageous. You don't have any courtesy to the members in your chat room on November 9. This Court orders you to avoid opening chat rooms. If you do open chat rooms will be empty with a lack of members in your room.
His room was abandoned again this morning!
I heard you are on suicide watch after Trump CRUSHED that cunt stain Kamala! She was a total loser with no plan and no skills. Outmatched at every level!
I am glad you are getting state funded help!
You are the typical DNC voter- racist, anti-gay, hates Jews. But pretends to be so tolerant and outraged! Do NOT attempt to grow a brain you fucking hillbilly muppet cunt rag!
We all know you cannot afford private treatment!
--------------------------------------- added after 45 hours
Will the court compel Saggy Granny to get some help?
Will seh be remanded into a special center>?
SITO MEMBERS, Plaintiffs
vs.
CAT, defendant
The Court declares the following statements to be true;
COUNT I. USING 2 FAKE PROFILES
1. The defendant CAT has been using 2 fake profiles; #610414 opened on July 6, 2024, with 176 points.
2. Later in the month, the defendant opened a new profile using the following phone number: (786)530-8870.
3. She opened the above profile after her first profile lacked new visitors to her page.
4. The defendant has violated the rules of the profile
site guidelines. Under the rules of this Court, each member must maintain one profile name without excessive numbers.
JUDGE RuFino; Miss CAT you are an unstable member of this site. I ordered you to delete one of your profiles within one week. Failure to do so you will result in Contempt of Court.
Mentally ill, mentally unstable, old, and riddled with at least three diseases. Dealing with an amputee and auto-immnune disease husband, a cerebral palsy drooler, and poverty!
What a winner! #610414 You old slag!
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
vs.
Mobynine, defendant.
__________________________/
The Court states that the following statements to be true;
COUNT I. CHAT ROOM ABANDONMENT.
1. The defendant opened a chat room on November 7, 2024, and violated the rules of chat rooms.
2. The defendant hosted a room on the above date but abandoned his room on the above date.
3. Under the rules of this Court chat room host must notify members of the room when the host is taking a break or leaving. The defendant Mobynine failed to announce members on the chat room he was leaving.
Judge Clarisbinda's decision on the case;
I declare this defendant rude and incompetent to have a chat room. This Court restrained the defendant from opening chat rooms.
The defendant will be on probation for 30 days.
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
vs.
Celestial, Defendant.
____________________________/
This Court declares the following statements to be true;
Count I. Tampering with Case Evidence
1. The Court on October 15, 2024 charged Member CAT a/k/a (786)530-8870 with the Clean Page Act. The Defendant on this case Celestial send CAT gifts.
2. Under the rules of this Court, the defendant in this case tampered with the evidence of CAT by sending gifts to block the evidence of the case member CAT.
3. Member CAT knew about the tampering of member Celestial and didn't do anything about it.
4. This Court will not allow a defendant to receive gifts to cover her nasty page.
5. This Court orders CAT to clean her page immediately.
Judge; Florisbinda; Mr. Celestial you are guilty of the above charge of Tempering of Evidence in a current Court case. The Court will give you probation for 2 months.
Member Sir-Sittles, plaintiff
Site Members, plaintiffs
v.
CAT a/k/a 786-530-8870, defendant
___________________________________/
This Court declares all the evidence of this case is true based on the evidence.
COUNT I. VIOLATION OF CLEAN PAGE ACT
1. The defendant CAT has violated the Clean Page Act rule.
Her page is dirty with negative gifts.
2. Under the Clean Page Act all members must keep clean their pages at all times.
3. The Court will introduce the following evidence by member; Sir-Skittles; /blogs/58549.html
COUNT II. WITNESS TAMPERING
1. The defendant has covered all the evidence with the help of member Celestial. This constitutes Witness Tampering.
2. She contacted the above member because she has no points to clean her page.
3. This Court doesn't care about the points to clean the page.
COUNT III. ATTACKING IMMUNITY MEMBER
1. The defendant CAT has violated the immunity member rule. Under this rule, no member under this rule/Act cannot be attacked or defamed.
2. The defendant attacked the following member under this Act/rule; Sir-Skittles.
COUNT III. MENTALLY UNSTABLE
1. Member CAT appears unstable, based on the evidence of member; Sir-Skittles.
2. The evidence shows this member is using a phone number as her profile name on this site.
3. Member CAT has shown her unstable behavior from a normal member of this site.
4. She posted old pictures of herself making this type of behavior unstable.
JUDGE RuFino; Ms. CAT you are more lunatic now than last time you were in my Courtroom. I found you guilty of all the above charges. You have 30 days to clean your nasty page.
Saggy playing the victim yet again! Stupid bitch. (786)530-8870
Like your daughter was contacted. If she was as you say, and you are still on this scummy site after she saw you sucking dick, that is a new low even for you. A normal person would be ashamed and would delete.
Please get the Saggy Granny some site assistance! She is completely senile and defenseless!
Posting her drivers license and now her mobile number. Things may go horribly wrong for her now!
Can we get her to delete or into a sanitarium?
(786)530-8870
SITO Members, plaintiffs,
v.
Phillyphuncouple, defendant.
_______________________________/
This Court declares the following statements to be true;
COUNT I. VIOLATION OF CLEAN ACT
1. Defendant has violated the site CLEAN PAGE ACT rule. Under this Act, every page must be clean and free of trash gifts.
2. The defendant phillyphuncouple violated this rule several times during the past 2 weeks.
3. The defendant has been advised to clean up his page.
COUNT II. ATTACKING PREMIUM MEMBERS
1. The defendant has attacked several premium members of this site.
2. The defendant has shown no respect for premium members of this site.
COUNT III. ATTACKING AN IMMUNITY MEMBER
1. The defendant phillyphuncouple violated the rule of Attacking immunity members. Under this rule any immunity member of this site shall not; be attacked in chat rooms, emails, blogs, or forums. Also, no immunity member shall not receive trash gifts.
2. The defendant attacked the following immunity member; Sir-Skittles
JUDGE Tomasina: This defendant has some serious charges. Their behavior on this site is outrageous. I will order a Gag Order for 30 days. In addition a letter of apology to member Sir-Skittles. The Court and his allies will be watching this defendant on this site .
New Comment Go to top