Page #747
Pages: #1... #742 #743 #744 #745 #746 #747 #748 #749 #750 #751 ...#773
New Comment Rating: 11 Similar topics: 1.Food stuff 2.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF 3.A Forum Topic 4.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF II 5.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF III Comments: | ||
You must be logged in to post here. Log in
A poop chute is reference to the butthole.
I don't see it as a big deal. The more people you blacklist, the fewer interactions you have here. I don't see it as an abuse. If they don't want to play with others, that's their call. The fact that the individual you mention has banned over 100 people says more about them than it does the banned members.--------------------------------------- added after 7 minutesT
The blacklisters I have a problem with are the cowardly ones who drop a pile of shit or a nasty comment on your page and THEN blacklist you-- before you can respond. Those people are assholes (and, most likely, Trump supporters).
Of the 3 people who have blacklisted me:
1 is a crazy person who talks conspiracy theory nonsense--so, no loss there
1 is "you know who"--again, no loss (and no risk of projectile vomiting)
1 is some guy I have never interacted with in any way--so, who cares?
My life, and my activities here, are not affected in the slightest.
But, who is "you know who"????
Tip: If such a situation happens. Log out, go to their profile and post a rebuttal if you choose. You will be labeled as anonymous, and your comment will surely be deleted. But...at least you got in the last word.
Sweaty balls!? Ewwwww!
Sometimes, you are such a GIRL!
That being said, I will always go the extra mile in defense of the balls of a guy who agrees with me.
However, in this case, I was speaking out in the defense of all the balls on the planet.
I have to agree with Will because he told me I do.
--------------------------------------- added after 8 minutes
It wasn't a rebuttal to anything, just childish name calling but I'm OK with that.
--------------------------------------- added after 79 seconds
Therein lies the importance of a comma. It wasn't a forgotten question mark.
Will, I agree with that.
I do not always blacklist people as retaliatory means and decided a comparison was in order. Voila! His name pops out, the guy that blacklisted me about two months ago has unblacklisted and I unblacklist him. Does it stop there? NO! I decide to send him a simple private message which said "Thank you" and he blacklists me AGAIN! But not before I could view his stats!
At the time, he had blacklisted 111 members (make that 112) and had been blacklisted by 5 (make that 6) members. What makes this guy tick? Somebody asked me how he could maintain a friendly rating with all of his shenanigans. Simple, his rating has nothing to do with the number of members who he blacklists, his rating is based on how many members blacklist him. Because there are only 6 members that have blacklisted him, his rating is not affected. I suspect there is a fair amount of non paying members who have no idea who or why they were blacklisted (because he does not state (WHY?) and have ended up on this man's list.
--------------------------------------- added after 40 hours
Correction, Bathe but pronounced bath.
But does she need a bath? Have you smelled her?
--------------------------------------- added after 23 seconds
(q should be pronounced in the arabic fashion, as in qatar)
--------------------------------------- added after 98 seconds
And there's an indian business guy called ANURAG DICKSHIT. Really. lol
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
To all Evaluation Panel voters, the voting FREEZE option is a really cool feature and should be used when appropriate. When is appropriate, you ask?
I have used it when a member has been referred for posting an internet picture or pictures BUT will be offered the opportunity to remove the pictures or risk the possibility of having their profile deleted. Please don't use the freeze option because that's "your privilege", include your reason with your vote, why you chose to freeze the voting.
As the voting process is currently established, it only takes +5 to boot a member. If there are enough voting members online at the time the referral is made, a member can be gone in minutes. Think about this, what if after 48 or 72 hours, 2 or 3 days, the majority vote prevails. That gives any interested voting member the opportunity to say their peace. If at the end of 48 or 72 hours, the vote is 26 [ABUSE] to 19 [NO ABUSE], the member gets booted but on the other hand, if the figures are reversed, the member is "saved".
Of course this proposal would only be recommended for referrals involving internet picture disputes. Things involving ch,ildren or an,imals are often reviewed and resolved with expediency when admin sees it.
All it takes is a posse of GET HER/HIM! LOCK HER/HIM UP! members to boot someone or a bunch of the sympathetic defenders of fake profiles to get together quickly and vote.
Look, ma'am, over the years I have made it abundantly clear that I am not a fan of the Star Chamber. I have frequently pointed out that it is often @bused and misused. It is a flawed system, just as the people who participate in it are flawed people.
However, I understand why the Chamber exists, and why admin set it up.
It is the system we have, and the guy who runs the site has indicated that he is happy with how it functions.
We can complain all we want about the problems with the Star Chamber,as has been going on for a number of years, but it is what it is.
Also, you did not respond to the post below. I will take your lack of interest as being "NO".
I believe that, due to the way the forum works, the "post below" is no longer actually the post below. I mean, it is probably below THIS one, but not directly.
Uh...what was the question again?
Allow me to illustrate a scenario; when a photo is uploaded in the wrong category and the picture is flagged and removed, the member gets "spanked" for their error and cannot upload for a period of time. Also, professional athletes can receive a fine and suspension for foul play.
Are ya following me? SO....if the person referring a member for deletion cannot do it properly, maybe they need to get "spanked"!
If I posted an iliegal photo, I would know which one it is but it is imperative to the person who initiates the report to specify which photo is the offending one so other members know.
Will, an automatic Recent Event notification is a Gold Star idea.
If I recall correctly, you mentioned you often use your phone when you are online and here. Would you have any idea why I was not able to find any information on Nirvana Lust when I use Google to search?
I understand your point of view, but, having a page full of internet pics does not make the member a fake. I'm sure many are, but, he may not be able to post real pics or he/she is insecure at how he/she looks. What's more, many, many members react positive to internet pics as they are, usually, better in subject matter and quality, and that encourages them to post more (I know, i was guilty of that when I first joined the site almost 4 yrs ago). I was just chatting with a guy that has no pics up on page for the public. He's been here a while. I asked him why no pics. He said he was not comfortable with his looks to do so. This guy will, one day, get an internet pic and post it..is he fake?? i don't think so. CC54, you seem to be, and, every one agrees that you two are great people. I agree too, but, you seem to have this fixation about "fakes". At least admit that giving them a heads up about delition is only fair.
--------------------------------------- added after 6 minutes
I don't have the time anymore to chase these fakes. Only if it's completely obvious, I don't bother anymore. I have been just using the "notes" and marking who I know is fake for our personal reference. Which right now is about 10. All I'm saying if you notify them they will remove the pics and stay. Which I could care less. But if you do that you might as well eliminate the evaluation panel cause it will be useless.
New Comment Go to top