Page #21
Pages: #1... #16 #17 #18 #19 #20 #21 #22 #23 #24 #25 ...#29|
Started by #485312 [Ignore] 15,Dec,20 18:50
New Comment Rating: -1 Similar topics: 1.WHY DO PEOPLE COME ON SYD WITHOUT VALID PROFILES???? 2.MERRY CHRISTMAS. 3.What constitutes "World-Famous"? 4.Having Oral Sex Preformed on me by a Priest 5.YouTube can be educational too (let's share videos) Comments: | ||
You must be logged in to post here. Log in
The last big ice age was 11,700 years ago.
We lose Arctic sea ice at a rate of almost 13% per decade, and over the past 30 years, the oldest and thickest ice in the Arctic has declined by a stunning 95%.
So it was very slowly warming up for the last 11,670 years, but it somehow sped up
the last 30 years?
That was a small hoax pulled over the worlds eyes for a practice run for more latter on I think.
I had forgotten all about Y2K, actually seems like it was yesterday but I do lack concept of time
Most liberals are so high on dope I don't see how they can tell the atmosphere is going bad.
only registered users can see external links
If you wanna know what I'm talking about, go watch the movie 'Don't Look Up'
with Leonardo DiCaprio. It's very funny movie, but also very realistic.
The population of the world two hundred years ago was one seventh of what it is now. The only answer to an eventual serious problem is a reduction in population. That will not come about through families having fewer children.
Nature will eventually intervene as it has done in the past.
A virus perhaps?
only registered users can see external links
But sure, the 100% scientists who support climate change are lying.
And people who use that "global cooling" story as an argument are honest
These were in my classroom when I was in school. I very well remember the term global cooling as being a very common thing talked about by Far more than 1 person. There was several articles in this reader that I remember well. 1 was of the earth inside a green house, the other was along with a page about the SST.
an inventor, and a women's rights campaigner from Seneca Falls, New York.
Women's rights campaigners tend to be on the left of the political spectrum.
BUT THAT WAS IN 1856!!!
Don't you think not-far-left-scientists could have debunked the science by now,
if it was actually not real?
Or are only far left people capable of doing science?
Actually, it's pretty obvious that far right ideology damages the brain so much,
that understanding science becomes impossible.
The earth is round.
Nature will sort this out if we do not do it first. The pandemic is an illustration of what Nature can do. Just think of that x 100.
Bring yourself a couple boats over to the Texas border and there is a large number of people crossing mexico right now that want to WORK and be a Asset to a country, born and raised to work hard in the heat and eat rice and refried beans!
We don't need them,YOU do. Come git em, put em to work!
Fix your Labor Shortage NOW,not 20 years from now!
only registered users can see external links
Look where she is now! From Jamaica
China ALLOWS 3 children.
How many children does your government ALLOW?
My government doesn't limit the number of children, while The Netherlands has a 3.3x higher population density than China. But with fertility rate of around 1.5 children per woman, we don't have a problem. China has a fertility rate of 1.7 children per woman.
The US has a fertility rate of 1.8. A fertility rate under 2 is not a problem.
Taiwan has the lowest fertility rate worldwide; 1.07 children per woman.
Taiwan is also the seventeenth most densely populated country in the world.
China scrapped its decades-old one-child policy in 2016, replacing it with a two-child limit which has failed to lead to a sustained upsurge in births. Now China has announced that it will allow couples to have up to three children, after census data showed a steep decline in birth rates.
only registered users can see external links
Sadly to many because most of the idiots can't support all the kids they produce.
Never did understand why the drink companys would rather have to depend on new containers instead of cleaning and reusing them.Used to pick up bottles along the roadside when I was in high school to make extra gas money and such.
Now aluminum cans are not even worth picking up.
One of the losses is damage to the environment.
People with eyes and a brain already ask why the rest is so stupid!!!
IF young people are stupid enough to let all the "climate change" claims scare them this bad, they don't need to reproduce.
only registered users can see external links
You must be in quite a safe little world to just be worryed about something such as climate change.It has been changing since long before humans came along.and it will change after we are gone.
but completely deny clear and present dangers.
Terrified of terrorists / against any gun restrictions for insane people
Terrified of vaccines / dying from Covid to own the libs
Terrified of a meteorite ending earth / denying climate change
Terrified of libs taking their freedom / working 7/12 shifts for peanuts
We are not dying of wuhan any faster that the libtards. We just make the news because we were vocal.Even the red headed circle back gal from the white house is + for the virus .You would think that place would be a big safety bubble by now being it is full of libturds.
We don't deny the climate is changing, we deny that taxing the fuck out of everything and everyone is going to stop it .Common sense.
We have our weekends. 40 - 50 hours a week to earn a living to support yourself and be a asset to society is not loss of freedom,it makes it possible dingbat!
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
You have denied that the climate is changing many times. Drastically decreasing CO2 emissions will prevent the worst effects of climate change, which is devastation on an unprecedented scale. The damage will be much more expensive than preventing it. And it will cause constant death and misery. Humanity can cut back the emissions drastically now or we can wait a bit longer until we are forced to completely stop all emissions, in trying to save ourselves. It will only get more expensive and more horrible the longer we wait.
You will remember me, in 10 to 20 years, when you are dying from heat stroke, after
8 weeks of 120+°F and your air conditioning broke or you can't afford the power, because of price gouging. Unless you die in a wildfire, a storm or in a riot over water and food. But, you still might outlive me, because my country is mostly below sea level. When enough dikes break, it's game over.
People in 7/12 shifts don't have weekends. Many people in that Frito-Lay had been working for many months every single day. Workers who clock in for a 7 a.m to 3 p.m. shift are often forced to work four hours of overtime, "then [the company will] turn you right around and bring you in at 3 o'clock in the morning. So you only have 8 hours off to get home, shower, see your family, get some sleep and get back to work.". And that for a wage that DOESN'T support them. That's not freedom.
Federal and state governments impose gas taxes to help pay for road infrastructure projects. The average state gas tax is about 30 cents a gallon, though they range from less than 10 cents to nearly 60 cents a gallon.Apr 30, 2021
Google what are state and federal fuel taxes used for.
--------------------------------------- added after 8 minutes
How much is the carbon tax on natural gas?
The federal carbon charge puts a price of $40 on each tonne of greenhouse gas created by burning fossil fuels. Since natural gas produces greenhouse gases, the federal government has set a carbon charge equal to 7.83 cents that is applied to each cubic metre of natural gas that we sell.Apr 1, 2021
Wow, that will really put a strain on people’s pocket
However, climate change is going to make all our lives worse, every coming year. You're just lucky you haven't felt it yet. But, you're already paying for the damages and the costs will skyrocket. That will be due to rebuilding of infrastructure after disasters, protecting areas against flooding, moving people from areas that cannot be saved, strengthening infrastructure to withstand storms, providing the public with drinking water, expanding the power grid for all the air-conditioning, increasing food prices due to failed harvests from droughts, the south becoming to hot for cows, etc..
If you think doing nothing will be cheaper, you are wrong.
If the doctor finds a tumor, but he assures you he can save your life by cutting it out, are you saying "No!", because that costs money?
They don't need to reproduce anyway, there are already enough people.
New Comment Go to top