As a adult human, you should be capable of deductive reasoning.
You should be able to open your eyes, ears and take notice of what is happening in your immediate surroundings. High cost of environmental laws and regulations, the sacrifice's of comfort and well being, just so a volcano can erupt and blow more shit into the atmosphere in a week than humans have created this century.
Your life span is short as a human ,probably around 75-80 years. The earth has been here for eon's and will be here LONG after we and our descendants are gone.
Humans once ate raw meat and plants. Then fire was discovered and the pollution began. To eliminate the human impact on earth would require our annihilation.
Do you want that?
I doubt it.
Live your life and enjoy the luxury's of technology that has required the blood, sweat and tears of 1000's of inventors over century's.
Let's not put ourselves back into the stone age just to satisfy some liberal politicians.

Absolutely and thank you

That’s a good start

The idea is good. The problem is most of the inner city is private. No city will sink untold billions when they have to get the property through imminent domain.

No more dangerous than transporting the stuff in semi trucks to the dump site. If the launch pad could be located in the Caribbean it would be ok

Oh really? What country has ever used nukes? (Hiroshima and Nagasaki)
The US has almost started nuclear war before once.
Ever heard of the Cuban Missile Crisis?
Trump asked a foreign policy advisor why the U.S. can't use nuclear weapons. Not just once, but several times. If there is ever a nuclear war, it's about 100% likely that the US destroys the world, probably before anyone else has fired a nuke.

So explain with arguments why what I said is so stupid. If you can't, you're the moron.

Regardless of who thinks what, the USSR had all the firepower to reduce us to a cinder. They not only had the firepower but the technology to deliver it to any place in the world. They also had the ability to get alíes in Central America, the Caribbean, Africa, and Asia. Kruschev, in the UN took his shoe off and pounded the desk, yelling “We will bury you”. It was not an assumption. We were good and they were the bad any way you want to look at it. They overran the Eastern European countries, they supported terrorism, they went into Afghanistan, and made a police state out of Russia and it’s satellite countries. They disrupted the Middle East. What more do you need? And, don’t forget, I lived through it all until the Berlin Wall came down. And it became Russia again.

Science isn't a collection of opinions, it's a system for continuously testing and scrutinizing theories, determined from evidence. After hundreds or thousands of scientists criticized a theory for decades and all arguments against the theory fail, the chance that is not true gets to 1 in a million or higher. This is called the 'Gold Standard' (for level of certainty) of scientific evidence. The evidence that humans ere causing climate change has reached that 'Gold Standard'. There are always other opinions,
but it's up to the ones holding them to show their validity, against the science, not by claims of a political or religious nature.

Religion is determined via dogma, scripture and authority. When religion decides on an absolute truth, they will maintain that it's the truth, until no one in their right mind can deny the overwhelming evidence anymore, that it's false.

But why do you even pull religion into a discussion about climate change? The truth of climate change is a scientific question. If the bible said anything about the truth of climate change, wouldn't it be the prophesy of the "end times"?
Religion deals in morality, like whether humanity has an obligation to be a good shepherd to the earth.