Page #13
Pages: #1... #8 #9 #10 #11 #12 #13 #14 #15 #16 #17 ...#44
New Comment Rating: -4 Similar topics: 1.American men? 2.nude 3.Donald Trump 45th President of United States 4.🎆 🇺🇸 HaPpY BiRtHdAy America!! 🇺🇸 🎆 5.The Nobel Peace Prize 🏅 Comments: | ||
You must be logged in to post here. Log in
During the time Make America Great AGAIN refers to?
‘Israel in collapse’: 46,000 businesses forced to close since 7 Oct
only registered users can see external links
"A whole economic fabric faces collapse"
only registered users can see external links
Former Israel Defence Minister says soldiers plagued by nightmares, economy in collapse
only registered users can see external links
The end of Israel’s economy
only registered users can see external links
"The economic indicators speak of nothing less than an economic catastrophe. Over 46,000 businesses have gone bankrupt, tourism has stopped, Israel’s credit rating was lowered, Israeli bonds are sold at the prices of almost “junk bonds” levels, and the foreign investments that have already dropped by 60% in the first quarter of 2023 (as a result of the policies of Israel’s far-right government before October 7) show no prospects of recovery. The majority of the money invested in Israeli investment funds was diverted to investments abroad because Israelis do not want their own pension funds and insurance funds or their own savings to be tied to the fate of the State of Israel. This has caused a surprising stability in the Israeli stock market because funds invested in foreign stocks and bonds generated profit in foreign currency, which was multiplied by the rise in the exchange rate between foreign currencies and the Israeli Shekel. But then Intel scuttled a $25 billion investment plan in Israel, the biggest BDS victory ever.
These are all financial indicators. But the crisis strikes deeper at the means of production of the Israeli economy. Israel’s power grid, which has largely switched to natural gas, still depends on coal to supply demand. The biggest supplier of coal to Israel is Colombia, which announced that it would suspend coal shipments to Israel as long as the genocide was ongoing. After Colombia, the next two biggest suppliers are South Africa and Russia. Without reliable and continuous electricity, Israel will no longer be able to pretend to be a developed economy. Server farms do not work without 24-hour power, and no one knows how many blackouts the Israeli high-tech sector could potentially survive. International tech companies have already started closing their branches in Israel."
Stop supporting Netanyahu's madness! His evil is hurting everyone involved!
Do you want a war with Iran? Do you want American soldiers to die for Netanyahu?
Stop sending in soldiers. We have bombs and drones. BLOW THE LIVING HELL out of IRAN and any other place that promotes terrorism in the region.
You cannot destroy an ideology of hate, by giving them more reason for hate.
Iran is not some small country, with hardly any defense, like Gaza.
You are asking for the biggest war you have ever fought.
You will have to send in more soldiers than in Vietnam and Korea combined.
Do you know that some Muslim countries have nukes? Do you want nuclear war?
Do you think you can win a holy war against that many potential suicide bombers?
"any other place that promotes terrorism in the region"
Like Saudi Arabia, that you armed with billions worth of weapons?
If you think they'll pick your side in a holy war, think again.
Remember where most of the 9/11 hijackers came from?
And that for some 7 million Jews, who think that plot of dust is theirs.
The Muslim countries could kill all of them in an afternoon, and then what?
Nuclear annihilation for an Israel that doesn't exist anymore?
Continue and find 1.6 Billion Muslims, who will all hate you and Israel for it.
You think you got terrorism beat then? That's the dumbest idea ever.
Thank you.
apparently we can all see terrorism as a issue but do not agree on it's best solution.
My solution is; give back all the territory that Israel illegally stole from Palestine, recognize Palestine as an independent state, and protect the borders between them with a massive UN army. Palestine should be rebuilt and open to trade and travel. They would have a government like Iraq has, until they have a working economy.
It would probably takes several decades before they are ready for democracy.
They are some lower life form since they don't fly airplanes into buildings in the name of allah?
Israel was land given to the Jews to help them regroup and rebuild their lives and society.
The genocide of the Jews does not justify the genocide of the Palestinians.
I'm not talking this time about the land that was 'given' to the Jews,
I'm talking about all the land they stole since then.
I'm talking about going back to the 1949 borders.
That's me being reasonable, of course not being rational.
The 'one solution' seems the only rational one, at this time.
You're just as low of a life-form if you bomb innocent civilians with a drone
from 1000 miles away, as when you fly yourself into a building.
What's your solution?
Terrorist have surrendered their rights far as I am concerned when they terrorize the innocent. So they are vermin to be exterminated.Oct 7th in israel was inexcusable. And until there are no more hamas, the bombing should continue.
If you "blow the living hell" out of Iran, and some of the civilian casualties are pregnant women, doesn't that count as abortion by explosion?
Asking for a 'pro-life' friend...
Trust me, in my heart I wish it were such that you and I could buy Cat a airline ticket and have her sit down with Ali Khamenei and politely ask him not to harm folks in israel and to stop supporting terrorist attacks in general. No one would have to die, no 1 would have to kill.
But those folks don't think like we do,it is a honor to them to die for their cause. How can you explain logic and value of life to someone who wants to die killing others?
.And very preventable if people would quit fighting and terrorizing.
You don't seem to have a solution either?
I want to minimize them with sex education and free birth control.
If someone then still has an oopsie, they need a pill to quickly end the pregnancy.
Abortions should only be used, as a choice, in case of severe genetic defects.
But, women still have bodily autonomy, within reason.
That reason was provided by Roe v. Wade.
Now there are states that refuse to remove a dead fetus from a woman.
They're in a severe risk of dying, while traveling to another state. Unfortunate?
There is no one left fighting and terrorizing anymore, except the IDF.
One solution is paying off Lebanon and Egypt to take all Palestinians and let Israel steal their land. It's bad, but not as bad as murdering them all. It's expensive, but not as expensive as the current plan, if you can call this a plan.
Another plan: ramp up climate change so the whole region will be inhabitable ASAP. Then no one wants to live there anymore, ending the conflict and the Middle East.
The downside: I don't have a solution for all the refugees.
Kinda like ukraine giving up it's nukes on the word of others to try to keep them safe and now the russian invasion is slowly bankrupting all the allies?
Sometimes you make your own bed. You can 1, clean up the mess yourself,or 2,lay in it.
and the gazans just seem to be sitting around waiting for others to do the work
because of climate change. It will be like trying to survive in Death Valley.
they are just starving them to death.
That's worse than cutting people's head off. At least that's a quick death.
If Israel starves all Palestinians to death, my new political mission will be
fully sanctioning Israel in perpetuity.
Sheriffs are just as vulnerable to right-wing propaganda as you are.
Trump is weak at the border; he destroyed a bi-partisan deal, just to be able to keep lying about a border crisis. If my only issue was that I don't want any illegals in the US and I don't want drugs coming into the US, I would vote for Kamala, because she is much better on that. Trump just uses it as a talking point, but doesn't give a fuck about solving it.
"Defund the police" is a minority far left-wing idea, while Kamala is a centrist
and even then, it doesn't mean getting rid of police. It means taking away jobs police
is not doing well and transferring it to social workers, including the funding for it.
Like: getting cats out of trees or talking to a noisy neighbor or helping the homeless
or taking old confused elderly back to the home or finding a run away autistic kid and returning them to their parents or telling people not to have an open fire in a park.
All tasks that police do well often, but end up shooting innocent people sometimes.
In the past decades, everything that was important to keep the social structure healthy has been defunded and dropped on the plate of the police. That was a disaster.
"Defund the police" is turning back that mistake.
Republicans don't care about solving that problem.
They just straw-man and smear Democrats for trying to solve problems.
I must say that the slogan "Defund the police" is incredibly stupid messaging.
Democrats have the popular position on almost everything, but suck at advertising.
Please learn from Republicans who can advertise "fascism" as "patriotism".
Inflation yes it is down but prices are still higher than when Trump left office. Joe did that. Green energy. What? There is currently no way to recycle all those solar panels nor all that fiberglass from the wind turbines.
Defund the police? No give them more money and better training. Yeah there is some bad apples but over all the greater majority of cops are good people.
Facism; you are a fool for believing Republicans are facists and no I'm not a republican. I have friends from both parties . The only facists are democrats who pretty much want more power over us. Republicans tend to be conservatives which means to conserve not change the constitution.
Get over it and quit spewing bullshit.
That bipartisan deal would actually be against international law. Refugees and asylum seekers have a right to request legal entry. This bipartisan bill restricts that right.
When Republicans voted against it, Biden still passed executive orders to make border policies stricter. You are just parroting the lies they tell you.
No it does NOT allow for unchecked illegal immigration of 5000 people per day.
only registered users can see external links
HOW did Joe cause inflation?
Did Joe add 8 Trillion dollars to your national debt?
Do you understand what inflation is? Of course the prices are still higher, there was a period of massive inflation. For the prices to return to what they were, you need the same period of massive DEflation, NEGATIVE INflation.
Deflation would be horrible for the finances of the US. You have $35 trillion in debt.
The only possibility to correct that inflation is keeping it down, while wages are allowed to catch up. That is now happening under Biden.
Giving the police more money is exactly what Biden did. In 2022 he issued a
$37 Billion budget request for funding law enforcement, crime prevention.
Every Single Republican Voted Against that bill. LOOK IT UP!
The Republicans’ 2025 agenda contains cuts to funding for Law enforcement
and local police; "Defunding the police".
only registered users can see external links
Do you even understand what fascism means or is it just a curse to you?
Right-wingers are calling the Democrats "socialists", "communists", "Marxists", "LIBS" and "fascists". All those terms are referring to completely different ideologies, showing you have NO CLUE!!
"Fascism is a far-right form of government in which most of the country's power is held by one ruler or a small group, under a single party. Fascist governments are usually totalitarian and authoritarian one-party states."
Trump had his cronies in the Supreme Court give the president almost absolute power. If he wins the election, he is planning to fire all government workers and exchange them with absolute loyalists. He will make sure the Democrats will never be able to win another election, turning the US effectively in a one-party state. CLEAR FASCISM!!!
The training files for Project 2025 leaked out. They are clearly describing a
WORD POLICE, with spies in every level of the government and economy,
to report people who are using FORBIDDEN WORDS. That's STASI SHIT!
only registered users can see external links
Show that you are not a Republican, by neutrally listening to this.
Who wants more power over you?
Trump posted on Truth Social “...allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution.”.
Show that you are not just another MAGA Republican and investigate what I said,
instead of just calling it bullshit again.
International law is not something imposed on you, your country was part
of creating it. It's very similar to The Constitution.
Indoctrinated by Trump, saying they are all criminals, rapist, terrorists and 'vermin'. They do less crime than natural born citizens.
Hitler used dehumanizing language like 'vermin' too.
Clearly implying they are all evil and inferior by nature.
If you were German, you would say 'untermensch'!
Your side is progressing fast from fascism to Nazi.
I don't want illegals too, because they damage the jobs competition.
There is also a limit to the number of legal migrants we can take,
but I do not evade the responsibility to allow anyone to register,
so we can care for people who really need it.
That would be easy for the US to do, it's not a lot of people,
most come for jobs. After you know who is what, you can send them away.
You don't have to pretend that they're all monsters, to have that opinion.
It's a responsibility of the government to care about it's own citizens first.
However, there is no need to close the border to everyone.
If your country cannot handle anyone, that's pure incompetence.
I just hate the right-wing regime of Netanyahu, because they are war-criminals, doing a genocide. Netanyahu is partly responsible for what happened on 7 October; he propped up Hamas for years and he didn't protect his people. Of course he also stole the land and houses of Palestinians, and let the IDF kill innocent civilians and children. Border security was allowed to kill without justification. There are many soldiers saying on record that they killed random men, women and children, just because they were bored. That's the same terrorism, with the same number of victims, without provocation, just over a period of decades, instead of on one day.
If that's how the IDF feels about a human life, they are just as evil as Hamas.
only registered users can see external links
-Donald Trump
Of course it couldn’t possibly have anything to do with the jobs report that came out the previous day.
Today closed over 40,000 again.
--------------------------------------- added after 81 hours
Called it. 👍
He is pushing for legal pot, abortion and free meals.
typical of what most of us think democrats want, to get everyone high and sucking on the government tit.
Trump having some comic relief
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
Legal pot is not to "get everyone high". That's you using simplistic thinking. Just because people have legal access to weed does not give them more reason to use it. It might, for a while, stimulate use when legalization is implemented, but eventually use will go down to the original or below original level. Meanwhile, you solve all crime related to the production and sales of weed. It's not produced in some attic or shed anymore, causing nuisance to the neighbors. People who do want to use weed can buy it, without some dealer pushing coke, heroine or crack on them. The US cracked down on weed for decades, achieving nothing besides full prisons. Damage to society over a false idea.
Your side is unable to be honest about abortion. And even if you can be honest about it, we still won't ever agree on it. However, your opinion is in the minority and you want to push it on to people who don't share your opinion. People who are against abortion are completely free not to have one.
Free meals for kids who's parents are too poor to feed them. Is that what you have a problem with? Those kids are the future of your country. The least you can do is feed them. Even if their parents are "sucking on the government tit", their children should not be punished for it.
JD Vance is crying that too many people are not making children anymore. Only a few people like me think it's irresponsible to put kids in a dying civilization, all the others just don't have the money. Republican policies have reduced the middle class to poverty. Since Reagan, wages have not kept up with inflation, while production has increased at about a 250% level against wages. It has resulted in the wealthy becoming hundred-billionaires, while the middle class can hardly afford housing.
(Your Constitution failed to 'fix equality') Meanwhile, giving birth costs $18,865 on average, even if you have health insurance. You don't have paid pregnancy leave, maternity leave and paternity leave. Childcare is unaffordable for people where both parents have to work to stay afloat. Your education after K-12 is the most expensive
in the world. That takes all hope from poor people that their kids will get a better chance in life than them.
When your country fails to invest in the future, your country's future fails.
Tim Walz wants to turn that around.
Similar situation has been going on in Africa for decades, tv ad's with actors asking for money to send food for the hungry kids there.Sad situation. I never gave to that system.
BUT had someone said on a tv ad " donate to help teach birth control and condoms to africa" i may very well have done so,but liberals will jump up and scream that is violating civil rights. It seems liberals would rather have starving kids to show on tv than to prevent the suffering of the kids by them not happening in the first place with inexpensive birth control'
Same here in the states, people that can't rub 2 pennys will make 5 kids then expect the rest of the country to keep them up. that is where the gripe is.
If a company shuts down and 500 people are left jobless and there are kids to feed, Of course help them,they were trying to help themselves.
If the kids i see now when I am out and about are our future, we are royaly fucked.
They don't help each other ,won't talk to each other, expect to earn large wages for menial labor and are jealous of the older folks that actually have a little something .not realizing they actually worked for it. the young expect it all to happen over night. it takes most people 30 plus years to pay for a house.
harris wants to give first time home buyer 25,000 dollars to pay on a house. all that will do is increase the cost of a house 25,000 because the sellers know that is being given to them. no gain, only cost.
as for production increasing faster than wages, that is great, that is the whole idea of technology, to automate, to expand, eliminate costly labor.
Hopefully over time the population will reduce because the work will be automated and folks won't be able to house and feed 14 kids and will only have what they can afford to support.
Does JD Vance agree with you?
He want's to ban contraception and totally ban and criminalize abortion.
That means poor people cannot have sex. Right?
Having kids in the US is so expensive, income is so low and costs are so high,
that about 50% of the population would not be able to have kids, if there was no help from the government. Do you think that would be good for your country?
If Americans are not making babies anymore, where do you think corporations
will be looking to get their workers?
"as for production increasing faster than wages, that is great, that is the whole idea of technology, to automate, to expand, eliminate costly labor."
Why is it great, if the people doing the labor don't benefit from it?
You removed "wages have not kept up with inflation,...".
That means most people have become poorer.
Housing is becoming out of reach for most of the current generation.
There is no amount of working that they can ever do to regain what previous generations had, mostly because to be able to afford to buy a house, they need
an education that puts them in debt so much, they cannot also afford a mortgage.
If they don't have an education, then they also don't have any chance at a job
that allows any mortgage worth more than a shed. You just show you have no understanding at all on this topic.
because you said it eliminates jobs. What is it?
I'm not talking about labor problems,
I'm talking about income distribution problems.
Who are getting 14 children in the US?
I think that's only some Christian or Mormon fundamentalists.
Your fertility rate is 1.6 children per woman. Is that too high?
What fertility rate do you want in the US?
I'm OK with our 1.4 children per woman.
If you want it to be lower, banning IVF is indeed an idea, but you will restrict people who want children and would be very capable of caring for them.
You will get less educated people who will advance your economy.
If you want it to be higher, banning birth control and abortions is an idea,
but you will get more uneducated and criminal people and not the people
who will advance your economy.
The only reason for why you say that, I think is that more people are working from home than ever before.
There is a big labor shortage in my country, but that's NOT because less people are working. There are just more jobs than ever in my country. Also, there are more self-employed people than ever. People were fired from restaurants and found or created other jobs for themselves. Part of the uptick
in the economy is temporary. It's catch up consumption, after the Covid crisis.
I didn't make this up, it's on the site of the Ministry of Finance.
You are supporting Donald Trump, the worst lying bitch in American political history!
Your awareness on politics is literally limited to the nicknames Trump picks
for his opponents.
He use to be good at it. "Meatball Ron" was very funny.
Now, the are all "Lyin'", or at least Trump tries out his nicknames on the crowd.
"Do you guys like 'Sleepy Joe' or 'Lyin' Joe'?
"Shall I call Kamala “Laughing Kamala,” “Crazy Kamala,” “Lyin' Kamala,” and even “Dumb as a Rock Kamala,”? Come on, 'Don Whoreleone', you can do better.
So, now all of his opponents are either "Lyin" or "Crazy", and you just parrot it.
At least phart comes up with something. It's cheap and easy to find at least 10 times as much against any Republican, but at least it's something.
It's a level above your simple gut feelings.
I can see perhaps the girls bathrooms, but the boys??
Not every one is confused about what they are born as and so forth.
I did a google,
"https://www.wikihow.com/Why-Do-Hotels-Have-Bibles
That Algerian female boxer was not a male, you just accused her of being a male, because of how she looks. That's bigotry. You would force her into the male toilet, where she wouldn't have a tampon, if she needed one.
It will not be a problem in my country, because everyone who requires a tampon can just visit the toilet where the tampons are, disregarding looks or identification.
There is NO EVIDENCE for any tampon-dispenser in any boy or male bathroom.
They asked school-boards and such and no one could confirm that claim.
But, if there is one or a few in the boys bathroom, it is not because of Tim Walz.
It's either some wokester who did that or some right-winger trying to create outrage.
It's the same with the kitty-litter in school bathrooms story; bullshit!
They have to lie or at least wildly exaggerate, because they cannot win on the truth.
Maybe it’s part of the sex education program.
Hi Will !
Hi back!
Maybe it’s about equal rights.
Maybe you should worry about things that are more important because this certainly shouldn’t be taking up too much space in your brain.
The girls can go to the school nurse and get a pad or pon if they can't get any in the bathroom.
I guess the concept of wasted government funding doesn't cross your mind when tampons are placed in a male bathroom? Where are the parents in this, under 18 girls should be looked after for their needs by their parents anyway, not saying they shouldn't be in the girls room as they could run out, but still ,not needed in a male faciality. waste of money and brain power of our politicians. THEY ARE THE 1's that should worry about more important things than this.It is a subject you and I shouldn't even hear about.
only registered users can see external links
Not because you live near a wind-farm.
It has been completely debunked. Aren't you getting tired of it?
Do you think they'll win the election with that?
Yes, those boys need those tampons, to stop the bleeding of their asses,
after they are r@ped by the unqualified preachers the Republicans are allowing
as children's counselors.
sheesh, can't even be honest about his military record.And this is from a LIBERAL news source!!!
I can't see that being any "better" than Trump not serving because of a medical issue.
And besides, make fun of heel spurs if you like,but try marching with them,or walking thru the jungle, I bet you won't make it long
He was a rich kid, so his father bought a medical excuse for him.
Tim Walz served for 24 years, not including his service to the country as a teacher.
He supports drivers license for illegals and contributed tax money to the muslims.'Walz's administration also awarded $100,000 to the Muslim American Society of Minnesota,
His military service may have lasted 24 years but did he do much?
only registered users can see external links
Does that sound like someone who stand for America?
Whatever it is based on, is very likely to be logical.
The national guard is not a fighting unit. It's still in service of the country.
If it's not, abolish it, and let Trump hire private security guards.
Show there is at least some thinking going on in your head.
"A member of the 261st Signal Brigade, Biden was awarded the Bronze Star for his service and was posthumously awarded both the Legion of Merit and the Delaware Conspicuous Service Cross, which is "awarded for heroism, meritorious service and outstanding achievement."
How does that compare to a guy who cannot even remember what foot
he had heel spurs on, and who disrespected people who sacrificed their lives
in military service?
To Trump, people who serve their country are suckers.
He even mocked John McCain’s war injury and for getting caught and tortured
in the Vietnam War.
Even if you agree with Trump that military service is stupid,
it's still pure hypocrisy to attack his opponents for not serving ENOUGH.
Biden has an honorable military record. Don't be a bitch, to call him a bitch for it.
Even if he was playing cards on some base for 24 years, Tim Valz still served
his country more than Trump.
When you start flipping, I know you know. Flipping is just a cowardly move.
He was a pow ,claimed he stayed to support his men when he had a chance to go home since his dad was high up in government. Truth is,he didn't want to go back into combat and probably several people had a grudge and he was afraid of having his ass kicked, so he stayed in prison where he was "safe".
"The incident that I believe you are talking about was the fire aboard the aircraft carrier USS Forestal in 1967 that killed 134 sailors and injured another 161 sailors. This claim holds Senator McCain to be the individual responsible for the fire due to his negligence. This is actually what fake news is, because it wraps a bunch of lies around a kernel of truth. The kernel in this case is the fire, and the wrapping is the false narrative that attacks Senator McCain."
Is that what you are referring to?
It is fake news. Don't believe all the shit they are telling you.
only registered users can see external links
And even if it was true, it has no relation to what Trump said about him.
The official records say the fire was actually caused by the accidental firing
of an Mk-32 "Zuni" rocket as a result of an electrical power surge during preparations for a strike against a target in North Vietnam.
The Mk-32 "Zuni" rocket hit his plane, but he WASN'T IN IT.
That's the only link to McCain. How can you hold him responsible for that?
I don't have to defend a conservative Republican like McCain,
but I would defend JD Vance, if I see fake news used against him.
Unless it's something small, like him fucking couches. That's just fun.
The story was probably not real, but we don't know he didn't fuck couches.
The more sexual oppression someone supports, the more you can expect that.
That's different than accusing him of killing 134 sailors. That's not cool.
only registered users can see external links
Vance, a fellow that let's his money work for him and invest to have a brighter future for himself and his family. Note his wife only had a 1000 dollar wage indicated. In other other words, Vance takes care of his wife as a husband is supposed to,
for the country, providing them with insider information. That's corruption!
But go ahead and try that as campaign strategy. You will lose!
How is investing for their retirement a bad thing?
I guess you want the government sucking it's own tit after retirement?
they'll be fine.
They can invest their money in any retirement fund. If they are allowed to trade specific stocks and funds, they are prone to conflicts of interest and they can exploit their position with insider information. They won't represent you, they will represent their wallet.
I also don't want them to have their own companies, that can create conflicts of interest. It should only be allowed on a local level, for small political positions, that do not pay enough to pay the bills. If they are deciding on policies that might create a conflict of interest, they should recuse themselves. Several of the local politicians I am in contact with are self-employed and doing well. The party has approved their jobs for their current function, but it's possible they should quit those jobs, if they rise up the ranks.
I'm not just making this up, this is the code of conduct for all full-time politicians
of my Socialist Party.
When politicians retire from politics, then they are free to get whatever job they want, except for lobbyist. Most of them end up in some well-paying job in management in the private sector or in 'non-profit' organizations. They have management experience. Again, they'll be fine.
It depends how you define 'career politicians', whether I'm against them or not.
I want their job to be: representing their voters. They can do that for their whole career, as far as I'm concerned. I have no problem with those 'career politicians'.
What I don't want is the type of 'career politicians' who only represent themselves, either by being useless or by serving their own interests. That's why I want their jobs to be dependent on the approval of their constituents and why I want to protect them against as many as possible conflicts of interest. If they serve their constituents well, they can do that their whole career. When they retire, they should have a nice retirement, because they served society. Yes, on the government's tit.
Organizing the country is an important job. It's not well-fare to pay them well.
I also don't want them to get very rich of it. How can we trust them to relate to normal people, if they live in mansions and own superyachts? It should be a calling to be a representative, not an easy path to wealth. It should also not discourage people with talent, by letting them live on minimum wage in a drafty shed. These are all things my Socialist Party is doing well.
Talk to him about it.
That is not a free nation when you restrict peoples right to spend what they earn how they wish.
with the responsibility to not represent your own selfish desires.
Service means giving up some freedoms, for the good of the country.
Don't you think military service demands sacrificing some freedoms?
It's not like any other job, but even in any other job your employer demands you do not represent your own selfish desires during working hours, taking payment on the side from customers while sticking it to the employer. You cannot have a second job on the side, while you are on the clock. If you short your employers stocks and then create a big loss or a scandal for the company, so you can make a profit on their stock dropping, that's a crime.
OMG, what an archaic idea. Women are not pets.
It was done for centuries until idiots messed with the system.Now look at all the crazys we have in the world.
Supposed by whom? Not by me! Women are human beings, just like men.
They have the same human rights as men and the same duties as men.
They should not be dependent on men to take care of them.
In our household, we take care of each other. We have a combined income, without we wouldn't have been able to afford buying a house. If we would ever separate, we would be forced to sell the house, because we both own it. We would split the overvalue and our capital, and both of us would probably be able to afford a small apartment. I have a higher education, a higher income and work more hours per week, because her job is more physically demanding. She would probably need to work more hours, if she were on her own, but I have always stimulated her to develop herself and keep her connection to a job. I would keep doing that, even if my income would be twice or several factors higher from what it currently is. My girlfriend should be able to leave me, if she doesn't love me no more. It's part of why I know she still does.
Slavery has been done for centuries too. Did idiots mess that up?
"My girlfriend should be able to leave me, if she doesn't love me no more.
It's part of why I know she still does."
Is it protecting your woman, to make her dependent on you?
You're not protecting her FREEDOM that way.
Just another sign of right-wingers not giving a fuck about freedom.
If she is hungry and naked you just leave her be, equal rights, get her own?
Really?
Even YOU aint that low of a person.I feel sure you actually care for her enough to be with her for 25 years you don't want her harmed.
You made very clear what you meant with "a man's duty to take care of his woman". It's the man working and the woman cooking cleaning and being a mother. That's literally what you said.
Of course I would defend her, I do respect her, don't harm her etc.
We take care of each other like EQUAL PARTNERS.
I'm not making her dependent on me, to take her FREEDOM AWAY.
You think it's just a one sided responsibility to each other?
Can a wife just let her husband die, when she can prevent his harm?
I understand that I have a better chance to defend her than she has
at defending me, so I would. We even had a discussion where I asked her
to trust me in case of an emergency, because we both know I'm much cooler
and effective in crisis situations. She agreed with that.
It's also very American to think of defending your wife, when a crazy wants to kill her, is your prime role as husband. Sure, but that's about a 1:1,000,000 chance. The fucker will kill me first and then her. You idiots with your dumb hero fantasies are tiresome. Worry about treating her well in the other 999,999 cases.
So, from what dark hole are you pulling this nonsense?
You damn well know what I'm talking about. You're being nuts now.
What is the relation with keeping her at home as housekeeper, cook and mom?
Do you think you're being honest in any way?
can't lead in his state,why would anyone vote for him to lead the country?
only registered users can see external links
praising Tim Walz for how he handled the protests.
only registered users can see external links
New Comment Go to top