Page #2
Pages: #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9 #10 ...#81
New Comment Rating: -6 Similar topics: 1.American men? 2.nude 3.Donald Trump 45th President of United States 4.🎆 🇺🇸 HaPpY BiRtHdAy America!! 🇺🇸 🎆 5.The Nobel Peace Prize 🏅 Comments: | ||
You must be logged in to post here. Log in
There have been no criminal charges against Clinton related to this from federal prosecutors on these specific matters.
Accepting foreign donations to a charity is not automatically illegal; the legal issue is whether those funds are misused, mishandled, or violate campaign finance law, and that has not been proven in court.
Could not have ask it any better.
IF nothing to hide,why hide?
1. FBI investigates
The FBI gathers evidence.
The FBI does not decide guilt and does not file charges.
2. Department of Justice (DOJ) prosecutors decide
Federal prosecutors (U.S. Attorneys or DOJ leadership) decide whether evidence supports criminal charges.
If yes → they seek an indictment (usually via a grand jury).
3. Courts determine guilt
A judge and/or jury determine guilt or innocence.
This is the only place criminal guilt is legally decided.
Congress has no role in criminal prosecution or conviction.
You should learn something about your own justice system.
.If they fail to show up to a supeona to appear then congress should deem this as contempt of congress which is a criminal act and of course create warrents. Once the investigations are over it is up to the Department of Justice to decide if warrents are necessary for further inquiry. Since they do not hold any upscale offices at this time they are considered Privte citizens and its up to the DOJ to decide whether or not to take this matter further. Congressional hearings do not have to be televised.. BUT the DOJ will be paying very close attention.
In case of the highly classified documents that Trump 'forgot to return' and then
denied having and obstructed justice to cover up, there is possibly an issue of
national sovereignty, indeed.
Trump is doing pay to play openly, 1000x worse than what you accuse Hillary of.
If it is true, she only got some donations for her foundation. Trump is personally enriching himself, with by the hundreds of millions / billions of dollars.
If there is a reason to suspect Hillary of corruption, fine, follow the law and hold her accountable, but this whataboutism doesn't in any way justify Trump's unprecedented corruption and criminality. Trump is now richer than he ever was, clearly due to 'opportunities' he gained while in office. That is why you once had the Emoluments Clause.
There were some concern about the Clinton Foundation, when Hillary became Secretary of State in 2009. several actions were taken to reduce conflict:
Board Restructuring:
- Some high-profile foreign donors were removed from the Foundation’s advisory boards.
Commitments by the Clintons:
- Bill and Hillary Clinton pledged not to take any foreign government money for the Foundation during her tenure as Secretary of State.
- This pledge helped minimize the appearance of conflict, though the Foundation still received some donations from foreign individuals and entities, not governments.
Independent Management:
- The Foundation’s day-to-day operations were largely handled by a separate team to keep Hillary Clinton at arm’s length from donations while she was in office.
What did Trump do, when he became president in 2017, he let his son handle his business, with absolutely no guarantee that he could not advise his son to profit from his presidency. In fact, the Saudi government booked many of Trump's hotel rooms, to profit him personally. There are many other examples, but I'm done wasting time on you.
What did Trump do in 2025? NOTHING! He is now fully in charge of multiple companies and has designed specific businesses to make it easy to accept personal bribes, by selling products at ridiculous margins, Mar‑a‑Lago memberships of ~$1 million initiation, $1 million per seat fundraisers at Trump-owned properties,
and cryptocurrencies, which he himself called the money of criminals in 2019.
He is also possibly using insider trading, by manipulating the markets with tariffs.
In April 2025, Trump posted on his social platform a message saying “THIS IS A GREAT TIME TO BUY!!!” just hours before announcing a 90‑day pause on planned tariff increases. The tariff pause caused a large stock market rally, including in the broader market and in Trump‑related stocks. Should Congress investigate that?
Congress on insight is to expose truth although the democrats divert the truth in order to attack trump . Also sometimes televising congressional hearings are selling points to the american people and not finding truth..
I'm actually sick of your Trump Derrangement Syndrom. There is no cure for this,,, so far. I'm not playing your games. This forum is to establish truth. Not looking for sympathisers for having a small dick and blaming it on trump.
I'm not going to discuss tariffs with you. I've given reasons for it but you just don't get it.
Whatever you are accusing Hillary of is Hillary Derangement Syndrome.
You also have Obama Derangement Syndrome and Biden Derangement Syndrome.
You keep believing what you want to believe, not what is true.
That's far past Derangement Syndromes, that's just being Delusional.
I understand what Trump tried to achieve with tariffs, he has just failed.
I wouldn't want to discuss tariffs either, if I was a Trump supporter.
The Clinton Foundation is a registered non-profit, tax-exempt 501(c)(3) charitable organization under U.S. tax law, operating as an "operating foundation" that runs its own programs for health, economic opportunity, and civic engagement, and it holds high ratings from charity watchdogs like Charity Navigator and the BBB's Give.org.
that I'm saying. You just call it dumb, ignore what I said, and come up with the
next claim, supported by zero justification, that I then have to bury.
What you are doing is called "The Gish Gallop". It's a dishonest strategy.
So with that said which is right in front of your face what the fuck is the matter with you.. Just calm down,
National sovereignty is also maintained with a closed border avoiding any breaches,,, Oh you can visit, people can leave with a passport , and the port of entry provides assisstance for people that want to come legally into the country... NOT CLIMING OVER FUCKING WALLS, SMUGGLED IN BY TRUCKS, LIVING OFF THE TAXPAYER and murdering people. Democats have broken this oath in supporting our constitution.. So with that said... WHAT THE FUCKING HELL IS THE MATTER WITH YOU?? Technically breaking oath of office could result in impeacchment, incarceration or death basede on the incident that the breach of oath occurred.
Oh one more thing.. Trump won the election fair and square, 3 times. The one they cheated still has overwhelming of ballot tampering in all the swing states. When he was sworn 8in 2025 he closed the border reestablishing national sovereignty.. Not only did he do that he used ICE and the NATIONAL Guard in order to give the country the much needed enema from the criminal acts in the last 4 years.
Saying that Hillary sold classified documents to other nations doesn't make it true. Where is the evidence?
When I accuse your president, you want evidence and a guilty verdict, but for yourself you are satisfied with Trump saying it. Do you understand the issue here?
I agree, you need secure borders to have National sovereignty. Illegals are a threat to National sovereignty. Allowing in refugees and worker migrants, and giving them a path to citizenship, is not a threat to National sovereignty. Your gaslighting about those people is sickening, and just shows your indoctrination. They commit crimes at a much lower rate than natural born Americans.
I told you before that Republicans are more guilty of illegal employment than Democrats. You can act outraged, but that is not a justification of your opinion.
Trump got his 60+ court cases, and he failed to present ANY election meddling.
All claims of ballot tampering have failed to withstand scrutiny.
However, there is mountains of evidence showing he conspired in crimes to steal the election. There is even video of the fake electors presenting themselves at the Capitol, trying to cast their illegitimate votes for Trump.
I presented you with all the information you need to double check that, but instead you keep repeating lies, without any verifiable facts. Have you even watched a minute of former Special Counsel Jack Smith closed-door testimony to the House Judiciary Committee? Did you read one line of the transcript?
They are doing what you are asking for; Congressional Investigation.
I watched several hours already. Are you going to ignore it?
The way that Trump uses ICE and the National Guard, against his own citizens, are huge violations of the 4th, 5th, 6th, 8th, 9th, 10th and 14th Amendment.
And when the press is criticizing it, he is violating the 1st.
Don't ask me for justification, before you provide ANY yourself.
Do your homework. Ask Grok and request references. Go look for yourself.
If phart can do it, so can you.
Relax and enjoy life. Aren't you happy Trump is making Iran a free state? I am. People are taking over police stations all over iraq and the police are finally joining them.. God Bless Donald Trump...
Take a chill pill and get over it. All should get love through each other not by wasting cyberspace with fucking bullshit... Stop being a baby... By the way did you know trump is going to do the same thing to cuba, columbia and greenland? Why would you think he is doing that for?
Definition of country as I've said a billion times to you.... Truth, Justice and the value of a single human being even if it is just one..
If every human has the the same value, you wouldn't justify people being kidnapped and transported out of the country to a horrible prison in a horrible dictatorship, without JUSTICE proving that they did anything wrong.
Better than you.
As a trump supporter and being proud of who I am. I have this to say to you...
Sticks and stones may brake my bones... But you are one smelly chigger infested thick demented hairy cunt..lol
into an even more evil empire.
When you are proud to support such a person, you cannot be a good person yourself.
HOWEV#R.... Sovereign Prerogative: The Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled that the power to admit, exclude, or deport non-citizens is an inherent "sovereign power" essential to national self-preservation and the conduct of foreign relations. Rights of Non-Citizens
The Supreme Court has consistently held that many constitutional protections apply to all persons within U.S. borders, regardless of their legal status.
Due Process (5th and 14th Amendments): Non-citizens are entitled to "due process of law" before they can be deprived of life, liberty, or property. In the context of deportation, this generally includes the right to a fair hearing and the opportunity to challenge evidence.
Equal Protection (14th Amendment): States cannot deny any person within their jurisdiction "equal protection of the laws." For example, the Court ruled in Plyler v. Doe (1982) that children cannot be denied a public education based on their immigration status.
Fourth Amendment Protections: Immigrants are protected from "unreasonable searches and seizures." Generally, immigration agents must have a judicial warrant or probable cause to enter a home.
Birthright Citizenship (14th Amendment): All persons born in the United States, and subject to its jurisdiction, are automatically U.S. citizens, regardless of their parents' status.
Limitations and Exceptions
Civil vs. Criminal Nature: Most removal (deportation) proceedings are considered civil, not criminal. Therefore, the Sixth Amendment right to a government-appointed lawyer does not typically apply; non-citizens have the right to an attorney, but must usually pay for one themselves.
Border Search Exception: Within a 100-mile radius of any U.S. border or at ports of entry (airports), the government has expanded authority to conduct warrantless searches without probable cause.
Expedited Removal: Under certain federal statutes, individuals caught near the border who have been in the country for a very short time may be subject to rapid removal without a standard hearing, though asylum seekers must still be granted a process to present their claims.
"Non-citizens are entitled to "due process of law" before they can be deprived of life, liberty, or property." Like I said.
"In the context of deportation, this generally includes the right to a fair hearing and the opportunity to challenge evidence." Like I said.
" States cannot deny any person within their jurisdiction "equal protection of the laws."" Like I said.
"Fourth Amendment Protections: Immigrants are protected from "unreasonable searches and seizures." Generally, immigration agents must have a judicial warrant or probable cause to enter a home."
Like I said.
And your current administration is disrespecting those laws consistently.
"Most removal (deportation) proceedings are considered civil, not criminal." INSTEAD, they are treated like major violent criminals
and punished SEVERELY, without due process.
"Under certain federal statutes, individuals caught near the border who have been in the country for a very short time may be subject to rapid removal without a standard hearing,"
I have no problem with that at all.
"though asylum seekers must still be granted a process to present their claims."
Which is consistently violated by your current administration.
Do we understand each other now?
Don't take it personal. You've been writing to me a lot lately.. You are writing your book on here? It means to me you know I'm right on everything and you refuse to acknowlege... Are you educated? Doesn't sound like it... And I can mispell anything I want to mispell.. I could take the time with spell check and sometimes there are typos.. But since your position is so unfounded it just makes me do it this way... I don't care.. But I'm sure you already know that.
And be thankful... I haven't put any rats or shitpiles on your page for several days now.. I've learned to be empathetic from your stupidity...:x
Fifth Amendment: “No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime… nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law…”
Key word: "person", NOT "citizen".
Fourteenth Amendment — Section 1: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States… nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”
Clearly first defining the difference between a "person" and a "citizen"
and then clearly assigning the right to "any person".
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States"
Uh that means if you fell out of your mothers womb on US soil you are a citizen,unfortunately in alot of cases nowadays as it creates anchor babies.
BUT it says nothing of those that swim the river to get here.
Who is this fucken Ananas2xLekkerringcunt guy..??
He's a total fucking dope that constantly makes a fucken fool out of himself..
I've been honest with him and tried to compare with morals and ethics but he's a thick headed bitch with no manners..
Ah I get it now.. He wants his american money .. that deal is done and in german,,,, kapuut....
Leo is the 1 that just resorts to name calling and jurking off in everyone's coffee cup when they aint looking. He never really comes up with any logical answers and or solutions to problems.
ANY progressive left fucking jew hating countries are also put on notice... Iran and Venezuela are just the beginning.. And as for Trump? He's changed things... FOREVER
Do you think you can send some helicopters to go pick up the ayatollah?
Try it, and you will be spending 20 trillion on the next war.
That's not "America first", that's sending your kids to die
for a stupid distraction, from the truth that Trump, his billionaire friends
and many Republican politicians are sick perverts on the member list
of Epstein's island.
OMG, the OG Jew haters are the American right.
You just love Netanyahu's genocide.
Yes, Trump definitely changed things... FOREVER. He unleashed the very 'evil empire' so many had long feared the US was becoming.
You've confirmed just how much you hate the jewish people and the greatest leader Israel has ever had. I'm starting to understand you now.. Understatd to make sure you are still at least one ocean away from me.
The 5th is "Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group".
They have no desire to transfer children, because they just kill them too.
Yes they are entitled.. Ok,, BUT,,, Its like if someone looks like an illegal immigrant they can't go near them without due process,,, meaning they can investigate and if found that they came into the country illegally, meaning not through the port of entry, whether driving, flying, train, or on foot crawling or squirming or alien shit from outer space or if a giant hand picked them up and put them in NYC or any other reason,,,, it doesn't mean they are disqualified... It means they are sent to the port of entry OUTSIDE the country where they would have to apply for citizenship, or political assylum.. Whether undocumented or not,,, if you come into the country illegally without going through the legal chanells it is up to the government in power to determine just findings. So its a gray area. BUT for people to come into the country and the taxpayers have to cough up the tab is unjustified.. Its not our fault. Trump is always america first..
Do you give ICE a color sample chart?
Indeed, you cannot just assume someone is an illegal immigrant, with the only reason that they "look" like an illegal immigrant, because there is no specific appearance to illegal immigrants. That's when you start bullying American citizens that you think look like illegal immigrants. That's called discrimination. It all shows that you don't understand the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment.
It's even irrelevant if those amendments would only protect citizens, because ICE is bullying American CITIZENS for "LOOKING LIKE" illegal immigrants.
When you have ICE posting at immigration offices, they are not picking up illegal immigrants, they are picking up immigrants in the process towards citizenship.
When Trump started with this, he just sent ICE to farms, orchards, meat-packing plants, hotels, and restaurants. It's completely legitimate to ask the employer to show evidence that all their employees are in the books, and to pick up everyone who isn't, because that IS a probable cause or reasonable suspicion that those are illegals. It is legitimate to deport those people, if a simple check clearly shows them to be illegal, but they shouldn't let the employer get off without even a warning. They won't learn anything and just keep doing it, if there is no risk to themselves. I think we can agree on all of this. Your side keeps thinking that lefties are pro-immigration, we are not. Respect the law, and you get no grief from me. The only people who like illegal immigration are employers who want to exploit them. The idea that Democrats want them as voters is nonsense, because many immigrants
are conservatives and end up voting for Republicans.
Where we don't agree is the cruelty, treating all immigrants like criminals, using tattoos as justification for calling them criminals, and then sending them to a concentration camp in a bug-infested swamp, or a dictatorship.
And denying that is evil too.
HOW else do you find illegals among your people if you don't use a standard or a profile? How would you find a criminal without a profile?
I'm not saying that none will ever commit a crime, but we have capable police. If they do commit a crime, it's mostly petty theft.
They will get caught, because they have not a lot of places to hide,
and then they have ruined their chances of getting their asylum,
and are sent back from whence they came.
The immigrants who pose the most problems are the LEGAL migrant workers, from within the EU, who get exploited and dumped, and then are homeless on the streets. That (again) is the result of right-wing policies.
The left has tried to fix that for decades now, but they get voted down by
the majority. It's extremely rare that an undocumented, illegal immigrant committed a violent crime. I found one case of murder in a tram (2018,
4 people), but he was already under investigation. Recently, we had a Ukrainian refugee going mental and stabbing five people. He was already documented and staying in the Delta Hotel in Amsterdam as shelter. He is in custody, and official legal proceedings/investigations were underway.
No official public details as of yet, confirming mental‑health issues or PTSD.
These things happen sometimes, but they are much less frequent than violence from our own citizens. I would like my country to spend more on immigration cervices, so we minimize those risks.
Still, we are living in a much safer country than you do, and that has nothing to do with immigration. We have very strict gun control and we take better care of our citizens (and guests) so we have much less desperation-driven crime than the US.
For a country with 48,000 gun deaths per year and around 45,000 excess annual preventable deaths, due to lack of healthcare access, I find you irrationally fearful for illegal immigrants. You're about as likely to get killed
by bees, wasps or hornets in your country, and much much more likely by another American citizen.
You must have an awful conscience to keep assuming that killers would come to your country to slaughter innocent people. It truly comes across
as disturbingly twisted.
Some get caught hiring them,some don't. they carried off a bunch of illegals loccally about a month ago. Had alot of home builders scrambling to keep schedules.
If you abolish or cut back on all agencies responsible for monitoring employers, you leave a gaping hole for illegal immigrants to hide in.
Instead of agencies that would mostly bother employers, you now have
an intrusive armed invasion-force, who constantly needs to look in all those holes, bothering, beating up and killing American citizen.
And they are very fucking expensive too.
Find the truth by yourself.. That's how I did it.
My grandmother who was in Aushwitz concentration with typhoid fever dying miracously survived told me to not listen to bugs,, can't reason with bugs. Today, what is bugs to me are liberals pretending to be victims while they are the ones bringing up death and destruction. Dont focus on bugs.. Be a good son, good father, good brother, good american and support Israel.
With you telling me the United States is responsible for bringing in victims of repressed countries is also another breach of character from you.. Yes you... Single mothers that have to work 2 jobs get refused wellfare with their lives on the line while these bastards steal our money, r ape our women before murdering them,, and murder children coming from you is an absolute outrage. Bugs like you deserved to be squashed,, but I leave that up to God to decide.
//////////////////////////y Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 1d ago other posts
What the fuck is up with you referencing Iran all the time?
Do you think you can send some helicopters to go pick up the ayatollah?
Try it, and you will be spending 20 trillion on the next war.
That's not "America first", that's sending your kids to die
for a stupid distraction, from the truth that Trump, his billionaire friends
and many Republican politicians are sick perverts on the member list
of Epstein's island.
OMG, the OG Jew haters are the American right.
You just love Netanyahu's genocide.
Yes, Trump definitely changed things... FOREVER. He unleashed the very 'evil empire' so many had long feared the US was becoming.
You would have trouble teaching a class because you can't understand how to use Jack and jane went up the hill to fetch a pail of water, they would both be straw people with your mindset
A "John Doe" is some unknown person or personality.
A "Straw-man" is misrepresentation of someone’s position to make it easier to attack.
The Intent: To win an argument by deception.
The "straw-man" isn't a real person; it's a caricature.
When you are straw-manning someone, then you are not attacking the actual ideas of that person, but what you are pretending are his ideas.
Here is a common example involving a workplace project:
Colleague A (Actual proposal): "I think we should extend the testing phase of this software by one week. I’m worried we might miss some bugs if we rush to launch on Monday."
Colleague B (The straw-man): "So, your plan is to delay the entire launch indefinitely and tell our clients that we are incapable of meeting deadlines? We can't just stop working every time someone gets nervous."
No to Europe too,, you included,, especially you.... you've wasted my time for over a month now... I really can't believe how fucking dumb you are... You're so fucking dumb I can't believe it..
PURE MAKE-BELIEF to justify actions that you cannot justify honestly.
"United States are a super power now." And that justifies it for you to act violently towards all those countries you are listing, including DENMARK.
At least some of those countries have been antagonistic towards the US, but DENMARK? The only thing you can accuse them of is not gifting you their Sovereign territory. And Cuba? You just didn't like their choice of self-government, when they threw the US out of their country, for treating them like a whore. Iran? You don't like it that they didn't like you fucking with the Middle East for ever for their oil. China? Just a country who got rich of producing stuff for your corporations, and who is not willing to serve you anymore. I sort of understand Colombia and Mexico, for all those drugs, but they didn't force it down your nose and veins. It's your own failures as a country that make your people have drugs problems. In my country, you can get drugs in a minute, but we have nowhere near your overdose and addiction problems. Your problems with Russia are simple; you didn't like their ideas and you didn't like another superpower rival. You forced everyone to pick your side or die. We all were your bitch for decades, and as soon as the bully needs to do his job and defend us from the other bully, you back down.
You show clearly that you don't have the slightest bit of empathy, and the ENTITLEMENT of the US you are expressing is profound.
You ARE wasting your time, because you cannot justify any of your claims.
Even when you prove yourself wrong, you are unable to learn.
You understand that you are not engaging in a honest debate, and you are here to gaslight, straw-man and use cheap tricks, to defend an ideology you believe in, and a leader that you adore for his performative dominance,
that you know are both completely indefensible. You cannot reconcile the principles you say you hold high with the ideology and leader you support. That's prevalent on your side of politics.
The late Charlie Kirk was well-known for using nothing but cheap tricks and editing his videos, to make others think he won the debate, while he only embarrassed himself every time. If someone needs cheep tricks to propagate their ideology, they know that their ideology is not defensible. That made him a grifter, because only the money made his career worthwhile. He must have hated himself and it looks like his wife didn't love him much either. She clearly shows she only liked his money and his audience, that she wants to continue to monetize. It's a hollow existence.
Likewise, only the result of your efforts here could make it worthwhile for you. Since you have not achieved anything, not even with your own side of politics, it has been a completely hollow activity for you.
That's different for me, because I don't need cheap tricks and I never defend anyone or anything that I consider not truthful or not worth defending.
My ideology is consistent, from my core principles, to the words I speak when I am out canvassing, and the representatives I canvas for.
I never have to pretend that my representatives are better human beings than how they present themselves, because they are all exemplary in character, behavior and competence. They are all not serving their self-interests, but exist solely to defend the core values of the party, its voters, and the people, only for as long as the members allow it.
I can support this ideology, without betraying myself and my dignity.
The effort is just, the means is just, so my time investment is justifiable.
You are required to lie and humiliate yourself for the evil of your cult leader.
It was a waste of time, before you typed one word.
I came here on this blog because it showed an apparrent interesting topic. I said Trump will win the third term where I still feel is going to happen. Afterall the democrats have nobody. At least nobody they can risk their money spending millions of dollars and just losing. I'm curious as to what will happen when we retain the house and enlarge the senate.
By the way you scroll up and down the constitution searching for loopholes when in fact the juristiction of letting people into our country actually falls within the Supreme Court.
The way you started attacking me calling me stupid, not knowing my country, a missspeller was telling me you are not here to seek truth.. It was to troll using your left socialist wing ideology as a reference point. I also feel you have nothng in life better to do than to come on here and trolling people, jerking off then fall asleep on the chair. When you started in with the genocide phrasing then you lost all credibility with me, getting to know you better and not taking any further time trying to understand you because you are well known to me now.. I believe you have fakes on here because these names also have no life like you do.. When you are bored, have nothing going for you and blame everyone except yourself it is natural for you to hate Jews...
Back in the 60s The democrates were acceptable and were lenient with the middle class JFK was a great American. He didn't want to go into Vietnam and he was sympathetic towards minorities and did avoid total Annihilation with life as we know it on the planet. He did it with approximately 30 mimutes to spare. We were at defcon 2. But the soviets aborted it. Kennedy got into scuffles with the CIA over going into war and was assassnated. When Bobby Kennedy won the California Primary in NYC in 5 minutes he too was assassinated,. From that point on the coup was well established and we lost lives in Vietnam...The democrats then changed and the abandoned the middle class. If you notice but if you've ever been here at all in blue cities there is no middle claqss. You have the top 1% or 10% but no middle class with high taxes and cost of living. All you have for the most part is extremely well off, homeless then Illegal freelancers that sucked the middle class dry. The middle class abandoned them so they imported more illegals and illegal voting ballots. They have abandoned the country. Taxes, cost of living and education is superior in Red States for now. All blue states have terrorism and hatred which includes whites, jews and anybody else that voted for Trump.
But these cockers are not the level 1 agenda. It's the central banks.. If the democrats want power they have to use illegals. Nobody else wants to vote for them. To show this is true every single democrat in congress and the senate including the mayor and governor of all states their approval ratings are below 20%.. Some are in the single digits.. So with that said how are they still maintaining power? Its not from Americans,,, its from illegal ballots.
Americans want their sovereignty. We welcome all visitors and people that want to be american citizens.. Not murders that climb over walls and tresspass... Americans are dying because of Joe Biden opening the border.
I feel safer now ,, As well as over 80 milion other americans.. Now since the border is closed with ICE kicking them out of the country the democrats are losing power and money. What is going on with Iran is the result of the democrats losing money to kill Jews. This is why I get irritated with you because I have told you oveer and over ... then you try to say I'm ignorant and don't know my constution. I know what you will never know.,.,
You are not saying anything wrong there. I can agree.
But those are CORPORATE CENTRIST LIBERALS, NOT SOCIALISTS/LEFT WING.
FDR (not JFK) was probably the most left-wing president you ever had. They had to create term limits to get him out, because he was that popular. Bernie Sanders is left-wing. He has been the most popular senator for a decade now.
Hillary, Obama and Biden are Corporate Centrist Libs., not socialists.
You have to learn about what those terms mean, because you're humiliating yourself.
Stop your BS about illegal voting. The only real case for that has been again Trump.
What are 'superior taxes'? The cost of living in red areas is lower, because red areas are sparsely populated and poor. Of course an apartment in New York City is more expensive than a big house in a rural area. Across almost every major indicator,
blue states and metro areas outperform red states and rural areas. Still, in general, education in the US is failing hard to teach kids science and critical thinking skills,
but that is mostly because of religion meddling with people's logical reasoning.
They want to fill people's heads with dogmas, and discourage critical thinking, because critical thinking destroys dogmas.
"It's the central banks.." ??? No, it's the billionaires, who control the banks.
Democrats take money from billionaires, just like Republicans.
It's true that they abandoned the working class for their donors.
Still, they are better at maintaining some equality/reducing poverty.
Republican have not just sold out completely, they ARE the billionaires.
Trump's whole administration is filled with wealthy people.
The wealthiest man in the world supported Trump and after it helped Trump
'win' the election, Trump let Elon rummage around in your governmnet finances, cancel already approved payments and destroy agencies. Then Trump lowered taxes for the wealthy and raised taxes on consumers (tariffs). Is that supposed to represent the working class?
"every single democrat in congress and the senate including the mayor and governor of all states their approval ratings are below 20%"
"congress and the senate"? Congress = House + Senate
OMG, are you talking about Favorable/Unfavorable for House Representatives?
THAT'S YOU FAILING TO UNDERSTAND POLLING!!! See other comment.
You are so fucking dumb!!!
Joe Biden did NOT 'open the borders'. Remember all those people, sitting in the desert near your border? Stop being a fucking parrot.
Having illegal immigrants in a country is damaging. That however is the result of decades of neglect. Democrats wanted to allow refugees in LEGALLY, but Republicans made that almost impossible. Still, Republicans allowed that illegal immigration to happen, because they didn't want to punish employers who are exploiting illegal workers. Rural areas are now completely dependent on those illegal workers for picking fruit and vegetables. Low skilled, high risk, uncomfortable work is now done by illegals for a huge part. That is because Republicans didn't want to crack down on those employers. Democrats have proposed many bills and wanted to assign budgets to regulate and sanction against illegal employment, but Republicans have voted against that many times. Look it up, don't be a lazy fuck.
FEELING safer is no evidence for BEING safer. Just because 80 million people voted for Trump, doesn't mean they still support everything he does. They are not all as blind as you are. Only 36% of Americans still approve of how he performs.
On immigration, his main 'issue', he gets an approval rating of 37%.
Most people don't like illegals, but they dislike Trump's cruelty more.
only registered users can see external links
"democrats losing money to kill Jews" What are you even trying to say? You're mental.
I think you have more general knowledge than the average MAGA, but you're even more delusional than the average MAGA, and that's quite an achievement.
1. Sen. Peter Welch (D‑VT), Latest approval rating (Jul–Sep 2025): 66 %
2. Sen. Brian Schatz (D‑HI), Latest approval rating (Jul–Sep 2025) ~60+%
3. Sen. Mazie Hirono (D‑HI), Latest approval rating (Jul–Sep 2025): ~55–60 %
4. Sen. Ed Markey (D‑MA), Latest approval rating (Jul–Sep 2025): 57 %
5. Jon Ossoff (D‑GA), Latest approval rating (Jul–Sep 2025): 51 %
Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, Latest approval rating (Jul–Sep 2025): ~71 %
Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro, Latest approval rating (October 1, 2025): 60 %
California Governor Gavin Newsom, Latest approval rating (mid‑Nov 2025): ~56 %
Illinois Governor J. B. Pritzker, Latest approval rating (Nov. 30, 2025): 52.2 %
There is no approval rating data for House representatives, because National and state polls do not routinely measure job approval for individual rank‑and‑file House members, unless they are very high‑profile.
The 5 Most Popular U.S. House Members (2025–2026) are:
1. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio‑Cortez (D‑NY)
2. Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D‑NY)
3. Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R‑PA)
4. Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D‑TX)
5. Rep. Ro Khanna (D‑CA)
Only one Republican, Brian Fitzpatrick, because of his Bipartisan cooperation.
If you see for instance a Favorable: ~17 %, that is NOT an approval rating.
Random people are asked: "Do you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of this person?" Often includes people who haven’t heard of the person, which counts as neutral/don’t know. That means that the results can be Favorable: ~17 % and ~15 % negative/unfavorable. The remaining ~68 % are essentially “no opinion/neutral.”
Your "below 20%" reference, THAT'S YOU FAILING TO UNDERSTAND POLLING!!!
When Democratic politicians are not popular, or lost a lot of their popularity recently, like Chuck Schumer, Hakeem Jeffries and Kathy Hochul, it is because people don't think they are fighting Trump hard enough, not as you seem to think, that they are not like Trump enough. That's by people who will OBVIOUSLY NOT vote for Trump.
Those voters will still vote for ANY Democrat, because they are NOT Trump.
I was waiting for that character to come out. You actually managed
to hide it away for a good while. I wonder if you'll be able to put him
away again or if he's now out of the closet permanently.
To return a compliment to phart; without claiming he is one, he's a much better STOIC than you are. I guess life experience, persevering despite adversity, has taught him that. You can learn Stoicism from books, but it takes discernment, epistemic integrity, and a willingness to change,.... qualities you clearly lack.
"is there verified evidence of an FBI-released tape of Clinton admitting to illegal conduct or that the Clinton Foundation was proven to be used for personal use or to hide campaign debts."
answer
"No, there is no verified evidence of an FBI-released tape in which any Clinton admits to illegal conduct. Recent FBI documents released via the Senate Judiciary Committee do reference a recorded conversation intercepted by the FBI between Hillary Clinton and convicted donor Sant Singh Chatwal, in which they discussed Clinton Foundation donations in the context of her 2008 campaign debt. However, the documents indicate that FBI headquarters blocked agents from questioning Clinton about this during her 2016 interview, the conversation itself does not appear to involve an explicit admission of illegality (it focused on redirecting donations from her campaign to the Foundation), and the tape has not been publicly released by the FBI—only descriptions of it in the declassified files. Other FBI-released materials from past investigations (e.g., her email server probe or older White House file controversies) do not mention or include such a tape. Recent Justice Department releases related to Jeffrey Epstein include photos involving Bill Clinton but no tapes or admissions of illegal conduct by any Clinton.
Did you also have Grok explain your legal processes?
The law should be blind, and not performed by a politically inspired congress.
You lot always let your cult leader meddle with the separations of power.
When it's a Democratic president you all know very well, but when it's your side,
you don't give a flying fuck.
When it is a republican,it is usually something good for America , something the dems, don't like.
Present some real facts for a change, instead of your lazy accusations.
Republicans only do things for the rich and wealthy, NOTHING for you.
If they sprinkle some cash on you, it's cash that they first took from you, tenfold.
Refute that tariffs are not just taxes on consumers.
Here is an example of what I'm talking about:
Trump announced a one-time $1,776 bonus for about 1.4+ million U.S. military service members, calling it a “warrior dividend”. Though Trump claimed the bonus was funded by tariff revenue, Pentagon officials say it’s being paid out of money Congress had already appropriated for military housing assistance (a Basic Allowance for Housing supplement) as part of the 2025 One Big Beautiful Bill Act.
Approximately $2.6 billion of that housing funding is being repurposed for the one-time payments. The funds were originally intended to help service members with housing costs, not a standalone cash bonus. Redirecting them means less available for housing support that service members and families would otherwise get. Because the payment is framed as a bonus rather than regular housing allowance, under current law, most bonuses are taxable income, so recipients may see withholding and taxes reduce the actual amount they receive. The result is that those 'warriors' get less money for housing, to pay for a one time bonus that is worth much less.
So, Trump cut $2.9 billion for the Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH), and he is spending roughly $2.6 billion on the “Warrior Dividend”, which is TAXED! (~30%).
They will get about $1.8 billion from the original $2.9 billion.
only registered users can see external links
How is this NOT sprinkling same cash on them, after taking it from them?
"I know what you will never know.,.," Did you know this?
And of course many farmers have been affected hard by Trump's tariffs.
Trump will bail them out a bit, but bailouts is not what farmers are working for.
-> Sprinkling some cash on them, after taking their business from them.
Should I start about the Affordable Care Act (ACA) premium subsidies?
Or can we just wait a bit, until many people cannot afford their health insurance premiums anymore, so you can see for yourself? Did you know that this affects
red states more than blue states? Trump is fucking over his own voters.
What will Trump sprinkle on them, after their premiums double or triple? 1x$1000?
I guess they will Find Out, after Fucking Around.
New Comment Go to top