Page #2
Pages: #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9 #10 ...#103
New Comment Rating: -7 Similar topics: 1.American men? 2.nude 3.Donald Trump 45th President of United States 4.🎆 🇺🇸 HaPpY BiRtHdAy America!! 🇺🇸 🎆 5.The Nobel Peace Prize 🏅 Comments: | ||
You must be logged in to post here. Log in
If you're sick of his bullshit, but can't swallow the thought of voting for a Democrat, just stay home. Take the day off and relax. Don't vote for anyone!
With love, your neighbour.
only registered users can see external links
Chrystia Freeland, Former deputy prime minister of Canada
and author of Unreliable Boyfriend
Key Operations and American Participation
• Stevenson-Sputnik LLC: Founded in 2010 near Voronezh, Russia, by Montana rancher Darrell Stevenson alongside Russian business partners (Sergei Goncharov and Alexander Buzuleyev). The project transplanted thousands of head of U.S. Angus and Hereford cattle, equipment, and American cowboy methods to help build a domestic beef herd.
• Miratorg Agribusiness Holding: Owned by Russian executives (Viktor and Aleksander Linnik), this massive vertical operation is one of the world's largest cattle producers. It heavily relied on American expertise, importing U.S. Angus genetics, horses, saddles, and hiring American ranch managers and trainers (such as Phil George from Kansas and trainers from Wyoming) to train local Russian workers.
• Certified Angus Beef (CAB) Partnership: Miratorg partnered with Certified Angus Beef to implement U.S. and Canadian quality standards across hundreds of thousands of commercial Angus cattle and feedyards in western Russia
only registered users can see external links
first it was what made New York Pizza special,now it is the way tourist are able to enjoy the city.
What next?
Let me assure you that if we had the power to interfere with the US election, Donald Trump would not be your current president!
What kind of a library could you make for him that would make any sense? The world now knows he has health issues and is not doing well,but those issues were in place while he was filling depends and the oval office.
only registered users can see external links
You can’t call yourself anti racist if you consider people of color so much lesser than white people that you think they can’t be expected to behave appropriately in a given setting, by the way. Show me a biological difference between a white person and a person of color that requires the latter to be held to a low standard, and I will show you a social construct. If you’re someone who says things like, “they don’t know any better/it’s in their nature/they don’t know how to do that/they are physically incapable of doing that/you shouldn’t expect better from them/etc” you are a white supremacist and you deserve to be punched in the throat
with this beautiful quote! However, I have to correct you: Van Gogh unfortunately
never said or wrote this.
The misconception started around 2009, when a museum in Basel used this phrase
on the flap jacket of a Van Gogh exhibition catalog without a proper source. The internet did the rest, permanently gluing his name to it. In reality, the metaphor is much closer
to a line from the 19th-century French writer Émile Zola.
The underlying sentiment does resonate with my philosophy on life. For me, walking off the paved road means refusing to adopt off-the-shelf opinions or blindly follow a crowd.
My views and thoughts are entirely my own, shaped by careful reflection rather than consensus. It requires independent thought, but I can highly recommend it.
So what is so hard to figure out
"Normality is a paved road: It’s comfortable to walk, but no flowers grow",
that was attributed to Vincent van Gogh in your picture, to your Zionist propaganda.
Funny and a good trick. A RAT MOVE, but you tricked me.
It just shows that you cannot be trusted on ANYTHING.
You resort to this fucking stupidity because you can't debate heads up so you play the fucking victim. This only shows your incompeted means of reasoning. NO REASONING.
The planet is contaminated by you.How can I TRICK you of telling the truth where the only person you tricked is yourself? . The problem is YOU. You still haven't answered my question of what fucking planet you are from after parachuting onto earth.
I'd tell you to GET BENT but you are already passed that level of stupidity..
This is not ZIONEST propaganda. It all comes down to you.. Only you.. Fucking jackass.
Just like any asshole that stinks up the place.. You should be ashamed of yourself.. Take a look at you. Your a little fucking bitch.
Katie Zacharia, really is the craziest deranged cretin,
of the whole line of bodged Barbie clones, I have ever seen.
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
Specific Verses
• Surah Al-Ma'idah (5:21): Moses tells his people: "O my people, enter the Holy Land which Allah has assigned to you and do not turn back [from fighting in Allah's cause] and [thus] turn back as losers."
• Surah Al-Isra (17:104): Allah addresses them: "And thereafter We said to the Children of Israel, 'Dwell securely in the Promised Land. And when the last warning will come to pass, we will gather you together in a mingled crowd.
Key Context and Interpretations
• The Holy Land: Islamic commentary generally identifies the "Holy Land" (Al-Ard Al-Muqaddasah) as the region encompassing Palestine and Canaan.
• Condition of Righteousness: Traditional Islamic scholarship notes that while the Quran acknowledges the land was assigned to the Children of Israel, the inheritance and God's favor are tied to righteousness, obedience to God's commands, and moral behavior rather than an unconditional, permanent title.
• Ultimate Ownership: The Quran emphasizes that ultimate ownership of all the earth belongs to Allah, who grants it to whomever He wills among His servants.
Chapter 7, Page 248: "The conquest of the Promised Land is presented as a series of divine commands to exterminate every living thing, to leave nothing that breathes. This is not just bad morality; it is a terrifying blueprint for ethnic cleansing, justified solely by the claim that a particular piece of territory was 'promised' to a specific group of people by their God."
Chapter 8, Page 259: "The take-home message is that 'thou shalt not kill' applies only to the in-group. Religion is a label of in-group/out-group identification, and it is a potent source of conflict... It is hard to see any solution to the problem as long as children are systematically brought up to believe that they are 'chosen' or 'special' by virtue of their ancestors' religion."
Everyone is reading this.. I need 2 points for the next shitpile..
What makes something true?
Is something true, when it is written in an old book?
Why does the age of a book matter for the content being true?
"This is legal"? WTF are you talking about?
THIS is what I know. WHY DOES IT MATTER??
Here are some other 7th-century myths:
1. The Seven Sleepers of Ephesus
A group of young men flee religious persecution and hide inside a cave, where God places them and their dog into a deep sleep to protect them. They remain asleep for over 300 years, with the text explicitly detailing how God periodically rolls them from their left to their right sides to prevent their bodies and clothes from rotting, while their dog keeps watch at the entrance with its paws stretched out. Upon waking, the men believe they have only slept for a single afternoon, discovering the truth only when they attempt to buy bread in the city using coins that are centuries out of date.
2. The Iron Wall of Dhul-Qarnayn
A legendary king travels to the physical ends of a flat earth, reaching the furthest western point where he witnesses the sun setting directly into a dark, muddy pool of water, and then the furthest eastern point where the sun rises over people who have no shelter from its heat. During his journey, he encounters a terrified population plagued by the apocalyptic tribes of Gog and Magog, and he protects them by pouring an immense barrier of molten iron and copper between two mountains, sealing millions of these destructive creatures behind the wall until the end of days.
3. The Transmutation of the Sabbath Breakers
The inhabitants of a coastal town attempt to bypass strict religious laws that forbid fishing on the Saturday Sabbath by setting up their nets on Friday evening and harvesting the trapped fish on Sunday morning. In immediate response to this theological loophole, God intervenes and instantly mutates the entire deceptive population of the town into physical apes and swine as a permanent public punishment for their trickery.
4. The Voyage of Cesair and the Birth of Ireland
Before the Great Flood, Noah’s granddaughter, Cesair, is denied a place on the Ark because of her pagan beliefs. Under divine guidance, she builds three giant ships and sets sail across the uncharted oceans with fifty women and only three men, including her father Bith and the shapeshifter Fintan. After a perilous voyage, they land on the uninhabited shores of Ireland, exactly forty days before the deluge begins. When the global flood finally hits, the entire colony drowns except for Fintan, who survives for thousands of years by magically transforming into a salmon, an eagle, and a hawk, witnessing the entire subsequent history of the island and the arrival of the magical Tuatha Dé Danann warriors.
Do you believe that they are all true, because they are from the 7th century?
• The Holocaust: The most prominent genocide during World War II was the Holocaust (also known as the Shoah), in which Nazi Germany and its collaborators systematically murdered approximately six million European Jews—about two-thirds of Europe's Jewish population—between 1941 and 1945.
• Other Targeted Groups: Nazi Germany also committed genocides and mass atrocities against other populations, including the Romani people (Porajmos), millions of Soviet prisoners of war and Slavic civilians, Polish citizens, people with disabilities (Action T4), and political dissidents.
• Mechanisms: These mass killings were carried out through mobile killing squads (Einsatzgruppen), forced starvation in ghettos, slave labor in concentration camps, and industrial extermination camps like Auschwitz-Birkenau and Treblinka.
Other Atrocities of the War
• Japanese Empire Atrocities: Outside of Europe, Imperial Japan committed massive war crimes and atrocities against civilian populations and prisoners of war across Asia and the Pacific, such as the Nanking Massacre and human experimentation by Unit 731, though historians classify these events under war crimes, crimes against humanity, or mass violence alongside specific definitions.
• Broader Distinction: While the Second World War involved vast conventional battles between nations, the ideology of the Nazi regime turned large portions of the conflict into a deliberate, bureaucratic program of racial extermination, as documented in historical overviews like Genocides in history.
Wikipedia
Genocides in history (World War I through World War II)
The Holocaust The Holocaust was accomplished in stages. Legislation to remove the Jews from civil society was enacted years before...
The National WWII Museum | New Orleans
The Holocaust | The National WWII Museum | New Orleans
Persecution: Nazi Germany state-sponsored genocide targeting six million European Jews, Roma, Soviet POWs, Poles, and disabled ind...
Wikipedia
The Holocaust
The Holocaust This article is about the genocide of European Jews committed by Nazi Germany from 1941 to 1945. For all groups pers...
Wikipedia
Victims of Nazi Germany
Victims of Nazi Germany This article is about all groups persecuted by Nazi Germany from 1933 to 1945. For the genocide of Europea...
Wikipedia
German war crimes
World War II Main articles: Consequences of Nazism, The Holocaust, War crimes in World War II § Crimes perpetrated by Germany, Wor...
And here is the kicker,
Postwar Accountability: Following World War II, the United States granted immunity to Ishii and key unit members in exchange for their secret human experimentation and research data. The Soviet Union prosecuted twelve members at the 1949 Khabarovsk War Crime Trials. In 2002, the Tokyo District Court formally acknowledged the Japanese military's biological warfare atrocities
Of course we did the same for Hitlers bunch ,that's why we had color tv and rockets and jet planes and such before our home grown tech had caught up. Sadly, the research hitlers jewish doctors did to cure and treat cancer was all hidden away, to much money made nowadays in the treatment and Control of cancer, no money to made with cures. That was 1 of Hitlers worst fears, dying of cancer
By sheer numbers, Hitler's regime was far worse than Unit 731. Bias against Asians seems to be the only reason to claim otherwise.
In some ways wars advance science, but in other ways wars throw back humanity for decades. The most useful advances in science are made during peacetime, when governments are not wasting money and people on murdering other people.
Believing that Hitler's scientists developed a general cure for cancer is based on complete ignorance of biological science. Cancer is not a single disease, it is hundreds
of different diseases, driven by distinct genetic mutations that cause cells to divide uncontrollably, in lots of different ways. You cannot cure it with a single, general silver bullet. To even attempt a universal fix, you would need advanced, targeted gene therapy to rewrite DNA at a cellular level. That technology was lightyears out of reach in the 1940s, and it remains one of our most complex scientific frontiers today. There was
no hidden cure, it's bullshit.
🌊 The Parting of the Red Sea
The miracle of Allah opening the sea to save the Israelites from Pharaoh is mentioned in multiple places:
• Surah Al-Baqarah (2:50): "And [remember] when We parted the sea for you and saved you and drowned the people of Pharaoh while you were looking on."
• Surah Ash-Shu'ara (26:63-65): Allah commands Musa to strike the sea with his staff, parting it into twelve distinct paths like massive mountains, allowing them to cross safely.
• Surah Ta-Ha (20:77): Musa is commanded to strike a dry path through the sea for his people.
🗺️ Entering the Holy Land
The command and assignment of the Holy Land to the Children of Israel are explicitly stated in:
• Surah Al-Ma'idah (5:21): Musa tells his people: "O my people, enter the Holy Land which Allah has assigned to you and do not turn back [from fighting in Allah's cause] and [thus] become losers."
• Surah Al-A'raf (7:137): "And We caused the people who had been oppressed to inherit the eastern regions of the land and the western ones, which We had blessed..."
• Surah Yunus (10:93): "And We surely settled the Children of Israel in an agreeable settlement and provided them with good things..."
Enuma Elish (Babylonian) — c. 18th–12th Century BCE
• The Myth: The god Marduk splits the primeval water goddess Tiamat in half to create the ordered world.
• Biblical Adaptation: The writers transformed this cosmic battle into a historical event, where Yahweh splits the sea to conquer chaos (Egypt) and create a path for His people.
The Westcar Papyrus (Egyptian) — c. 1600–1500 BCE
• The Myth: A royal magician folds one half of a lake's water onto the other half to retrieve a lost jewel from the dry lake bed.
• Biblical Adaptation: The visual imagery of standing walls of water exposing the dry floor was localized into the Exodus narrative.
The Baal Cycle (Canaanite) — c. 1400 BCE
• The Myth: The storm god Baal defeats Yam (the god of the sea and chaos) to establish his kingship.
• Biblical Adaptation: Israelite writers used the exact same poetic language. Yahweh uses a powerful wind (a storm-god attribute) to conquer Yam (the Hebrew word for sea) and demonstrate His supreme authority over rival Canaanite deities.
The Book of Exodus (Hebrew Bible) — c. 6th Century BCE
• The Synthesis: Written down much later (largely during the Babylonian Exile), this narrative combined these well-known regional motifs into a single historical epic to prove that their God, Yahweh, controlled the elements.
Divine Land Allocation is also a very ancient theme.
Sumerian & Babylonian Royal Inscriptions — c. 2500–1800 BCE
• The Myth: Gods like Enlil or Marduk directly assign fertile territories, kingdoms, and city borders to specific kings and their peoples to establish divine order.
• The Adaptation: The concept of a supreme deity drawing physical borders and handing a specific piece of earth to a designated group was already a standard legal and religious practice in Mesopotamia.
The Egyptian Conception of Sacred Soil — c. 2000 BCE
• The Myth: The creator god Amun-Ra designates the fertile Nile valley specifically for the Egyptians since the creation of the world (Zep Tepi), while framing outside lands as chaotic.
• The Adaptation: Regional nations adopted the Egyptian idea that living on a specific, god-given piece of land was a requirement for spiritual purity and divine blessing.
The Hittite and Amorite Land Claims — c. 1800–1400 BCE
• The Myth: Migrating Near Eastern tribes claimed their storm gods (like Tarhunz or Amurru) commanded them to march into, conquer, and settle specific fertile valleys.
• The Adaptation: Invading or migrating groups consistently used the "divine mandate"
to 'legally' and 'morally' justify taking over lands that were already occupied by others.
The Hebrew Bible & Later Islamic Texts — c. 6th Century BCE & 7th Century CE
• The Synthesis: The biblical writers (and later the Quran) took this ancient, universal political tool, using a god to legitimize territorial ownership, and tied it to their own monotheistic covenant. The land was no longer just won by strength; it was an inheritance granted by the one true God based on religious obedience.
From a literal, historical perspective, this recycling undermines the claim of unique divine revelation. It demonstrates that these stories are human literary products, evolved folklore rather than eyewitness history.
Far from proving history, this continuous copying proves something else: that myths
are just tools humans invent to claim territory and assert dominance over rival cultures.
They have turned themselves into good mothers, fathers, sisters, brothers. These arabians still call themselves Arabs freely that live in israel give thanks to Allah for what they have so their children can play happy in there front yard while their children learn to be surgeons, lawyers,, leaders and most importantly human beings being thankful for today in order to create better tomorrows.. Unity is a beautiful thing.. This where learning is so beautiful.
[deleted image]
In your case "Research shows clearly" is simply as a rhetorical tool to make emotional, politically charged social media opinions sound authoritative.
Actual academic and geopolitical research contradicts or complicates the text's claims in three ways:
• Movement Restrictions: Research and official data show Palestinians from the West Bank and Gaza do not have free access to Israel. They are subject to a strict military permit system, checkpoints, and blockades. Only Arab individuals who hold actual Israeli citizenship can move freely within the country.
• Human Shields: International organizations (like the UN) have documented that militant groups place military infrastructure near civilian areas. However, the text's specific phrasing ("guinea pigs", "virgin goats") is inflammatory rhetoric, not scientific findings.
• Socio-Economic Status: It is true that many Arab-Israeli citizens become successful surgeons, lawyers, and leaders. However, socio-economic research notes that these communities still face systemic inequalities, lower municipal funding, and higher poverty rates compared to Jewish-Israeli demographics.
Ben Shapiro's Position and Arguments
• Arab Citizens of Israel: Shapiro frequently points out that Arab Muslims and Christians are full citizens of Israel who hold voting rights, serve in the Israeli Knesset (parliament), and work within the Israeli judicial and medical systems.
• The Claim of Coexistence: Shapiro has argued that Israel is a multi-ethnic and multi-religious society where Muslims, Jews, and Christians live side-by-side under the same rule of law, contrasting this with the lack of religious and political pluralism in many surrounding Middle Eastern nations.
• Critique of "Apartheid" Comparisons: Shapiro rejects the characterization of Israel as an "apartheid" state, stating that internal legal differences apply to non-citizens in the Palestinian territories rather than Arab citizens living within sovereign Israel proper.
• Counter-arguments and Controversy: Critics and journalists have often challenged these views, arguing that Arab citizens of Israel face systemic inequalities in land allocation, municipal funding, and housing, and pointing to ongoing social and political tensions. Shapiro has consistently dismissed reports or opinion pieces claiming that coexistence in Israel is a "myth" as biased media
He talks that fast, so people don't have time to recognize all the lies.
Only use an argument from authority with people who are credible and honest.
• Against Full Citizenship Rights: Voting rights mask institutional exclusion. While Arab citizens hold passports and vote, they face systemic discrimination in housing and zoning. The Admissions Committees Law legally permits hundreds of community towns to reject Arab applicants based on "social suitability," enforcing de facto segregation.
• Against the Claim of Coexistence: Coexistence is fractured by structural inequality. Daily interaction exists, but it takes place within a system of deep economic disparity. Nearly 39% of Arab families live below the poverty line [Israel Democracy Institute] due to decades of underfunded municipal infrastructure, segregated school systems, and restricted land allocations for Arab towns.
• Against the Apartheid Critique: Sovereign borders are a legal fiction in human rights analysis. Restricting the debate to Israel proper ignores the reality that one single authority—the Israeli government—maintains ultimate military, economic, and bureaucratic control over the entire territory from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea, managing a fragmented but singular hierarchy of ethnic dominance.
• Against the Dismissal of Media Controversy: Constitutional law explicitly codifies inequality. Shapiro's dismissal of critics ignores the 2018 Nation-State Law. This constitutional Basic Law explicitly declares that national self-determination is "unique to the Jewish people" and downgrades the Arabic language, proving that inequality is not a media myth, but a constitutional reality.
only registered users can see external links
No wonder with the shit you say amsterdam must be stenched.
I was not there in Germany, to understand their reasons. Were you?
Unless you accept the authority that decides what to call a genocide and what not, YOU are denying that the holocaust is a genocide.
Don't change the subject and make it personal, COWARD!!!
Talking to you is like talking to a drop out 2nd grader.. I'm not in a debating mood with you because you disgust me.
That whole area used to be ethnically diverse for millennia.
If these are the standards, then OK, they passed the minimum.
That's no argument against the ethnic cleansing going on for decades.
Palestinians were robbed from their houses, house by house, street by street.
Anytime there was some form of protest against that, it was used to swat them down and steal more of their land. Later the strategy with walls was introduced. Put a wall around them with armed guards at the entrance. Starve them out so they have to leave. Kick out the remaining ones and take the area. Next area. This is how Israel stole most of the land. Any protest was just met with overwhelming violence. In the meantime, Palestinians were just murdered for fun. When you control the law, you can kill with impunity. The numbers are a bit lower, but the level of evil is on par with the holocaust. And you disgust me for supporting it.
is the individual's steady disposition to think, feel, and behave in ethical ways across different situations.
Core Elements of Moral Character
• Virtues: Established habits of goodness, such as honesty, integrity, courage, fairness, empathy, and loyalty.
• Motivational Element: A genuine consideration for others and an awareness of how one's actions impact them.
• Ability Element (Self-Regulation): The strength to manage short-term temptations or personal comfort in favor of long-term ethical values.
• Identity Element (Moral Identity): Viewing morality as a central part of who you are and how you define your self-worth.
How It Works in Practice
• Consistency: It is shown through repeated patterns of behavior over time—especially under pressure, temptation, or conflict—rather than a single isolated good choice.
• Decision-Making: It acts as a moral compass that guides how a person treats others, handles responsibility, and reacts to unfairness. The most important aspect of character is the desire for transparency and doing the right thing.
///// On the other hand a person that shows Lack Of Character.
• Dishonesty
• Depravity
• Corruption
• Dishonor
• Viciousness
Right anal licker of the most unclean?
A logically sound moral system cannot just begin with high-level behavioral traits like 'honesty' or 'integrity'. Every coherent framework requires a foundational premise,
a root from which all secondary values are derived.
As a secular humanist, my framework is explicitly built on a single, non-negotiable axiom: the intrinsic value of human existence. From this ultimate foundation, the right to human well-being and subsequent ethical behaviors naturally and logically follow.
You, on the other hand, are presenting the branches of a tree while skipping the root entirely. You define what you believe character is, but you fail to explain why these specific traits hold any objective worth. Without a foundational premise that cannot be dissected further, your definitions of 'virtue' and 'lack of character' are not a logical system, they are merely arbitrary, personal preferences.
(Phart, if you want to know who has a better argument, ASK GROK!)
Using this woman’s sign as a token to justify the obliteration of Gaza or the displacement of its people is a bad-faith distortion of her message. She is protesting for peace and human liberation, not condoning the murder of civilians by foreign bombs. To pretend her stance validates the total destruction of these populations completely reverses her intent and fuels the exact cycle of violence she is standing against.
Using her image to justify that kind of violence is the exact opposite of the empathy,
that you claim to base your morality on. She DOESN'T agree with YOU.
You are a racist. Either you make yourself as a hater or a hater. You make statements displaying hatred towards people that want leadership by slandering their character because you hate Jews.. All socialists hate Israel and you're no exception.. You are easy to figure out based on your 1 dimensional reasoning stupid enough to change my mind.. But then again this is being read in form, not in private which shows everyone here how fucking stupid you are....
I'm not sure whether to laugh at you or to just spit on you.
I'm not sure whether to take this personally or to take pity on you.. It turns out I actually take empathy on your girlfriend...
Oh you can say I used private facts.. But your an Anti-semite so as far as I'm concerned we are even..
The way I felt empathy towards you is by reasoning this is not your fault. You were just born that way.
You can do better.
There is not much you can offer more than 72 virgins for dying for your cause is there?
The argument originates from a controversial 2000 book, The Syro-Aramaic Reading of the Koran, , written by a German scholar of ancient languages using the pseudonym Christoph Luxenberg. Early Quranic Arabic was heavily influenced by Syriac-Aramaic (the dominant language of the Middle East at the time).
The word Houri: In the Quran, the companions in paradise are called Houri. In traditional Arabic, this is interpreted as dark-eyed, pure maidens. However, Luxenberg pointed out that in Aramaic, hur means "white" and was often used idiomatically to mean "white grapes" or "raisins".
Luxenberg argued that "white grapes" make more sense because other verses describe paradise as a lush garden filled with flowing water, shade, and abundant vineyards. Furthermore, ancient Syrian Christian hymns described heaven using the exact imagery of being served crystal-clear grapes.
While it is an intriguing theory, the vast majority of secular Western historians and Islamic scholars view it as highly unlikely due to the rest of the text. The Quran and early commentaries don't just use the word Houri; they explicitly describe these companions using distinctly human, feminine terms. For example, the text describes them as having "modest gazes," "beautiful eyes," being of "equal age," and being untouched by man or jinn. White raisins cannot have modest gazes or eyes.
The number 72 is never actually mentioned in the Quran. The number 72 comes from later sayings of the Prophet Muhammad (Hadiths). If the original Quranic word just meant "grapes", it is highly implausible that generations of native Arabic speakers, living immediately after the Quran was written, somehow collectively forgot their own language and invented a hyper-specific narrative about 72 wives.
Personally, I agree with Jeff Dunham's puppet Walter: "Seventy-two virgins?
Why not 72 slutty broads who know what the hell they're doing?"
so my question is how many more shit-piles is needed to pronounce sentence
so far I believe its 10 but tempted to give a shitpiles every 150 points
When I claim something, you want evidence.
If you claim something, bring your evidence.
I donated 100 points to you. Go ahead.
I don't think the US at any time tried anything close to peace making,
if you keep killing hundreds of thousands of people to get to the oil
under their feet and topple their more democratic moderate governments,
because they don't want you to have their oil for cheap.
This monster is your creation, and the world is suffering for it.
People who are doing well are not easily convinced to sacrifice their lives
over a fairytale. However, if you murder their family and friends, and make them
live in poverty, they are much more acceptable of sacrificing their lives to kill
the people who did that to them.
AS for the oil,they aint doing anything with it,camels can't eat it,they can't drink it, we could trade a bushel of corn for a barrel of oil but they are the 1's that aint happy for a fair trade.
Remember how we talked about survivors on an uninhabited island? You said that one of them would own a crate of supplies if they found it. Now it's OK to literally murder people in a country that owns the natural resources?
You actually proved my point. I completely agree with you about the average Confederate soldier. Most of them didn't own slaves; in fact, the institution of slavery economically harmed poor Southern whites. They were manipulated by a wealthy elite, who absolutely DID fight to maintain slavery.
Just like modern terrorists who are brainwashed by their leaders and have very little left to live for, those Confederate soldiers had nothing to gain and everything to lose. They were easily turned into pawns. They bravely fought and died, for what they believed was right. It just happened to be an atrocious lie.
My question to you is: if you can clearly see how poverty, trauma, and manipulation drove those soldiers to fight, why can't you apply that exact same human psychology to people today? And more importantly, you need to realize that you don't make these people less extreme by inflicting even more suffering upon them. Escalating the misery only feeds the cycle.
New Comment Go to top