Your views, thoughts or simply opinions. The Economy is not well (understatement). I know there are some here that will try to link the country they are residing in as problems of the USA. Sorry the USA cannot be responsible for 100% of the problems in the world nor should they be expected to help repair all problems.
Middle finger to him, I may not be living in a utopia at the moment, but I am FAR better off than I would be if the cackler had got in office. and that,makes me feel I am better off now than I was.
When the only thing you can think off is that you don't have to listen to a female president laughing annoyingly, it means that you're showing him to be correct. You have nothing.
You say you FEEL that you're better off now than you were.
Facts don't care about your feelings. You're duped!
Mental health is important. If I feel that my freedom is being stolen from me 1 law at the time, i feel threatened and my life and actions go accordingly. I don't feel threatened, i don't feel in danger, there for,to me, yes, I am better off with Trump than harris. you are the 1 missing the point.
Your freedom? Below is a list of freedoms that Trump is stealing.
Why do you think that you have more right to rights than other people?
Abortion and reproductive autonomy
• Reinstated policies limiting federal funding for abortion-related services.
• Reversed some Biden-era reproductive health policies.
• Critics argue this reduces women's ability to access abortion, particularly for lower-income patients.
Asylum and immigration protections
• Expanded deportation efforts and narrowed asylum eligibility.
• Critics argue this limits due process and the practical ability to seek refuge in the United States.
Rights of transgender people
• Federal policy has been changed to recognize only male and female biological sex in many contexts.
• Protections and recognition for transgender people have been reduced in areas such as federal documentation, education, and some government programs.
Demonstration and protest rights (particularly on campuses)
• The administration has directed agencies to take stronger action against certain campus protests, especially those connected to allegations of antisemitism, and has supported investigations and immigration consequences for some non-citizen protesters.
• Critics argue these measures chill political expression and assembly protected by the First Amendment, especially when based on political viewpoints. Supporters argue they target unlawful conduct or harassment rather than peaceful protest.
Freedom of the media
• President Trump has continued to publicly attack major news organizations and has pursued policies such as attempting to end federal funding for NPR and PBS, arguing they are politically biased.
• Critics contend these actions, together with lawsuits and regulatory pressure on media organizations, risk undermining press independence and creating a chilling effect, even though no general censorship law has been enacted.
Freedom of lawyers and legal advocacy
• Executive actions have targeted several major law firms by restricting access to government facilities, contracts, or security clearances because of their clients or prior work.
• Many legal scholars and courts have questioned whether these actions infringe First Amendment rights and the independence of the legal profession.
Voting access
• The administration has supported stricter voter eligibility verification measures, including proof-of-citizenship requirements for some registration processes.
• Critics argue these rules could disproportionately burden minority voters, including Black Americans, although they do not explicitly deny voting rights based on race.
Diversity and equal opportunity programs
• Federal DEI initiatives have been dismantled or prohibited in many agencies and grant programs.
• Critics argue this restricts efforts to remedy historical discrimination; supporters argue it removes preferential treatment and restores merit-based decision-making.
Birthright citizenship (attempted)
• The administration sought to limit automatic citizenship for some children born in the United States through executive action.
• The policy faces constitutional challenges and has not been definitively upheld.
Civil service independence
• Reforms have expanded presidential control over parts of the federal bureaucracy and reduced some protections for career officials.
• Critics argue this weakens institutional independence and could discourage dissent within government.
I see few if any of my rights as a natural born citizen being violated there. I see protection of the rights for CITIZENS> and dei is not a right, it's government sponsored racism.
Throughout the 2024 campaign, Donald Trump repeatedly promised to "stop wars" and bring peace to the Middle East, a pledge he reiterated during victory speeches after winning the election. He specifically vowed to prevent global conflicts and end "endless" wars across the region.
Donald Trump repeatedly promised to lower gas prices throughout the 2024 presidential campaign. He made these pledges at numerous campaign rallies and economic speeches, frequently asserting that he would cut gasoline and overall energy costs in half within 12 months of taking office, and specifically stating he would bring gas below $2 per gallon.Key moments of his campaign promises:August 2024: At a rally in York, Pennsylvania, Trump pledged that all energy costs—including gasoline, heating, and air conditioning—would drop by more than 50% within his first 12 months in office.September 2024: At rallies in Wilmington, North Carolina, and Indiana, Pennsylvania, he guaranteed voters he would cut energy and electricity prices in half.October 2024: In a major speech to the Detroit Economic Club, he stated: "12 months from January 20th… your gasoline for your car is going to be 50% cheaper."
Donald Trump’s campaign made its most prominent promise to "end inflation on Day One" of his presidency during rallies and events in August 2024, such as his speech in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania. He reiterated this core economic pledge at several campaign stops throughout the fall, including an October 2024 rally in Saginaw, Michigan.------------------------------------
Donald Trump made the "no new wars" pledge repeatedly throughout his 2024 presidential campaign. High-profile instances of this promise include:Election Night: During his November 2024 victory speech, he told supporters, "I'm not going to start wars, I'm going to stop wars."The Republican National Convention: In his July 2024 address, he promised, "With our victory in November, the years of war, weakness, and chaos will be over. I don't have wars."Pennsylvania Rally: In August 2024, he explicitly stated, "Under Trump, we will have no more wars, no more disruptions."
The annual inflation rate is 4.2% as of the most recent report. During the Biden administration, inflation reached an average of roughly 5% annually, peaking at a 40-year high of 9.1% in June 2022 before cooling to about 3.0% when the administration ended
Phart, you haven’t lived in a utopian economy or anything else, especially since you live in a state where utopia is something found in books only.
You really think you are better off than if Harris had won? If you do you are blind to reality
Harris is a fucking joke and was in the pockets of many others that would actually be running things.
No new wars? Well gee, the situation in 1979 was never really resolved, and Iran sponsors terror, there has been a literal war on terror since 2001 , oh i know, you have forgot about that. anyway, far as I am concerned the war on terror was already in effect and Trump is trying to stop it at the funding source. I was just in a discussion with a local farmer about cost of fertlyzer and how it was stuck in the strait of hurmuz due to iran. now that maybe it's open again, cost can come down. 1 nation does not need to be in a position to stop the world economy like that.
The thing is that Harris would not have gotten us into a stupid war. The world economy stopped working BECAUSE THE CLOWN STUPIDLY STARTED A WAR WITH IRAN.
In his Fiscal Year 2027 executive budget (released in May 2026), Zohran Mamdani allocated $26 million annually for the Office for the Prevention of Hate Crimes, describing it as fulfillment of a campaign pledge to increase hate-crime prevention funding by more than 800%.
only registered users can see external links
This will help Jewish New Yorkers through prevention, victim support, education, community partnerships, and coordination across agencies, rather than primarily through increased policing.
Some examples of what the city's hate-crime prevention offices already do:
- Work with Jewish organizations and other community groups to identify threats and respond to incidents.
- Support victims of antisemitic incidents and improve reporting of hate crimes.
- Fund community projects, interfaith initiatives, and educational programs intended to reduce antisemitism and other forms of bias before they escalate into crimes.
- Coordinate responses among agencies such as the NYPD, Commission on Human Rights, schools, and district attorneys.
- Improve hate-crime data collection, training, and outreach to communities that may underreport incidents.
Mamdani explicitly justified the increase by noting that Jewish New Yorkers suffer a disproportionate share of the city's hate crimes.
laying a trap for them. appeasement. kinda like the boil a frog story, by the time the Jews and others realize it's to late, they will be line at the ovens again.
You are the one voting in the fascists. Your president is literally quoting Hitler, dining with Nazis, retweeting KKK-propaganda and calling neo-Nazis "fine people". They are little busy with putting immigrants in concentration camps, reinstating Jim Crow laws and planning criminalization of gays, but they will surely get back to killing Jews, as soon as they have created the promised land. They don't believe that the promised land belongs to the Jews, it's intended for Christians, after the Rapture.
Will somebody please tell this Canadian why there is never any fraud committed when a republican wins? There is only fraud occurring if a democrat wins!
Many economists now see inequality increasing, and are predicting abject poverty
for most people. It's just the continuation of a trend that you'd have to be willfully blind
not to notice. Gary saw it happening, and made money betting on the collapse of society.
He is now feeling guilty, and he is doing what he is doing, because he is expecting
that future suffering people will ask him: “Did you try and do anything?”.
"I've seen the tsunami coming"
only registered users can see external links
If you don't agree with his prediction, why not?
- Are you OK with most people living in abject poverty again?
- Do you think he is wrong? If so, why? What are you seeing, that I don't?
- Do you think he is lying? Why? What's in it for him?
Leave it to crooked california to not help it's people that are suffering but waste money on supporting protest.
only registered users can see external links
Why would they take money from people who lost their homes and waste it on something like that?
It's official. Donald Trump has become the deadest duck of all the dead ducks in the history of American presidents.
All those Republican guys retiring have suddenly found a spine and a pair of balls and they are out for revenge…
"Democratic lawmakers and progressive advocacy groups strongly oppose the Trump administration's efforts to use public health data systems—specifically through the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)—to track and deport undocumented immigrants. The political and legal battle escalated following reports that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), coordinating with the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), sought access to sensitive CMS databases to match Social Security numbers and extract addresses for immigration enforcement"
Ok,so democrats and liberals have spent years telling us there are NO illegals on medicare or medicaid. BUT YET when someone starts looking around and using the info to find them, they get upset? WHY? there aren't supposed to be any on it, so if there is,why not get them off something they don't belong on?
Before answering your question, first explain how an undocumented alien has a social security number. And, if so, then you know how they can access Medicare and Medicaid.
The objection is that the medical data of millions of Americans would be exposed without regard to their privacy.
Also, and this is just an aside, Medicare is available only to those that are 65 or older and Medicare has to be approved on an individual basis and the person has to qualify.
And before you say,” I told you so”. Let me remind you that there are countless **** teenagers getting liquor using fake IDs. You don’t hand over all the data of state DMVs to a government that wants to control them.
so you approve of the fraud. otherwise you wouldn't obstruct whatever means required to stop it. there is at least 1 person using my dads id at the moment in a nearby city for their cell phones. so i know it happens.
Not love by no means, there are several things Trump and the repubs are doing that I don't like. talking about legal pot and more alcohol in gas and such, blah, nope,not good. BUT kamala would have left the borders open for so many terrorist to come in along with all the other cans, mexicans, porter ricans, and etc that America would be swamped.
What terrorists? You see the boogie man everywhere. And by the way, Puerto Ricans only need to fly in. THEY ARE AMERICANS and that means they can go anywhere in the United States.
Illegals don't get Medicare & Medicaid Services.
People don't trust your administration, for good reason.
The first thing it did, was letting a billionaire and his boys go through
everyone's private information unchecked.
This is why my country's House of Representatives has voted by a large majority
to block the purchase of Solvinity by the American company Kyndryl.
Solvinity provides a key role in our DigiD services. We don't trust THIS America
with our Digital Identity for government services.
And why would we? The American people don't even trust their own government
with their information, to have a Digital Identity for government services themselves.
Did anyone see the Melania movie?
If you didn't, you must have already expected it to be shit.
These people did see it and can confirm your expectations.
only registered users can see external links
Can you only imagine the outrage from right-wingers,
if Amazon had spend $75 million on a Jill Biden movie?
And how much hateful joy would we have heard from them,
when it also only made $16.3 million?
It must suck to be MAGA, and be force so much COPE upon you.
another sign of how dumb california is
only registered users can see external links
"The sanctuary state policy is designed to make sure that our state resources, the taxpayer dollars, the public servants that we have, are focusing on doing their jobs — which is not cooperating with the federal immigration authorities. IN other words no respect for federal law.
Federal immigration authorities are breaking all the laws.
They have ignored hundreds of judge rulings and even the supreme court.
California is protesting that.
You're kidding right? I have posted long lists, of all the laws that are broken
by your administration and ICE, multiple times already.
Federal immigration authorities cannot just attack and kidnap random people
off the streets. They are consistently ignoring the 1st, 4th, 5th, 6th, 8th, 9th, 10th
and 14th amendments, which are all fixed in federal and state laws.
Ask any AI of your choice about it. Do SOMETHING to inform yourself.
I am Dutch, you are American. Why do I care about your Constitutional protections, more than YOU? Do you still remember caring about the Constitution once?
I care. The people that came here ILEGALLY have NO constitutional rights as the constitutionis for citizens. . They should be rounded up and sent back home. This is the last comment from me on this subject.
Not true, many constitutional rights are written broadly. The Constitution often says “persons,” “people,” or “the accused,” not “citizens.” For example:
The 5th Amendment says no PERSON can be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process.
The 14th Amendment guarantees equal protection to any PERSON within a state’s jurisdiction.
Why the last? You know you will loose the argument?
'Innocent until proven guilty' is for everyone. It's against the law to assume someone is an illegal on just their appearance. ICE is blocking roads, raiding appartement buildings and posting outside immigration offices. They are in that way harming the rights of lots of AMERICANS, legal immigrants and legitimate documented asylum seekers. Your Constitutional rights include that immigration authorities cannot demand from random people that they prove that they are NOT illegals.
So yes, illegals should be arrested and sent back home, but ICE is breaking the law by assuming everyone is 'illegal until proven innocent' and deporting lots of people without a fair legal process. You have masked men, attacking people on the streets with impunity, and you only accept this from Trump, because you are a cult.
Your side has fearmongered for decades that Democrats would do something like this, and now it's your side acting like the fucking STASI, you just let them take away your constitutional rights. Well, REAL Americans will say 'not on our watch', in November.
You forget that here in America people who have been accused by authorities of committing crimes are held by those authorities until seen by a judge who will decide if the case is valid. All illegal aliens are accused of committing a.crime. in this case entering the United States of America illegally which is a crime. They will be seen by an immi g region judge who will decide what needs to be done. I personally think that person should be sent to their home country and given the paperwork they need to gain entry legally. This gives the system time to find out if they have any connections to terrorism.
And the only reason Joe Biden let them all in is they ( the illegal alien) are all potential dem voters. Now shut the fuck up and mind your own damn business.
if this was true, I would agree with deporting illegals in the way you describe.
It is however NOT true at all.
1. Immigration violations are NOT criminal offenses requiring jail before a judge.
Entering the U.S. without authorization is a CIVIL violation, not a criminal one. Immigration courts are administrative courts, NOT criminal courts.
So the claim “all illegal aliens are accused of committing a crime and must be held”
is LEGALLY FALSE.
2. Non‑citizens, including undocumented migrants, have constitutional due‑process rights.
The Fifth Amendment protects "all persons", not just citizens. Courts have repeatedly affirmed that non‑citizens are entitled to DUE PROCESS, including the right to challenge removal.
So the idea that they can be detained or deported without judicial review is UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
3. Trump’s policies explicitly reduced access to immigration judges.
Multiple legal organizations document that Trump’s administration has:
- Expanded expedited removal, which bypasses immigration judges entirely.
- Stripped access to attorneys, making fair hearings nearly impossible.
- Implemented “grant and deport” and similar policies, that remove people without proper hearings.
This directly contradicts the claim that “everyone gets seen by a judge.”
4. Trump has carried out mass deportations without normal asylum procedures.
Asylum is a LEGAL RIGHT under U.S. and international law.
But Trump has:
- Restricted or ended asylum access, even for people legally presenting at ports of entry.
- Deported people en masse, including those with valid claims.
This means people are being removed BEFORE they can make their legal case.
5. Deporting people to dangerous third countries without hearings violates due process.
The American Immigration Council documents that Trump has attempted to deport people under the 'Alien Enemies Act' without hearings, a practice that the Supreme Court rejected.
This directly disproves the claim that deportations only occur "after" a judge decides.
6. Immigration courts are overwhelmed; millions wait years for hearings.
There are 3.5 million pending cases, and DHS prioritizes only certain categories.
Claiming that “everyone is held until they see a judge” is impossible and factually untrue.
7. Trump’s policies have broken the immigration court system. Legal experts report:
- Massive “mega‑hearings” with 100+ people at once.
- Hearings appearing without notice.
- Structural changes undermining fairness.
This is the opposite of a system ensuring due process.
Joe Biden did NOT let them all in. They are also not all potential dem voters,
many of them are very conservative. How about the Cuban immigrants?
And don't be a fucking snowflake, this is not a MAGA safe space.
It's pretty damn humiliating that a foreigner has to correct you on your own laws.
Just vote for politicians who obey the law and don't lie to cover up for them.
Your assumption that I am MAGA in the derogatory use of the term MAGA is wrong. I am pro Make America Great Again in the exact sense of making America great again. There is nothing wrong with that. The dems here have have aligned themselves with communist beliefs. Trump has tried to cut the size of the government. To make the government accountable to the people of this nation. There are many " experts" who disagree with your experts. It just depends on which side of the news you believe.
Your opinions dont matter and I really dont care about them. You are not here to see and feel the affects of illegal immigration. The constant begging in the streets the homeless camps that have piles of trash around them. The illegal immigration policies of the last administration allowed many criminals and terrorists to come into our country and if it takes getting ALL illegals rounded up and sending them back to get these terrorists and criminals out then so be it.
Obama deported more people than Trump yet no one says a word about that. Obama is the one who separated families he started that policy. Trump gets the blame.
I can clearly see that you lean way left. For most policies
I am a centrist. Believing in what the constitution says,
Immigration law here may be broken but its all that we have. The immigration courts have been overwhelmed for many years not just under Trump.
Cubans are a very small amount of the illegals to come here. Chinese came here in vast numbers many connected to cartels, they set up drug labs and create violence here. An apartment complex near where I used to live was shut down and because Tren de Aragua took it over, I witnessed that, I saw the guns I saw friends terrorized for "rent". I saw a once beautiful complex trashed by illegals. From my backyard. Many times I heard gun fire and hoped and prayed no one was hurt. I helped move some friends out under poluce guard to safer locations. I
You are parroting the same lies and using the same false arguments.
You are not a centrist, you are far right.
If not, what is the difference between you and the right-wingers here?
So you think you are a centrist on immigration, economic equality, climate and environmental protection, preventing people from going homeless or helping them back on their feet, the separation of powers as the main goal of your Constitution, drugs policies, housing, and how the police behaves towards citizens and criminals?
What's your opinion on abortion, gay-marriage or LGTBQ-rights in general, religious freedom/secular government? Do you at least have the “leave me alone / I’ll leave you alone” philosophy for that? I think I've seen you support the MAGA idea on that as well. Maybe I've missed some of your centrist ideas, but if you
don't want to say...
You have supported the hard right-wing line on all these issues and I have NEVER seen you push back on extreme right-wing ideas of the MAGA loyalists.
If you don't have ANY differences of opinion with MAGA, then you are MAGA.
If you STILL like Trump more than Obama, than you are MAGA or just a racist.
The only thing Obama did was being half black, while Trump is telling and reposting KKK/NeoNazi propaganda. He is even using Hitler's retoric.
There is even en exodus from hard-line MAGA loyalists at this moment. He is bleeding his base. Only hardcore MAGA is still supporting and defending him.
You think of your own ideas as common sense, because you get fed them 24/7.
If you watch any other ideas, it's only for rage-bait. Face it, you're NOT a centrist.
If you cannot tell me anything concrete about your disagreements with the right and your agreements with the left, than you are NOT a centrist.
I indeed lean way left. I am an active member of the Socialist Party. I don't pretend to be anything else. I just don't have all the straw-man ideas that your side puts
on the left. The Socialist Party addressed tensions around immigration and multiculturalism before the issue became mainstream in Dutch politics, while center-right and right-wing parties supported large-scale labor migration during the postwar economic boom, because employers demanded additional low-wage labor. The SP is still the most anti-labor immigration party and proposes real policies to reduce it, while our populist right-wingers didn't get anything done,
in the year they dominated politics until they pulled the plug. They tried illegal policies together with CUTS on the Immigration and Naturalisation Service (IND), the agency that is needed to send back asylum seekers that don't have a legitimate claim for asylum. That only worsens the problems we face.
That's INTENTIONAL, because they need problems from asylum seekers for people to keep voting for them. They don't want solutions, they want problems.
In the meantime, they betrayed all the other promises they made to their voters.
The only difference between them and Trump is that Trump is doing everything that the law and Constitution should protect against, while our Rule of Law held.
On everything else, he is betraying his voters completely. If you don't see that,
or you keep defending it, than you are NOT a centrist. Or very stupid.
If I am wrong on any of your ideas, I'm here for it.
-The Globe and Mail
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
You say you FEEL that you're better off now than you were.
Facts don't care about your feelings. You're duped!
Why do you think that you have more right to rights than other people?
Abortion and reproductive autonomy
• Reinstated policies limiting federal funding for abortion-related services.
• Reversed some Biden-era reproductive health policies.
• Critics argue this reduces women's ability to access abortion, particularly for lower-income patients.
Asylum and immigration protections
• Expanded deportation efforts and narrowed asylum eligibility.
• Critics argue this limits due process and the practical ability to seek refuge in the United States.
Rights of transgender people
• Federal policy has been changed to recognize only male and female biological sex in many contexts.
• Protections and recognition for transgender people have been reduced in areas such as federal documentation, education, and some government programs.
Demonstration and protest rights (particularly on campuses)
• The administration has directed agencies to take stronger action against certain campus protests, especially those connected to allegations of antisemitism, and has supported investigations and immigration consequences for some non-citizen protesters.
• Critics argue these measures chill political expression and assembly protected by the First Amendment, especially when based on political viewpoints. Supporters argue they target unlawful conduct or harassment rather than peaceful protest.
Freedom of the media
• President Trump has continued to publicly attack major news organizations and has pursued policies such as attempting to end federal funding for NPR and PBS, arguing they are politically biased.
• Critics contend these actions, together with lawsuits and regulatory pressure on media organizations, risk undermining press independence and creating a chilling effect, even though no general censorship law has been enacted.
Freedom of lawyers and legal advocacy
• Executive actions have targeted several major law firms by restricting access to government facilities, contracts, or security clearances because of their clients or prior work.
• Many legal scholars and courts have questioned whether these actions infringe First Amendment rights and the independence of the legal profession.
Voting access
• The administration has supported stricter voter eligibility verification measures, including proof-of-citizenship requirements for some registration processes.
• Critics argue these rules could disproportionately burden minority voters, including Black Americans, although they do not explicitly deny voting rights based on race.
Diversity and equal opportunity programs
• Federal DEI initiatives have been dismantled or prohibited in many agencies and grant programs.
• Critics argue this restricts efforts to remedy historical discrimination; supporters argue it removes preferential treatment and restores merit-based decision-making.
Birthright citizenship (attempted)
• The administration sought to limit automatic citizenship for some children born in the United States through executive action.
• The policy faces constitutional challenges and has not been definitively upheld.
Civil service independence
• Reforms have expanded presidential control over parts of the federal bureaucracy and reduced some protections for career officials.
• Critics argue this weakens institutional independence and could discourage dissent within government.
" I see protection of the rights for CITIZENS> and dei is not a right, it's government sponsored racism."
You really think you are better off than if Harris had won? If you do you are blind to reality
No new wars? Well gee, the situation in 1979 was never really resolved, and Iran sponsors terror, there has been a literal war on terror since 2001 , oh i know, you have forgot about that. anyway, far as I am concerned the war on terror was already in effect and Trump is trying to stop it at the funding source. I was just in a discussion with a local farmer about cost of fertlyzer and how it was stuck in the strait of hurmuz due to iran. now that maybe it's open again, cost can come down. 1 nation does not need to be in a position to stop the world economy like that.
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
This will help Jewish New Yorkers through prevention, victim support, education, community partnerships, and coordination across agencies, rather than primarily through increased policing.
Some examples of what the city's hate-crime prevention offices already do:
- Work with Jewish organizations and other community groups to identify threats and respond to incidents.
- Support victims of antisemitic incidents and improve reporting of hate crimes.
- Fund community projects, interfaith initiatives, and educational programs intended to reduce antisemitism and other forms of bias before they escalate into crimes.
- Coordinate responses among agencies such as the NYPD, Commission on Human Rights, schools, and district attorneys.
- Improve hate-crime data collection, training, and outreach to communities that may underreport incidents.
Mamdani explicitly justified the increase by noting that Jewish New Yorkers suffer a disproportionate share of the city's hate crimes.
You are the one voting in the fascists. Your president is literally quoting Hitler, dining with Nazis, retweeting KKK-propaganda and calling neo-Nazis "fine people". They are little busy with putting immigrants in concentration camps, reinstating Jim Crow laws and planning criminalization of gays, but they will surely get back to killing Jews, as soon as they have created the promised land. They don't believe that the promised land belongs to the Jews, it's intended for Christians, after the Rapture.
only registered users can see external links
Crazy eh?
-Mike Pence
for most people. It's just the continuation of a trend that you'd have to be willfully blind
not to notice. Gary saw it happening, and made money betting on the collapse of society.
He is now feeling guilty, and he is doing what he is doing, because he is expecting
that future suffering people will ask him: “Did you try and do anything?”.
"I've seen the tsunami coming"
only registered users can see external links
If you don't agree with his prediction, why not?
- Are you OK with most people living in abject poverty again?
- Do you think he is wrong? If so, why? What are you seeing, that I don't?
- Do you think he is lying? Why? What's in it for him?
only registered users can see external links
Why would they take money from people who lost their homes and waste it on something like that?
All those Republican guys retiring have suddenly found a spine and a pair of balls and they are out for revenge…
Ok,so democrats and liberals have spent years telling us there are NO illegals on medicare or medicaid. BUT YET when someone starts looking around and using the info to find them, they get upset? WHY? there aren't supposed to be any on it, so if there is,why not get them off something they don't belong on?
The objection is that the medical data of millions of Americans would be exposed without regard to their privacy.
Also, and this is just an aside, Medicare is available only to those that are 65 or older and Medicare has to be approved on an individual basis and the person has to qualify.
And before you say,” I told you so”. Let me remind you that there are countless **** teenagers getting liquor using fake IDs. You don’t hand over all the data of state DMVs to a government that wants to control them.
People don't trust your administration, for good reason.
The first thing it did, was letting a billionaire and his boys go through
everyone's private information unchecked.
This is why my country's House of Representatives has voted by a large majority
to block the purchase of Solvinity by the American company Kyndryl.
Solvinity provides a key role in our DigiD services. We don't trust THIS America
with our Digital Identity for government services.
And why would we? The American people don't even trust their own government
with their information, to have a Digital Identity for government services themselves.
only registered users can see external links
If you didn't, you must have already expected it to be shit.
These people did see it and can confirm your expectations.
only registered users can see external links
Can you only imagine the outrage from right-wingers,
if Amazon had spend $75 million on a Jill Biden movie?
And how much hateful joy would we have heard from them,
when it also only made $16.3 million?
It must suck to be MAGA, and be force so much COPE upon you.
only registered users can see external links
Tied to Donald Trump Jr.
only registered users can see external links
After raging about the alleged corruption of Hunter Biden for years,
explain why you are not talking about this, please.
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
"The sanctuary state policy is designed to make sure that our state resources, the taxpayer dollars, the public servants that we have, are focusing on doing their jobs — which is not cooperating with the federal immigration authorities. IN other words no respect for federal law.
They have ignored hundreds of judge rulings and even the supreme court.
California is protesting that.
by your administration and ICE, multiple times already.
Federal immigration authorities cannot just attack and kidnap random people
off the streets. They are consistently ignoring the 1st, 4th, 5th, 6th, 8th, 9th, 10th
and 14th amendments, which are all fixed in federal and state laws.
Ask any AI of your choice about it. Do SOMETHING to inform yourself.
I am Dutch, you are American. Why do I care about your Constitutional protections, more than YOU? Do you still remember caring about the Constitution once?
The 5th Amendment says no PERSON can be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process.
The 14th Amendment guarantees equal protection to any PERSON within a state’s jurisdiction.
Why the last? You know you will loose the argument?
So yes, illegals should be arrested and sent back home, but ICE is breaking the law by assuming everyone is 'illegal until proven innocent' and deporting lots of people without a fair legal process. You have masked men, attacking people on the streets with impunity, and you only accept this from Trump, because you are a cult.
Your side has fearmongered for decades that Democrats would do something like this, and now it's your side acting like the fucking STASI, you just let them take away your constitutional rights. Well, REAL Americans will say 'not on our watch', in November.
And the only reason Joe Biden let them all in is they ( the illegal alien) are all potential dem voters. Now shut the fuck up and mind your own damn business.
It is however NOT true at all.
1. Immigration violations are NOT criminal offenses requiring jail before a judge.
Entering the U.S. without authorization is a CIVIL violation, not a criminal one. Immigration courts are administrative courts, NOT criminal courts.
So the claim “all illegal aliens are accused of committing a crime and must be held”
is LEGALLY FALSE.
2. Non‑citizens, including undocumented migrants, have constitutional due‑process rights.
The Fifth Amendment protects "all persons", not just citizens. Courts have repeatedly affirmed that non‑citizens are entitled to DUE PROCESS, including the right to challenge removal.
So the idea that they can be detained or deported without judicial review is UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
3. Trump’s policies explicitly reduced access to immigration judges.
Multiple legal organizations document that Trump’s administration has:
- Expanded expedited removal, which bypasses immigration judges entirely.
- Stripped access to attorneys, making fair hearings nearly impossible.
- Implemented “grant and deport” and similar policies, that remove people without proper hearings.
This directly contradicts the claim that “everyone gets seen by a judge.”
4. Trump has carried out mass deportations without normal asylum procedures.
Asylum is a LEGAL RIGHT under U.S. and international law.
But Trump has:
- Restricted or ended asylum access, even for people legally presenting at ports of entry.
- Deported people en masse, including those with valid claims.
This means people are being removed BEFORE they can make their legal case.
5. Deporting people to dangerous third countries without hearings violates due process.
The American Immigration Council documents that Trump has attempted to deport people under the 'Alien Enemies Act' without hearings, a practice that the Supreme Court rejected.
This directly disproves the claim that deportations only occur "after" a judge decides.
6. Immigration courts are overwhelmed; millions wait years for hearings.
There are 3.5 million pending cases, and DHS prioritizes only certain categories.
Claiming that “everyone is held until they see a judge” is impossible and factually untrue.
7. Trump’s policies have broken the immigration court system. Legal experts report:
- Massive “mega‑hearings” with 100+ people at once.
- Hearings appearing without notice.
- Structural changes undermining fairness.
This is the opposite of a system ensuring due process.
Joe Biden did NOT let them all in. They are also not all potential dem voters,
many of them are very conservative. How about the Cuban immigrants?
And don't be a fucking snowflake, this is not a MAGA safe space.
It's pretty damn humiliating that a foreigner has to correct you on your own laws.
Just vote for politicians who obey the law and don't lie to cover up for them.
Your opinions dont matter and I really dont care about them. You are not here to see and feel the affects of illegal immigration. The constant begging in the streets the homeless camps that have piles of trash around them. The illegal immigration policies of the last administration allowed many criminals and terrorists to come into our country and if it takes getting ALL illegals rounded up and sending them back to get these terrorists and criminals out then so be it.
Obama deported more people than Trump yet no one says a word about that. Obama is the one who separated families he started that policy. Trump gets the blame.
I can clearly see that you lean way left. For most policies
I am a centrist. Believing in what the constitution says,
Immigration law here may be broken but its all that we have. The immigration courts have been overwhelmed for many years not just under Trump.
Cubans are a very small amount of the illegals to come here. Chinese came here in vast numbers many connected to cartels, they set up drug labs and create violence here. An apartment complex near where I used to live was shut down and because Tren de Aragua took it over, I witnessed that, I saw the guns I saw friends terrorized for "rent". I saw a once beautiful complex trashed by illegals. From my backyard. Many times I heard gun fire and hoped and prayed no one was hurt. I helped move some friends out under poluce guard to safer locations. I
You are not a centrist, you are far right.
If not, what is the difference between you and the right-wingers here?
What's your opinion on abortion, gay-marriage or LGTBQ-rights in general, religious freedom/secular government? Do you at least have the “leave me alone / I’ll leave you alone” philosophy for that? I think I've seen you support the MAGA idea on that as well. Maybe I've missed some of your centrist ideas, but if you
don't want to say...
You have supported the hard right-wing line on all these issues and I have NEVER seen you push back on extreme right-wing ideas of the MAGA loyalists.
If you don't have ANY differences of opinion with MAGA, then you are MAGA.
If you STILL like Trump more than Obama, than you are MAGA or just a racist.
The only thing Obama did was being half black, while Trump is telling and reposting KKK/NeoNazi propaganda. He is even using Hitler's retoric.
There is even en exodus from hard-line MAGA loyalists at this moment. He is bleeding his base. Only hardcore MAGA is still supporting and defending him.
You think of your own ideas as common sense, because you get fed them 24/7.
If you watch any other ideas, it's only for rage-bait. Face it, you're NOT a centrist.
If you cannot tell me anything concrete about your disagreements with the right and your agreements with the left, than you are NOT a centrist.
I indeed lean way left. I am an active member of the Socialist Party. I don't pretend to be anything else. I just don't have all the straw-man ideas that your side puts
on the left. The Socialist Party addressed tensions around immigration and multiculturalism before the issue became mainstream in Dutch politics, while center-right and right-wing parties supported large-scale labor migration during the postwar economic boom, because employers demanded additional low-wage labor. The SP is still the most anti-labor immigration party and proposes real policies to reduce it, while our populist right-wingers didn't get anything done,
in the year they dominated politics until they pulled the plug. They tried illegal policies together with CUTS on the Immigration and Naturalisation Service (IND), the agency that is needed to send back asylum seekers that don't have a legitimate claim for asylum. That only worsens the problems we face.
That's INTENTIONAL, because they need problems from asylum seekers for people to keep voting for them. They don't want solutions, they want problems.
In the meantime, they betrayed all the other promises they made to their voters.
The only difference between them and Trump is that Trump is doing everything that the law and Constitution should protect against, while our Rule of Law held.
On everything else, he is betraying his voters completely. If you don't see that,
or you keep defending it, than you are NOT a centrist. Or very stupid.
If I am wrong on any of your ideas, I'm here for it.
New Comment Go to top