Page #1
Pages: #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9 #10 ...#98
New Comment Rating: -7 Similar topics: 1.American men? 2.nude 3.Donald Trump 45th President of United States 4.🎆 🇺🇸 HaPpY BiRtHdAy America!! 🇺🇸 🎆 5.The Nobel Peace Prize 🏅 Comments: | ||
You must be logged in to post here. Log in
only registered users can see external links
• Made September 11 an official NYC “Day of Remembrance and Service” every year. This is a new citywide designation. It calls for a moment of silence honoring both people killed on 9/11 and people who later died from 9/11-related illnesses.
• Encouraged city agencies to hold memorial ceremonies and educational programs and work with NYC Service to promote volunteer opportunities on September 11. The idea is to connect remembrance with the spirit of service that New Yorkers showed immediately after the attacks.
• Expanded the focus beyond people killed on September 11 itself. His announcement explicitly recognizes first responders, survivors, city workers, families, recovery/construction workers, and people who became sick from toxic exposure in the years afterward.
• Updated NYC's emergency-continuity planning for the first time since 2007. He created a new interagency Continuity and Mission Assurance Team involving emergency management, technology, city services and budget officials, intended to make sure essential government services can continue during a catastrophe.
Your side always talk a good game, but it's mostly a political point to hate Muslims and go to war. Remembering people who died is cheap, but recognizing the health damage of first responders, survivors, city workers, families and recovery/construction workers costs money. If it wasn't for Jon Stewart shaming Congress, they would have completely ignored all the people who are suffering health issues from doing their important work.
That is sickening.
while he controls the House, the Senate and the Supreme Court.
Trump left Joe with a pandemic; ~400,000 US deaths and people distrusting the solution, 6.4% unemployment, a $3.13 trillion Federal deficit, a ~100% of GDP Federal debt held
by the public and a major recession (−3.5% of GDP).
You're only showing that you have no valid arguments.
The right thing to do is to make a statement then you take the facts and connect the dots. You just posting bullshit links of fake news proves nothing at all. So I call this bullshit.. Get your facts by connecting the dots of things already proven.. NOT FAKE NEWS.... Do you really think I'm as stupid as you?
The whole world saw Trump goof off, Americans didn't like it either,
all the polls showed that he was going to lose the election, and then he did.
A year of investigations and NOTHING to show for it.
You have NOTHING but lies and bullshit.
Meanwhile, Republicans are already trying to steal the election in Texas,
in a brazen way, like they ALWAYS do.
1. Mid-Cycle Gerrymandering
Redrawing congressional districts before the normal redistricting cycle to lock in more Republican seats.
2. Restricting Mail Voting
Making absentee voting harder through tighter eligibility and identification requirements.
3. Imposing Proof-of-Citizenship Barriers
Requiring documentary proof of citizenship that could prevent otherwise eligible voters from registering.
4. Aggressive Voter-Roll Purges
Using voter-roll reviews and removals that critics say risk sweeping up eligible voters.
Important qualification: Texas's 1.2 million “suspense voters” have not actually been disenfranchised; they can generally still vote after confirming their address.
5. Closing Polling Places
Eliminating dozens of Election Day polling sites, potentially increasing travel and wait times.
6. Restricting Where and When Texans Vote
Moving toward precinct-based, single-day voting and limiting flexible voting options.
7. Encouraging Voter Challenges
Supporting efforts to challenge voters' eligibility, potentially intimidating or deterring legitimate voters.
8. Tightening Election Administration
Adding stricter ID, registration, ballot and voter-verification requirements.
9. Weaponizing “Election Integrity” Investigations
Using allegations of voter fraud and noncitizen voting to justify investigations and tighter voting restrictions.
10. Closing Republican Primaries
Trying to restrict Republican primaries to formally registered Republicans, changing who can influence GOP nominees.
11. Undermining Confidence in Election Results
Promoting fraud narratives and election challenges that can create grounds to dispute unfavorable results
And here are the sources:
Texas GOP — Election priorities/platform
only registered users can see external links
Brennan Center — Texas: Legal Protections from Election Subversion and Voter Suppression
only registered users can see external links
Brennan Center — Texas: Limits on Voter Eligibility Challenges
only registered users can see external links
Brennan Center — Texas: Protections Against Intimidation of Voters and Election Workers
only registered users can see external links
Brennan Center — States Requiring Proof of Citizenship
only registered users can see external links
Associated Press — Texas “suspense voters” and the 1.2 million claim
only registered users can see external links
Associated Press — Tarrant County polling-place cuts
only registered users can see external links
Houston Chronicle — Tarrant County polling-place closures
only registered users can see external links
Associated Press — Noncitizen voting claims and efforts to change election rules
only registered users can see external links
Reuters — Federal effort to restrict mail voting
only registered users can see external links
Texas Secretary of State — 2026 election rules and limited ballots
only registered users can see external links
CHEATING!!! And no investigations needed, because it's on their OWN platforms.
You are a complete numbskull and unable to make a decent point, ever.
The topic was "the economy is only bad because of the MESS that Sleepy Joe left".
He had nothing but a claim and you had nothing either. Only bullshit.
You couldn't even bring yourself to say: "But the DOW...". NOTHING!!!
Do I need to make your points FOR YOU?! IT'S EMBARRASSING!!
lout to the illegals forcing them to vote to the left. The rest is to dilute Trumps popular approval.
So my question is to you, sir,,,,Name one thing the radicql left has done for america in order to make it a better country?
IF the dems went into office next january and actually started FIXING problems, they could earn the respect and votes of the people.
At least 1 dem did vote to keep the supreme court the same instead of letting the dems stack it in their favor.
Your side has not just lost independent voters, you're even losing life-long conservatives.
Undocumented immigrants cannot vote. Only naturalized US citizens can vote in federal, state, and generally local elections.
I do agree that the Democrats haven't shown a lot of plans the last decades. They were just managing the country. That's still better than destroying everything that matters. For plans that improve people's lives, you need progressives. FDR was a progressive; your side would call him a Communist Marxist today. He was so popular that your side needed to introduce term-limits to get rid of him, because he was overwhelmingly popular. This is the time that most Americans want back now. They have seen the absolute failure of your side, they have seen that corporate centrist Democrats are useless, so now those progressives and democratic socialists are winning almost everywhere. There is a wave coming that you cannot stop, because most Americans a sick and tired of being sick and tired. They want a government that works for them, instead for the wealthy.
Sure, everything on the list below would be called socialism, communism, Marxism or radical left by your side, it it was introduced today:
• Social Security — Gave elderly Americans, disabled workers, and survivors a basic financial safety net.
• Medicare — Ensured virtually every American over 65 has access to health insurance.
• Medicaid — Expanded health coverage for low-income Americans, children, pregnant women, and people with disabilities.
• Civil Rights Act of 1964 — Outlawed racial discrimination in employment and public accommodations.
• Voting Rights Act of 1965 — Protected the right to vote against racial discrimination.
• Fair Housing Act — Outlawed discrimination in housing based on race and other protected characteristics.
• Desegregation — Used federal authority to dismantle government-enforced racial segregation.
• Equal Pay Act — Made paying workers differently solely because of sex unlawful.
• Americans with Disabilities Act — Protected Americans with disabilities from discrimination and required reasonable accessibility.
• Child-labor protections — Prevented children from being exploited in dangerous and abusive employment.
• Minimum wage — Established a nationwide wage floor for covered workers.
• Unemployment insurance — Provided temporary support to workers who lose their jobs.
• Workers’ compensation — Provided protection for workers injured on the job.
• Collective-bargaining rights — Protected workers’ ability to organize and negotiate with employers.
• GI Bill — Helped millions of veterans obtain education, homes, and economic opportunity.
• Rural electrification — Brought electricity to millions of rural Americans.
• New Deal infrastructure — Built roads, bridges, dams, schools, parks, and other infrastructure that served Americans for generations.
• FDIC — Protected Americans’ bank deposits and strengthened confidence in the banking system.
• Food and drug safety — Established stronger federal safeguards against dangerous food, medicines, and consumer products.
• Occupational safety standards — Established nationwide protections against dangerous workplace conditions.
• Clean Air Act — Dramatically reduced harmful air pollution.
• Clean Water Act — Established strong federal protections against water pollution.
• Environmental conservation — Preserved public lands, wildlife, forests, wetlands, and other natural resources.
• Superfund — Created a mechanism for cleaning up severely contaminated hazardous-waste sites.
• School nutrition programs — Helped ensure children receive nutritious meals regardless of family income.
• Head Start — Expanded early-childhood education and support for disadvantaged children.
• Veterans’ health care — Expanded federal medical services for American veterans.
• Consumer protection — Strengthened Americans’ protection against dangerous products and deceptive business practices.
• Nuclear arms control — Democratic administrations negotiated agreements that reduced the risk of nuclear conflict.
• Peace Corps — Created a long-running program of American volunteer service abroad.
• AmeriCorps — Created opportunities for Americans to serve their communities.
• Protection of interracial marriage — Federal constitutional protections ultimately eliminated state bans on interracial marriage.
• Protection of contraception access — Established constitutional protection for married couples’ access to contraception and later extended that protection.
• Marriage equality — Extended the legal right to marry to same-sex couples nationwide.
Now your turn; give me a list of things that Christian Nationalists, far-right conservatives or MAGA has done for America in order to make it a better country?
If you are a dope or illegal you will support democraps where they give you money which keeps them in power.
So let me ask you this. Are you a dope or illegal?. All of these are lies but let us go down if it is true.. The democraps party did at one time help americans. But at the time there was no radicals.. Which means you have not answered my question? Are you dumb and can't read or are you just plain stupid? Oh and by the way I am over 65 years old. Now I am making more than I did when shithead Biden cheated in the office.
Social security is for people that work and pay into it or get hurt trying to work.yet to many folks get it that have never worked or worked very little.
As for illegals not being able to vote, legally no,they can't but they buy fake id's and vote. why do you think I had to make sure my dead mothers name was off the roster? because some damn illegal would buy the info on the dark web and vote in my mothers name.
The SP is highly democratic because political power is deliberately organized from the bottom up: members organize in local branches, directly control those branches, elect representatives to higher bodies, collectively control important national decisions, participate in choosing the leadership and retain mechanisms for holding both party officials and elected representatives accountable.
The Republican denied the existence of Project 2025, didn't give you any consistent program to vote on, but expected you to vote for them just because of partisanship. You had candidate Trump promising to fix every problem in the US directly in very short times, and as soon as he got elected not even trying to do any of it.
When you are an SP member, you are involved in writing the program.
Then the representatives will work tirelessly to get as much of it done.
If they don't do their best to do exactly that, they can be replaced with
someone who will, at the members demands. We don't need to wait
for the next primaries.
The difference; you are loyal to your party, my party is loyal to it's members.
I support them, because they represent me, not the other way around.
And my country is more democratic, because I can easily switch to any of the many others. You have only two damn awful and corrupt choices, that have been there for ever and collude together to keep out other parties. In 10 years, we gained 4 new national political parties that gained seats; FVD, Volt, BBB and BIJ1. The BBB was even in the last government coalition. It wasn't a success, but it is giving my people lots of democratic choices that you don't have.
You are so confident that all illegals would surely vote for Democrats. Is that maybe because you understand that it takes decades of indoctrination to become stupid enough to vote for Republicans, and they didn't have that?
FDR killed many Jews. Woodrow Wilson killed Jews as well as henry ford and thomas edison.
I hate democrats and I hate replicans. Just a couple are worth hearing what they have to say.
Leadership vs. Ruling is the same as Utopia vs. socialism. You're a socialist right?. you and me is like oil and water.
Humanity evolved from Africa, also the middle east which is in Asia.
I know, so what?
You keep accusing me of lying, but you keep failing to show it.
FDR was MUCH more "radical" than the majority of the current Democrats. Most of them are centrist corporatists. They are about as right-wing now as Reagan was, and you can see it in their policy proposals. You ignore more of my questions than I ignore yours. I would, if it was in good faith and worth answering. Mostly they are not.
FDR killed many Jews. Woodrow Wilson killed Jews as well as henry ford and thomas edison.
I hate democrats and I hate replicans. Just a couple are worth hearing what they have to say.
Leadership vs. Ruling is the same as Utpia vs. socialism. You're a socialist right?. you and me is like oil and water.
It doesn't matter, because you will accuse me of lying anyway.
And then you just spit out nonsense without ANY facts or evidence.
You're either delusional or a troll.
Put some evidence towards those killed Jews.
"Leadership vs. Ruling is the same as Utpia vs. socialism."
That's just word salad. I guess, it must be delusional.
The MS St. Louis (1939): The most famous incident involved the German ocean liner St. Louis carrying 937 Jewish passengers fleeing the Third Reich. After being turned away by Cuba, the ship approached the U.S. coast, but the Roosevelt administration refused to let them disembark. The ship returned to Europe; roughly 254 of those passengers ultimately died in the Holocaust.
(https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/voyage-of-the-st-louis), (https://www.facebook.com/councilonforeignrelations/posts/in-a-survey-cfr-asked-members-of-the-society-for-historians-of-american-foreign-/1453189673519453/),(https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/may-27/ss-st-louis-jewish-refugees-turned-away-holocaust), (https://stlouislegacyproject.org/2019/06/04/1939-when-jewish-refugees-were-turned-away/), (https://www.dia.mil/News-Features/Articles/Article-View/Article/566971/confronting-the-holocaust-dia-remembers/),(https://jewishjournal.com/commentary/opinion/345006/fdrs-jewish-problem-and-its-japanese-link/)Unused Quotas: Historians note that between 1933 and 1945, strict immigration enforcement and State Department policies left approximately 190,000 legal quota slots for German and European refugees unfilled.(https://jewishjournal.com/commentary/opinion/345006/fdrs-jewish-problem-and-its-japanese-link/)Refusal of Children: FDR also refused to support the Wagner-Rogers Bill, a 1939 congressional proposal that would have allowed 20,000 Jewish refugee children fleeing Nazi Germany to enter the United States outside of official quotas
Why It HappenedImmigration Quotas: The Immigration Act of 1924 set strict national origin quotas that Congress and the State Department enforced rigidly. (https://www.reddit.com/r/ww2/comments/1kb01au/til_that_in_1939_the_us_denied_963_jewish/), (https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/the-evian-conference)Economic and Security Fears: During the Great Depression, many Americans worried refugees would take scarce jobs. Later, during World War II, officials and security agencies like the Justice Department and State Department feared that refugees or disguised Nazi spies posed a national security risk. (https://www.facebook.com/councilonforeignrelations/posts/in-a-survey-cfr-asked-members-of-the-society-for-historians-of-american-foreign-/1453189673519453/), (https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/the-evian-conference), (https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/us-government-turned-away-thousands-jewish-refugees-fearing-they-were-nazi-spies-180957324/)Antisemitism: Deep-seated prejudice among key bureaucrats in the U.S. State Department also actively hindered efforts to ease refugee admissions
No it is not word salad. Ruling is socialism, communism.. Democracy is leadership. The only ignorant troll here is you.
which is exactly what you want Trump to do. There are genocides and mass murders going on today too.
In Marxist theory, socialism is democratic worker control and ownership of the workplaces and means of production.
Communism is the ultimate, stateless, and classless society that emerges after socialism.
Democracy is any system of government where power is vested in the people and exercised by them either directly or through elected representatives.
Democracy under socialism is inherently different from capitalist democracy. Marxists argue that capitalist democracy is an illusion (bourgeois democracy) because wealth dictates political power. In contrast, democracy under socialism is envisioned as a radical, bottom-up system where the working-class majority rules society and democratically manages the economy.
In Marxist theory, a political state and its democratic systems (like voting, parliaments, or laws) only exist to manage conflict between different social classes. Because full communism is a classless society, the mechanisms of political rule become completely obsolete.Instead of a political democracy, society is organized through .the voluntary association of producers. Without a state or money, society relies on rotating administrative bodies to manage resources and plan production based directly on human need. Because automation and collective cooperation create an abundance of goods, survival is guaranteed. Individuals are completely free to pursue their creative potentials, erasing the distinction between the governors and the governed.
Personally, I think that communism is too complicated. I prefer socialism as
an end goal, but I would already be satisfied with a hybrid of capitalism and socialism, in which important public services are socialized, but luxury consumer goods would be produced and owned by private companies,
that are regulated and taxed enough to limit their power.
Yeah it is the same. Just as guilty.. Who do you think funded Hitler's 3rd reich... No it wasnt Germany..Wasn't the Vatican or Russia.. It was the United states of America..Led by FDR.. When he sent the Jews to the gas chamber he knew what was going to happen.... You know what.. Just shut the fuck up already.
Have you seen Trump at work? HE DEMANDS OBEDIENCE.
Socialism and communism are derived from the words social and commune for a reason; because their core theory is built on collective ownership and cooperation, NOT a ruling class.
Why do I even try to talk some sense into a person who believes fringe conspiracy theories, historical revisionism, and factually upside-down claims? You are explicitly contradicting history, as it is recognized by allies and enemies alike.
There is a massive paper trail showing exactly how the Nazis funded their own regime, mostly through plundering occupied Europe and stealing the wealth of Jewish citizens. FDR didn’t run Germany, nor did he order the Holocaust. The US government actually fought a total war to destroy the Third Reich. Blaming the country that helped liberate the camps for building them ignores the real perpetrators: Hitler and the Nazi regime.
Over 400,000 American soldiers died fighting across Europe and the
Pacific to destroy fascism. American troops were the ones who liberated concentration camps like Buchenwald and Dachau. To claim that the US government and FDR actually ran the Third Reich and sent people to gas chambers completely spits on the sacrifice of those American veterans.
I'm accused of hating America a lot, but what you just said is worse than ANYTHING I have ever said.
To the others on this forum who usually back him up: if you stay silent on this, you are showing a complete lack of principle and intellectual courage.
--------------------------------------- added after 8 hours
only registered users can see external links
-Canadian reporter
perhaps the problem isn't your friends.
Being able to make something yourself is not the same as it being economically sensible to make it yourself. It's like saying: “Why do you buy bread? You could grow wheat, beat it to flour and bake your own.”
You don't do that, because your time and resources are more valuable when you specialize and trade with other people who specialize in different things.
The US CAN produce its own wood, but it just isn't always the cheapest or most efficient option. Canada has enormous forests, a large established logging industry, and is geographically close to the US. So Canadian lumber can often be produced and transported to the US at a lower cost than expanding US production.
Canadian auto workers were generally unionized too. Canada had a big market that automakers wanted to serve. The US–Canada Auto Pact (1965) allowed companies to specialize production across the two countries rather than build every model and component in both.
Canada offered skilled workers, established suppliers, and access to the US market. Automakers could therefore build certain vehicles or components in Canada and ship them across the border efficiently.
Companies will always do what is most efficient, because they want to make money. What is most efficient is based on the economic realities of different countries.
My country produces about 11% of the wheat we use to make food and animal feed.
We could grow more, but we already use half of our country to grow agriculture products. We would need to either grow less other products or sacrifice land to wheat that we now use for other things. Wheat is a low value product, so we prioritize higher value products.
Most of the iPhone is manufactured in Taiwan, Japan, South Korea, India and China, because that it cheaper. They have created the industry to do it there, they have build their supply chain around it and they have lots of cheap labor. If you wanted to make the iPhone in the US for 100%, you would have to invest hundreds of billions of dollars and recreate the ecosystem that has developed in Asia over decades: raw materials → chemicals → specialized machinery → components → subcomponents → assembly → packaging → logistics
And if you did that, it would almost certainly cost substantially more than today's globally optimized version, particularly during the enormous transition period. No one would buy an iPhone that would cost $3000 with similar capabilities of a Samsung costing $600. People who love Apple are a bit weird, but they are not THAT crazy.
We have vast amounts of oil, aluminum, nickel, uranium, and a wealth of other critical minerals all needed for the future. We have more fresh water lakes than the rest of the world combined.. water!
3.9 billion barrels of oil everyday flows south to you at a discount price.. Imagine what the price of gas would be if that doesn't happen.. the list goes on..
This is not a trade dispute to make it better for Americans, this is a trade policy designed by the current administration to cripple Canada to the point of annexation.. simply put. It will never happen.
Oh and the draft dodgers are happy and being looked after in their old age.. There was one that stayed behind tho, and right now he's the one who's behind the wheel of your car
of each other?
'Liberalism' is fundamentally a political philosophy centered on things such as individual liberty, equal legal rights, constitutional government, freedom of expression, and limits on arbitrary state power. If society IS liberal, they would be conservative in wanting to preserve that.
'Conservatism' generally emphasizes tradition, continuity, social order, and skepticism toward rapid or sweeping change. The current political movement in the US is pushing for historical sweeping change. Therefore, it cannot be called 'conservative'. What it can be called is 'illiberal' though.
Conservatism attitudes are based on education of critical thinking. Rather than just skimming the tax payer they find ways of independence from government support.
Trump is destroying the constitutional republic and the rule of law. And there has never been a more corrupt president.
Jim Jordan
5 days ago
·
Common sense: pro-business policies, secure borders, and backing the blue.
Crazy: socialism, open borders, and abolishing the police.
More specifically:
- Asylum/refugees: People genuinely fleeing war and persecution should be protected and accommodated humanely.
- The SP wants faster asylum procedures and better distribution of asylum seekers among municipalities.
- Labour migration: The SP strongly opposes uncontrolled labour migration. It proposes work permits and says only workers who are genuinely needed should be admitted.
- EU free movement: The SP argues that the EU's unrestricted free movement of workers has contributed to exploitation, low wages and pressure on housing, and wants to curb/regulate it.
- Students/knowledge migrants: The party also wants to reduce knowledge and student migration.
- Overall target: The SP currently advocates a net migration figure of 40,000 per year, rather than unrestricted immigration.
That's the Dutch SP responding to the specific needs of my country, which is highly overpopulated. The US is NOT highly overpopulated, so the US DSA doesn't need to limit free movement of people.
The DSA describes abolition as the END goal, and presents its immediate proposals as steps toward a society in which the existing police system is no longer NECESSARY. The basic theory is that you reduce the functions currently handled by police by addressing the underlying social problems, by:
1. Redirect police money into public services
2. Treat mental illness and addiction as health problems
3. Create non-police responses to crises
4. Demilitarize police
5. Reduce the scope of policing
6. Build a different social and political system
You are straw-manning them by leaving that out. It means that you have no response to their actual positions, so you need to make believe that they are crazy. That's a dishonest tactic.
How about actually making an argument?
The places that are overpopulated are where the democrats bullshit minorities while giving threats if they vote for Trump they will lose their free money from the hard working conservative.
The rest of your stupid bullshit is unremarkable. Here's what you do.. Stay in Europe,, the european union's got you by the balls.. Don't come here.. You will lose.
Trump didn't 'WIN' anything; his stooges gave him something
that should have been decided by the PEOPLE.
That's why The Constitution starts with "We the People"
and not with "We the Supreme Court".
Conservatives are freeloaders; blue states are funding red states to stay alive.
Conservatives cry about taxes and then they cry harder when they need help.
All your MAGA voting farm-boys are kept afloat by subsidies.
Just calling it bullshit isn't an argument.
YOU are unremarkable and a waste of my time.
Point to ANYTHING that I was lying about and show why it was false.
If you say "Everything", like before, just provide 1 good example.
I add numbers, data and often sources. You don't do any of that.
If you want a source for the claim "58% of Americans favor allowing voters to cast their ballots by mail", here it is: only registered users can see external links
Do you acknowledge that the Supreme Court voted 6–3 to allow the Trump administration's mail-voting restrictions to proceed, while the legal challenges continue?
only registered users can see external links
Congress did NOT vote on the current mail-voting restrictions before they were imposed. The restrictions at issue came from President Trump’s executive order of March 31, 2026, which directed the Department of Homeland Security and USPS to create voter-eligibility lists and establish new requirements for mail ballots.
only registered users can see external links
Are you arguing that it is constitutional to change in a major way
how elections are performed by executive order?
You have proven nothing. Not to me anyway.,
You have a democratic system and Trump disrespects it, by ignoring the wish of the people, ignoring their representatives in Congress, by ruling by executive order, by letting his corrupt, bad faith Supreme Court justices defile your Constitution, or by just doing shit that no one allowed, until he gets ordered to reverse it, and then ignoring the orders. This is completely unconstitutional.
Trying to diminish this to a semantic discussion about right and wrong
is just a stupid trick.
Maybe then voting at all would be useless?
I can READ the Constitution. Constitutional integrity is nowhere to be found among the Supreme Court justices appointed by Republicans.
I'm sure YOU agree, but you should care that the majority of Americans agrees with what's happening in your country, even if it's not what YOU want.
When politicians in my country do what they promised, and they represent the majority of my countrymen, I might not like that, but
I accept it as a democratic choice. I debate people to make them reconsider their choices. I'm not supporting politicians who CHEAT.
about what is happening in the world.
You profess a certain morality, but support the opposite.
If I challenge you on it, you answer with complete gibberish.
It's either a dishonest tactic or you are delusional.
That's not morality, that's just OBEDIENCE, which is WEAK.
Atheism is NOT a moral structure, it's just the rejection of theism.
I'm not JUST an atheist, I'm also a humanist, which IS a moral structure.
Humanism emphasizes human well-being, dignity, flourishing, autonomy, and reason, rather than grounding morality in divine commands or supernatural authority. In other words; it's NOT based on the made-up demands of a made-up deity; delusion.
Maybe it's you who should calm down, stoic.
Did they then pay that trillionaire to play with rockets?
Your country tried it your way for DECADES. What do you have to show for it?
You have the highest percentage of incarcerated people in the world, but also
the most murders in the modern world and the worst drugs problem.
that the next 2 presidents won't be able to fix it all.
How about he stops committing impeachable offenses?
Here are some of his impeachable offenses of just the last TWO MONTHS:
1 Using federal immigration forces in ways alleged to violate constitutional rights
• Rep. Al Green's August 24 impeachment resolution accuses Trump of abusing presidential power through ICE and CBP, including alleged unlawful arrests, excessive force, violations of due process, and suppression of speech.
• The resolution specifically points to the July killings of Lorenzo Salgado Araujo in Texas and Johan Sebastián Durán Guerrero in Maine, alleging that the administration subsequently protected officers and obstructed investigations.
2 Obstructing or undermining state/local investigations into federal-officer conduct
• Green's articles allege that Trump's administration withheld evidence, refused to identify officers, and interfered with state and local investigations into ICE/CBP shootings.
• If established as intentional obstruction by the president, that could fit the historical impeachment concept of abuse of power/obstruction of lawful oversight.
3 Defying judicial authority in immigration enforcement
• The impeachment articles allege that ICE, under Trump's authority, continued detention/removal practices despite court orders and that the administration acknowledged numerous violations of judicial orders.
• Separately, courts are currently blocking parts of Trump's immigration and election-related policies, although a court ruling against an administration policy does not automatically constitute an impeachable offense.
4 Attempting to alter federal election administration beyond presidential authority
• Trump's administration has attempted to impose new restrictions on mail voting through executive action. A federal judge has again blocked implementation, with opponents arguing that the order improperly intrudes on powers assigned to Congress and the states.
• This could be characterized as abuse or usurpation of presidential power, particularly if Congress determines that Trump knowingly exceeded his constitutional authority.
5 Attempting to restrict birthright citizenship despite constitutional constraints
• Trump signed another order on August 6 limiting birthright citizenship in specified circumstances. On August 28, a federal judge expressed serious doubts about its legality, particularly in light of the Supreme Court's June 2026 decision concerning Trump's earlier birthright-citizenship order.
• Again, an unconstitutional executive order isn't automatically an impeachable offense; the stronger impeachment argument would be knowingly and persistently abusing executive power in defiance of constitutional limits.
6 Potential abuse of executive power through suppression of protected speech
• A Reuters investigation reported that federal judges had ruled in 75 cases that Trump's administration violated First Amendment rights, including through actions against protesters, universities, journalists and political critics.
• That establishes substantial judicial findings against administration conduct, but attributing each violation personally to Trump—and turning it into an impeachable offense—would require additional evidence of presidential involvement or direction.
Republicans tried to impeach Biden 17 times. Dems are only at 6 for his 2nd term.
Stop crying, when you voted in the most corrupt and authoritarian president EVER.
New Comment Go to top