Your views, thoughts or simply opinions. The Economy is not well (understatement). I know there are some here that will try to link the country they are residing in as problems of the USA. Sorry the USA cannot be responsible for 100% of the problems in the world nor should they be expected to help repair all problems.
"He also said there was no constitutional right to “truthful information from officials during a public health crisis.”
So for all of us that ever hope for the truth to be told, this court case tells us we don't have a right to the truth. All the bullshit with covid, can be withheld if this precedent is used.
so hard to believe it has been 25 years since 9-11.I remember it just as if it were a couple hours ago. And to think what new york is becoming now, is sickning.
only registered users can see external links
Are you kidding? Mayor Zohran Mamdani just took several concrete steps at long-term preparedness and remembrance.
• Made September 11 an official NYC “Day of Remembrance and Service” every year. This is a new citywide designation. It calls for a moment of silence honoring both people killed on 9/11 and people who later died from 9/11-related illnesses.
• Encouraged city agencies to hold memorial ceremonies and educational programs and work with NYC Service to promote volunteer opportunities on September 11. The idea is to connect remembrance with the spirit of service that New Yorkers showed immediately after the attacks.
• Expanded the focus beyond people killed on September 11 itself. His announcement explicitly recognizes first responders, survivors, city workers, families, recovery/construction workers, and people who became sick from toxic exposure in the years afterward.
• Updated NYC's emergency-continuity planning for the first time since 2007. He created a new interagency Continuity and Mission Assurance Team involving emergency management, technology, city services and budget officials, intended to make sure essential government services can continue during a catastrophe.
Your side always talk a good game, but it's mostly a political point to hate Muslims and go to war. Remembering people who died is cheap, but recognizing the health damage of first responders, survivors, city workers, families and recovery/construction workers costs money. If it wasn't for Jon Stewart shaming Congress, they would have completely ignored all the people who are suffering health issues from doing their important work.
That is sickening.
I never really had a issue with canada, but really, they don't supply anything we can't make or do ourselves. Automakers went there to dodge the profit eating unions, we can grow our own lumber and etc. they took our draft dodgers and didn't keep them very long,
Sure, the US could make almost everything themselves that they now get from other countries. But why didn't you, do you think?
Being able to make something yourself is not the same as it being economically sensible to make it yourself. It's like saying: “Why do you buy bread? You could grow wheat, beat it to flour and bake your own.”
You don't do that, because your time and resources are more valuable when you specialize and trade with other people who specialize in different things.
The US CAN produce its own wood, but it just isn't always the cheapest or most efficient option. Canada has enormous forests, a large established logging industry, and is geographically close to the US. So Canadian lumber can often be produced and transported to the US at a lower cost than expanding US production.
Canadian auto workers were generally unionized too. Canada had a big market that automakers wanted to serve. The US–Canada Auto Pact (1965) allowed companies to specialize production across the two countries rather than build every model and component in both.
Canada offered skilled workers, established suppliers, and access to the US market. Automakers could therefore build certain vehicles or components in Canada and ship them across the border efficiently.
Companies will always do what is most efficient, because they want to make money. What is most efficient is based on the economic realities of different countries.
My country produces about 11% of the wheat we use to make food and animal feed.
We could grow more, but we already use half of our country to grow agriculture products. We would need to either grow less other products or sacrifice land to wheat that we now use for other things. Wheat is a low value product, so we prioritize higher value products.
Most of the iPhone is manufactured in Taiwan, Japan, South Korea, India and China, because that it cheaper. They have created the industry to do it there, they have build their supply chain around it and they have lots of cheap labor. If you wanted to make the iPhone in the US for 100%, you would have to invest hundreds of billions of dollars and recreate the ecosystem that has developed in Asia over decades: raw materials → chemicals → specialized machinery → components → subcomponents → assembly → packaging → logistics
And if you did that, it would almost certainly cost substantially more than today's globally optimized version, particularly during the enormous transition period. No one would buy an iPhone that would cost $3000 with similar capabilities of a Samsung costing $600. People who love Apple are a bit weird, but they are not THAT crazy.
We have everything you need.. 20 fold. That's exactly why Trump is so hot and heavy.
We have vast amounts of oil, aluminum, nickel, uranium, and a wealth of other critical minerals all needed for the future. We have more fresh water lakes than the rest of the world combined.. water!
3.9 billion barrels of oil everyday flows south to you at a discount price.. Imagine what the price of gas would be if that doesn't happen.. the list goes on..
This is not a trade dispute to make it better for Americans, this is a trade policy designed by the current administration to cripple Canada to the point of annexation.. simply put. It will never happen.
Oh and the draft dodgers are happy and being looked after in their old age.. There was one that stayed behind tho, and right now he's the one who's behind the wheel of your car
Can be.. Just like liberals finding out you are a conservative. It's not like I hate them. As a stoic it makes that choice to be impossible. It all comes down to me. Rather than listening to their ideas the only thing that comes to their pea-brained minds is thier hate while always pointing the finger to the conservative while never taking accountability for themselves. I just stay away from them.. Its better for them, better for me.. Isolation.
Did you know that the terms 'liberal' and 'conservative' are actually not opposites
of each other?
'Liberalism' is fundamentally a political philosophy centered on things such as individual liberty, equal legal rights, constitutional government, freedom of expression, and limits on arbitrary state power. If society IS liberal, they would be conservative in wanting to preserve that.
'Conservatism' generally emphasizes tradition, continuity, social order, and skepticism toward rapid or sweeping change. The current political movement in the US is pushing for historical sweeping change. Therefore, it cannot be called 'conservative'. What it can be called is 'illiberal' though.
Yes, you are correct.. BUT from day one to now the agenda's have changed to progressive using transgenders for removing rights of women... Or labled from liars that are trying to turn this into socialism of rulers that only care about the people's money and not the safety and well being.. Rather than doing anything for this country for the 5th time setting up impeachment hearings at the cost of the tax payer even if they don't want to..Trump has done well since he is closer to constitutional republic than the fucking democraps that are performing a coup to destroy it. So what you are saying was true but not.
Conservatism attitudes are based on education of critical thinking. Rather than just skimming the tax payer they find ways of independence from government support.
The DSA doesn't represent all socialists. The Dutch Socialist Party wants to control and limit migration. It says people fleeing war and violence should be received humanely, while economic migration should be substantially restricted.
More specifically:
- Asylum/refugees: People genuinely fleeing war and persecution should be protected and accommodated humanely.
- The SP wants faster asylum procedures and better distribution of asylum seekers among municipalities.
- Labour migration: The SP strongly opposes uncontrolled labour migration. It proposes work permits and says only workers who are genuinely needed should be admitted.
- EU free movement: The SP argues that the EU's unrestricted free movement of workers has contributed to exploitation, low wages and pressure on housing, and wants to curb/regulate it.
- Students/knowledge migrants: The party also wants to reduce knowledge and student migration.
- Overall target: The SP currently advocates a net migration figure of 40,000 per year, rather than unrestricted immigration.
That's the Dutch SP responding to the specific needs of my country, which is highly overpopulated. The US is NOT highly overpopulated, so the US DSA doesn't need to limit free movement of people.
The DSA describes abolition as the END goal, and presents its immediate proposals as steps toward a society in which the existing police system is no longer NECESSARY. The basic theory is that you reduce the functions currently handled by police by addressing the underlying social problems, by:
1. Redirect police money into public services
2. Treat mental illness and addiction as health problems
3. Create non-police responses to crises
4. Demilitarize police
5. Reduce the scope of policing
6. Build a different social and political system
You are straw-manning them by leaving that out. It means that you have no response to their actual positions, so you need to make believe that they are crazy. That's a dishonest tactic.
Spare me child.. Its only overpopulated with blue cities trying to mail in ballots and from what I heard Trump has won this fight,.
The places that are overpopulated are where the democrats bullshit minorities while giving threats if they vote for Trump they will lose their free money from the hard working conservative.
The rest of your stupid bullshit is unremarkable. Here's what you do.. Stay in Europe,, the european union's got you by the balls.. Don't come here.. You will lose.
58% of Americans favor allowing voters to cast their ballots by mail.
Trump didn't 'WIN' anything; his stooges gave him something
that should have been decided by the PEOPLE.
That's why The Constitution starts with "We the People"
and not with "We the Supreme Court".
Conservatives are freeloaders; blue states are funding red states to stay alive.
Conservatives cry about taxes and then they cry harder when they need help.
All your MAGA voting farm-boys are kept afloat by subsidies.
Just calling it bullshit isn't an argument.
YOU are unremarkable and a waste of my time.
That is my hypothesis.. I've giving you the opportunity for transparency here. You have not taken advantage which is telling me you are lying. I'm putting this nicely.. The only way you can win this argument is through transparency. If you are confident then show documentation with your argument.. Other than that its "thank you drive through"
I have countered every argument you have put up, correcting your misconceptions and straw-man arguments.
I add numbers, data and often sources. You don't do any of that.
If you want a source for the claim "58% of Americans favor allowing voters to cast their ballots by mail", here it is: only registered users can see external links
Do you acknowledge that the Supreme Court voted 6–3 to allow the Trump administration's mail-voting restrictions to proceed, while the legal challenges continue?
only registered users can see external links
Congress did NOT vote on the current mail-voting restrictions before they were imposed. The restrictions at issue came from President Trump’s executive order of March 31, 2026, which directed the Department of Homeland Security and USPS to create voter-eligibility lists and establish new requirements for mail ballots.
only registered users can see external links
Are you arguing that it is constitutional to change in a major way
how elections are performed by executive order?
So what are you trying to prove here.. What is your overall summation of right and wrong? I have no idea what you are talking about.. Is it to contrast democracy over socialism or visa versa..
You have proven nothing. Not to me anyway.,
See, when I get specific, you answer with complete gibberish.
You have a democratic system and Trump disrespects it, by ignoring the wish of the people, ignoring their representatives in Congress, by ruling by executive order, by letting his corrupt, bad faith Supreme Court justices defile your Constitution, or by just doing shit that no one allowed, until he gets ordered to reverse it, and then ignoring the orders. This is completely unconstitutional.
Trying to diminish this to a semantic discussion about right and wrong
is just a stupid trick.
not at all. You're just being a baby. Supreme court has highest juristiction of the country. One Left Wing Judge goes against the constitution then the supreme court of 9 judges over-rules him bringing the subject to conform to constitutional integrity. I agree with the final result.
Then why don't you let EVERYTHING be decided by the Supreme Court?
Maybe then voting at all would be useless?
I can READ the Constitution. Constitutional integrity is nowhere to be found among the Supreme Court justices appointed by Republicans.
I'm sure YOU agree, but you should care that the majority of Americans agrees with what's happening in your country, even if it's not what YOU want.
When politicians in my country do what they promised, and they represent the majority of my countrymen, I might not like that, but
I accept it as a democratic choice. I debate people to make them reconsider their choices. I'm not supporting politicians who CHEAT.
It is set up as such based on judicial law. This is the way it is to protect from radical judges for example Obama appointing corrupt judges. Radical judges want open borders. Open illegal migration then voting for corrupt politicians. This country is being invaded now,.
That you are incapable of honestly discussing your opinions
about what is happening in the world.
You profess a certain morality, but support the opposite.
If I challenge you on it, you answer with complete gibberish.
It's either a dishonest tactic or you are delusional.
You know nothing about morality or even justice. You can't since you are an athiest. We have nothing in common. Our goals are opposites..You are just a dormant fucktard that will never learn anything.. So let's just calm down ... And you fucking insult me again and there will be shit piles on your page will be coming out of your nostrils..
Theist based morality is only based on fear of punishment.
That's not morality, that's just OBEDIENCE, which is WEAK.
Atheism is NOT a moral structure, it's just the rejection of theism.
I'm not JUST an atheist, I'm also a humanist, which IS a moral structure.
Humanism emphasizes human well-being, dignity, flourishing, autonomy, and reason, rather than grounding morality in divine commands or supernatural authority. In other words; it's NOT based on the made-up demands of a made-up deity; delusion.
Yep, libs want to defund the police and send a unarmed mental health expert into a dangerous situation to try to "talk it thru". Most situations that police are called on, talk is what caused it all to escalate in the first place.
The idea of this bullshit party is to divert the truth by doing this shit such that it gives them a window of stealing from the taxpayer.. To them they are immune to accountability and so far they are getting away with it. The attorney general is said to be ruthless so we will see what happens.. So far there are many mayor's and governers arrested facing decades in prison. Let's see what happens.
Do you understand the difference between libs and socialists?
Your country tried it your way for DECADES. What do you have to show for it?
You have the highest percentage of incarcerated people in the world, but also
the most murders in the modern world and the worst drugs problem.
Well, far as I am concerned when they get the southern wall built, they can start on the northern 1. it is my understanding that alot of illegals come over from canada because of their policys at airports.
A wall doesn't have to be metal or brick and motar. it can be a simple law with some signs saying "stay the hell away or you will be sent to Haiti" and actually follow thru with it when folks disobey.It was more or less said to be sarcastic because nothing will be done about it in the long term.
It would be nice if our President could spend time fixing real problems but at the same time, I am enjoying watching him kick our fair weather friends in the shin once in a while. And besides, the democrats are already getting setup to do impeachments again if they get control of the house and stuff in the fall. So the libtards are worse, they have no desire to govern when they can play pin the tail on the donkey on Trump
He's not spending time fixing problems, he is creating so many
that the next 2 presidents won't be able to fix it all.
How about he stops committing impeachable offenses?
Here are some of his impeachable offenses of just the last TWO MONTHS:
1 Using federal immigration forces in ways alleged to violate constitutional rights
• Rep. Al Green's August 24 impeachment resolution accuses Trump of abusing presidential power through ICE and CBP, including alleged unlawful arrests, excessive force, violations of due process, and suppression of speech.
• The resolution specifically points to the July killings of Lorenzo Salgado Araujo in Texas and Johan Sebastián Durán Guerrero in Maine, alleging that the administration subsequently protected officers and obstructed investigations.
2 Obstructing or undermining state/local investigations into federal-officer conduct
• Green's articles allege that Trump's administration withheld evidence, refused to identify officers, and interfered with state and local investigations into ICE/CBP shootings.
• If established as intentional obstruction by the president, that could fit the historical impeachment concept of abuse of power/obstruction of lawful oversight.
3 Defying judicial authority in immigration enforcement
• The impeachment articles allege that ICE, under Trump's authority, continued detention/removal practices despite court orders and that the administration acknowledged numerous violations of judicial orders.
• Separately, courts are currently blocking parts of Trump's immigration and election-related policies, although a court ruling against an administration policy does not automatically constitute an impeachable offense.
4 Attempting to alter federal election administration beyond presidential authority
• Trump's administration has attempted to impose new restrictions on mail voting through executive action. A federal judge has again blocked implementation, with opponents arguing that the order improperly intrudes on powers assigned to Congress and the states.
• This could be characterized as abuse or usurpation of presidential power, particularly if Congress determines that Trump knowingly exceeded his constitutional authority.
5 Attempting to restrict birthright citizenship despite constitutional constraints
• Trump signed another order on August 6 limiting birthright citizenship in specified circumstances. On August 28, a federal judge expressed serious doubts about its legality, particularly in light of the Supreme Court's June 2026 decision concerning Trump's earlier birthright-citizenship order.
• Again, an unconstitutional executive order isn't automatically an impeachable offense; the stronger impeachment argument would be knowingly and persistently abusing executive power in defiance of constitutional limits.
6 Potential abuse of executive power through suppression of protected speech
• A Reuters investigation reported that federal judges had ruled in 75 cases that Trump's administration violated First Amendment rights, including through actions against protesters, universities, journalists and political critics.
• That establishes substantial judicial findings against administration conduct, but attributing each violation personally to Trump—and turning it into an impeachable offense—would require additional evidence of presidential involvement or direction.
Republicans tried to impeach Biden 17 times. Dems are only at 6 for his 2nd term.
Stop crying, when you voted in the most corrupt and authoritarian president EVER.
Just another silly thing to distract yourself from what is happening.
Decades of fearmongering about what Democrats would do,
and then your side does it ALL, and you don't want to see it; blinded by tribalism.
• “Jackbooted government thugs” — warned that federal agents would become an armed occupying force; then put militarized federal agents and troops into American cities.
• “The Second Amendment protects us from tyranny” — warned that an armed citizenry was the last defense against government tyranny; then a legally armed American was killed by federal agents, with his possession of the gun invoked to justify the shooting.
• “When the people fear the government, there is tyranny” — warned that federal power would become something ordinary Americans had to fear; then expanded armed federal enforcement against Americans resisting government action.
• “Don’t Tread on Me” — warned against government coercion of individual citizens; then used federal power to crush resistance and override local authority.
• “States’ rights” — warned that Washington would trample the states; then threatened states with loss of federal money unless they complied with federal demands.
• “Small government” — promised to shrink Washington; instead concentrated more power in the presidency.
• “Executive tyranny” — warned Democrats would govern by executive fiat; then made extraordinary use of executive orders and executive agencies.
• “Government censorship” — warned Democrats would silence conservatives; then pressured broadcasters, journalists and media organizations that challenged Trump.
• “Weaponized DOJ/FBI” — warned Democrats would use federal law enforcement against political enemies; then pursued Trump's political adversaries through federal investigations and prosecutions.
• “The Deep State” — warned of an unaccountable bureaucracy; then purged career officials and replaced institutional independence with political loyalty.
• “Political prisoners” / “two-tiered justice” — warned that political opponents would be selectively prosecuted; then used pardons and presidential power to protect allies while pursuing enemies.
• “Big Brother” — warned Democrats would build an all-seeing government; then expanded government access to Americans' personal databases and information.
• “The surveillance state” — warned that government would track ordinary Americans; then expanded the use of facial recognition, location data, license-plate surveillance and other tracking technologies.
• “Election interference” — warned Washington would manipulate elections; then used federal executive power to impose election requirements and interfere with state election administration.
• “Federal takeover” — warned Democrats would use Washington to control hostile states and cities; then sent federal forces into jurisdictions whose elected governments objected.
• “Law and order” — promised equal justice; then increasingly used extraordinary federal enforcement against political and ideological opponents.
• “Protect American jobs” — warned that foreigners would take Americans' jobs; then embraced rapid AI deployment while resisting regulation that could constrain AI-driven job displacement.
• “Globalist elites” — warned that ordinary Americans were being ruled by an insulated elite; then concentrated extraordinary political influence among billionaires, corporate interests and wealthy insiders.
• “Drain the swamp” — promised to destroy the Washington insider class; instead gave the swamp a new business model: billionaires, loyalists and insiders with direct access to presidential power.
• “Nobody is above the law” — promised to hold the powerful accountable; then made political loyalty and presidential protection increasingly consequential to who faces scrutiny.
• “Epstein's child-sex-trafficking cabal” — promised to expose the wealthy and powerful people supposedly protected by the system; then the administration and Republican leadership became embroiled in resistance to demands for fuller disclosure while powerful figures fought congressional subpoenas.
• “End the forever wars” — promised to stop endless foreign wars; then launched/expanded major military operations while American forces remained deeply engaged overseas.
• “America First” — promised to stop sacrificing Americans for foreign adventures; then asked Americans to absorb the human and financial costs of another major war.
• “Lower the deficit” — promised fiscal discipline and smaller government; instead the national debt passed $40 trillion.
• “Freedom” — warned that Democrats would use government to control Americans; then expanded federal control over speech, protest, immigration, elections, information and personal data.
Yep, but these are 2023 numbers. The US was the world's #1 from around the 1990s until at least 2018. El Salvador's rate recently surged dramatically, during President Nayib Bukele's anti-gang crackdown. It might even go up, because the Trump regime started sending people to El Salvador in 2025.
Importantly, the U.S. prison/detention landscape is complicated by the fact that immigration detention is generally not counted as part of the conventional "prison population" rate.
The current World Prison Brief leaderboard makes Cuba look like a very current #2,
but that's misleading. Its data are six years old. The data for Turkmenistan is from 2021,
as Turkmenistan is an exceptionally closed country. However, it has made no meaningful progress on its already atrocious human-rights record since then.
I think the issue is that they try to solve everything with repression,
instead of treating people with dignity and providing them a decent chance
of a worthwhile life. If you treat people like animals, they become animals
and the only thing you can do is put them in a cage.
That's a very rational perspective.
It seems the a big fraction of the AbeAmerican population live in abominable conditions with no social care. They end up on the streets and die on the streets. The state has no provision for them. They put them in prisons when they steal something to eat but the president, and others of that "caliber", can keep committing crimes without any repercussions. It's deplorable.
"He also said there was no constitutional right to “truthful information from officials during a public health crisis.”
So for all of us that ever hope for the truth to be told, this court case tells us we don't have a right to the truth. All the bullshit with covid, can be withheld if this precedent is used.
only registered users can see external links
• Made September 11 an official NYC “Day of Remembrance and Service” every year. This is a new citywide designation. It calls for a moment of silence honoring both people killed on 9/11 and people who later died from 9/11-related illnesses.
• Encouraged city agencies to hold memorial ceremonies and educational programs and work with NYC Service to promote volunteer opportunities on September 11. The idea is to connect remembrance with the spirit of service that New Yorkers showed immediately after the attacks.
• Expanded the focus beyond people killed on September 11 itself. His announcement explicitly recognizes first responders, survivors, city workers, families, recovery/construction workers, and people who became sick from toxic exposure in the years afterward.
• Updated NYC's emergency-continuity planning for the first time since 2007. He created a new interagency Continuity and Mission Assurance Team involving emergency management, technology, city services and budget officials, intended to make sure essential government services can continue during a catastrophe.
Your side always talk a good game, but it's mostly a political point to hate Muslims and go to war. Remembering people who died is cheap, but recognizing the health damage of first responders, survivors, city workers, families and recovery/construction workers costs money. If it wasn't for Jon Stewart shaming Congress, they would have completely ignored all the people who are suffering health issues from doing their important work.
That is sickening.
--------------------------------------- added after 8 hours
only registered users can see external links
-Canadian reporter
perhaps the problem isn't your friends.
Being able to make something yourself is not the same as it being economically sensible to make it yourself. It's like saying: “Why do you buy bread? You could grow wheat, beat it to flour and bake your own.”
You don't do that, because your time and resources are more valuable when you specialize and trade with other people who specialize in different things.
The US CAN produce its own wood, but it just isn't always the cheapest or most efficient option. Canada has enormous forests, a large established logging industry, and is geographically close to the US. So Canadian lumber can often be produced and transported to the US at a lower cost than expanding US production.
Canadian auto workers were generally unionized too. Canada had a big market that automakers wanted to serve. The US–Canada Auto Pact (1965) allowed companies to specialize production across the two countries rather than build every model and component in both.
Canada offered skilled workers, established suppliers, and access to the US market. Automakers could therefore build certain vehicles or components in Canada and ship them across the border efficiently.
Companies will always do what is most efficient, because they want to make money. What is most efficient is based on the economic realities of different countries.
My country produces about 11% of the wheat we use to make food and animal feed.
We could grow more, but we already use half of our country to grow agriculture products. We would need to either grow less other products or sacrifice land to wheat that we now use for other things. Wheat is a low value product, so we prioritize higher value products.
Most of the iPhone is manufactured in Taiwan, Japan, South Korea, India and China, because that it cheaper. They have created the industry to do it there, they have build their supply chain around it and they have lots of cheap labor. If you wanted to make the iPhone in the US for 100%, you would have to invest hundreds of billions of dollars and recreate the ecosystem that has developed in Asia over decades: raw materials → chemicals → specialized machinery → components → subcomponents → assembly → packaging → logistics
And if you did that, it would almost certainly cost substantially more than today's globally optimized version, particularly during the enormous transition period. No one would buy an iPhone that would cost $3000 with similar capabilities of a Samsung costing $600. People who love Apple are a bit weird, but they are not THAT crazy.
We have vast amounts of oil, aluminum, nickel, uranium, and a wealth of other critical minerals all needed for the future. We have more fresh water lakes than the rest of the world combined.. water!
3.9 billion barrels of oil everyday flows south to you at a discount price.. Imagine what the price of gas would be if that doesn't happen.. the list goes on..
This is not a trade dispute to make it better for Americans, this is a trade policy designed by the current administration to cripple Canada to the point of annexation.. simply put. It will never happen.
Oh and the draft dodgers are happy and being looked after in their old age.. There was one that stayed behind tho, and right now he's the one who's behind the wheel of your car
of each other?
'Liberalism' is fundamentally a political philosophy centered on things such as individual liberty, equal legal rights, constitutional government, freedom of expression, and limits on arbitrary state power. If society IS liberal, they would be conservative in wanting to preserve that.
'Conservatism' generally emphasizes tradition, continuity, social order, and skepticism toward rapid or sweeping change. The current political movement in the US is pushing for historical sweeping change. Therefore, it cannot be called 'conservative'. What it can be called is 'illiberal' though.
Conservatism attitudes are based on education of critical thinking. Rather than just skimming the tax payer they find ways of independence from government support.
Trump is destroying the constitutional republic and the rule of law. And there has never been a more corrupt president.
Jim Jordan
5 days ago
·
Common sense: pro-business policies, secure borders, and backing the blue.
Crazy: socialism, open borders, and abolishing the police.
More specifically:
- Asylum/refugees: People genuinely fleeing war and persecution should be protected and accommodated humanely.
- The SP wants faster asylum procedures and better distribution of asylum seekers among municipalities.
- Labour migration: The SP strongly opposes uncontrolled labour migration. It proposes work permits and says only workers who are genuinely needed should be admitted.
- EU free movement: The SP argues that the EU's unrestricted free movement of workers has contributed to exploitation, low wages and pressure on housing, and wants to curb/regulate it.
- Students/knowledge migrants: The party also wants to reduce knowledge and student migration.
- Overall target: The SP currently advocates a net migration figure of 40,000 per year, rather than unrestricted immigration.
That's the Dutch SP responding to the specific needs of my country, which is highly overpopulated. The US is NOT highly overpopulated, so the US DSA doesn't need to limit free movement of people.
The DSA describes abolition as the END goal, and presents its immediate proposals as steps toward a society in which the existing police system is no longer NECESSARY. The basic theory is that you reduce the functions currently handled by police by addressing the underlying social problems, by:
1. Redirect police money into public services
2. Treat mental illness and addiction as health problems
3. Create non-police responses to crises
4. Demilitarize police
5. Reduce the scope of policing
6. Build a different social and political system
You are straw-manning them by leaving that out. It means that you have no response to their actual positions, so you need to make believe that they are crazy. That's a dishonest tactic.
How about actually making an argument?
The places that are overpopulated are where the democrats bullshit minorities while giving threats if they vote for Trump they will lose their free money from the hard working conservative.
The rest of your stupid bullshit is unremarkable. Here's what you do.. Stay in Europe,, the european union's got you by the balls.. Don't come here.. You will lose.
Trump didn't 'WIN' anything; his stooges gave him something
that should have been decided by the PEOPLE.
That's why The Constitution starts with "We the People"
and not with "We the Supreme Court".
Conservatives are freeloaders; blue states are funding red states to stay alive.
Conservatives cry about taxes and then they cry harder when they need help.
All your MAGA voting farm-boys are kept afloat by subsidies.
Just calling it bullshit isn't an argument.
YOU are unremarkable and a waste of my time.
Point to ANYTHING that I was lying about and show why it was false.
If you say "Everything", like before, just provide 1 good example.
I add numbers, data and often sources. You don't do any of that.
If you want a source for the claim "58% of Americans favor allowing voters to cast their ballots by mail", here it is: only registered users can see external links
Do you acknowledge that the Supreme Court voted 6–3 to allow the Trump administration's mail-voting restrictions to proceed, while the legal challenges continue?
only registered users can see external links
Congress did NOT vote on the current mail-voting restrictions before they were imposed. The restrictions at issue came from President Trump’s executive order of March 31, 2026, which directed the Department of Homeland Security and USPS to create voter-eligibility lists and establish new requirements for mail ballots.
only registered users can see external links
Are you arguing that it is constitutional to change in a major way
how elections are performed by executive order?
You have proven nothing. Not to me anyway.,
You have a democratic system and Trump disrespects it, by ignoring the wish of the people, ignoring their representatives in Congress, by ruling by executive order, by letting his corrupt, bad faith Supreme Court justices defile your Constitution, or by just doing shit that no one allowed, until he gets ordered to reverse it, and then ignoring the orders. This is completely unconstitutional.
Trying to diminish this to a semantic discussion about right and wrong
is just a stupid trick.
Maybe then voting at all would be useless?
I can READ the Constitution. Constitutional integrity is nowhere to be found among the Supreme Court justices appointed by Republicans.
I'm sure YOU agree, but you should care that the majority of Americans agrees with what's happening in your country, even if it's not what YOU want.
When politicians in my country do what they promised, and they represent the majority of my countrymen, I might not like that, but
I accept it as a democratic choice. I debate people to make them reconsider their choices. I'm not supporting politicians who CHEAT.
about what is happening in the world.
You profess a certain morality, but support the opposite.
If I challenge you on it, you answer with complete gibberish.
It's either a dishonest tactic or you are delusional.
That's not morality, that's just OBEDIENCE, which is WEAK.
Atheism is NOT a moral structure, it's just the rejection of theism.
I'm not JUST an atheist, I'm also a humanist, which IS a moral structure.
Humanism emphasizes human well-being, dignity, flourishing, autonomy, and reason, rather than grounding morality in divine commands or supernatural authority. In other words; it's NOT based on the made-up demands of a made-up deity; delusion.
Maybe it's you who should calm down, stoic.
Did they then pay that trillionaire to play with rockets?
Your country tried it your way for DECADES. What do you have to show for it?
You have the highest percentage of incarcerated people in the world, but also
the most murders in the modern world and the worst drugs problem.
that the next 2 presidents won't be able to fix it all.
How about he stops committing impeachable offenses?
Here are some of his impeachable offenses of just the last TWO MONTHS:
1 Using federal immigration forces in ways alleged to violate constitutional rights
• Rep. Al Green's August 24 impeachment resolution accuses Trump of abusing presidential power through ICE and CBP, including alleged unlawful arrests, excessive force, violations of due process, and suppression of speech.
• The resolution specifically points to the July killings of Lorenzo Salgado Araujo in Texas and Johan Sebastián Durán Guerrero in Maine, alleging that the administration subsequently protected officers and obstructed investigations.
2 Obstructing or undermining state/local investigations into federal-officer conduct
• Green's articles allege that Trump's administration withheld evidence, refused to identify officers, and interfered with state and local investigations into ICE/CBP shootings.
• If established as intentional obstruction by the president, that could fit the historical impeachment concept of abuse of power/obstruction of lawful oversight.
3 Defying judicial authority in immigration enforcement
• The impeachment articles allege that ICE, under Trump's authority, continued detention/removal practices despite court orders and that the administration acknowledged numerous violations of judicial orders.
• Separately, courts are currently blocking parts of Trump's immigration and election-related policies, although a court ruling against an administration policy does not automatically constitute an impeachable offense.
4 Attempting to alter federal election administration beyond presidential authority
• Trump's administration has attempted to impose new restrictions on mail voting through executive action. A federal judge has again blocked implementation, with opponents arguing that the order improperly intrudes on powers assigned to Congress and the states.
• This could be characterized as abuse or usurpation of presidential power, particularly if Congress determines that Trump knowingly exceeded his constitutional authority.
5 Attempting to restrict birthright citizenship despite constitutional constraints
• Trump signed another order on August 6 limiting birthright citizenship in specified circumstances. On August 28, a federal judge expressed serious doubts about its legality, particularly in light of the Supreme Court's June 2026 decision concerning Trump's earlier birthright-citizenship order.
• Again, an unconstitutional executive order isn't automatically an impeachable offense; the stronger impeachment argument would be knowingly and persistently abusing executive power in defiance of constitutional limits.
6 Potential abuse of executive power through suppression of protected speech
• A Reuters investigation reported that federal judges had ruled in 75 cases that Trump's administration violated First Amendment rights, including through actions against protesters, universities, journalists and political critics.
• That establishes substantial judicial findings against administration conduct, but attributing each violation personally to Trump—and turning it into an impeachable offense—would require additional evidence of presidential involvement or direction.
Republicans tried to impeach Biden 17 times. Dems are only at 6 for his 2nd term.
Stop crying, when you voted in the most corrupt and authoritarian president EVER.
Decades of fearmongering about what Democrats would do,
and then your side does it ALL, and you don't want to see it; blinded by tribalism.
• “Jackbooted government thugs” — warned that federal agents would become an armed occupying force; then put militarized federal agents and troops into American cities.
• “The Second Amendment protects us from tyranny” — warned that an armed citizenry was the last defense against government tyranny; then a legally armed American was killed by federal agents, with his possession of the gun invoked to justify the shooting.
• “When the people fear the government, there is tyranny” — warned that federal power would become something ordinary Americans had to fear; then expanded armed federal enforcement against Americans resisting government action.
• “Don’t Tread on Me” — warned against government coercion of individual citizens; then used federal power to crush resistance and override local authority.
• “States’ rights” — warned that Washington would trample the states; then threatened states with loss of federal money unless they complied with federal demands.
• “Small government” — promised to shrink Washington; instead concentrated more power in the presidency.
• “Executive tyranny” — warned Democrats would govern by executive fiat; then made extraordinary use of executive orders and executive agencies.
• “Government censorship” — warned Democrats would silence conservatives; then pressured broadcasters, journalists and media organizations that challenged Trump.
• “Weaponized DOJ/FBI” — warned Democrats would use federal law enforcement against political enemies; then pursued Trump's political adversaries through federal investigations and prosecutions.
• “The Deep State” — warned of an unaccountable bureaucracy; then purged career officials and replaced institutional independence with political loyalty.
• “Political prisoners” / “two-tiered justice” — warned that political opponents would be selectively prosecuted; then used pardons and presidential power to protect allies while pursuing enemies.
• “Big Brother” — warned Democrats would build an all-seeing government; then expanded government access to Americans' personal databases and information.
• “The surveillance state” — warned that government would track ordinary Americans; then expanded the use of facial recognition, location data, license-plate surveillance and other tracking technologies.
• “Election interference” — warned Washington would manipulate elections; then used federal executive power to impose election requirements and interfere with state election administration.
• “Federal takeover” — warned Democrats would use Washington to control hostile states and cities; then sent federal forces into jurisdictions whose elected governments objected.
• “Law and order” — promised equal justice; then increasingly used extraordinary federal enforcement against political and ideological opponents.
• “Protect American jobs” — warned that foreigners would take Americans' jobs; then embraced rapid AI deployment while resisting regulation that could constrain AI-driven job displacement.
• “Globalist elites” — warned that ordinary Americans were being ruled by an insulated elite; then concentrated extraordinary political influence among billionaires, corporate interests and wealthy insiders.
• “Drain the swamp” — promised to destroy the Washington insider class; instead gave the swamp a new business model: billionaires, loyalists and insiders with direct access to presidential power.
• “Nobody is above the law” — promised to hold the powerful accountable; then made political loyalty and presidential protection increasingly consequential to who faces scrutiny.
• “Epstein's child-sex-trafficking cabal” — promised to expose the wealthy and powerful people supposedly protected by the system; then the administration and Republican leadership became embroiled in resistance to demands for fuller disclosure while powerful figures fought congressional subpoenas.
• “End the forever wars” — promised to stop endless foreign wars; then launched/expanded major military operations while American forces remained deeply engaged overseas.
• “America First” — promised to stop sacrificing Americans for foreign adventures; then asked Americans to absorb the human and financial costs of another major war.
• “Lower the deficit” — promised fiscal discipline and smaller government; instead the national debt passed $40 trillion.
• “Freedom” — warned that Democrats would use government to control Americans; then expanded federal control over speech, protest, immigration, elections, information and personal data.
The US is near the top in the company of great countries!
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
Source : only registered users can see external links
--------------------------------------- added after 66 seconds
Here's the rest of the list
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
Importantly, the U.S. prison/detention landscape is complicated by the fact that immigration detention is generally not counted as part of the conventional "prison population" rate.
The current World Prison Brief leaderboard makes Cuba look like a very current #2,
but that's misleading. Its data are six years old. The data for Turkmenistan is from 2021,
as Turkmenistan is an exceptionally closed country. However, it has made no meaningful progress on its already atrocious human-rights record since then.
That's how long I have been doing this. Down right crazy actually.
So it seems to be worse!
In fact, there are people who should be in prison that are not (trump) and probably many who are but should not.
instead of treating people with dignity and providing them a decent chance
of a worthwhile life. If you treat people like animals, they become animals
and the only thing you can do is put them in a cage.
It seems the a big fraction of the AbeAmerican population live in abominable conditions with no social care. They end up on the streets and die on the streets. The state has no provision for them. They put them in prisons when they steal something to eat but the president, and others of that "caliber", can keep committing crimes without any repercussions. It's deplorable.
New Comment Go to top