Page #3
Pages: #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9 #10 ...#81
New Comment Rating: -6 Similar topics: 1.American men? 2.nude 3.Donald Trump 45th President of United States 4.🎆 🇺🇸 HaPpY BiRtHdAy America!! 🇺🇸 🎆 5.The Nobel Peace Prize 🏅 Comments: | ||
You must be logged in to post here. Log in
plugging the leaks of American tax dollars! 1 of the reasons I voted Trump instead of the kamel
All those that are whining about the dope dealer being caught in venzwalla, need to look at the dates on these reports and documents. Who was president during that time?
Why are you bitching? A dem's administration made all these reports and charges and a repub took action.
only registered users can see external links
not carcinogenic, water in rural Colorado. Why? Is that his empathy speaking?
Republicans and Democrats alike, say that he did that to get back at Lauren Boebert,
who sponsored that bill, because she helped ensure a vote on releasing the Epstein files.
Does anyone still believe that Trump wanted those Epstein files released?
How incredibly childish to punish people for the actions of their representative.
only registered users can see external links
the law on other topics: not releasing ALL the Epstein files, and censoring information
that they are not supposed to censor.
The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) is reviewing more than 5.2 million pages of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein as part of the effort to comply with a federal transparency law, far beyond earlier estimates, and the review is delaying full public release past a statutory deadline.
only registered users can see external links
Isn't it "strange" how they keep "finding" all those Epstein files?
They are wasting time on heavily redacting those document, because they want to protect the powerful men, who are heavily involved in the crimes, with Trump as their priority.
That is NOT ALLOWED by the Epstein Files Transparency Act. They should be investigated for breaking the law. They'd better know what's coming, after the midterms.
Should you wish to understand why Trump was so important to win the 2024 election comes down to these points.. The link here shows the Dictator of Venezuala was captured for cheating in the election of 2024 which technically an act of war. Also for illegal drug imports, child sex trafficking within the juristiction of the United States of America. Human smuggling across the border of the United States of america. ect... From the news that will not be broadcasted by the fake news Iran is in total economic collapse. Trump is directly responsible because imposing tariffs on most of Europe. The money they ripped us off on was sent to Iran for domestic and global terrorist regimes such as Hamas, Houthies.. Hezbollah and so forth including terror cells in this country. The Europeon Union and any branch of the central banks are powerless including the U.N.
The democrats have run out of money. deportations of muslim groups in minnesota and NY have reduced their voting power by over 90% which is illegal. Chuck Schumer is resigning after the election cycle. WHat Im saying is without illegal migrants the democrats have no power therefore no money. Iran is collapsing and is in hiding. People on the streets were killed but it won't make any difference. They have had enough.
God bless the United States of America, the brave people of Iran and God bless the people of Venezuala
Congress didn't vote for this.
Maduro is indeed an illegitimate president, but that's no business of the US.
This is not about drugs, but about oil, and Trump clearly admits it.
This is not "Drill baby drill!", but "Steal baby steal!"
Trump is now saying that he wants the US to control Venezuela for ever.
Your regime gets more evil by the day, and it should be humiliating for you.
It goes against every principle you say to hold high.
What the fuck are you babbling about Iran, Hamas and Houthies.
It has absolutely no relation with Venezuela. Are you high?
We don't need venezualan oil. We have enough. Its not about oil jackass,,, its about stopping shippments of drugs into the country. If there is more oil, whatever but the primary reason was to extradite the dictator. Just like El Chappo going to ADX Florence. Like Noreaga in Grenada. This is extradition judicual prossess where he will stand trial. Just like the others.
BREAKING: Attorney General Pam Bondi announces that Venezuela's Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, have been indicted in the Southern District of New York.
The attack on Iran, was also an illegal act of war under US domestic law
and international law.
You cannot use an ACT OF WAR, without Congress authority.
Under the United Nations Charter (Article 2(4)), states may not use force
against another state unless one of the following is true:
- Self‑defense (an actual or imminent armed attack),
- UN Security Council authorization.
There was NO UN Security Council authorization for the U.S. strikes on Iran,
and most legal experts say the evidence for an imminent Iranian attack justifying self‑defense was insufficient.
If it's not about the oil, why is Trump constantly talking about the oil?
If it's about the drugs, why did he not attack Mexico instead?
About 98 % of the fentanyl entering the U.S. illicit market is estimated to originate from Mexico. There is no evidence that Venezuela is a significant source of fentanyl entering the United States.
Why did Trump just pardon pardon to Juan Orlando Hernández, the former president
of Honduras? Hernández had been serving a 45‑year federal prison sentence in the U.S. after being convicted in a New York court on charges related to drug trafficking
and firearms conspiracies, including helping move large quantities of cocaine into
the United States and protecting cartel interests while in office.
You are constantly confusing what you WANT to believe, with what is TRUE.
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
A extremely liberal news site
No forever mentioned.
If this is what it takes to Protect American citizens from the drugs, so be it.
Trump says lots of things, but the words of a liar are meaningless.
I would be very surprised if that 'time' comes under Trump or a next Republican president, if Americans are stupid enough to vote them in, or your side will destroy
fair elections for ever.
George W. Bush repeatedly framed the U.S. intervention in Afghanistan as temporary and goal-limited, not as a permanent occupation, and he used language very similar
in substance (though not identical wording) to what you quoted.
Trump wants to stay in Venezuela until the US dominates the oil resources, 100%.
He has already asked several US oil companies if they want to go to Venezuela.
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
You can be sure that those oil companies will reverse on what they said.
Do you think that they will deny making trillions from the single largest
confirmed oil reserves in the world?
They could no longer sell their oil, so they lowered production.
At some point, their oil and oil products were worth almost nothing.
I saw a video on our news at that time, of how a gas station in Venezuela asked customers to give them their smallest coin in their wallet, for a tank-full of petrol, because the actual value of it was so close to zero, that it was impossible to pay
the actual price.
It's not the only reason, but it's a big one. The other reason is that Venezuela wanted to nationalize their oil, so that it wasn't just enriching private companies and wealthy owners, but the citizens of Venezuela. That's when the wealthy people, who controlled it, revolted and tried to kill the industry.
As soon as a country tries to do that, it is labeled 'the enemy' by your country.
Only the rich should profit form oil and the people should just suffer its pollution.
That's the only principle that you lot never betray.
only registered users can see external links
"Whoops. You get what you vote for. A self-avowed socialist kicking off his mayoral term by leaving the masses disillusioned, cold, and hungry is almost too on the nose."
To prove my point, look here:
A Two-Headed Coin That Always Comes Up 'Trump'
only registered users can see external links
the highest number since 2010 and an increase of 14% from the previous year.
only registered users can see external links
""The cost of child care will no longer discourage young adults from starting a family, because we will deliver universal child care for the many by taxing the wealthiest few."
In other words he is encouraging people that can't afford to raise kids to have kids and they be raised on someone elses dime.
That is not helping anyone, that is just putting MORE BUMS into circulation. These kids will be growing up in a welfare condition and their kids will and etc, a bunch of bums.
"The billionaire class in this city and in this country have got to understand that in America, they cannot have it all. "
In other words he is a DAMN THIEF, Why can't they have it all if they RISK IT ALL, INVEST IT ALL< unlike the idiots that demand it all for nothing
The difference is that your idea doesn't provide them with any money to be able to afford being a decent parent, while Mamdani's plan will.
It's not just the poorest people who cannot afford to have children in your country anymore, it's the majority of the working class. There is a point where your whole economic system collapses, because only a tiny minority would be able to live and have children. It's getting very close to that in the US. The only way to prevent it, is either raising the wages, or taxation.
Your wealthy are supported with tax-dollars paid for by the working class.
It is time to turn that around.
A RAND analysis (summarized in press releases) estimated that between 1975 and 2023, roughly $79 trillion in cumulative earnings gains went to the top 1% instead of being shared more evenly, compared with the income distribution of 1975.
That is: $79 trillion in total redistributed from the bottom 90% to the top 1%.
Why isn't that STEALING?
Would he be a "damn thief" if higher taxes for the wealthy would go to disabled people?
Is Trump a thief for putting all those tariffs on the American consumer?
In 2013, while Pam Bondi was Florida’s attorney general, her office was considering whether to investigate or join a multi-state fraud case against Trump University. At that same time, Bondi personally solicited and received a $25,000 donation from the Donald J. Trump Foundation for her political committee. Soon afterward, her office declined to take action against Trump University. The donation was later ruled illegal under federal charity law, and Trump paid an IRS penalty.
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
Bondi and Trump deny the donation affected her decision, but the timing created lasting ethical concerns and triggered watchdog complaints. Regardless of intent, the episode demonstrated something important to Trump: Bondi was someone who could be counted on to exercise 'discretion' in a way that protected him when it mattered.
Years later, as Trump sought to reshape the Department of Justice around personal trust and control, Bondi stood out not merely as a loyal ally, but as someone Trump had reason to believe he could use to his advantage, someone who had already shown, at a critical moment, that she would not pursue him legally and would publicly defend him afterward.
- Al‑Shabaab/terror funding claims are not verified by prosecutors and remain unproven allegations from political commentators and advocacy reports.
- Tim Walz is criticized politically for oversight failings, but there is no legal finding that he personally facilitated or supported terrorism or directed fraud funds to any terror group.
If that oversight is nationally organized, the buck stops at Trump.
Trump is NOT charged for crimes from private citizens.
Trump is charged for JUST his OWN crimes, unless he is clearly guilty of Incitement.
Come up with actual argument for blaming Tim Walz for this, instead of associating him with just something random happening in his state.
Minnesota is consistently ranked as one of the best states to live in, praised for its high quality of life, strong healthcare, excellent education, natural beauty, and civic engagement, often appearing in the top 10 overall in rankings by U.S. News & World Report and WalletHub.
You could have had a VP with actual experience, indeed. Instead you have one that we only knew from calling the current president "Hitler", admitting to fuck couches and being a loyalist to one of the most dangerously insane wealthy men in your country.
That's not good. You should be happy that he is always on vacation.
only registered users can see external links
The way you chose to ignore or deny it will show your level of dishonesty.
You yourself have stated how dangerous AI is.
HAD these files all been authentic, they would have been released a long time ago.
This all started so long ago that documents could have been created,forged,altered ,whatever to put anyone in there they want to.As you can see already, Bill Clinton is in pics out the wazoo. Ok, a good photoshop artist could put YOUR face in place of his. AI could put the Popes face on any of those bodies. AI can create any kind of porn you want to see, it can also alter body lines and shapes to make a grown woman look young to make it look illegal.
And as far as the "victims" I will say the same thing I always do in regards to that,Where was all this 10 years ago? You were a "victim" and you waited until a certain man became President before you came out hollering. Mighty ironic timing. There should be a statute of limitations on claims like this.
by releasing fake documents? That's the dumbest shit ever.
Patel just did his best (for a dumb-ass) to redact all the evidence against Trump.
He even broke the law to do it.
Files like these are NOT released, because powerful men will always be protected.
People were warning you about Trump, long before you ever voted for him.
You just didn't care that he is at least a conman, a pervert and an adulterer.
I prefer to vote for honorable people, and you prefer to vote for selfish assholes.
When this was about a Democrat, you would never talk about a statute of limitations.
If they stole candy as a toddler, that would be a reason to vilify them for ever.
Remember Tim Walz? It wasn't true and it wasn't illegal, but you kept going on.
And now you literally found that demonic pe.dophile sex-ring that QAnon always screams about, and you don't want to know, pushing down the truth, because OBVIOUSLY it's all dirty old conservative men, who like to dominate young vulnerable girls.
Hypocrisy is dominant in conservative culture. Any time you have some Christian Nationalist pastor, there will be stories of him cuckolding his wife with black dudes.
Any time you have some anti-gay politician, we will eventually hear stories about him sucking off male prostitutes. All those politicians with their sanctimonious faces, employ
an army of lawyers to pay off all the women they sexually assault, and an agency only intended to hush all the scandals. So many examples, it would take me a year to list
just what was uncovered.
It's only logical, a culture of sexual repression, the glorification of male dominance,
and elimination of accountability, will inevitably result in exactly the type of behavior
that we see over and over again.
I wonder what George was expecting to get for his donation? he does not even live in the US. What interest is it for him to be spending on a new york attorney general?
Unless he is doing the very damn thing so many people deny that he does, interfere with American lives.
If you want to ban donations like this, then support laws against it, like me.
Stop clutching your pearls over what Dems do, and look at your own 'party'.
Dems seldom EVER bring out news like this on their own people. And when repubs bring it out on them, they always point and say, "He did it to".
Lefties talk about this legalized corruption, all the time.
You are talking about a donation to a CAMPAIGN, while Democrats are talking about direct personal enrichment, on your side. That's different, don't you think?
You think that there are no honest men in politics, but why chose the worst?
She puts out your politicians' dirty laundry like a champ.
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
Now be a good little socialist and follow the blind leader.
Human dignity -> equality -> solidarity
Same thing, so I can refer to Jesus as much as I like.
We don't have a "leader", we have representatives.
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
Trump: Someone explains the executive order to him, he goes "Oh, good idea!",
then signs it, making a big fuss about signing papers.
only registered users can see external links
Biden: Explains the executive order to everyone, then signs it later.
only registered users can see external links
Pretty pathetic that senile Biden knew better what he signed,
than your excuse for a president.
I just showed you Biden explaining it and Trump needing it being explained to him.
They need the president to sign it, to do so.
So what you are saying makes no sense. What's your argument?
He could explain them, but could not write his signature? Why?
Trump seems to think it is very 'presidential' to sign papers,
but it's the easiest part of being president. You could do it.
They don't need the president to understand it, just sign it.
Biden explained them, while Trump needed to get them explained.
That shows clearly that Biden understood what he signed and Trump doesn't.
Recently, Trump did start to explain some of them, very poorly.
He probably heard that 'autopen' argument and understood it applies to him.
It never applied to Biden though. You were doing projection, like always.
As soon as you see something you don't like from Trump, you need to
project it onto a Democrat, or your head will explode.
OMG he cannot talk, aaaahhhhrrrggg, Biden, Biden, sigh.
OMG he cannot walk, aaaahhhhrrrggg, Biden, Biden, sigh.
OMG he's fucking stupid, aaaahhhhrrrggg, Biden, Biden, sigh.
OMG he's fucking scamming me, aaaahhhhrrrggg, Biden, Biden, sigh.
It's so sad that you need to make-believe to support a side that you willingly chose
and can willingly change. Who are you fooling, besides yourself?
biden could read a teleprompter and listen a ear piece right along with the best of them.
Trump delegates reading of the orders to someone else as that is his job , to oversee and be the final signature.
or that staff “used it behind his back.” It's just a stupid story started by Republicans.
You really need to learn some critical thinking skills.
The president's job is overseeing Congress making and passing laws.
These are EXECUTIVE orders, which is a power invested in the President,
only intended as a tool for the President to ensure laws are "faithfully executed".
It is up to the President to explain IF AND WHEN he uses that power.
You seem to think that EXECUTIVE orders are the standard mode of operations,
but they are NOT.
Biden issued a total of 162 executive orders. Trump issued 220 executive orders
in his first term and he has now already issued 221 in the first YEAR of his second term. Trump is far overstepping what the executive order is intended for.
You can keep making hollow accusations, but I SEE a Trump who doesn't know
what he is signing, while his administration abuses the power invested in him, because their Congress is incapable of making and passing laws, even while
they have majorities in both chambers.
How incapable is the Republican congress? Well, they first wrote and passes the “Big Beautiful Bill” that eliminated the Affordable Care Act subsidies that help lower health insurance premiums, and now they understand that it would affect 24 million Americans, of which many voted for Trump. Many of the same Republicans who voted for the BBB are now regretting how it turns out, and voting to extend it for another 3 years. They prefer it to end, just before a Democratic president enters office, so they can blame them for the increasing health insurance premiums.
It's nice that Democrats care about people having healthcare, but maybe
they had better let this one go. People need to know who screwed them,
because they unfortunately have the memory of a goldfish.
that Congress are the representatives of the people and not the president.
OK, so he obviously created the progress that this voter is talking about?
only registered users can see external links
Can you answer the question of the person commenting on it?
Which ones of his 221 executive orders are addressing her concerns?
(I found 4, FOUR!!!, that are framed to address the issue she is talking about,
but 3 are much more likely to raise the profits of the energy companies, large businesses, oil, gas, and coal companies, and their utilities, health insurance
and pharmaceutical industries, rather than helping that women, and 1 that
is directed to agencies to study or propose actions to lower prices. You know,
those agencies that Elon Musk defunded. Any results yet?
I can answer that too; no because other executive orders are negating that one.)
I don't want to hear you crying, when the next Democratic president
uses the precedent Trump created, and executive orders everything
that their voters are asking for. .. goose.. gander.. something....
New Comment Go to top