Page #135
Pages: #1... #130 #131 #132 #133 #134 #135 #136 #137 #138 #139 ...#799
New Comment Rating: 11 Similar topics: 1.Food stuff 2.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF 3.A Forum Topic 4.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF II 5.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF III Comments: | ||
You must be logged in to post here. Log in
only registered users can see external links
He-she-it could just learn to suck it up for 3 hours and walk the line with the rest of he-she-its classmates.
Back in the day when I graduated, there were a few girls that wore bikinis under their cap-n-gown. Oh, the things that young people will do!
Don't ruin the night for all those other students that struggled to get there. I can't imagine the photos that would be spoiled . Parents taking pics of their sons and daughters in their biggest moment of their lives and right in front or behind is someone dressed like a buffoon.
The trans needs to accept they are the minority in the crowd and the world has not,does not and will not,circle around them.
This is a problem because the faculty is making it a problem.
--------------------------------------- added after 7 minutes
The world doesn't circle around you either, yet, you want to impose your
Views/values on others. You are no sugared cup of tea to be telling the world how it should circle
2, I had no desire to take away from the experience of others.
3, I would probably have been dragged under the bleachers and had the living shit beat of me by other students and parents for embarrassing them in front of their family's and friends celebrating a important time in the kids lives. .
4, my parents would not have tolerated me trying to be something I am not.
5, it is much longer than a few minutes unless it is a 1 room school house.
It's not a "her" it's a HIM and he needs to put on his big girl panties and act sensible for just a few more hours,
And what makes you think the other students don't care?
Let's start with the last part. If he's graduating then his fellow students know all about him/her.They have not taken him in back of the bleachers and beat the tar out of HER during the year. In this day and age they probably accept
her/him as she is.
Going to #1.
It's good that at the time you knew who/what you were. Why don't you accept that she, too, knows who/what she is?
Going to #2.
I'm glad you didn't whip out your cock on the stage, after they called you up, and started wanking.
Going to #3.
I explained this above. Different times, different attitudes, although, by the late '70s or '80s, everyone knew what "gay" was all about except you, apparently. Of course, you are from the Carolinas.
Going to#4.
Your parents, being good Southern Christian people from the Carolinas, would have insisted you put pants on and married your pregnant cousin after the ceremony.
Going to #5.
Graduation ceremonies are 5 minutes of glory as they call you up to give you that piece of paper
(good for toilet paper the next day) and 3 to 5 hours of utter boredom sitting in an uncomfortable auditorium chair. I remember Johnny Boyd releasing a box full of mice from the back rows. Now, that was funny.
And now, let go to your last statement.
That's exactly what SHE wants to do. She wants to put HER Big Girl Panties, HER cute dress, HER gown, and HER mortar board. That's all.
The 1 thing I remember from graduation is about 60 people hollaring "INSTANT GRITS".
Some one had ask me how long I would last having sex, and as a joke I said,I was like instant grits, 2 minutes and done.
Damn,
DUH.
That is what a larger group of people is called , the smaller group or 1 in this case,is called a minority.
Well, at least they are not going to leave the wholesalers high and dry.
When do you think they will have an overweight/obese Barbie and in our current world climate, transgender Barbie? Gee, for transgender Barbie, all Mattel would need to do is make dresses to fit the Ken doll and as some of his accessories, include a wig and blue eyeshadow. BOOM! Problem solved. You're welcome, Mattel! 👍
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
Sad that people know so little about their country.
--------------------------------------- added after 8 minutes
His first day of his so called "womanhood" he did his first video. At which he stated he cried 3 times, he ordered dresses online that he couldn't afford, and had trouble deciding what tampons to buy. It's nice that his first day of womanhood he gave the impression that women are undecided, can't manage their money, and are crybabies. Not what my wife wanted to perceived as.
The sad thing is,even when he is made up to look like a woman,he is butt ugly!
What will he do when he has a husband and he comes down with prostate cancer? Oops honey forgot to tell you I was born with nuts.
Just imagine him in 25 years ,with big boobs and a beer gut!
Then how about all the women who are sterile? Are they not women?
Did you know that transgenders have brain physiology that is consistent with the brain physiology of the sex they identify with. No, because you value not-knowing.
A man who identifies as a trans-woman has the brain physiology of a woman
and a woman who identifies as a trans-man has the brain physiology of a man.
Their plumbing just doesn't match the sex of their brain.
How about a person who was born with a vagina, but without a uterus and ovaries?
"Uterine agenesis is a congenital disorder, meaning it is present at birth. It occurs when the baby's reproductive system fails to develop fully in the womb. Other reproductive organs may also be missing or smaller than usual. The cause of this abnormal development is not yet known."
While the exact process of this development failure is not yet known, it's surely caused by specific genes being damaged, not available or not having been activated during development of the fetus. The last can be caused by an hormonal imbalance or deficiency in the womb. That happens much more often than this severe version of the biological variation.
That's 0,02%. Still 33.000 women in the US.
How many transgender athletes are you worried about?
Before you go off on the word "women", it wasn't my word, but they are called 'women', because they show other sex characteristics of 'women', like having a vagina, or at least not having a penis. Maybe you wouldn't even call all of them women, but they are not men either.
"If you ask experts at medical centers how often a child is born so noticeably atypical in terms of genitalia that a specialist in sex differentiation is called in,
the number comes out to about 1 in 1500 to 1 in 2000 births [0.07–0.05%]."
But, if they just see some sort of penis, they call it a boy and if they just see
some sort of vagina, they call it a girl.
When I was in school, I don't recall a single male dressing as female. Or vice versa. this stuff of boys 10 years old wearing dress's to school and shit, they are not even old enough to understand the difference between male and female. They should not have even been exposed to any photos or persons to see the difference, that is chi1d abuse . a young chi1d should be learning their abc's and math,history,not wearing clothes of the other gender because they are lead to believe a curious question they ask a teacher suddenly means they are living a lie. Sex change is not reversable once the knife comes into the picture.
Oh, here is something else to ponder. When a person that is obviously a man,like that fellow in washington that is over our health that dresses like a woman but is so obviously a man,he is not only putting up a fake image, he is trying to force the rest of the world to accept that fake image as being real. what right does he have to force me to think of him as a woman? he is NOT a woman.
And another thing, and I think I have posted about it on a page I linked to. Trans people whine and bitch and piss and moan about us straight people not accepting them, dating them and what not. They try to make it appear WE are the 1's with a problem. We are not the problem, we are straight males and females that want the REAL DEAL and not a fake.They should not take offense to that,and should simple interact with others of their kind.
NO IT DOESN'T! If you understood how complex the processes are associated with the sex development of a fertilized egg into a baby and how many things can vary during that process, you wouldn't make such a scientifically incorrect claim.
Even if scientists would completely sequence the DNA of a fertilized cell, they could not predict with 100% certainty if it grows out into a boy or a girl.
Even a zygote with XX chromosomes can turn into a male and a zygote with XY chromosomes can turn into female.
If you actually want to know some science facts about sex and gender,
here is a biology teacher explaining it:
only registered users can see external links
However, I would be shocked if you actually wanted to know some science.
--------------------------------------- added after 6 minutes
Not in my state. Not now not ever. Florida is the last of the fucking wild west. This state will not cave in, at least not before your time. And I'm pretty sure you already know that. So why haven't you moved to Chicago or Seattle yet. Kippy Yi A Mutha Fucka.
only registered users can see external links
--------------------------------------- added after 112 seconds
only registered users can see external links
they will gain several people who like that 'woke' messaging.
They wouldn't have done it otherwise.
Companies don't have any conscience, they just act like they do,
if it helps them sell more of their products.
You can see that as a sign that your ideas are losing.
If hate of trans people would sell their beer, they would use that.
--------------------------------------- added after 4 minutes
Yuengling larger rules
only registered users can see external links
I'm sure right-wing customers have temporarily brought down sales a bit,
but that will never last. Your side has the attention span of a goldfish.
As soon as some book edits out something racist of M&M's get less sexy shoes,
you're all of attacking some other company. Meanwhile all the pink haired non-binary kids will think Budweiser actually cares about them.
that one trans-person in the ad could have been forgiven?
Well, I understand. Nutella® can do a lot of shit, before I let that go.
Maybe I should dry-beg like CAT and maybe you will add me as a friend......
--------------------------------------- added after 3 minutes
No wonder you have over 600 friends. It only took you about 10 yrs. Nice going.
Transgenderism is more of a political issue in the US than a child safety issue. If Americans are so concerned about child safety, why do they allow so many of them to get slaughtered in their schools?
How many children have been murdered by transgender people entering public washrooms? Zero?
Intelligent marketing appeals to the 99% not the 1%. And - guess what - they lost a shed load of sales (down 26% year on year) and the share price crashed.
Serves the stupid woke fucktards right.
It still does to most people, like me, but some people confuse it with
what companies do, which is just posing as being respectful of human rights,
to distract from them using child slaves in poor countries and pollution.
Real woke also gets confused with the ideas of some pink haired teens,
who have no fucking clue about the world, but just like to shock the boomers.
Although I like it when boomers are shocked, it distracts from getting any
actual progress done.
But that's exactly why right-wingers are fighting 'woke' by attacking the ideas from pink haired teens; because the actual human rights are very popular and attacking those will lose them every election.
So they act outraged over stupid M&M characters, while their real intent is just to make black people second-class citizens again, put woman back in their place as pregnant maids, gays back in the closet and make transgender kids prefer suicide over coming out.
I woke up.
Now it is so distorted no one really knows what the fuck it means. I just associate it with nut cases like that black guy in france right now that is pissed off he can't run in the olympics with women so he can win. from what I can tell, he would be considered, "woke".
I consider him, a "nutcase".
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
"Black American folk singer-songwriter Huddie Ledbetter, a.k.a. Lead Belly, used the phrase "stay woke" as part of a spoken afterword to a 1938 recording of his song "Scottsboro Boys", which tells the story of nine black teenagers and young men falsely accused of raping two white women in Alabama in 1931."
"By the mid-20th century, woke had come to mean 'well-informed' or 'aware', especially in a political or cultural sense. The Oxford English Dictionary traces the earliest such usage to a 1962 New York Times Magazine article titled "If You're Woke You Dig It" by African-American novelist William Melvin Kelley, describing the appropriation of Black slang by white beatniks."
"Through the 2000s and early 2010s, woke was used either as a term for literal wakefulness, or as slang for suspicions of infidelity."
"The term began crossing over into general internet usage as early as 2015. The phrase stay woke became an Internet meme, with searches for woke on Google surging in 2015."
"By 2019, opponents of progressive social movements were often using the term mockingly or sarcastically, implying that "wokeness" was an insincere form of performative activism."
So, for 81 years 'woke' meant 'well-informed', 'aware' of injustice.
But then in less then a decade, right-wingers corrupted the meaning.
Now it's associated with the culture of pink haired gender fluid teens.
But, of course you don't like it when you are called 'fascists' yourself.
While your ideology fits the 80 year old definition quite accurately.
Around 96% of people are straight, some 3% gay/bi and less than 1% trans (and the trans number is inflated by people who claim to be trans because they think it's trendy).
Now most of the 96% (and many of the 4%) do not want to hear everything defined purely in terms of colour and/or gender. Because, very simply, neither of these things matters a flying fuck to the majority of people. Whilst at the same time they are the ONLY things that matter to woke fucktards.
It has nothing whatsoever at all to do with (popular, my arse) 'human rights' It is plain and simple moronic infantile fuckwittery.
"No-one wants to put women 'back in their place'"?... "as pregnant maids"
Republicans have completely banned abortion in many states and want to do it everywhere, even for ra.ped teens, and dead fetuses.
Republicans are banning no-fault divorce, so women have to stay in marriages that they want to get out of.
Republicans can still not find themselves in passing age restrictions on marriage and support marriage of 12 year old girls to middle-age men.
OK, 'pregnant child brides'. And then you call the other side 'groomers'.
What are those percentages saying? You apparently agree with 'putting gays back in the closet and make transgender kids prefer suicide over coming out', because I hear crickets on that. How you treat minorities defines your morality.
"'human rights' It is plain and simple moronic infantile fuckwittery".
Are you saying humans should have no rights?
Your comments make it obvious that more people need to wake up
and be woke. (in the original meaning of the term)
If you can do equal work, are equally smart, and put in equal effort then you are equal. Anything less, you are NOT. It all begins with YOU and how YOU look at yourself .If you think you can't do better,then you won't. .
They could have improved themselves faster, with just a bit more help.
No crazy things, just the same level of education and investments
in their neighborhoods, that white people get.
But I understand that you feel that way. A little bit less
oppression looks like a lot of help to you.
You do actually support a certain type of equality;
no help for anyone, of any color, of any sex or religion.
Unless they are wealthy! The wealthy get whatever they want,
because they might start a company where the poor can work
to pull themselves up by their bootstraps. Right?
This is the kind of thing that gets my goat.
This fellow is whining about being turned down by men.
Not many men would want a woman this size, especially not 1 with nuts.
How many decades have women tryed to get equal rights ,only to have wimpy men put on lipstick and duct tape and compete against them claiming to be women?
Sad times.
How many manly women are playing football?
How many manly women are wrestling real men?
Um,
There should be a board that decides who is allowed to compete in sports and for which sex. That doesn't mean excluding every transgender person from every level of sports. Most levels of sports are about participation. Turning the goal of every level of sports into only winning is pathetic.
DUH< DID I just have to post the OBVIOUS???????
They are born with male plumbing and a female brain.
Do you think I don't know that?
This is a new thing,a offshoot of transgender ,it is Transabled, meaning people WANT TO DISABLE THEMSELVES.
And of all people DR PHIL seems to support this shit, only registered users can see external links
Who thinks putting drano in your eyes is a good thing????? A CRAZY PERSON.
Do you even understand the concept of being trans?
Yes, having parts of the opposite sex that you feel you are.
It's not just people with male parts feeling like they are women,
it's also people with female parts feeling like they are men.
But that is somehow less threatening, so it's talked about less.
It's not a mental health issue and it cannot be treated.
It is a variation in biology. It can be confirmed with an MRI.
"DR PHIL seems to support this shit" Than he accepts science.
Any psychologist that doesn't accept this science is a quack.
And Republicans only seem to care about doing the opposite.
It's a losing strategy, because most Americans care about freedom
and the government not stacking all the odds against them,
instead of just making life worse for the minority enemy pick of the day.
There should be 3 groups for sports, female ,male and other.The other would be for the trans and those that don't care about a level ,fair and equal playing field.
Here you go, this guy fixed the issue in canada.Now the "trans" is whining. HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
only registered users can see external links
If they do testing for all the characteristics that define men and women
and only allow 100% pure woman to compete with each other,
that 'other' group will probably turn out to be very large.
By the way, it's very expensive to do a full DNA sequence and hormone categorization of every single competing sporter. It's not just the people who identify as trans. There are lots of women who have some characteristic of men, that can give them an edge in sports. Most likely, every woman who has more than average body hair, a deeper voice, above average libido or who gets thinning hair later in life, has at least some hormonal variation. That can give them an advantage over women who don't have that.
Many women would be excluded for being not completely woman.
Some women are 6'3, are they allowed to run or swim against shorter women?
Even you might have a female characteristic, without even knowing it.
He could still be a sore loser, without anything you are saying being true.
He could also have a point. But that's not a reason to just let him compete.
Are you telling me that there are no rules on the subject?
This guy
Towers over the ladies in photos like the jolly green giant. Has no business stealing the rewards of all those womens hard work.
to compete against cis-women.
But why is that a reason for not allowing her to be a trans-woman?
Or why can't this one compete against cis-woman?
only registered users can see external links
A handicap for the trans that wants to play sports with women, we can tie a cord around their nut sack and hook it to their left leg so when they try to run they will squeeze their balls, that will slow them down!
"Again, your talking about the first four or five days of fertilization. Once the X or Y chromosome fertilizes the egg then the gender is set."
It takes about 24 hours for a sperm cell to fertilize an egg.
Generally, the sex of the zygote is determined from the chromosomes.
I said 'generally', because during gestation, the development of the sex is determined by several processes of gene expression and hormone interactions. And variations in that process are much more frequent than you think.
You would know some of that, if you allowed yourself to absorb some information from a 30 minute video. It's not 'woke', it's science. Do you think 'woke' means 'informed'? And if so, why do you prefer being 'uninformed'?
You have a chance to learn something about it. I'm not criticizing you on your lack of knowledge, I'm criticizing you for making incorrect claims with confidence, while you lack knowledge on the subject and your unwillingness to learn some facts on that subject.
I don't know what your profession is, but you most likely have knowledge and experience related to some profession. If for instance you are an accountant.
How would you react to someone without any knowledge related to accountancy, making all sort of claims about specific accountancy processes, that you would then know are completely false?
Why then is it OK, for people with no biological knowledge or interest,
to make claims that require said biological knowledge and interest?
We just don't go for this crazy shit that people are pulling out of their hats.
It took me a minute to find this, but this is how men can enjoy the birthing experience. The Hodge twins had a video on it but I can't find it.
only registered users can see external links
And then you think you are an expert.
Lack of knowledge doesn't make you ignorant, thinking that you are in a position
to make claims on a field of science, despite your lack of knowledge on it, makes you ignorant. Refusing stubbornly to learn anything new, that was discovered since the genetics dark ages, makes you ignorant.
Gender Diversity is not a birth defect it's just biological variation.
And what the hell are you trying to point to with that link?
Sure, perverts and pe.do's exist. You can find them the most
in extremely right-wing and fundamentalist religious circles.
No one is still supporting marriage of 12 year old girls, but them.
Hell, I couldn't care less to sit around and learn about these 592 so called genders, there are men and women ,and a few birth defects ,anything else is mental. NOTHING physical.
IF a trans woman was actually a woman, there would be no need for the trans in front the word woman.
Just graduating from school doesn't make anyone functional adults.
There is a lot more to learn after and besides school.
School didn't teach me all the specifics about sex either.
That would be another several years of study and life dedication.
I just needed to learn everything about cell structures, DNA expression to proteins and lots of biological pathways. only registered users can see external links
The book already contained decades of research from thousands of scientists, but it needs to be updated every few years for all the advancements in the subject.
Maybe the newer editions describe more about sex biology.
only registered users can see external links
Furthermore, they taught me the scientific method and the capacity to learn.
The basic knowledge is just handy to recognize BS, when it is presented.
I don't make any claims about engineering subjects, that you might have more knowledge about. If I did, I would be open to you correctly, correcting my mistake and presenting me with information on the topic.
It's all about arguments and facts. You are presenting incorrect 'facts',
so your arguments can never be correct.
"IF a trans woman was actually a woman, there would be no need for the trans in front the word woman."
No one is claiming that a trans-woman has the SEX of female.
Everyone who is born with a functioning dick and balls and XY chromosomes and the normally associated hormone balance is called a male by SEX. But if they feel like a woman, they most likely have the BRAIN PHYSIOLOGY of a woman (THAT'S PHYSICAL, NOT MENTAL!!) and then they ARE female/woman by GENDER.
They will never have the SEX of female, but they deserve to get the GENDER of female/woman. Maybe in the future we can actually change people's SEX, by providing them with the fully functioning plumbing of choice. By your own definition a person who can get pregnant is a woman, by SEX. And is a person who can create a pregnancy with sperm, a man, by SEX? They are not a complete definition, but a necessary part of it. I don't think it would be feasible to exchange chromosomes, but as I said before, chromosomes do not accurately define SEX.
You know that this is the claim, because you are not dense enough to still not understand the claim by now (I hope), so you are just gaslighting.
There are also people whose sex cannot be (accurately) determined.
They are not transgender, but intersex. Whatever gender they choose to be is not a transition, even if it takes surgery for them to become the gender they choose to be, because they never had a sex to begin with.
No one is asking you to learn anything, unless you express opinions on lack of knowledge. People who know you get your facts wrong have a responsibility to point that out, because your opinions affect other people. I would have no problem with your ideas, if they only affected you. Transgenders have all the rights to ask you to stop messing with their lives. I'm just supporting their fight, because they are a small minority, that is politically persecuted, just like the Jews were ninety years ago in Germany. In Florida, they are proposing to take away trans children from their parents. It's getting terribly close to what the Nazis started out with.
Also very close to Russians, who are stealing Ukrainian children, to re-educate them and turn them into obedient Russians.
just recently Hooters: The constitution is what it is.
2hr ago Ananas2xLekker: I don't consider anyone the enemy, but I do consider conservatives a liability for the world to make any progress. But I don't even consider you a conservative. Your ideas are so erratic that no label fits them. In Dutch we call you 'wappie', but I don't think there is a fitting term for you in English. It's the type of person who is attracted to QAnon. If you are not already affiliated, you would feel right at home with them. If you think I am understanding you all wrong, than that's caused by your failure to communicate what you think. But, you're right, you have no obligation to make sense to me or to anyone. But, it just starts to feel useless at a point.
3hr ago Ananas2xLekker: Damn, you just set a new bullshit record. I haven't seen anything altruistic in your behavior. Maybe there might be something altruistic in your opinions, but you haven't shared anything significant about your opinions, other than some standards for morality, some definitions you get wrong and some conspiracy theories, so I have no idea about those. I could only be intimidated by someone who argues, but you have no idea how to do that.
5hr ago Hooters: not at all,, here's the difference between you and me. I try to be altruistic while your desires are centered towards yourself. Atruist vs. egoist. I'm not an authority on anything here but you take it as such. Perhaps as an authority on you I'm deemed as a threat to your integrity. Trust me I don't have to do anything. If that happens you will do it all by yourself. Honestly I don't care when you think or how you view me. We do not know each other. You are intimidated so you want to fight with me. There is nothing you can do,... Such as every other liberal your tantrums signify your maturity. You do it to yourself just like all liberals. Conservatives are not your enemy ,,, You are your enemy.
1d ago Ananas2xLekker: I don't see you being open to the truth at all. You just say things posing as an authority and accept people to accept that. Is that supposed to be convincing somehow?
1d ago Ananas2xLekker: I don't think of truth as black and white as you seem to do. The goal is to approach truth as much as possible. I approach truth like all scientists do, there is always an uncertainty factor. Nothing ever is absolutely certainly true or absolutely certainly false, but ideas can be based on supporting and refuting evidence.
1d ago Ananas2xLekker: Whenever anyone gives some reasonable arguments, I acknowledge that. It's also very much possible to change my mind. It only requires evidence that is appropriate to the claim.
1d ago Ananas2xLekker: I said "I never back down from a good 'fight'", not that I'm looking for it.
1d ago Ananas2xLekker: Accepting evidence that the holocaust happened is not 'believing'.
1d ago Hooters: Do you believe in the holocaust? I'm not fighting because I know what is real. You are here to fight, NOT to learn the truth. So our motivations are different. That's why I find you boring..
2d ago Ananas2xLekker: OK, sorry that I kept it going then. I never back down from a good 'fight'.
2d ago Hooters: its what I wanted in the first place
2d ago Ananas2xLekker:
2d ago Hooters: If you say so. I have no comments in reply
2d ago Ananas2xLekker: I'm talking about the private chat now. We are not doing each other any favors, by continuing this here. I might still comment to your posts in the Discussion Forum, if I feel like it. It might not be useful to you, but maybe for others.
2d ago Ananas2xLekker: I see no use in 'pestering' you any further.
2d ago Ananas2xLekker: You are not discussing anything. What you are doing is not disagreeing, because that's what you do or not with OPINIONS. We don't even get to opinions, because you clearly don't accept facts. If their is no basis in facts to agree on, then we will not be able to discuss opinions.
2d ago Ananas2xLekker: But, you're right, this is starting to get boring.
2d ago Ananas2xLekker: "There is NO biased right wing.. It's either right or wrong" So, you don't think FoxNews, OAN and NewsMax are biased? Sure, they are either right or wrong. When they know they're wrong, but still telling you those wrong things, that's called LYING. And they do it, because they are biassed.
2d ago Ananas2xLekker: What you are saying is just clear WRONG
2d ago Ananas2xLekker: "The mueller report is debunked. Said NO EVIDENCE" No it didn't, it presented lots of evidence. It led to 37 charged in 22 months. As you know several of Trumps associates went to jail for their involvement in Russian collusion.
3d ago Hooters: Why do you continue to pester me after weeks and weeks of me disagreeing with you? Surely you can do better than this.. There is NO biased right wing.. It's either right or wrong, justly or unjustly. C'mon this is starting to get boring. Impress me.
3d ago Hooters: The mueller report is debunked. Said NO EVIDENCE. I don't click on your links. about biden? who cares. He's failed
3d ago Ananas2xLekker: Answer this: How many associates has Biden pardoned over investigations into his collusion and corruption? Also 15, on just one subject?
3d ago Ananas2xLekker: It's clear that you only listen to some completely biassed right-wing media and nothing else.
3d ago Ananas2xLekker: Really, everything you are saying shows so much ignorance about the facts.
3d ago Ananas2xLekker: only registered users can see external links
3d ago Ananas2xLekker: The only reason for why Mueller didn't indict Trump, is because he said he could not indict a sitting president. Then it was no longer a legal procedure, but a political procedure, and of course all the Republicans stood behind Trump to protect him from consequences. But that Mueller report contains lots of evidence of wrongdoing and obstruction of Justice.
3d ago Ananas2xLekker: Donald Trump has issued pardons to 15 people including two figures convicted of lying to the FBI during an inquiry into the US president's campaign.
you've read the constitution but you don't undersstand it no matter how many times you've read it? .... My advice is don't say words that are too long for you and act intelligent. You are on too high of a level here and you don't know who you are dealing with on this level. Go back to basic fundamentals and smaller words.,,, I'm' not a conservative in your definition of it. to put it clear and I hope the word is not too long for you.. Too many letters,, let me try.. its called constitutionalist that was written by James madison derived from socratic ethical reasoning. Don't say words that have too many letters. You can't bluff mm that way. Now get back to class..
9hr ago Ananas2xLekker: There is a definition for 'reasoning objectively', but it lacks explanation on how you do that. Definitions don't make you understand anything. It requires more effort than that.
9hr ago Ananas2xLekker: "Read the constitution of USA" I have, several times, yours and mine. But if you think my comment on it is 'starting to act intelligent', then you have not understood your own constitution.
9hr ago Ananas2xLekker: "you still have no definition for justice" You don't either. You just wanted to let me try, so you can shoot it down.
9hr ago Ananas2xLekker: You called yourself a conservative. What you vote for matters, but your associations too.
9hr ago Hooters: stupid? You have no valid argument. you want to kackle more.. I'll just sit. let me know when your done.
9hr ago Hooters: Im mpt a republican,, I'm independent.... Mr. Kackle,, or ms ...as you put it for the 3rd time. you still have no definition for justice, reasoning objectively, . Read the constitution of USA before you start to act intelligent, then we can talk
9hr ago Ananas2xLekker: You think climate change is caused by people breathing? Damn, that's stupid. That's like a factor 1000 less than just cars.
9hr ago Ananas2xLekker: "Have you ever heard the wisbeman prefers silence when the fool kackles" you can't shut up either. But you are the one cackling.
9hr ago Ananas2xLekker: Maybe a shock to you, but when you take your last breath, then you will die too. You believing some fairytales is not going to change that fact.
9hr ago Hooters: I'm just going to pass on this one. Have you ever heard the wisbeman prefers silence when the fool kackles,,, *Your facts are so fucked up you are from another planet.. you have to be
9hr ago Ananas2xLekker: What makes you think people will remember you more than they do me?
9hr ago Ananas2xLekker: I'm fighting for the rights of people, conservatives are fighting to take as much rights away as they can, except the unlimited right to own assault weapons, which kills tens of thousands of people per year. Very altruistic to associate yourself with that ideology. NOT!
10hr ago Ananas2xLekker: 'the devil'
10hr ago Ananas2xLekker: Why don't you take a teaching course and learn how it entails explaining concepts and ideas. Look up the word 'explaining' if it's not clear for you.
10hr ago Ananas2xLekker: The US is not the only country with a constitution.
However, my country doesn't have a bunch of corrupt political stooges,
'interpreting' the constitution in a way completely opposite to its secular intent.
19hr ago Hooters: altruistic vs bullshit. Ego vs teaching. You do a deal wtih the devil and you will then eventually take your last breath then you will die, then you will forgotten... The liability is the egoist wasting all the beautiful oxygen given off by flowers. I consider this part of climate change. I don't expect anything from you. No future, nothing. Who cares? nobody, not even you.
19hr ago Hooters: The constitution is what it is.
2hr ago Ananas2xLekker: Since the constitution is written by liberals, to assure liberty, you are, as a constitutionalist, by definition a liberal. But you are calling me a liberal, as it was a dirty word. Reason that away, if you can. But you won't, you will just call me names for it.
Do you want to continue this here?
Our 'discussion' has no relation to this topic, which is about sex and gender.
I have no problem with anyone seeing what I said to you, privately,
even though it might bore the others to tears, but at least start a new comment for it.
--------------------------------------- added after 14 hours
An update:
"8hr ago Hooters: I don't use names. you do and you started the names. Spare me"
Name-calling means "the use of offensive names especially to win an argument or to induce rejection or condemnation (as of a person or project) without objective consideration of the facts"
When I'm being impolite, I'm making comments on your behavior towards me in this conversation. I think you are being very condescending and you make wild assumptions on my character, which are not based on my behavior towards you in this conversation, but as an alternative to honest argumentation. I've never seen anyone who is stuck on his high horse as you are (that's a comments on your behavior towards me in this conversation). I'll give you some examples of your own comments. If you consider this argumentation from reasoning objectively, than you can reply with comments that I made to you, which you consider name-calling.
"You don't know what you are talking about.", without disclaiming anything
"You are enslaved by the european union of brainwashing.", without specifics
"You do a deal wtih the devil"
"then you will die, then you will forgotten"
"Your facts are so fucked up you are from another planet", without refuting them
"You are on too high of a level here and you don't know who you are dealing with on this level."
"Go back to basic fundamentals and smaller words."
"I try to be altruistic while your desires are centered towards yourself. Atruist vs. egoist."
"You are intimidated so you want to fight with me."
"Such as every other liberal your tantrums signify your maturity"
"Conservatives are not your enemy ,,, You are your enemy"
"Read the constitution of USA before you start to act intelligent, then we can talk"
"Perhaps as an authority on you I'm deemed as a threat to your integrity."
"You are here to fight, NOT to learn the truth."
"So our motivations are different. That's why I find you boring.."
"Why do you continue to pester me after weeks and weeks of me disagreeing with you?"
"Surely you can do better than this.."
"C'mon this is starting to get boring. Impress me."
"100% inaccurate. absolutely inaccurate..", without refuting anything
"That is 100$ inaccurate. You are either lying or you are in a reality not in this dimension"
"It's ok to talk to me but I'm smarter than you think."
"If you are going to write to me only speak the truth and not speculation."
"you want to study moral ethics? study,, you are confused with moral and political correct."
"I've said it but you don't so why argue?... next question"
"do not include money for it is outside the topic of discussion." We never aggreed on any topic
"Here is my reply,, take it down on paper. ...."
"If ou are not educated you are easily brainwashed and vote for what you believe is true.. "
"If you are a socialist or a left wing supporter it is what they have done to you."
"If you don't see it then you are blind."
"You need to learn how to feel more and think less.. "
"I don't get it with some.. They are quite intelligent but yet they think too much."
"You always want to be right but since I'm a straight shooter I tell it like it is."
"Accept what is.... No wonder everything is complicated for you."
"I doubt anyone on here on the site reasons like the way I do or I haven't met him or her yet."
"I would suggest before you do to make sure the fucking difference between good and evil."
"WHY DO YOU CONTINUE TO SUPPORT EVIL SLAVE OWNERS AND ****PHILES? WHAT DOES THAT SAY ABOUT YOU?"
"Take a look at all the evil people you support that have endless blood on their hands."
"It's time for us to act like adults. Stop all diversional tactics and accept was is truth and not what is bullshit."
"The more you continue to write to me the more I understand how far the contrast between you and me."
"If you want this to be a learning experience its fine."
"Nothing personal at all I just hate the circles of never ending conflicts that are not necessary..."
"before you discredit my statements make sure you know the meanings of those words.."
"I'm not going to read all of your passages since I gratuated from college and don't need to do research papers."
"You use words that you do not understand its meaning but yet you use them with the assumption its the right words to say."
"If you want to stay being a robot who am I to judge."
"Teaching is an art also.. It's not as easy as you think.."
"You are too comsumed with words and spread around the left ideology."
"Remember that the wise man listens while the fools always chatter. Why does the wise man listen? He's learning"
"You need to learn to feel. Very simple questions that are impossible to do logically.. you can't"
"the answer is learning. Only you can solve this."
"You may not be ready yet for this. You will know when you are ready."
"you have no idea what choices others make besides your own.."
"To you love does not exist if you tell me yourself before your own.."
"Let's stick to stuff you understnd firs"
"Again you are thinking too much inside the box"
"you can either answer the question or you don't. there are no demands here. but there is no connection"
"Anything that is editorialized about government is propaganda."
""Materialism" Is this all you know?"
"I feel you have been victimized by propaganda and brainwashing so much that you actually believe what is true or not as what they publish.."
"you're right,, you would not be able to understand me"
"Here let me make it easy.." followed by something completely incoherent and unrelated
"Since I already know your realities and pools of circles over and over again ..."
"Since you are in the middle of the European Union it appeas you have been trained well... "
".... I don't see how you can benefit from our transgressons here."
"Learn to reason through critical thinking so that you can be self sustaining." That was very funny to me.
"You put things into a general perspective but assume a person that is called by name has good character."
"if you are a liberal left wing you say things to be politicallly correct so that you can get your way..."
Still, I agree that transgenders should not want to be soldiers.
They have no reason to defend a country that allows persecution of them.
You don't care if life is unfair, in a lot of ways, except for a few very specific things, related to race and gender. Only then are you demanding equality or equity.
Well, I'm sorry you believe that. Maybe they provided you competition,
because they know they have to work harder to get anywhere.
I work with lots of 'minorities', in a company that wears 'woke' on both sleeves, in a country that is way more 'woke' than yours. I have never felt anything like that.
What I did see, from some leaders, was a distinct more favorable opinion on very handsome men and very pretty women. If they were also extroverts, their less than average results got excessive praise, consistently. At least they promote them all quickly to leadership positions. That's were they can shine and cause way less damage on business that actually requires brain matter.
I actually see less 'minorities' on leadership positions than I would expect from our demographics. We might be doing OK with having women in leadership positions.
I know about it. Not near enough, to close the gap.
And it didn't eliminate enough of the 'opposing action'.
Those poor sweet companies just doing anything that hurts themselves?
You're living in an alternate reality.
There is absolutely nothing that forces companies to give jobs to unqualified people. They are only asked to invite some black people for job interviews.
Either you made up that story yourself or you got it from some right-wing propaganda site. Every study shows that diverse teams perform better.
But damn, I wouldn't want to be that token black guy,
working with a bunch of racists, who all know I was exactly
what they indeed really hired me for; the company trying to
wokewash their image away, from the racist stronghold they are.
here you go, this may help,.
only registered users can see external links
Did you actually read what's in your own link?
Those quotas were dismissed for being unconstitutional, so they were changed to goals. Companies didn't have to just give jobs to black people, they are required to have fair job interviews. Do you understand the credible deniability that is baked into that system? Companies are in no way forced to give a job to a black person that they are not qualified for. At best they could get into trouble for giving the job to a white person, who is less qualified for it. That's the opposite of what you are claiming.
The only way it was enforced is that black people, who feel they did not get an equal chance to apply for a job, or feel that a white person who is demonstrably less qualified, they could start legal actions. Do you know how expensive it is and how difficult to prove that is?
On your last remark, we can conclude that Affirmative action has succeeded to some extend. Are you sad about that? If you want them to do better, they need the chance to do it. And just giving them equal opportunity has resulted in improvements. That's not harming you, that's improving the economy and the country.
This excerpt from the page in case you don't want to read it is interesting and very related to this thread.
"Despite these assertions, human sex differences are among the most robust and replicable findings in the social sciences. The strongest effects are in physical abilities, such as throwing distance or speed, spatial relations tasks, and some social behaviors, like assertiveness, where men have the advantage. Women, meanwhile, tend to have an edge in being more extraverted, trusting, and nurturing. The largest sex differences, however, involve mate choice and are in behaviors that emerge out of Trivers’ theory of parental investment, with women giving more weight to traits that signal a potential partners ability to acquire resources (e.g., socioeconomic status and ambition), while men give more weight to traits that signal fertility (e.g., youth and attractiveness)."
SO WHAT?
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
Now hear me out a minute, So your body doesn't look to suit you, why not accept it for what it is and just try to live healthy?
It is cheaper than surgerys and treatments and shots and hormones.
New Comment Go to top