Page #29
Pages: #1... #24 #25 #26 #27 #28 #29 #30 #31 #32 #33 ...#773
New Comment Rating: 11 Similar topics: 1.Food stuff 2.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF 3.A Forum Topic 4.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF II 5.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF III Comments: | ||
You must be logged in to post here. Log in
BUT, those annoying emails telling me how many HOT Ukrainian women there are just waiting to marry me, still come pouring in to my inbox. Do the scammers think that people out there are SO DUMB as to respond to a ad like that nowadays?
“It’s done but there’s blood everywhere” and hang up. 🤣
Just putting this out there, i have had a rough day and when I went just a while ago ,OH MY, so I got concerned and read this. apparently stress can really reek havoc on your bowels. I am normally in the cracked poop-healthy poop borderline ,today I was in the major softblob department.
My family has a history of colon cancer so when shit don't go well I get worried..
from what I understand it is not very accurate?
only registered users can see external links
So the problem is that he was up for abuse but was never notified so he didn’t know and wasn’t able to rectify the situation by deleting a problem photo.
I think that if a complaint about you has been made you should be notified about it.
Thoughts?
--------------------------------------- added after 22 minutes
Might it have come up under “Recent Events”?
His recent event notifications don’t go back as far
as that time so he can’t confirm it.
"by hitting upload button you confirm that you have legal rights for the pic you are uploading
You must be 18 years old or older at the time the picture was taken."
I read that to mean 1) no internet pictures 2) if I have be 18 years old, it only seems reasonable that everyone else in the picture should be 18, too.
With that said, the uploading member should have understood that there could be ramifications if it were deemed discrepancies in said content. Regarding a system generated notification to the reported member, CAT brought voiced her concern about the very same thing eons ago.
--------------------------------------- added after 2 minutes
Like you get notified of this.
--------------------------------------- added after 2 minutes
I sent you a screenshot of the rules
--------------------------------------- added after 78 seconds
I know, I used to be here for over 12 years b4 I deleted my account and most cases were ridiculous
--------------------------------------- added after 41 seconds
And the answer is no they dont
--------------------------------------- added after 3 minutes
I stopped voting in the abuse panel because members were being deleted for bullshit reasons, not major issues
Do you recall someone that was reported on April 9, the member's screen name was Oralizedworship69. Heck, I took a screen print of the referral which was; "Posts only videos from the internet", which was not entirely true. The first seasoned voter voted to delete. I was 2nd to vote and voted NO ABUSE with the following comment/reason AND placed a freeze on voting while I reached out to the member. My comment/reason was as follows;
"According to the profile page, reported member has uploaded
541 pieces of content, 9 pages yet only 3.5 pages/videos are
extracted from commercial porn videos? I say give the guy a
chance to delete the content. Surely the fact that he has
uploaded more than 300 amateur photos of himself and/or lady
friend should be enough to allow him the time and leniency to edit his gallery of content."
I did message the guy and he blacklisted me which was really no problem other than I couldn't verify whether he edited his gallery. A respected SYD member voted NO ABUSE with the following comment;
"ABUSE HAS NO GROUND 10,Apr 11:28
find pretty weird posting such big amount of content like
this from the web as it doesn't contribute to anything 6 this site atsuch a scale. Sharing something from internet here can be fun once in a while but here it's just spamming...YET, as Bella! pointed out, this member ratio between their actual contribution and what they recently.. looded the place, still balance thingsout. For now at least"
There were 5 of us that voted NO ABUSE and I can tell you the names of 10 of the 11 who voted to delete. Heck, even one member made the following comment with their vote to delete; "blacklisting someone for trying to help them is also unreasonable"
My guess is that this moron is basing his "scientific study and theory" on whether the profiles are genuine or not, are if he is able to find a picture of the member holding a sign with their nickname OR if the member chooses to send him a private picture to him to PROVE otherwise...... What I find interesting is that the numb-nuts has attempted to share PRIVATE pictures sent to him by GoodGirl and Holly212 by posting their pictures in his blog. Isn't this unethical and a breach of trust? What's also a hoot is that in over 800 posted pictures of his alleged wife, there's not a picture of her or him authenticating themselves. So who died and left him/them in charge?
By the way, good to see you again!
valuable female members.
This guy is trouble.
--------------------------------------- added after 48 seconds
PS Kebmo, kudos for standing up for us women.
First, I noticed your account is that of a couple, so, whom am I chatting with? Are you the male or the female or is this a Man/Man or Woman/Woman couple?
Second, you state that "I have got no interest in interacting with the women in this site". Does that mean you interact only with men or want to interact only with men.? Are you a homosexual?
Third, if the above statement is true, why do you care if a member is truly a female or a female wannabe?
Fourth, my "inaccurate guesswork" is no less accurate than your guesswork. You are guessing and, in doing so, you bring harm to members just by your innuendos.
If a member is fake or not, he/she has the right to be here as much as anyone else AS LONG AS THEY ARE NOT DOING HARM TO OTHER MEMBERS. You, on the other hand are doing harm. You should be booted out of the site. That, of course, is my opinion, and not my call to make.
Fifth, who made you the fake/revenge porn police on the site? I don't remember Admin saying so, nor do I remember having an election to vote you to the position. If you have a beef with another member, either contact Admin or bring it up to the abuse panel's attention. Unless you have concrete proof of what you are implying, you don't have the right to make a blog were you impeach the integrity of a member. Especially when you go after one gender.
Sixth, if all the above did not have any effect on you, then, may I suggest you block all the members that you dislike or suspect and go on with your life? It's that simple.
👿
but It does annoy me that there are fake profiles at all.
I mean really, how many fake profiles are there of 78 year old men with 2 inch dicks?
the fake profiles are always the 1's that would attract attention and are desirable,but turn out not to be real. Server space aint free, the time to take care of the site aint free, and How many people are here to interact with FAKE people? Not many
Why not get a AI girlfriend or go to a AI site if dealing with fakes is the goal?
I see many men that "enhance" their tools. You know what I see? A big cock that makes my knees weak. So what? I'm not going to jump in bed with him. I just get the thrill my mind provided using that pic. As they say, "no harm, no foul"
--------------------------------------- added after 6 minutes
I’m usually up for guys CAT but last night I was up for you & Bella!
--------------------------------------- added after 3 minutes
And before you come after me, I posted my redacted Florida Drivers License. I blanked out the house number, most of the driver's license number and last name. And if you don't believe me, ask Skittles.
Being "verified" proves fuck all, as I've illustrated with your driving licence "foolproof" bullshit. How would one of these individuals get a photo of of their wife's cunt with their Syd name written next to it? Well, they can't; ergo, my method is in fact the better option.
Now, say you put something in place like I've been advocating whereby you have to post a photo (non identifiable) while holding a piece of paper giving your Syd name and the date. John is incredibly unlikely to manage to do that of Julie without her consent and/or asking "what the fuck is this for?!".
Now, I don't know how many times I have to say this before it registers - my point from the very beginning was to specifically root out men that are posting photos of a women AND pretending to actually be that woman is conversation and involvement with others on the site. On top of that, it would absolutely stop any instances of "revenge porn"..
Now, if you can't grasp what I'm saying or are unwilling to give it any thought then I absolutely give up. You can't as they say educate pork.
"You're great at name calling an insults. An incredibly weak and valueless debating technique. Congratulations on a glaringly low level of intellect."
Anyway, I bow to a higher intellect (sic). Pease, Lollipop.
BESIDES YOURSELF, NOBODY FUCKING CARES ABOUT YOUR FEAR OF FALLING IN LOVE WITH ANOTHER MAN AGAIN!!!
You should contact admin and suggest new options about proof of identity since you feel so strongly about it. The decision of how people identify themselves here is not yours to make because this is not your site.
To reiterate, just because you say it doesn’t make it true.
Talk to admin If you would like to change the policies of this site. You do not have the authority to do so.
And you just don't understand the numbers. Real revenge porn is rare and usually easily spotted. Those profiles mostly upload, plaster real names all over and go post somewhere else. If someone keeps chatting pretending to be female it's usually not a revenge porn, just some wanker getting who knows what out of it. And they mostly use internet photos with made up name which is copyright violation at best, not photos of someone they actually know and have grudge against or use their real name. And recently they more and more often use AI generated images which can't even be a copyright violation.
You claim you are real deal yet you told me that you would not prove yourself to other members and this is a quote from your message - "no way I would share an identifiable photo with the nut jobs on this site" and just now you suggested that it should be made by those very "nutjobs".
So, I assume you are just trolling and therefore I will withdraw myself from this discussion.
The verification process we use now is not perfect, but, it does work most of the time, and why would anyone want more than that? Your “system” would probably work too, but, it’s too cumbersome, too complicated and too time consuming, and, at the end, as everyone has told you so far, it can be defeated.
Your opinion of " they're easy to spot" is not a vindication for them existing.
18 out of how many members?? Hardly a democracy is it? It's ridiculous for any of you to even consider that you're really any different to an "unverified" member. Again, I revert to this faux opinion that you're more genuine than Joe Bloggs that creates a profile.
/blogs/57126.html
What do you think we were talking about?
but they are not getting my verification documents.
Some people have careers to worry about. Nude pictures can ruin a career.
New Comment Go to top