Page #602
Pages: #1... #597 #598 #599 #600 #601 #602 #603 #604 #605 #606 ...#799
New Comment Rating: 11 Similar topics: 1.Food stuff 2.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF 3.A Forum Topic 4.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF II 5.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF III Comments: | ||
You must be logged in to post here. Log in
With that said, 90 Day Fiance, Before The 90 Days, what a HOOT! Do mature men really believe they appeal to women that are 20, 25, 30+ years their junior? Same with these more than middle age women who pursue men that are 20 years plus, their junior?
These mature men and women who are seeking relationships with people that are so much younger are only fooling themselves. Just my opinion.
The women are interesting, too. These are 50-something year old women who are traveling to Nigeria to find their online dream man! For cryin' out loud, their guys are each 30 years of age, young enough to be their child and one has gone as far as emptying his "sugar momma's" bank account of $900.00. Gee, if $900.00 completley emptied her bank account, she's a piss poor "sugar momma" in my opinion.
Am I that cold and cynical that what I am seeing is just relationships that will get the people a plane ticket out of their current living conditions?
As far as leo, what he lacks in length and girth, his wallet will make up for!
I really can't blame them.
A lot of the men that were interviewed said they found American women too "aggressive" or "independent".
As for me, sure I'll "look" at a much younger woman, but I certainly would not want any kind of relationship with them. I would have nothing in common with them, it would feel awkward and uncomfortable. I would want someone nearer to my age, no more than 5 years difference. I would have much more in common and have shared experiences.
As for older women seeking younger men, I an only guess. Maybe the older women think men their age are too set in the ways or maybe it is an ego thing, like it would be for men.
Life goes on...
Useful, or complete bullshit?
Since her I have had relationships with women (slightly) older than me, some slightly younger and my latest ex was 14 years younger than me. Still in that group though: half of 54 plus 7 is 34 and she was 40.
In my opinion it boils down to our hominid origins. Men are looking for partners that will continue their lineage, and women are looking for good providers. A gross over-simplification, that's amended by our overlay of "civilisation".
Using that formula, my guy is going to be close to dead!
only registered users can see external links
But realistically speaking, the Bobby had some high expectations. He wanted his beauty to have black hair and blue eyes. Bobby is 46 years old, shy and not too interesting. WTF was he thinking of hoping to snag a young woman that was out of his league? I mean he can hope for a "10" and maybe be blissfully happy with a 6 or 7.
Did you see his ray gun collection?
I saw him several times over the years at various concerts. I even have a couple of his albums. Always terrific!!!
May John Prine RIP...
only registered users can see external links
And one of my favorite of his "Crazy Bone"
only registered users can see external links
I really like folk song performers, in fact, my music tastes span pretty much all genres, but not rap.
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
Early research into the first patients critically ill with Covid-19 in UK hospitals indicates that black and Asian people are more likely to be badly affected by coronavirus than white people.
The Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre found that 35% of almost 2,000 patients were non-white, nearly triple the 13% proportion in the UK population as a whole.
Fourteen per cent of those with the most serious cases were Asian and the same proportion were black, according to the study, which has triggered calls for further research to understand why the virus appears to be having a disproportionate impact on non-white ethnic groups.
The study is thought to be the first analysis of its kind anywhere in the world looking at the ethnic breakdown of cases of the virus. On Tuesday the confirmed number of deaths in NHS services among people with a confirmed case of the virus rose to 6,159 people, with more who died at home, in hospices and in care settings yet to be counted.
The study examined admissions to a sample of 286 critical care units in England, Wales and Northern Ireland with confirmed Covid-19 up until noon on 3 April. It also showed the median age of those in a critical condition of all ethnicities was 61 and that almost three quarters were men.
The patients most likely to survive in intensive care were those between 16 and 49, 76% of whom were discharged. The number fell to 50% for those aged 50 to 69, and to 32% for those aged 70 and over.
“This is a signal and it needs to be looked at more carefully,” said Kamlesh Khunti, professor in primary care diabetes and vascular medicine at the University of Leicester, who studies health trends in black and minority ethnic populations. “For example, South Asians live in more deprived areas and have more cardiovascular disease and diabetes.”
He added South Asian people often lived in larger, multi-generational households and so “social isolation may not be as prevalent”.
Government figures confirm that cramped housing is far more likely to be a problem for ethnic minorities. Thirty per cent of the UK Bangladeshi population are considered to live in overcrowded housing compared with 2% among the white British population. Fifteen per cent of black African people also live in overcrowded conditions, as do 16% of Pakistanis.
“We need to ensure that every individual, including the BAME population, are following social distancing instructions,” Khunti said. “We have anecdotal information that it might not be happening in certain BAME groups.”
"Apologies for another of my long epics" .
I mean, the person who sends you unsolicited pictures and/or where the conversations are uncomfortable or less than respectful. The member that is not interested in mingling with the opposite sex. The members that you might find abusive. Bottom line, the member that just irritates the mess out of you..... WHY AREN'T YOU BLACKLISTING THEM AND TELLING THEM WHY?
Also, with followers are told by their handlers to ban me. Leo does a great job of this. Fucking fat lump that he is...
I've read numerous blogs written by a member stating that their "blacklist" was administered by admin in order to keep that member from visiting, posting or sending the other member a private message. What seems to be an indication of weakness to me is when the member who has had admin implement the restriction on the member so that they may keep a "sterling reputation" has the balls and the freedom to visit and post messages on the blacklist-ee's page. Um, isn't that a bit odd and fcked up?
Another one of my favorite reasons are; "BAM! Back at you!"
Number of members who blacklisted Skittles: 105 (Why?)
Number of members whom Skittles has blacklisted: 0
ZERO!
Being a friend of a deleted member is a funny one...
I can't visit their page to click on a pic or use the report button to report them myself....
100 years ago you could still visit the profile of a member that has blacklisted you, you were only prohibited from contacting them via private message or posting on their wall. In my case, I believe I have 3 members that blacklisted me, blacklisted me because I contacted them regarding internet pictures that they posted. If there is a way to report a member to the Evaluation Panel for posting internet pictures without being able to open the picture to "tag" it or to visit that members profile, for the purpose of reporting pictures all after they have blacklisted "you", please tell me how.
Bottom line, I wonder why there's a difference in reporting format for reporting a member from the link on their page versus using pictures from their gallery.
By the way, BuckFizz decided to blacklist me because of my [NO ABUSE] vote with regard to his Z00 referral.
--------------------------------------- added after 13 minutes
Hey! Did you just add this link within the last 30 minutes, or so?
"Member posts stolen images from internet or that belong to other members"
Report pages are different for images and members because images can only have several specific problems and members can be abusive in more ways.
But as an active member of the panel you already know that in most cases reason is not selected properly anyway. People seem to think that if they select "illegal" it will give it more weight. Personally I just ignore most of abuse reports that do not have correctly selected reason. It tells me right away that reporter is either dumb and has no clue what he is reporting or he understands but is not acting in a good faith.
Your guidelines for voters to have common sense seems to be overlooked as well as the "we will ignore copyright infringement abuses without proper DMCA information." All someone has to do is report a member for having fake pictures and there will seem to be a number of voters who are happy to vote to delete even though no "proof" is provided and they, the voter, never seem to provide any reason for supporting the deletion.
Are you open to sharing your opinion or view on the verification of members, please? MY PERSONAL OPINION is that members seeking verification should only be verified after a period of no less than 6 months. I feel that in light of recent incidents, verified people being banned and deleted. When that has happened, it caused the people who verified them to lose their verification privilege. I believe that the two of the incidences that I am aware of have been corrected and I thank you for your consideration. I don't know, when a new member contacts me for verification, I will tell them "no" and why I choose not to at this time.
I can't provide proof of a members pics being from the web if I can't visit the page....how can I search the pics ,unless I've downloaded them?
Ok having a link to the report page,but what am I reporting?if it's a pic, people need to see what pics I'm reporting on...and not just me going "fake" and expecting others do check the pics themselves..
Just easier the way it was before,get blacklisted,you can still view the page but you can't comment etc....
I have changed this to the way it is now because of genuine members who were upset that people they blacklisted kept visiting their pages. Indeed I understood it would make life easier for those who use stolen pics, but I thought that it was more important to please those few genuine women who are on this site than bother about fakes that are always in bigger numbers than genuine women no matter what.
Fakes have taken over this site.....so when real women do turn up,they get abuse, I have suggested repeatedly to have a standard verification page for all members,you dismiss that and say it's up to the members to decide if someone is real..
So I have to assess if members are fake, I cannot do that if have been blacklisted and cannot view the pics....so if a fake bans me before I have seen their pics,as a few have done,cuz it's probably the same person behind those fake accounts, I cannot do anything.
If I get an unwanted photo, which is rare, I just nicely tell them that I don't like that type of photo and they don't do it again.
Some people have banned me but that's their choice. It doesn't concern me.
New Comment Go to top