"I don’t even know what to say. Today was a disgrace. @realDonaldTrump embarrassed America and should be ashamed of himself. Shame on anyone who chooses to ignore Russia’s interference in our democracy for the sake of Trump’s political well-being. I’m at a complete loss."
"This moron, puppet, coward sided with Putin over our own intelligence agencies! On a world stage!! BASED ON NOTHING MORE THAN PUTIN’S WORD! Why?? Can ANYONE answer that?? What the hell is happening. Politics aside, this is 100% un-American. Where are you @GOP????"
At the time I thought that would keep him from getting the presidency,,,I guess i was a fool to think that this country had more decent people,,,,that is the embarrassing part.
I'm curious for the Left Liberals... chuck Schumer is calling for Riots and Protests in the streets to resist the Supreme Court Pick by the president.... The thing is the president hasn't even said who he wants yet...What is the Liberal thinking here?
Resistance and revolt is overtly expressed. I don't understand your question..Haven't you seen the judiciary committee meetings? These 2 obstructionists against the constitution have called for fighting and revolts. It is easy to find proof.. Just look it up .
Godzillas, if Schumer were calling for riots and protests I think I would find it on his twitter feed or see it on the news which I did not. When you make a statement saying that an elected official is calling for riots and protests you should be able to back it up with proof which you can or will not.
My question is this: Where can I find proof that Chuck Schumer is calling for Riots and Protests in the streets to resist the Supreme Court pick by the president?
Chuck Schummer and Nancy Pelosi represent the democratic party here. They are representatives of the leftist movement that pretty much is in global agenda. Donald Trump is a constitutionalist that upholds national sovereignty. The supreme court justices he is appointing is consistent with his agenda....
You show me anyone that objects to national sovereignty and I'll show you a traitor. Us, on the "left", object to the President's idea of protecting and the way he's going about it. He's following an agenda that is, at the very least, racist and at worst, anti-Constitutinal. His views and his base is that of the old WASP establishment.
yes, unlike many Americans, I have,,,,and b4 you say he's following the letter of the law (and he is) my bitch is how he's treating refugees in our southern border. BTW, today i saw him in Helsinki show the world that we are a weak nation kissing Putin's ass. And if that is protecting our national sovereignty, then i fear we won't have any left.
And BTW,,,if I don't like our laws then i'll get my representatives to change it (reason there's 27 amendments-that's changes to you-to the Constitution),,,i'll organize demonstrations (right of assembly) and petitions. It's the reason my dad fought as a corporal in the Army Air Corp in WWII and my **** fought in Vietnam. This country is a democratic country and while i'll defend your views, i don't have to agree with them. I WILL NEVER MOVE OUT. ONLY LOSERS DO THAT. THIS IS MY COUNTRY. THE GREATEST COUNTRY IN THE WORLD WAY BEFORE THAT BUFFOON TOOK OFFICE. AND IF YOU DON"T LIKE IT, THEN, YOU MOVE OUT.
Absolutely. This country does have the greatest idea in the world.. The United States is supposed to be united not divided with ****, persecution and division. When you come to this country you can be Muslim, Gay, Woman, Jew, Christian... and so forth.. There is no persecution or at least the constitution is set up as law to forbid it..The constitution is our law and your father and relatives fought for this law and idea because you agree with it and want to protect this... Like our president or not with his ideas, he fights for this value. He is tough on immigration because he has to be.. Islam declared war on us 39 years ago and are still threatening to destroy us and our freedom. Our national sovereignty must be maintained and protected. It is our right and obligation, as Americans to protect ourselves and law.
actually we were fighting Islam in Jefferson's time,, The Barbary coast pirates were Muslim,,,BTW,,,the battle song of the US Marines mentions this,,"from the halls of Montesuma to the shores of Tripoli...
As far as immigration is concerned, I agree, **** entry to the US is and should be against the law. All countries have similar laws. It's the way Mr Trump tries to **** these pilgrims to keep away. SEparation of **** from their parents is wrong,,you can be of any political party,,it's wrong. And, according to US law, these people have the right to ask for asylum,, his deptmnt of homeland security in sink with his justice department are putting road blocks in front of these people,,,That's wrong too. BTW,,,40% of **** aliens enter this country by air flights. Last yr there were 11 million illegals in the US. In a population of 340 million that's less than 4%. I don't think they'll take over the country --------------------------------------- added after 54 seconds
Bill Clinton made the law, it went through the Bush Adminstration and even after 911 nothing of changed of the law.. Obama made and supported this law and the lying fake media never reported the incident ... Trump is trying to speed up the trocess becasue of seperation of parents which he doesn't know if the parents are coyotees instead..If there are then the **** gets sold as sex slaves.. The pictures you saw on TV are years older than when trump was president..
that is true but there are people that send planes into buildings killing thousands,, r_ping women while **** their ch ildren to watch the ****..Roosevelt forced japanese into concentration camps and reagon was about to sent russians to the same place..There is no choice here.. I don't like the circumstances but it has to be done..
no,,it does not,,,it's funny,,while Obama was president the media criticised him all the time. The likes of Glen Beck lied through their teeth about him,,,i don't remember anyone complaining about "the fake news"then
Because the Fake News is not journalism. It is a diversion to cover-up the radical left. You need to understand the flow charts of history dating back to before Christ to see the patterns... I know you have much pride and compassion for the United States. This is good. Our law is the best idea there is but it is under constant pressure from radicals that want socialism and nationalism. Motives are the key here. Right now there is evidence to support c_hild sex trafficking at the borders which is a reason why the left wants open borders and sanctuary cities.
Here is the big point on immigration. If you want to come to America you come legally. There is US embassy's all over the world including Central America and Mexico. You want to come legally then do it that way. This way you don't have 1000s of people crossing borders and living free off of taxpayers while murdering and stealing from tax payers..When people infest our borders it is an invasion not sanctuary...You refuse to go to embassy? ---invasion..
What difference does it make? It is either right or wrong. Chuck Schummer you don't know what country he is in? What difference does it make... Its a global movement...
It's just common sense when one refers to "the president" in an international forum to also specify the country.
Anyway, I agree with you. Both Schummer and Pelosi seem to be very conservative capitalists. The kind that Jefferson wouldn't want to have at his side. --------------------------------------- added after 5 minutes
I also agree with you that Trump is a communist. only registered users can see external links Trump sides with Russia against FBI.
No US president, ever, would side with an enemy country against the very conservative, very American, the definition of US itself in fact, the FBI.
No you didn't. But I think you meant it. After just reading that Trump sided with Putin against the FBI, I called him a communist but perhaps that label doesn't apply anymore. No president would ever side with an enemy country, so I agree he's very strange.
Chuck Schummer and Nancy Pelosi represent the democratic party here. They are representatives of the leftist movement that pretty much is in global agenda. Donald Trump is a constitutionalist that upholds national sovereignty. The supreme court justices he is appointing is consistent with his agenda....
So are you saying his base that voted for him colluded with Russia too?
Perhaps the KGB sent aliens to put in a=nal probes to cause voters to vote for him? This is a stupid excuse of the democratic party..Used to support them. Not anymore..
I don't know my friend. I just feel sorry for you and all my American friends for having a president collude with Russia against FBI. This is betrayal. It seems really dangerous. I don't think that a US President has ever gone against its country's intelligence service.
I don't think Leo meant that. His base voted for him because they are closed minded section of the electorate and mostly the bottom half of the middle class,,the ones that think that "foreigners" are taking their McDonald's jobs and collecting food stamps while they can't get any help, and lets not forget,,,we might even take away your guns,,,can't be a MAN without a six shooter
Would just like to say thankyou to the efforts of many countries who pulled together and had hope and determination to get these k1ds out of the cave in thailand.
It proves that we can all get along in times of need but hey, lets learn and just get along
I know that I am unusual in not being a huge fan of blow jobs but yes, definitely yes. I had a recent experience where despite the woman’s partner saying that she gave the most amazing blowjobs I just found it pure torture and just had to call an end to it.
But that is just me and I am probably weird.
I must emphasis that I have never been a fan of blowjobs but her technique was really very vigourous and I stopped her after - this is just a guess - maybe 10 minutes. I was determined to give her a chance. I am not sure whether she had a stud in her tongue now, but she certainly left me with very visible bruising to my penis which appeared later !!!
I like to receive blowjobs more than any other kind of sex, but there are women who just don't do them right. And in their performance blowjob is often unpleasant and sometimes straight painful. Usually those are the women who don't like to give blowjobs, but still do them for some reason. They are often clumsy at it - not careful with teeth, don't use enough tongue, don't understand when to be rough and when to be gentle. And being rough on an overstimulated penis causes pain. But at least one of those women preferred to give blowjobs over normal sex (she had something like congenital hip dislocation) and sincerely thought she was great at giving them. She could not bring me to orgasm even once (she was the only one like that) and every time kept trying until it started to become painful. Also, she tended to talk during a blowjob.
When met with bad blowjob performance I never say "stop it", I don't want to offend the partner. I try to change position - switch to regular sex or take a lead role when I literally fuck someone in their mouth. Sometimes I directly say - "it's too much, let's try something else", without mentioning in any way that the performance is bad. Though one time I got what was wrong and explicitly told to the girl what she should and should not do and after that it was all good. She was kinda submissive and liked that kind of approach. But many women take it too personally, if you say something that implies they don't know how to give head.
I enjoy lengthy blowjobs, and I would never stop
my cocksucker from enjoying himself as long as he likes.
But I also must be reasonable about how long I would
like my cocksucker to orally please me.
I once had an older guy suck my cock for almost 2 hours
(with restroom breaks, between me and him)...
...even though I provided a couple of thick couch cushions
for him to kneel on, the blowjob session eventually took
its toll on my buddy's back and he had become sore from
being in the kneeling position all that time.
His jaw muscles were also hurting from such a prolonged
bobbing and gagging activity.
So, he stopped sucking and finished me off with an
hour-long oiled handjob.
Jeezus, I was literally GOONING from all that
pleasure sensory overload!
I'd love to experience it again and again.
But we humans have our physical limits.
I edge for hours, 3 to 5 hours at a sitting and it get painful at times. Having your dick sucked for an extended period is much the same. Keeping it changed up between 'sucking', stroking, kissing and licking helps. But yes, if it goes on to long it gets uncomfortable and my dick goes soft. A good sign its time to try something else
How is it that there are some photos with 20-40 thousand views? Does the member post it dozens of times on the banner? Here's an example that I just came across. To be clear, it's a mighty fine cock and a great quality 5.5 year old photo and I certainly bear no animosity towards this basque9, I'm just wondering how it gets 47,000 views.
That is over 23 views each and every day since it was posted. Which does not sound too outrageous said like that but who maintains that degree of consistency.
Of course an active member who intereacts with lots of people and who maybe does make use of the banner regularly will get more views. Plus having a large dick is a help.
Does the total number of views on a pic include the views of non-members who stop in to the site to check out cocks and then just move on? Basque9 does have an impressive looking schlong, and that particular pic is bound to catch the attention of casual pecker-peekers who happen by.
"I don’t even know what to say. Today was a disgrace. @realDonaldTrump embarrassed America and should be ashamed of himself. Shame on anyone who chooses to ignore Russia’s interference in our democracy for the sake of Trump’s political well-being. I’m at a complete loss."
"This moron, puppet, coward sided with Putin over our own intelligence agencies! On a world stage!! BASED ON NOTHING MORE THAN PUTIN’S WORD! Why?? Can ANYONE answer that?? What the hell is happening. Politics aside, this is 100% un-American. Where are you @GOP????"
only registered users can see external links
So embarrassing...
My question is this: Where can I find proof that Chuck Schumer is calling for Riots and Protests in the streets to resist the Supreme Court pick by the president?
As far as immigration is concerned, I agree, **** entry to the US is and should be against the law. All countries have similar laws. It's the way Mr Trump tries to **** these pilgrims to keep away. SEparation of **** from their parents is wrong,,you can be of any political party,,it's wrong. And, according to US law, these people have the right to ask for asylum,, his deptmnt of homeland security in sink with his justice department are putting road blocks in front of these people,,,That's wrong too. BTW,,,40% of **** aliens enter this country by air flights. Last yr there were 11 million illegals in the US. In a population of 340 million that's less than 4%. I don't think they'll take over the country
--------------------------------------- added after 54 seconds
****= I L E G A L S
Here is the big point on immigration. If you want to come to America you come legally. There is US embassy's all over the world including Central America and Mexico. You want to come legally then do it that way. This way you don't have 1000s of people crossing borders and living free off of taxpayers while murdering and stealing from tax payers..When people infest our borders it is an invasion not sanctuary...You refuse to go to embassy? ---invasion..
Anyway, I agree with you. Both Schummer and Pelosi seem to be very conservative capitalists. The kind that Jefferson wouldn't want to have at his side.
--------------------------------------- added after 5 minutes
I also agree with you that Trump is a communist. only registered users can see external links Trump sides with Russia against FBI.
No US president, ever, would side with an enemy country against the very conservative, very American, the definition of US itself in fact, the FBI.
Chuck Schummer and Nancy Pelosi represent the democratic party here. They are representatives of the leftist movement that pretty much is in global agenda. Donald Trump is a constitutionalist that upholds national sovereignty. The supreme court justices he is appointing is consistent with his agenda....
Perhaps the KGB sent aliens to put in a=nal probes to cause voters to vote for him? This is a stupid excuse of the democratic party..Used to support them. Not anymore..
It proves that we can all get along in times of need but hey, lets learn and just get along
But wtf was Elon Musk thinking when he accused one of the Brits of being 'p-e-d-0' ????
Here's my question, does there ever become a time when having your cock sucked becomes too much or too long and is no longer enjoyable?
But that is just me and I am probably weird.
Inquiring minds ( me.... ) would like to know how long you endured that torture?
I honestly feel that men give better blowjobs because they WANT to do it and they love doing it.
my cocksucker from enjoying himself as long as he likes.
But I also must be reasonable about how long I would
like my cocksucker to orally please me.
I once had an older guy suck my cock for almost 2 hours
(with restroom breaks, between me and him)...
...even though I provided a couple of thick couch cushions
for him to kneel on, the blowjob session eventually took
its toll on my buddy's back and he had become sore from
being in the kneeling position all that time.
His jaw muscles were also hurting from such a prolonged
bobbing and gagging activity.
So, he stopped sucking and finished me off with an
hour-long oiled handjob.
Jeezus, I was literally GOONING from all that
pleasure sensory overload!
I'd love to experience it again and again.
But we humans have our physical limits.
Of course an active member who intereacts with lots of people and who maybe does make use of the banner regularly will get more views. Plus having a large dick is a help.
New Comment Go to top