On my mobile device, I seem to get a fair amount of "human interest stories" that focus on Meghan Markle, now the Duchess of Sussex.
Apparently, her shoes are now attracting attention, not because of the style or who the designer might be, it is because her shoes appear to be a size or two bigger then they need to be. And the paparazzi that have noticed this have decided that she wears larger sizes to avoid blisters.
Really? Has anyone worn shoes that are too large? Shoes that are too large are often as painful as shoes too small.
Shoes too large can cause blisters or callouses from all the unnecessary rubbing and sliding about.
I saw this in a blog,,i wont name names (you dirty copper, I won't talk) but since i'm one of the people that does this, i would like more input,,,
",,Could never figure out why a man feels the need to throw his ankles behind his head and take a picture of his asshole. Do the gay men members even think that's sexy?,,"
the only comment i'd like to make right now is that this comment, coming from a person with a great looking partner, and, obviously, well versed in sex, would be so narrow in his ideas as to what others like,,,or don't like,,,,
GO PEOPLE,,,MAKE ME REGRET I OPENED MY MOUTH,,
I have 1898 photos but not one like that. I think they're gross and when I see one I instinctively hold my breath! When I visit a profile with lots of such photos I hit my back button and leave the profile.
Maybe my feelings about it have something to do with the fact that I never have anal sex...or vice versa.
Having said that, I probably have lots of photos that some people don't want to see so I mention my personal opinion only because it was asked for.
Kebmo, thanks for the impute. You don't have pics like that, but, you have many showing men peeing, even inside their panties. And you certainly have pics of men giving head, so, considering that most of your pics are of you in panties, I would assume that you are either BI or gay. I understand that, perhaps, the picture of an anus may remind you of **** I do have to tell you that anal sex is a possibility in gay sex. What's more, a woman putting her legs up like that and spreading her pussy and ass seems to be a great "come on". And if you don't believe me then you are not looking at women's pages --------------------------------------- added after 52 seconds
I do find that "key members" are everywhere, but, if you have the time, or a helper, that's OK. I was looking at all the forum titles and saw many have a number for the creator of that forum thread. Imagine my surprise when I tried to look them up and they are listed as "does not exist". So many. Why?
You answered your own question, the member does not exist, that's why it's a number
And as for key members it goes like this,if it's someone you like ,you are/have an admirer,if it's someone you don't like,you are/have a stalker/creeper...
The forum threads/comments still stay around from the deleted accounts,and some of the threads are from over seven years ago...
I did suggest a long time ago that dusty threads(those created by deleted members) should have a section to itself..
I kinda think that the members that use 69 and 420 believe that that makes them more appealing. Do you agree? Gosh, I'm especially drawn to the SYD members with multiple 69's in their name.
Non-premium members have limit of only 15 spots in their black list. And yes, there are members who are maxed. About 35 members. Several have more, but they are or were premium.
That's a sad statement. What's even sadder is that what I took from it was wondering if there are any other words that have the letters 'ioi' in sequence.
Just exchanging thoughts with 2nice in another forum thread and I want to bring the discussion over here. Here's my question;
Do you feel that there is a major difference between pretty and beautiful? If possible, are you able to articulate what you feel is the difference? There is no right or wrong and in the event that anyone posts their thoughts, please remain respectful of their opinions.
To me there is a big difference. Pretty is a physical appearance. Example, she has a pretty face, she has pretty feet, etc... Beauty comes within. A person is beautiful from the inside. Doesn't always mean that a pretty girl is also always beautiful. If that makes any sense.
That's actually a good description of the difference. I would just take it a bit further by saying that "pretty" touches your brain, while "beautiful" touches your soul. This applies to more than just people. For example, a song can be "pretty" and be pleasant to listen to. A "beautiful" song has an emotional impact that goes way beyond that, though.
I’ve always classified attractiveness in four unique categories. Pretty, Beautiful and Cute. Each one is not decided solely on the physical. There are emotional and spiritual forces that also come into play.
Pretty - Something pleasant to look at or listen to. Appealing to the senses.
Beautiful - Almost perfection. Something that draws you in so strongly you cannot look away or direct your attention away from it. Extremely powerful.
Cute - Not pretty or beautiful. Something that warms your heart and puts you in that “Awwww” state of being.
There is also a fourth category when classifying attractiveness with people.
Plain - Not attractive or unattractive.
A person’s poise, intelligence and attitude weigh heavily on each category which defines them as attractive. So heavily in fact, someone classified as beautiful with all the right attributes, but has an unpleasant attitude. That person could be bumped from attractive to unattractive.
As my Southern grandmother used to say to me growing up ~ Pretty is as pretty does.
Sometimes a person’s heart and attitude makes such a difference in the way their beauty is perceived.. kindness & love can be so much more important than what the world considers a pretty face.
Actually, "gorgeous" is, by definition, more of a synonym for "beautiful". Gorgeous is used to describe a higher degree of beauty. (To answer lanser's question: No, non-physical things can also be described as gorgeous.)
"...because it's often better to say nothing that would squander our 200 year relationship by replying to comments by a President that's sometimes hard not to respond to."
Justin Trudeau, Prime Minister of Canada being the adult in the room. Again.
Apparently, her shoes are now attracting attention, not because of the style or who the designer might be, it is because her shoes appear to be a size or two bigger then they need to be. And the paparazzi that have noticed this have decided that she wears larger sizes to avoid blisters.
Really? Has anyone worn shoes that are too large? Shoes that are too large are often as painful as shoes too small.
Shoes too large can cause blisters or callouses from all the unnecessary rubbing and sliding about.
I would like to see a separate category added for underwear pics! Some of those pictures are more drool worthy than a full frontal nude!
",,Could never figure out why a man feels the need to throw his ankles behind his head and take a picture of his asshole. Do the gay men members even think that's sexy?,,"
the only comment i'd like to make right now is that this comment, coming from a person with a great looking partner, and, obviously, well versed in sex, would be so narrow in his ideas as to what others like,,,or don't like,,,,
GO PEOPLE,,,MAKE ME REGRET I OPENED MY MOUTH,,
Maybe my feelings about it have something to do with the fact that I never have anal sex...or vice versa.
Having said that, I probably have lots of photos that some people don't want to see so I mention my personal opinion only because it was asked for.
--------------------------------------- added after 52 seconds
****= s c a t
And as for key members it goes like this,if it's someone you like ,you are/have an admirer,if it's someone you don't like,you are/have a stalker/creeper...
--------------------------------------- added after 2 minutes
The number part I understand. The part I don't and was inquiring about is the sheer number of deleted accounts
I did suggest a long time ago that dusty threads(those created by deleted members) should have a section to itself..
I recall there were members that had far greater than 15 members on their blacklist, when was the change implemented?
-CBC News
But yes, it is sad. I suppose the US reflects about the same stats.
Do you feel that there is a major difference between pretty and beautiful? If possible, are you able to articulate what you feel is the difference? There is no right or wrong and in the event that anyone posts their thoughts, please remain respectful of their opinions.
I'm glad that you both were able to successfully describe a difference between the two words, thank you.
Pretty - Something pleasant to look at or listen to. Appealing to the senses.
Beautiful - Almost perfection. Something that draws you in so strongly you cannot look away or direct your attention away from it. Extremely powerful.
Cute - Not pretty or beautiful. Something that warms your heart and puts you in that “Awwww” state of being.
There is also a fourth category when classifying attractiveness with people.
Plain - Not attractive or unattractive.
A person’s poise, intelligence and attitude weigh heavily on each category which defines them as attractive. So heavily in fact, someone classified as beautiful with all the right attributes, but has an unpleasant attitude. That person could be bumped from attractive to unattractive.
As my Southern grandmother used to say to me growing up ~ Pretty is as pretty does.
Sometimes a person’s heart and attitude makes such a difference in the way their beauty is perceived.. kindness & love can be so much more important than what the world considers a pretty face.
--------------------------------------- added after 4 minutes
There's also the crossovers. Examples, she has pretty eyes or beautiful skin.
Justin Trudeau, Prime Minister of Canada being the adult in the room. Again.
Now our days will become shorter......
New Comment Go to top