Page #241
Pages: #1... #236 #237 #238 #239 #240 #241 #242 #243 #244 #245 ...#769
New Comment Rating: 11 Similar topics: 1.Food stuff 2.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF 3.A Forum Topic 4.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF II 5.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF III Comments: | ||
You must be logged in to post here. Log in
Hi question does any one know how to delete a account on here not sure where to go.
Yes, on the far right side and under your points is the MEMBERSHIP box. Click on that and your very last option is DELETE PROFILE. Click on that and follow the directions.
Can't even follow instructions either. What a cunt! How many times did you piss on top of the toilet lid before someone told you to lift it up?
It won’t end here. Women will bury you dirty old Republican men. Maybe not in 6 months, maybe not 2024, but soon, we’ll kick you in the nuts.
By the way, if you liberals decide to start kicking people in the nuts, you better wear something besides flip flops and sandels!
The young men are the 1's out fucking all the time.
A zipper,a simple to operate device used to keep pants UP.
Besides that, only 10 states or so have banned abortion.So if you are into killing your babies, MOVE to a state that allows it. Sadly my state still allows it.But neighboring states are looking at fixing the issue.I hope we can get rid of our dumocrat governor and clean up the mess here to.
You have to be blind, deaf, and dumb not to realize that today the politics of the United States has changed.
And if you don't mind, show me the section of the constitution that says it is ok to kill a citizen before they exit the womb?
I looked over it a bit and see nothing that says it is ok to kill.
only registered users can see external links
Debates about whether some particular right is “in” the Constitution or not are debates about how to read and interpret the Constitution. Those who claim that the Constitution doesn’t say “right to privacy” or “separation of church and state” are relying upon the assumption that unless a particular phrase or specific words actually appears in the document, then the right doesn’t exist — either because the interpreters are drawing invalid implications or because it’s illegitimate to go beyond the exact text at all.
Whenever people complain about courts creating new rights that aren’t in the Constitution, they are usually talking about the right to privacy. Although the Constitution doesn’t mention any right to privacy, several passages imply such a right and many court decisions have found a right to privacy in different aspects of human life, such as contraception the education of children.
There is nothing in the Constitution about a right to be treated innocent until proven guilty,
There is nothing in the Constitution about a “right to a fair trial.”
Many people imagine that they have a right to tried in front of a jury of their peers, but there is nothing in the Constitution about that.
The Constitution lists no such explicit right, as the right to vote as it does with speech or assembly. It only lists reasons why you can’t be denied the ability to vote — for example, because of race and sex.
The idea that the courts have the authority to review the constitutionality of laws passed by legislatures is firmly entrenched in American law and politics. However, the Constitution does not mention “Judicial Review” and does not explicitly establish the concept.
The right to travel is not mentioned either. The same about the right to marriage or procreation.
Abortion was given the go ahead because it was a matter of privacy.
It was left like that. That was wrong. It should have been codified (made into formal Federal law). That is what is women will work hard to implement and we’ll do it through the power of the vote.
The right to travel is a part of the 'liberty' of which the citizen cannot be deprived without due process of law under the Fifth Amendment.
Freedom of movement under United States law - Wikipedia
only registered users can see external links › wiki › Freedom_of_movement_...
WRONG
The Sixth Amendment guarantees the rights of criminal defendants, including the right to a public trial without unnecessary delay, the right to a lawyer, the right to an impartial jury, and the right to know who your accusers are and the nature of the charges and evidence against you.
Sixth Amendment | US Constitution - Legal Information Institute
Although the First Amendment does not explicitly mention the right of access, the Supreme Court has held that the right to attend criminal proceedings is implicit in freedom of speech and serves an important function in a democratic society by enhancing trial fairness and its appearance.
--------------------------------------- added after 4 minutes
Travel is not mentioned in the Construction. The Constitution mentions what can happen to prisoners but there’s no mention about innocent until proven guilty. Abortion is the same.
They were intelligent as hell. The best system in the world to date.
The framers took into consideration of changes, but you do have a small point here, I do not think they foresaw the changes that we have today.
They did a hell of a job and look how long it has lasted. There are things I look at and say how did they know to include this?
Smart if you ask most scholars.
Roe v Wade should have never been approved in the first place. State's rights. Remember to vote if you want change.
Thomas wrote that those rulings "were demonstrably erroneous decisions."
They are currently available on Amazon and Walmart sites in Canada.
--------------------------------------- added after 89 seconds
only registered users can see external links
--------------------------------------- added after 9 minutes
* these websites.
There will be a lot of prescriptions being sold online now to counter these archaic laws.
I also know that insulin is grotesquely more expensive in the US and a lot of Americans buy it from Canada.
Strange that Canadian government and pharmacies are so lenient. Heck, everyone knows that Americans are drug taking, gun wielding, sue happy heteroclites
You care, I care, again, for the opposite things.
The ruling was made by the high court. Adapt.
Have sex in a responsible way, or move to a state that agrees with killing of babies.
What urks me is everyone is acting like abortion is now impossible and it is the end of the world. It's not banned, unless the state you live in bans it.
And people that fuck like rabbits usually live in califunny or new york or some other liberal state and it doesn't affect them the least. They can fuck like mice, and just go by the abortion clinic on the way to get their hair done as always.
As for rubbers and pills, you all seem to forget politicians fuck everything that moves like Bill clinton and even Trump had issues with keeping his pants up. I think stopping murder is as far as they will try to go as they would be cutting into their side action with their interns and so forth. The idea of prevention is far more viable, safer and cheaper than abortion. IF used properly, abortion would have been scarce along time ago. Just as with the spread of monkey pox at a party in uk because of random sex unprotected, , pregnancy is caused by random sex without protection.
We could discuss what if's until the cows came home and the chickens came to roost.
The simple fact is, your idea of not fucking, is the best thing for these ------- fill in the blanks with poor ,Asian, whatever ,women to do to prevent issues if they do not have the cognitive ability to choose protection or responsible males to mate with.
ANY effort to remove those panties if the wearer is unwilling is R@PE plain and simple. There are and should be harsh repercussions for that.
As I have tried to elude to, there is no unknown law saying a woman has to give sex to a man. IF sex happens and the woman don't want it,it is R@PE and she should deal with it as such. Concealed carrry? Blow his nuts off? I mean really , quit acting like women are slot machines for men.
Why is a non religious woman marring a catholic? They are religious rabbits as they don't believe in nothing but making babies. Looks like a case of leaping before she looked.
A woman has control over the sex ,they are indoctrinated to believe they are the victims of everything and can hollar anytime and they are believed in a court of law over a man 10 to 1.
I totally disagree with what you say about women having no control.
They don't have to marry , they don't have to have sex, therefore no children to be had.
Your argument makes the Me to movement moot. you make it sound like men are entitled to sex.If thats the case,where in the hell is mine??
We can control our urges, sex is like any other urge ,you don't have to have that potato chip, that new car,or pussy.You are just in a position nowadays that credit will buy what you think you need and pussy allows it's self to be had so it can hollar "me to" 40 years later.
Although the rowing verses wading thing is causing a uproar for alot of liberals, most of us conservatives are still interested in the economy.You know if the economy was in good shape,people might be able to afford to raise a child. So the economy is going to decide the mid terms and that will slow bidens machine down until we can get a decent president to actually try to fix America.
There are MILLIONS of Americans that are fed up. Mirical's do happen, we had a couple last week. Every journey begins with the first step.
And we conservatives are just now putting our shoes on.
These people that are whining, Delta is ready when they are.
As for Trump being racist, sheesh,
only registered users can see external links
Remember the Platinum plan? Remember lowest unemployment for all races during his term?
--------------------------------------- added after 10 minutes
Adult Humnan Female, or what?
I am against abortion-murder when it is used for cases like you mentioned,women just running around with men every night using it like a douche bag.
Some states already have trigger abortion laws that went into effect immediately after the Supreme Court decision. Some of them have no provision in case of r@pe or !nsest.
Statistics show that promiscuous women or what is referred to as the modern woman, do use contraception and protection. Many are on the pill and most carry condoms to prevent STD’s. It’s unusual for them to get pregnant and, if they do, they have the financial ability to get help.
The problem is with women who are too poor to afford protection, women that home life is not conducive to have protection and, yes, women that are irresponsible, like drug addicts.
why is home life not conducive? we need to fix that. Are they being abused? If so,prosecute.
only registered users can see external links
New Comment Go to top