Page #59
Pages: #1... #54 #55 #56 #57 #58 #59 #60 #61 #62 #63 ...#200|
Started by #610414 [Ignore] 14,May,20 02:51
New Comment Rating: 3 Similar topics: 1.Food stuff 2.STUFF, JUST STUFF 3.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF 4.A Forum Topic 5.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF II Comments: | ||
You must be logged in to post here. Log in
only registered users can see external links
Ohio has rejected a Republican motion to make it harder to change the state's constitution - a move seen as a defeat for anti-abortion groups.
Women should be free and in control of their own body. They shouldn't be owned by any government or religion.
I would be interested to know how many of the Americans have even heard about this.
Why are some foreigners so absorbed with American politics, you ask?
People might understand that, if they know the 'boiling frog' analogy.
If that frog just concerned Americans, foreigners would just be sorry for them.
We would say: "It's what they want. Maybe they'll learn eventually.".
Unfortunately, America controls the fate of the rest of the world, for a huge part.
We are in that pan with you, but unlike you, we know how much it's getting hotter.
We are looking for ears, but frogs don't seem to have them. AAAAAAAAAAH!!!
This story deals with an issue in the state of Ohio and it’s more about a state constitutional issue than about abortion. However, it shows the intent of the voters, both on the left and the right. Republicans chose to get involved with women’s health and reproductive issues. It’s fueled by the religious right and the majority of the electorate is pushing back.
This could be a pivotal point in the coming 2024 election along with the economy.
and saving the world, you're fight is over returning the rights of women over their own bodies, which they had for decades. And you're not winning much.
The 'one step forward, two steps back' approach is not going to cut it.
You're only forced to fight this battle, because Democrats didn't protect this right enough. They let Republicans put extremists in the supreme court way too easy
and they didn't fight at all to get in their moderates into the supreme court.
Even if you think that it wouldn't have changed the outcome, the fight still matters.
Republicans are always fighting hard, mean and dishonest, and Democrats are
just playing pet-a-cake. Not even Bernie Sanders is being tough when it matters.
He didn't dare to criticize Biden or Hillary in the primaries once and then he lost.
He would have crushed Trump, and you would not be forced to fight the battle
over abortion again. Most of the time the people who fight the hardest win.
I'm not saying that Bernie should run, but Democrats should open the primaries
and let everyone run. Then I hope you all choose well. It's the time for it.
only registered users can see external links
Republicans tried every way to stand against the will of the people.
If you base it on the teaching of Jesus or humanism, yes what Republicans do
is unethical, but if you base it on the self-aggrandizement of a lying, narcissistic, fake-populist, criminal man-baby, with a bad case of affluenza, then you can rationalize every despicable act to yourself.
New thread.
DeSantis is a lot smarter than Trump, but MAGA doesn't like smart people.
And DeSantis has no charisma, which is the only thing MAGA cares about.
It stands for Make America great again it’s not a group what is Biden’s catch phrase M G P A
Make Geritol plentiful again
--------------------------------------- added after 2 minutes
And how do you like the catch phrase i came up with for Biden he should use that as his campaign slogan
Of course I knew. That's what your movement is called now,
no matter how ironic that feels to people outside of it.
You're literally calling for the destruction of the government,
while you have no ideas on how to build something back up again.
Trump didn't invent the term MAGA though.
only registered users can see external links
"Make America Great Again" (MAGA) is a campaign slogan used by American politicians. It was first used by Ronald Reagan during his 1980 presidential campaign. The term was created in 1979 during a time in which the United States was suffering from a worsening economy at home marked by high unemployment and inflation.
only registered users can see external links
It's fully deserved, Crowder is an asshole to many people.
only registered users can see external links
"Back in 1991, Biden made another troubling prediction.
According to a speech he gave at the Detroit College of Law, the future forty-sixth president asserted that he’d be dead-and-buried by the year 2020.
Well, Biden was wrong about that, too.
Not only is Biden still kicking but he’s running the country (right into the ground)."
only registered users can see external links
While the liberals are wading in pools of hatred for a FORMER President, the 1 in there now is far worse than anyone that has been there before. only 1 is about as bad ratings wise, and that was Carter .And frankly, I think Carter wasn't a really bad guy, he just was not qualified for the job.I don't know of any criminal activity linked to him as serious as treason and bribery either.
--------------------------------------- added after 2 hours
"I AM THE AI" says the fellow that can't find his way around.
only registered users can see external links
Velcro or strings?
only registered users can see external links
This is the guy that the liberals are trusting with the nuclear codes now.
We are in a sad state of affairs in the USA right now.And some people are to fucking dumb to understand it.
When you can't afford to buy grocerys, people are worried about problems the government uses the media to drum up instead. like "climate change" "equity", etc.
Hell, lets burn some diesel and get some beans and taters on the tables of ALL Americans ,hunger,and homelessness are 2 things that could be fixed, but no,let's waste time on "climate change".
Do you just like how they kill a lot of Muslims and steal their land?
Or just because they are crazy conservative and anti-democratic, like you?
So, now you know that; why do you care so much about Israel?
because you already have oil, but you're really lacking knowledge.
I can highly recommend the movie 'Where to Invade Next' by Michael Moore.
only registered users can see external links
Live like donkeys and fight. And have oil under their feet that could give them better lives thru employment and selling the resources. But yet ,let's fight.
And you are telling me we need to invade country's to learn something besides how to fight?
When we went into afganistan, it shoulda been bombed to a point a mouse would go stir crazy looking for a corner.
When we left iraq, same. All those people killed chasing after a terrorist that was behind our towers getting bombed and then they walked right back into the government as soon as we pulled out. The country,the oil, was not worth it,should bomb it still
And with zero amount of oil. Same with Egypt. Afghanistan is not in the Middle East.
Then you have people like you, who support genocide, just because some terrorist is hiding in that country, while you pretend to be more civilized.
I don't consider eliminating the terrorist behind the 911 event to be a genocide. It was to try to prevent further attacks from a known enemy.
It might have been true, that Osama bin laden fled to Afghanistan, it might have been a lie. Obama finally caught up with him in Pakistan, remember? There were surely Al Qaeda / bin Laden sympathizers in Afghanistan.
No evidence was ever presented, that they were in any way involved in planning 9/11 though. No Afghans were among the hijackers! There were certainly terrorists, that hated the US and the rest of modern civilization, but they mostly threatened their own region. The US killed about 50,000 citizens to try to destroy an ideology. If there is an ideology of hate against you building, killing civilians doesn't help much to combat it, it makes it worse.
Then Bush started to actively implicate Iraq and Saddam Hussein in 9/11. That was an absolute lie! Your war-hawks just had Iraq on their hitlist and they CREATED an opportunity to fulfill their plans. That war resulted in the deaths of about a million innocent people and the deaths of 4,431 US soldiers and 31,994 wounded. It also released the terror ideology over the whole region, creating the exact opposite of what you are saying you want to destroy; extremist Muslim fundamentalism and anti-west ideology.
I would have agreed with Bush bombing terrorist hideouts and training grounds, to 'prevent further attacks from a known enemy'. However, he was either the biggest fool in human history or he didn't care about that.
Bush's actions resulted in the exact opposite. I don't believe Bush was that stupid, he only cared about making even more money from oil and the priorities of war-hawks, not about the safety of Americans.
Besides lying the world into a horrible and very expensive war, Bush committed many war crimes. He should have been tried and imprisoned for it, but of course, you love treasonous, criminal presidents.
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
Strange how Israel is clean and the Palestinian area has shit running down the streets.
only registered users can see external links
Why would Palestinians need to give up their land for the Jews?
The Palestinians had nothing to do with the Nazis exterminating Jews.
It would have been fair to give the Jews like a quarter of Germany.
How would you have liked it if Jews were given half of the state you live in
and you had to move, because it's their country now?
If you thought about it, instead of just spewing your bias, you would understand how an overpopulated open prison, that gets bombed every other day, turns to shit after a while.
The current conflict between the Israelís and Palestinians dates back to the late 1800’s
It has mostly been called Palestine. Israel has never existed, until 1948.
Jews don't have any more claim to that region than the Palestinians have.
The international community just accepts Jews being horrible land robbers,
because 6 million of them were exterminated by the Nazis. But, I think that's bullshit; we shouldn't allow atrocities to make up for atrocities.
I don't believe there will be any lasting peace ever.
Calling the Palestinians the aggressors is like calling Ukrainians the aggressors. It's the exact same thing. It's just the side that your government
is supporting, that's different between those two cases.
Israel doesn't have much power to stop most wars. Why should they?
They're not in a war, they are just facing resistance from the people
they are stealing their houses and land from.
Who says you and other's should leave them the hell alone?
I'm not. They still deserve some protection against another genocide,
but the UN should make that protection dependent on them not doing
a genocide themselves.
Since the US broke the nuclear deal, it's not clear if they have nukes.
Israel has its big buddy the US, but Iran has Russia.
Only a few nukes are enough to wipe Israel off the map.
Would the US really back Israel, if they start that shit?
I don't think Israel is stupid enough to try that.
Now you turn it around. Neither one can attack, without it becoming a tragedy, for everyone involved. That's when mortal enemies are able to coincide peacefully.
Of course Israel should be able to defend itself, they are surrounded
by Muslim extremists. That doesn't require stealing houses and land, and putting the people who used to live there in a concentration camp.
If your methods to protect yourself become worse than the methods
of your enemy, you turn yourself into the villain.
New Comment Go to top