Page #3
Pages: #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9 #10 ...#60
New Comment Rating: 0 Similar topics: 1.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF 2.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF II 3.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF III 4.Be honest!! 5.Is this about you 🤷♂️, those that live in glass houses should not throw stones. Comments: | ||
You must be logged in to post here. Log in
You know, they are acting like the world has ended.
Black people are very forgetful.
only registered users can see external links
They had the lowest unemployment rate their race has ever known during Trump
Are they mad because they will have to return to work?
whoever wrote this is 1 depressed individual.
only registered users can see external links
BUT to qoute 2 lines,
"Today is for suffering."
"I don’t give a shit anymore"
And that is what is bad, when anyone doesn't care anymore, nothing can be accomplished.
If you aint a CITIZEN You don't vote
only registered users can see external links
California passed a anticrime bill.
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
Obama was loved and respected almost everywhere.
Trump is ridiculed everywhere, except in dictatorships.
Bush was being made fun off by all of the modern world.
Biden is a wash. He is ridiculed for being too old and still running,
but he was also respected a lot.
You're just believing what you want to believe, it's at odds with with reality.
There was a poll in my country, showing 68% would vote for Harris and 11% for Trump.
only registered users can see external links
It's skewed by the voters for FvD (Forum for Democracy), but they only have 3 of the 149 seats in the House of Representatives. Clowns supporting a clown.
I was surprised that even Geert Wilders's voters prefer Harris over Trump.
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
Trump’s claims about economic catastrophe under Harris seem particularly ironic given that the stock market is currently near record highs, and multiple analysts paint a different picture than his dire predictions. For instance, Goldman Sachs projects real GDP growth of 2% or more from 2025 to 2027, while Moody’s economists actually forecast more robust economic growth under Harris (2.1%) compared to Trump (1.3%).
only registered users can see external links
but when you ask him, he says: "I know so much about that subject, that I cannot even answer your question.".
How long has he been promising to make healthcare great now?
How says he now has a "concept of a plan". Wow, great.
Meanwhile he says the $35 for insulin was his idea,
but every Republican voted against it.
They are going to destroy healthcare for everyone, and then come to the realization that his "concept of a plan" is bullshit.
Which I voted TRUMP last thursday, and at least 4 others did do because i was able to glance at their ballots, none of us were ashamed and didn't bother hiding them ,and 2 were women.
But, he has admitted to make shit up, to point to a real problem.
If there is a real problem, why do you need to make shit up?
That's not "only speaking the truth", that's LYING!
"harris is apparently in aggreement with what has happened and wouldn't change anything" Can you be even less specific?
There is a huge list of what Harris is planning to do.
About 95% of it has the approval of the American people.
Such a list exists for what Trump is planning.
It has about 50% approval of the American people.
Some of his plans only have 24% approval of the American people.
More than half of his policies have below 50% approval.
Only about 5% of Harris's policies have below 50% approval.
Among their own voters Harris has higher support than Trump.
Even among Trump voters, Harris's policies are 50% popular.
When they were asked, they thought those were Trump's policies.
That's because Trump supporters don't inform themselves.
only registered users can see external links
Go to the bottom of the page, for poll results on their policy proposals.
Except at cocksucking. Trump knows how to suck cock way better.
He's sucking the cocks of wealthy assholes 24/7.
I didn't hear Kamala openly fantasize about a dead man's giant cock for 10 minutes.
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
On September 22, 1975, Sara Jane Moore attempted to assassinate the 38th President of the United States, Gerald Ford, after he had made an address to the World Affairs Council.[1] Moore fired two shots at President Ford with a .38 Special revolver, both of which missed. Ford had survived a previous assassination attempt 17 days earlier, and after the second attempt, President Ford would wear a bulletproof trench coat while out in public. On January 15, 1976, Moore was sentenced to life in prison for the attempt, and on December 31, 2007, was released on parole.
The presidents who anger the other side are not necessary the great ones.
Some are just evil fucks that screw over people, which angers people.
I agree that president who don't rock the boat much are probably not going
to get murdered, because the elites don't have an incentive to incite the people
to hate that president. It's the presidents who work the hardest for the working class, who anger the owner class, and who are in danger of getting assassinated.
Ronald Reagan is not one of those, he did everything the owner class wanted.
Trump turned out to be a cuck for the elites too. Tax-cuts for the wealthy!
I'm sure socialists are dreaming of killing them, but they know those presidents
are not the disease, but the symptom. They will just become a martyr, resulting
in a worse one next. People who try to kill presidents like that are just loners
who have nothing to lose.
It's a joke Ananas,it's a joke,
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
to be able to support your useless politicians.
I'm socially liberal towards the people and a die hard socialist towards the owner class. I want everyone to have a choice in what to eat, but I want the owner class to be forced to provide better choices, at incentivizing prices.
You're humiliating yourself by showing that you still don't understand these things, after I have explained it all ad nauseam.
I want to change the world by putting demands on the powerful people.
You want to stop change by making normal people obey your demands.
You accuse my side of forcing you to eat tofu, while your side is causing
your inability to afford steak.
Your sentence about high labor cost and working for free is unintelligible.
I explained my opinions about labor often enough. Every job should earn a
living wage. If some jobs are not important enough to justify a living wage,
then those jobs should disappear and people should spend their time on
more important jobs.
I add to that; the negative effects of a production process should be minimized and the remaining negative effects should be accounted for in the price of the end product. If that makes some products cost more, than to me that is a feature, not a bug. It is exactly the incentive I want for people to make the better choices. I only want to correct for that, if unhealthy products are cheaper than healthy products. I would want taxation to make the healthy products cheaper and the unhealthy products more expensive. That's not "forcing you to eat tofu", because tofu isn't even that healthy and isn't even environmentally friendly. It might result in a vegetarian burger made from beans and mushrooms being cheaper than a beef burger. That's because the meat industry is heavily subsidized now and society pays for their damages. I want to make meat compete with other products on a level playing field and I want the consumption of meat paying for it's own health damage.
I support a world where there are no people who don't have the freedom to make their own choices for the food they eat due to lack of money, especially not for disabled people. People who don't want to work shouldn't be fed filet mignon every day, but I still support a system where they shouldn't be forced to eat beans every day. The incentive to work should come from it being rewarded, for everyone, not just for the elites that you worship.
With that logic, the vegi burger should be taxed so it cost the same as the meat based burger, so both companys producing the product have a level playing field and the customer will choose the 1 they WANT to pay for with their money.
When you have More people than important jobs, what do you do with the people?
No soybeans on my plate
Also, my girlfriend is allergic to soy, so we never eat it.
I'm not a vegetarian, but we do have meatless days sometimes.
There are better products out there nowadays.
Mostly, we have cut down on beef and pork, to exchange it for chicken.
Chicken is just much better for the planet, than other meat.
It's also much healthier, than other meat.
There is an oversupply of chicken legs and other chicken pieces
in my country, because most people buy chicken fillet. Since there are
no chickens with just fillets, all the other parts are exported, all over
the world. By eating those other parts, I'm saving the carbon emissions
from the transportation.
[Soy contains isoflavones, which are converted in the body to phytoestrogens, similar to human estrogen that occurs naturally in both men and women. Theoretically, a high isoflavone intake could stimulate production of estrogen and decrease production of testosterone, with one result being enlarged breast tissue.]
I'm not a vegetarian, I like meat. I am trying to eat healthier though.
And I find it is very expensive to do so.
However, it was just an example of a poor man's diet compared to a rich man's diet. Meat is extremely cheap, if you compared it with the actual costs of farming and processing. Fruit and vegetables are very expensive, if you compared it with the actual costs of farming and processing.
The cheapest food in the supermarket are all the most unhealthy foods.
The most healthy food, which is also the least polluting food, is the most expensive food.
Why is that, do you think?
Meanwhile, vegi based burgers are sold at much higher profit margins in supermarkets, because people who care about their health are willing to pay more for it.
It all results in poor people having much higher rates of obesity, heart disease and diabetes, because they don't have the choice you are referring to.
I'm not taking away choice, I'm taking away the skewed priorities affecting people's choices. Instead of hurting nature and hurting people's health, because profit incentives created a system where unhealthy food is cheap and healthy food is expensive, I want to correct that.
Do you understand the costs for society, if you allow profit incentives to make healthy food artificially more expensive?
Why is it only choice, if people choose the bad option?
Isn't it choice, if they have to pay more for unhealthy food?
We are carnivores by nature. People willing to pay more for the so called "healthy" food is the reason the damn price is high.Because the companys know they will pay the high price, that is essentially price gouging.
Just like you, we cannot even take a shit, without paying through
our nose. Any toilet paper that doesn't cut open your ass, is about $1
per roll now.
One 250 ml bottle of Axe showergel is $6.35.
One pound of Dutch young cheese is $6.79.
One liter of milk is $1.61.
The cheapest loaf of fresh factory whole wheat bread is $1.07.
One pack of orange juice from concentrate (1.5L) is $4.73.
One bottle of Coca Cola (1.5L) is $2.79.
One avocado is $1.46.
One bunch (1 kg) of Chiquita bananas is $2.36.
One five-pack of Snickers bars (50 g/bar) is $3.12.
One family bottle of liquid detergent (2.07 Liter) is $32.33.
One six-pack (half liters) of national brand beer is $9.33.
How does that compare to your supermarket prices?
My government has introduced a sugar tax to make unhealthy products more expensive. The problem is that they include fruit juice without added sugar as a product with sugar, because it contains fruit sugars.
That's stupid in my opinion. They also promised to reduce the sales-tax on vegetables and fruit, but they didn't deliver on that, because they couldn't agree on a definition of vegetables and fruit.
That was our previous right-wing government and the right-wing populists promised to eliminate stupid things like that. Now they're the biggest party and they remember none of their promises. The first thing they did is give tax-cuts to big companies and equity investors and now they are saying they have to cut costs for education and healthcare, raise the income tax, raise the tax on sport, culture and tourism. Instead of as planned, reducing the tax-benefits for expats, they are keeping them. Expats are just well educated IMMIGRANTS. Expats are pulling down wages for good jobs, but they are pulling up prices for houses. They are also not doing anything about the Eastern European job migrants that come here by the hundreds of thousands. They only focus on the 46,000 refugees that came here in 2024, blaming them for the housing crisis.
In other words; the right-wing populists are showing from day 1 that
they are useless liars.
You lot always point to Biden for those price increases, but you cannot point to any action that would cause it. These price increases are global, so how did Biden cause that?
In my country, ribeye steaks are about €30-€40 per kg in the supermarket, which is $14.69-$19.59 per pound. I don't know how much your two pack weighs.
Meat has increased in price so much, because of the Russian war on Ukraine. Both Russia and Ukraine produced a large percentage of the world grain supply. Ukraine's production has mostly been destroyed and Russia is sanctioned. The resulting shortage in grain caused higher grain prices. Cattle eats a lot of grain, resulting in higher beef prices.
Are you so petty as to blame the Russians' attack on Ukraine on Biden too? The only difference between Biden and Trump, towards Russia is that Trump loves Putin and Biden doesn't. Think of the effects of that in the long run. A higher price for food is the last of your worries then.
Do you think more Russians are eating steak than you?
They are mandated to buy food that kills them.
No matter what you do, beef is bad for you.
We are not carnivores by nature, we are omnivores.
Our whole biology is evolved to eat mostly fruit and vegetables
and sometimes a little protein.
YES, PRICE GAUGING!!! When companies know they can jack up the price of products that you need to survive or stay healthy, they WILL DO IT! That's capitalism! That's why I want to heavily regulate food and turn healthcare into a public utility, without any profit incentives.
Sometimes, you see a sliver of truth. Then your indoctrination kicks in.
To you, it's always the people's fault, when the powerful screw you.
People could have so much power, if they resisted the indoctrination.
and never something that is actually close to reality.
Meanwhile, Republican presidents put your country in a crisis every time.
How many times does it need to happen again, before you see that pattern?
New Comment Go to top