Page #3
Pages: #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9 #10 ...#82
New Comment Rating: 0 Similar topics: 1.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF 2.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF II 3.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF III 4.Be honest!! 5.Is this about you 🤷♂️, those that live in glass houses should not throw stones. Comments: | ||
You must be logged in to post here. Log in
wow, peace and quite, companionship,
only registered users can see external links
My belief is you have got to be happy with the version that you are currently in a relationship with. Thinking that the person will be “perfect (or better) if only…..” and thinking that you can be instrumental in orchestrating their change is so wrong! Their change will only happen when they truly want to change. How many movie stars, rock stars, TV personalities, local drug addicts, etc are you aware of who are admitted into whatever facility or program and fail multiple times? Some would continually fail and getting clean NEVER HAPPENS! Sadly, this happens all of the time! People/suitors need to realize and understand that they get what they get. So either accept it or get the heck out of the relationship.
number 10 hits home for me by the way i answered by pm instead of here a bit personal
but as for trying to help someone recover from dope and alky, yea, being family members were able to quit drinking cold turkey, i see no reason everyone can't. but some are determined to self destruct and you can't help them. i remembered this gal for what and who she was before a punk in my high school class got her hooked on pot then it became not enough. she was extremely smart, very attractive, green thumb, but once she got ahold of pot then dope at 17 it was a down hill spiral. sadly the 27th of this month her parents are going to court to try to pension the state to take over her care as they are elderly and she has turned violent again, she threw her 80 year old mother onto the floor in febuary and about killed her. she is tied to a hospital bed as i type. that 3rd suicide attempt about did the trick,but it ruined her brain instead.
wow, peace and quite, companionship,
only registered users can see external links
--------------------------------------- added after 29 seconds
.
--------------------------------------- added after 43 seconds
.
can't think of anyone that resembles anyone in this video, but at the 1 minute mark the fellow does speak the truth.
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
This video begins by showing an older man who is apparently dying. The person who is documenting the event pans the room that is filled with family and friends who are waiting for him to draw his last breath. Why are there 3 people on their phones? Are they checking to see whether their lottery ticket was a winner? Who in the frick uploads this kinda stuff and WHY?
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
It ain’t no joke when it comes time to pay that note
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
Crying about propaganda in classrooms and then literally do that.
PragerU is one of the worst partisan conservative filth channels in the world.
PragerU claimed "Being taken as a slave is better than being killed"
Instead of presenting them with clicks (find it yourself if you need),
here is the common sense reaction to that idea:
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
i don't mind a idea like this for the handicapped but normal people shouldn't be this lazy
um, i think some of us have mentioned this before,so it is real
only registered users can see external links
just a random murder and attempted murder,stopped by a gun .
only registered users can see external links
4.40,good question, won't cook or make em a sandwich but uses the man for sex.
Women are not property, they are other human beings.
Don't expect them to make your damn sandwiches. Be a grown-up!
some women understand that you work together to make a relation ship work but most don't. they have the pussy and you shall serve them like slaves to get any.
1 thing that i can agree with liberals on is prostitution should be legal. it would be much cheaper to pay 50 bucks once in a while than to have to buy flowers, jeweler, clothes ,houeses ,cars and etc, just to get a piece once a week and hen pecked the rest .
but in my country men and women do work together to make a relationship.
We work together, care for children together, do housework together.
Still many women chose to care more than the men. Freely, not compulsory.
Sex is something you share together. If it's some reward, you're not doing it right.
My girlfriend doesn't make the same money as I do, but she definitely doesn't spend more on herself than she brings in. We have shared financial goals for the future.
I bring in most of the money for that, I do most of the financial planning, but I do not sacrifice more luxury, comfort or spare time, than she does. We contribute to our future luxury, comfort or spare time together.
Also, my country has had right-wing politics in power for decades now.
Almost everything important is privatized in my country.
The only thing we do (still) have is some more social benefits.
Why we still have that, is because right-wing voters want to keep it.
Right-wing populists are promising left-wing benefits, like no increase on the retirement age, eliminating the deductible on health insurance, a rent-increase-freeze or subsistence security. However, when they get into power, they forget everything they promised, but it still makes it very difficult for them to actively destroy the social benefits that we have had for many decades now. They have to walk a tight rope.
The term 'equality' doesn't mean something different in different systems.
A strong short definition is: “Equality is the fair treatment of all people, giving them
the same rights, opportunities, and respect regardless of differences.”
If men earn more than women, for the same job, with the same performance, that is not 'equality', unless there are other job rewards for women, that men don't get, compensating for the difference in pay. You could say maternity leave is one of them, but equality is respecting differences. Society should not punish women for having
a womb and the burden to keep humanity from extinction.
If I have to speculate, then I say it's mostly a cultural thing. When a culture accepts the inequality, than it will result in the inequality, because employers will never pay more than they need to. Their bottom line is maximizing profit. If a culture doesn't accept the inequality, they will demand social rules and laws enforcing equality. It's that simple.
If you vote for a politician who outlaws DEI, you're basically saying: "We don't care about equality!". The result will be growing inequality.
not to mention all the time they have to take off to carry the kid to the dr and sport events and so forth. a man goes to work in the morning and goes home at the end of the day. no monthly periods, no need for maternity leave and so on. thus being more productive and a better investment of training and funds.
that is not to say women can't do the same job as a man in Most cases. but there is justification in difference in pay in most cases
you LIKE inequality. It doesn't matter if pregnancy is a choice, it's ONLY a choice
for women, which is a factor to consider, in relation to equality.
At least you can consider pregnancy a choice, but that's not an argument for the menstrual period. They indeed are quite affected in that period, which probably does affect their productivity. That's EXACTLY why equality means considering that as a factor, although a small one, that needs to be compensated.
If men were bleeding from their dicks every month,
we would have 4 days off from work every month.
Did you even read the definition of equality? You seem to not understand.
What do you think the "regardless of differences" part is about?
You're the one who kept yammering about 'men' in female sports.
How about women NOT being allowed to have 'equality' in sports?
"Sorry ladies, it's just fair that you lose in basketball from Shaquille O'Neal."
"What? Do you think you deserve special treatment? Sports is a CHOICE!"
woman needs to change pad every so often,what does a man do that is equal?
woman has 4 days of evil each month, what does a man have that is equal?
What do men do or are affected with, to make them less effective for their employer? Here are some examples:
Higher rates of risky behavior and injury — Men are statistically more likely to take physical risks, get into workplace accidents, or engage in dangerous hobbies that can lead to missed work days.
Shorter average lifespan — Men tend to die younger on average, which could mean (by that same twisted reasoning) less long-term return on training investment.
Higher incidence of certain health problems — Men have higher rates of heart disease and certain other conditions that can impair work capacity.
Lower performance in multitasking — Research shows that, on average, women often outperform men in multitasking and some forms of complex communication — skills relevant in many modern jobs.
That's not just a few days per month, that men are less effective than women.
but that would mean a society run by women would be different.
It would be brains over brawn, instead of the other way around.
I also think it would be a more peaceful society.
Men have fucked up this world pretty hard. Women wouldn't do that.
Men might have built a lot of things, but we are also very good at destruction.
because we would already have it.
Are you able to understand this very simple concept?
“Equality is the fair treatment of all people, giving them the same rights, opportunities, and respect REGARDLESS OF DIFFERENCES.”
The principle is that it is unfair to have people suffer consequences
for circumstances they have no control over, like being born a woman
or being born black or being born with poor parents or being disabled.
I know you disagree with that principle. You can explain your principle
until you're blue in the face, but it's not a lack of understanding, it's a difference in moral principles between us.
You keep focusing on the equality between men and women, but that is not the worst equality problem. The real problem is that some people make 500X more money than the people who work for them. Are those people 500X stronger? ALL of them have a "sissyfied office job". According to your own logic, they shouldn't make more money than the people who do the ACTUAL work, with their big brawny muscles, because they are probably weaker than some women. Can you explain that, without flipping your principles to something else?
stop expecting the worker to keep up the lazy, and the rich to keep up the lazy.
work,earn,enjoy, simple
Do you think they risk going hungry? Workers do, every single day.
Their bosses control their livelihoods 24/7. What risks do billionaires have? If they do something stupid, they fire all their employers and sell the parts of their investments. Often, even the government comes to their aid. During Covid, Trump dumped trillions of tax-dollars on them,
to save them from any losses and they became even wealthier, while people were waiting in food-lines and were at risk of losing their homes.
You really need to purge this dump propaganda from your brain.
Billionaires don't work, they have people work for them. It's the easiest job in the world, it only takes money, to make more money.
The only skill that the wealthiest of them have is talking a good game.
There is millions of people who can do that.
I predicted you would flip your arguments. First, how much you should earn is completely dependent on how much a person produces and now all the sudden it is dependent on taking more risk, by investing your money or investing in yourself and putting your ideas and labor out there. Any reason to say that women can't do that?
i can't explain why some people are content doing little as possible to survive. that is lack of motivation perhaps?
In your country, most people work their asses off.
It's not lack of motivation, it's lack of opportunity.
When you're born as a serf in the US, their is almost no chance
of becoming a lord. The lords made sure of that, with your support.
that is bullshit that opportunity is not there. it just not taken by most. to lazy and no desire for improvement.
Netherlands: ~32.4 hours/week
Austria: ~33.7 hours/week
Germany and Denmark: ~34–34.6 hours
In one breath you call Americans lazy, in the other you are telling me that many American make it from rags to riches. You don't present statistics, you present anecdotal evidence. First of all Lee Iacocca is ancient history by now. Back then, there was still a lot of opportunity in the US. Your politics has destroyed that opportunity. It made education unaffordable, it destroyed small businesses and it gave the wealthy a dominant position to kick people, who try to make it, back down. Amazon is literally selling products under cost, until their competition is dead. Then they have a monopoly, so they can raise the price of the product to whatever they want.
How many times have I presented you the 'opportunity' data?
The US is 27th in the world. The top 10 countries are:
Denmark
Norway
Finland
Sweden
Iceland
Switzerland
Netherlands
Belgium
Austria
Luxembourg
You have supported the idea that entrepreneurship is the best way to make it big, right? In the US, self-employment percentage is 10.1%. In my country it's 16.8%.
Self-employed also are van drivers, who get exploited like crazy.
In my country, there are still many more Lee Iacoccas than in yours.
What mostly remains in the US, is from riches to kings, like Elon.
He came to your country with blood-emerald mine money.
The top 10 richest people all came from families that could support their higher education.
1. Elon Musk: Studied physics and economics at the University of Pennsylvania.
2. Larry Ellison: Studied computer science at the University of Illinois and the University of Chicago.
3. Jeff Bezos: Degrees in electrical engineering and computer science from Princeton University.
4. Mark Zuckerberg: Studied computer science at Harvard University.
5. Steve Ballmer: Graduated from Harvard University with a degree in mathematics and economics.
6. Larry Page: Degree in computer science from the University of Michigan.
7. Jensen Huang: Studied electrical engineering at Oregon State University and Stanford University.
8. Sergey Brin: Degree in mathematics and computer science from the University of Maryland and also studied at Stanford University.
9. Warren Buffett: Studied at the University of Pennsylvania and Columbia Business School.
10. Bernard Arnault: Studied at the École Polytechnique.
No poor family can pay for an education like they all had.
Here is a review of her debate about women's sexual freedom, with some feminists.
only registered users can see external links
Why do the people who represent your opinions feel the need to lie so much?
Can't they find anything that's true, supporting your opinions?
New Comment Go to top