|
New Comment Rating: -1 Similar topics: 1.Cum isn't stored in the balls!!! 2.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF 3.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF II 4.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF III 5.Is this about you 🤷♂️, those that live in glass houses should not throw stones. Comments: |
only registered users can see external links
Come to think of it, I haven't saw omar so mad since her brother forgot their honey moon!
I wonder how it felt to her last week having her home invaded like the dems did to Trump and Mar largo? I also wonder if the agents dug thru her panties like they did Melanias? to get dna samples, may have needed to.
--------------------------------------- added after 5 hours
Not only did she marry her brother but her 1st daughter is of inc--t. which is yet another illegal action. I guess liberals will be defending that next. it's ok to marry and get prego from your bro
only registered users can see external links
Won't be as long as we think before the replacators on the Star ship Enterprise will be yet another out of date tech like the flat screen tv and hand held flip phones. Just think,no trips to mandomi's 911 grocery store, just stand in your kitchen and say, " Hamburger" and poof!
all of MAGA is going to accept it, eat it and defend it.
MAGA loves an immigrant billionaire who makes his money from electric cars
and space shit, paid for with your tax-dollars, because he turned Twitter
into the source for their daily rage-bait.
You have choices. The choices of voters got you where you are now,
and the choices of voters can turn you back on a better track too.
Lots of politicians on the the left do not take corporate money and there are more of them now. Some libertarians also do not take corporate money, but they are a dying breed. Overturning Citizens United isn't easy, but they got it in too.
All of them are corrupt....does not matter what side....left and right are just labels .....
It's a lot easier to buy politicians than voters....
That's exactly what they want you to believe.
Then you don't hold them accountable.
No money in peace is there,America has been a war economy for centuries...do you think anything has changed ?Global banking built on a FIAT system that fucks consumers not corporations,guarantee continuing debt and interest payments from nations under the guise of monetary aid ,knowing full well those developing economies will fuck it up unable to keep up interest.
EU is a copy of the USA....it's just a banking cartel....all the freedom of movement and unity stuff,free trade etc,is a ploy to own the currency.....
France is bankrupting Africa with CFA franc which bankrolls the French treasury to buy USA treasury bonds,while China buys the mines...
And you think you can hold these people accountable....?hilarious
Everything you said about the IMF, debt traps, and the global economy has truth
to it. But treating it like an unchangeable 'death cult' means giving up before the fight even starts. Change has never come from the top down; it’s always pushed from the outside. The labor rights we have, environmental regulations, local consumer protections, none of that was handed down by benevolent bankers.
It was clawed back by cynical, tired voters who still chose to do something rather than shrug and say 'it's all a cartel.' Cynicism feels smart because it's never wrong about how bad things are, but it never built anything better either.
If they didn't think that your opinion matters, and they had it all in the bag, they wouldn't spend so much money on campaign ads for Republicans and corporate Democrats. They also wouldn't have the corporate media attack the left constantly. There's a good reason why the left is their enemy, and it's not to defend the rights of working people.
You talk about activism on a small scale...that's nationalism.....EU doesn't like nationalists....that's why they want open borders and single currency.You're not anti EU now are you ?EU is stripping away nations right to govern themselves bit by bit....who does that benefit the most,it's the corporations not individuals..
Change is supposed to come from the top,that's why you vote...but guess what,they are already compromised by the time they get to office....quid pro quo...
At the most basic human mindset....it which everyone has to ask themselves "what's in it for me?".....people pick a side based on what is in it for them,they rarely do it out of principles...
As me being a cynic ,so what,I'm not smart at all....I'm just expressing my thoughts
AOC is NOT a millionaire and Nancy Pelosi is FAR from being a socialist. Pelosi is a corporate centrist Democrat, who takes lost of campaign donations from the wealthy. She hates progressives, leftists and socialists just as much as any Republican, because they are a threat to her wealth, that is based on corruption.
Just don't think that Pelosi's corruption is worse than any Republican's.
"Change is supposed to come from the top"? Who told you that? In history, change has almost always been fought, bled and died over. The only time you could say something like that was when your founding fathers wrote The Constitution, but don't think that the working class had nothing to do with that. People were fed-up with a ruling class sending them off to die in wars, and the elites were afraid to end up at the end of a pitchfork.
I am not against the EU in principle, but I am very much against how it is organized to favor the wealthy and corporations. The Socialist Party is also
not against European cooperation, but we fight against the EU power grab constantly, and fight for countries to retain their sovereignty and self-determination.
You are right about people's selfish nature. So, what makes people give up
their "what's in it for me?" reasoning, when they want to give up all their rights
as workers, their pension, their social safety net, to further enrich some wealthy assholes who think that they deserve everything they take, and YOU deserve nothing?
You might be smarter than you think, because you ask better questions than most. Your thoughts are very anti-establishment. I can relate to that, but why do you think that AOC is the establishment? She was despised by both parties, when voters made her a representative. Remember how she was dismissed as a stupid waitress? They spat on her as a peasant. And now she has some money, she is the establishment? Who told you this nonsense?
Let's say AOC will keep her current function for the next 40 years. Elon Musk makes the same money in 7 minutes and 46 seconds. And he went on stage
with a chainsaw joking about cutting government money. Since then, he got
$38 BILLION in total government funding, loans, subsidies, and tax credits.
AOC would need to keep her function for 218,391 years to earn that.
During WW 2, victory gardens were the thing,the stack of old news papers I have show ads encouraging them. not if but WHEN we have WW 3, most of the damn liberals will starve to death because if they can't go to starbucks they go hungry and thirsty
for decades. Your country allows chemicals and processes for your food that other countries are mortified about. That's because it makes the manufactures more profit.
That is more important than your health. Don't act like this is something new.
I am sure you have bought gasoline, but diesel? that is what most farm machines run on. Have you bought fertilizer ? Have you tried to plant a crop,and save your own seeds and wind up gettting sued? So then have you bought seed every year?
I could go on but that will be enough for the example.
You over regulate the energy sector,it makes the diesel go up.you over regulate the industry making fertilizer,it goes up, you continue to allow seed companys to hold patents on "their" seed and there is a cost that goes up every year. all this and more to produce food period,regardless of healthy or slop. can't you see the problems that regulation can cause? you can only see the 1s it prevents.
Well, make you billionaires do it then. That's what you say you have them for.
• Percy Schmeiser (199
• Systemic Enforcement: Studies by groups like the Center for Food Safety note that agrochemical companies have filed hundreds of patent-infringement lawsuits against small farmers and seed cleaners.
Been a problem for years
Oh and yea, farmers get sued and such for saving rain water to.
1800 people arrested, buildings burned,welcome to 2026, the new world order
only registered users can see external links
Do you think that taxes on labor are more fair?
You own your body, you provide your time and your energy,
and then someone says "30% of what you just made is mine!".
The government needs money. Where do you want it to come from?
Do you believe in the principle of "Those with the broadest shoulders
should bear the heaviest burden"?
At least he has some property. Why do people who own NOTHING still pay taxes for the ONLY thing they have? As soon as their taxed labor allows them to own a roof over their head, a thing they need to survive, they pay property taxes. The property tax in the US
is about 1%. You pay that, even if your mortgage is higher than the value of your home.
Elon Musk own companies and property valued around 1 TRILLION dollars.
He pays roughly $930,000 annually in property taxes. His companies usually secure
100% property tax exemptions and there is no wealth tax. That means that Elon Musk pays ~0.00009% annually over his ownership. He also doesn't pay taxes over his labor, because he is paid in stock options. He only pays taxes when he sells them, which he almost never does, because he lives of personal loans, using his Tesla and SpaceX
stock holdings as collateral.
So, some people pay 1% over property that the bank owns and other people pay
almost nothing for property that they fully own and makes them money.
Now you know that, do you think differently about what that nice man was saying?
"The average effective property tax rate in the United States is approximately 0.8%
to 1.1% of a home's assessed or market value (with a national median rate hovering around 0.9% to 1.02%)"
A government ought to hold a higher moral standard than the criminals it punishes.
They fucked up. That’s the reason she survived. Just shooting her brains out would have been less cruel than what they’ve done to her. But that would LOOK brutal.
It would destroy the sanitized image that allows this practice to continue.
And that, to me, is part of the problem. Some Americans need the people who commit horrific acts to be monsters, because it is easier to condemn monsters than to confront the failures of the society that produced them. Others couldn’t accept the brutality of state killing, so they made the killing look less brutal instead.
That’s how you end up with this: not a society becoming more humane, but a society finding cleaner ways to present its brutality. The United States keeps refusing to confront the uglier parts of human nature and its own failures, and instead keeps finding ways to sanitize them. At some point, a nation that considers itself civilized
has to grow beyond that.
AND reject Israel for committing a horrible genocide.
The actions of Israel do not get rid of the threat, it motivated millions of Muslims all around the world to hate them even more. Jewish people are suffering from more antisemitism because of this. Not everyone can make a mental separation between Jewish people
and Israel's genocide. You should understand that, because you cannot make a mental separation between individual Muslims and Islamic terrorists.
only registered users can see external links
By the way, satellite internet SUCKS:
• High Latency: Traditional satellites sit over 22,000 miles in space.
This distance causes data delays, making live online gaming, video calls,
and fast browsing feel sluggish.
• Weather Disruptions: Heavy rain, snow, and dense cloud cover can easily weaken
or block the signal (a problem known as rain fade).
• Strict Data Caps: Many providers strictly limit your monthly high-speed data.
Once you hit that limit, they drastically throttle (slow down) your speeds.
• Network Congestion: You share bandwidth with everyone else in your region.
During peak evening hours, speeds often plummet.
• High Setup Costs: The upfront cost for the dish and router is typically very expensive compared to standard cable or fiber setups.
for less remote areas, with much larger communities, and forcing them to rely on Starlink, because that fills Elon Musk's pockets.
Trump got his donations, Musk gets people who stay dependent on crap satellite internet,
and lots of tax-dollars for his business, and Americans get fucked over.
By the way, you pay about twice as much as we do, for worse internet.
On a simple comparison website, I have the choice of 68 different internet subscriptions from 8 different companies. The cheapest one is $315,83 for a YEAR for 30 Mbit/s down and 3 Mbit/s up. I could have 2000 Mb/s up/down fiber for $434,46 for a YEAR or 8000 Mb/s up/down fiber for $718,81 for a YEAR. Those are all stable wired connections,
without hidden added costs for equipment. Adding phone or TV subscriptions will result
in discounts, but it is harder to compare TV services.
Currently, I have 100 Mbit/s down and 10 Mbit/s up, which is more than I need,
but my provider is working to replace all copper with glass, so I will be transferred
to something faster in a while.
Throwaway oil plugs, when they used to last the life of the car unless a dimwit got ahold of it.
only registered users can see external links
Things like these plugs are easy to recycle or burn.
AngelofDeath
Mentally retarded and physically deformed drunken bogan mouth breather that can’t get attention on his own so using AI rage bait to get off with all the idiots that thinks it’s really a chick nope just a desperate weirdo you yank to behind the ai
Maybe its time to move on luv, if not, you opinions on this profile mean nothing to me, just like your best friend bella! opinions about me.
Maybe you should get a puppy for a new hobby 🤷♂️.
WELL!! Not sure I've ever witnessed this side of you!
I do like it!
😆😂🤣
New Comment Go to top