Tired of ads on this site? | Become an expert in pussy licking! She'll Beg You For More! | Stay Hard as Steel!!! | Get Paid For Using Social Sites! |
New Comment Rating: 12 Similar topics: 1.RAND0M BULLSHIT 2.The ORIGINAL "Random Bullshit" thread is now in the Dumpster 3.RANDOM STUFF..... 4.RANDOM STUFF, JUST FUCKING BULLSHIT STUFF 5.RANDOM BULLSHIT Comments: |
The crazy thing is, I tried to contact this member, however the member "closes chat completely", meaning he does not accept private messages at all, zero, zip, nada!
It's kinda like SYD members who declare they are straight and will accept comments/votes from other SYD members but don't message them!
In my own case any male who messages me will always get a reply. Some times this initial message leads to a longer correspondence, sometimes not.
My point was that while a member can chose just to ignore all messages I cannot understand why if they feel that way that they join SYD in the first place.
The "first" upload is 22:39 on 21,Jul,17!
--------------------------------------- added after 9 minutes
...and he deleted it again,which cost me 20 points so I'm down 16 points.
One for the team.
--------------------------------------- added after 10 minutes
"Hey we're all sick of your bullshit. Either leave it or delete it".
And we all chanted; kebmo!kebmo!kebmo!
R.I.P.
Every time any member uploads a picture, the first page they come to clearly states what is acceptable. Point 1. and 2. are written in red and the last part speaks directly about your concern; "all should be over 18 years old at the moment of shooting."
Here's a copy and paste of the rules.
1. Posting photos of nude people under 18 years old is a criminal offence in most of countries, even if those are photos of your own body.
2. Posting nude photos of other people without their consent is a criminal offence in many countries too. No joking, you can go to prison for that. "Revenge porn" laws, identity theft laws and copyright laws are applicable.
So post only your own photos or photos of people you have their explicit permition to post, all should be over 18 years old at the moment of shooting.
Even the way you wrote the post is odd. The last sentence of your first post, you wrote; "SHE just wanted to be sure". Then when you responded to 2Kinky, you wrote; "I'll send HIM a pm"
She's obviously much newer than me, but yeah, it was a bad idea asking me, clearly. I didn't realize such a big deal would be made out of it if I asked here rather than explaining to her how to post in the forum - yeah, she's clueless.
Nothing weird about the post. 2Kinky said "I would definitely check with admin first." I said "I'll send him a PM." It's well-established that admin is a guy. His response was that it's legal, but it could send the wrong message to others. He wouldn't ban her if she posted it, but he'd recommend she take it down.
Is it legal? Maybe. Is it right? NO!!!
Don't those people have the slightest idea about the rules?
[deleted image]
So you thought that this random topic was the perfect opportunity for you to slip in your dick pic?
Gotcha!
[deleted image]
...what? How did that get there? Oops, oh well, lost my train of thought now
However, in the end although it could be argued that verification offers few benefits if I verify someone I am saying that I believe that they are who they say they are. If I am not convinced of that, it is my obligation to decline to do so. The onus is on the member asking to be verified to offer proof.
This site is very eye-opening about nature of people if you know where to look. Though I was aware of this technique before, it's typical method of "social hacking".
What one should learn from this is that people always find a way to cheat the system and some other people always fall for cheating. And that's why totalitarian governments "for the people" will never work the way socialists imagine.
New Comment Go to top