Price of gas? Price of groceries? American kids dying in a fools war? A deficit that will take over a 100 years just to pay the interest? A constipated Pentagon? A department of health that doesn’t know what to do about diarrhea?
Sure Phart, I believe you.

That's nonsense. First of all, there is no such thing as free health care. Governments can fund healthcare with taxes or let people pay premiums for health insurance. It's both funded by citizens, but a 'single payer' system is just more efficient and it enriches less people who don't contribute anything to healthcare.

It's impossible to keep wildfires under control, for a country like Canada, with ~347 million hectares of forest and hardly any road access to most of it. They spend about the same as the US, with 8.3 times less people. The US has ~310 million hectares of forest and about 10 times the number of wildfires.
Canada has roughly 9 times more forest per person than the U.S.
The area that is burned yearly is on average the same too. The only difference is that Canada has more large wildfires, occasionally. A single Canadian wildfire can burn hundreds of thousands of hectares. That's because they cannot get to it soon enough to put it out. Often, they chose to not even try. Why?
Imagine a lightning strike starts a fire 300 km from the nearest town. Sending dozens of aircraft and hundreds of firefighters may:
- cost millions of dollars
- put crews at risk
- have little chance of success if winds are strong
Instead, agencies prioritize fires threatening:
- communities
- infrastructure
- Indigenous communities
- power lines
- highways
- valuable timber

Canada is the second-largest country on Earth. About 90% of Canadians live within roughly 160 km (100 miles) of the U.S. border, while most of the country's forests lie far to the north. They simply cannot station enough firefighters and aircraft to immediately attack every remote ignition.

That doesn't mean additional investments in prevention, prescribed burns, aircraft, or staffing couldn't help, they likely would in some situations. But the idea that Canada's fires persist simply because it spends money on universal health care instead of firefighting doesn't match how wildfire management actually works. Weather, fuel conditions, terrain, and the sheer scale of Canada's wilderness are often the dominant factors.

It's not like the US is over-funding emergency services.
FEMA Non-Disaster Grant Programs: -$646 million, Proposed
Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities, (BRIC) Program eliminated (billions in future grants canceled)
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) ≈ -$491 million, Proposed
CDC Discretionary Funding ≈ -$3.6 billion (44%), Proposed
NOAA (overall) ≈ -26% Proposed cut
NOAA Office of Oceanic & Atmospheric Research ≈ -74%, Proposed
FEMA workforce ~200 positions eliminated, broader workforce reductions followed

If you implemented single payer, Americans would be able to afford more for wildfire
and other disaster prevention, response and relief.

Oh perhaps not

I wonder if he knows you don't get extra points for blacklisting members?

Perhaps and weight distribution versus height but they did something right none the less the intention of a speed bump was to slow people down

No she's right here, cunt. Laughing at your pathetic ass. Oh you woke her up talking shit about her boy.

I'd rather him play with his mama and let you bleed out

You fat bitches talk about members photoshoping pics. You're known for it. And you don't think you fat walrus friend doesn't. Huh, tell me where the 300 pounds of fat, rolls, and cellulite went in here new pic. Oh I guess we should all believe that she rubbed some baby oil on her ass and the cellulite went away. LMAO
--------------------------------------- added after 26 seconds

[deleted image]
--------------------------------------- added after 9 minutes

[deleted image]
--------------------------------------- added after 10 minutes

Look familiar. You and the walrus started this.

Please, do not start your shit here.