|
New Comment Rating: 11 Similar topics: 1.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF 2.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF II 3.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF III 4.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF,, ANY STUFF III 5.NEW MONGO STUFF, OLD MONGO STUFF, ANY MONGO STUFF III Comments: |
Of course it won't be 100% effective but damn it's a good idea and you have to rip the Band-Aid off somewhere.
I just wonder how long it will take the kids will find a workaround.
Besides children, the people who really don't like this would be ped0ph1les and perverts.
I’m only stating facts. There is no way to enforce this ban. It’s all for show, and nothing more. It’s the moral equivalent of wishing on a star.
This is the moral equivalent to what they’re doing in Australia: A person is swimming twenty-five yards out in the water, when he suddenly realizes he can’t make it back to shore.
He sees people on the beach and he begins to call to them just as he begins struggling to stay afloat.
The people on shore hear his cries and look out on the water and locate the struggling person.
But, instead of heading out on the water to effect his rescue, they all begin praying that he gets saved. They all pray really, really hard.
And, he slips under the water and drowns.
Here’s what they all say afterward: Well, we did something. At least we tried.
Same thing.
Same Same
They can now claim, with puffed up chests, “Look, everyone! We did something,” even though it’s totally and utterly meaningless!
However, if we accept that this is whistling in the wind, then, as a very smart man, what do you recommend should be done short of shutting down the internet?
In a perfect world, more parents would be more attentive and protective of their children. This is not a perfect world, however. People are flawed.
The ironic part is that government is made up solely of people. As stated above, people are flawed.
Why should we, then, trust government to always do the right thing, if the people in it are just as imperfect as the rest of us?
One thing is for sure: we can always trust the government to make a bad situation worse. Not even religion has had the ability to make the world right, and religion has been around far longer than government. The problem with religion, is the same as the problem with government: there are people involved in it.
A problem exists, and government’s solution, more often than not, is to make feel-good empty gestures for bragging rights, that is, when it's not trampling all over human rights. Doing “something" then becomes justification for spending more of our hard-earned money, just to micro-manage our lives.
The solution is to stop wanting the government to fix our lives and to take responsibility for ourselves. Modern societies have become far too reliant on government to solve their problems. That nonsense must stop, because government, whether through sheer incompetence or maliciousness, will ultimately be the end of human dignity and the death of humanity.
Anarchists want the world to burn. They produce nothing but misery. I want the world to be protected, because I live in it. I merely don’t want the State to tell me how I should live my life, so long as I am harming no one.
It’s not a black and white world. Why do you seem to insist that it is by labeling me an anarchist? Do you actually believe that there are only two sides in this issue: total submission/dependency or total anarchy?
Okay, you are not an anarchist. I didn’t label you. Thanks for that clarification. It was more of a question by me than a statement, but, you are a conservative, right leaning, citizen, right? So, let me ask you, what do you think of the EPA, the WHO, abortion, gun control, conservation laws, and treatment of illegal aliens? Because, in my book, many people want to live their lives in a cocoon where they don’t care about their neighbors. They just, and I quote, “don’t want the State to tell me how I should live my life, so long as I am harming no one.”
And no, I don’t believe “ that there are only two sides in this issue: total submission/dependency or total anarchy?” and I never said that. I notice you project to conclusions that are not what I’ve written (I do that too, sometimes 🤣
Why is it always a worst case scenario?
Government has been usurping the family unit for decades now. Look at the cities with the worst crime statistics. The family units are virtually non-existent in those communities, because government stepped in and told people, “You can’t do this alone. We’re here to help.”
You destroyers just can’t leave things alone.
Those family units that are virtually non-existent are a huge problem. I agree, but, without Big Government, how do you propose we deal with it? And before you say there’s too much red tape and waste of resources (and I agree with that), remember, nothing is perfect but something has to be done. Individual help is needed but it’s nowhere enough. Government help has to be.
Why not a blanket ban for all users.
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
What I preach is not bullshit on the other hand, I know Broward cops and they are shit. They even run from danger. I wonder if your son hides under the table.
If you'll notice I'll throw some mild insults but very seldom if ever throw tough ones like the last one. You forget I was born in Coral gables. I know what south Florida cops are like. And you are nothing better than a shallow dick. Heck, maybe I'm wrong but that fat assed Mrs CountryCouple looks like any other Cuban or Latin fat ass.
How am I doing CC54? I warned you and the whole forum, you are respectful and you get a pass from me. you trash my page or me and I become that crazy woman that makes your stay here a living hell.
angel1227--------------------------------------- added after 2 minutes@CountryCouple@ you posted your trash and then you blackball me? I guess you are like your son. All uniform and no guts,
@angel1227
--------------------------------------- added after 3 minutes
By system at 26,Sep,20 13:08
You were blacklisted by CountryCouple54
--------------------------------------- added after 40 minutes
/x80xio2800mdpic.html
--------------------------------------- added after 99 seconds
What's next bitch, you gonna call the Mexicans bean pickers?
--------------------------------------- added after 5 minutes
You think you have some fucking matter to our life. Bitch your useless, same as your daddy was. Hide down there in Coral Gables were you belong. Jeez, I hope you don't call those Cubans you live with "spics".
--------------------------------------- added after 6 minutes
How am I doing?
--------------------------------------- added after 7 minutes
--------------------------------------- added after 51 seconds
Countrycouple54 remember, you started this
--------------------------------------- added after 26 seconds
[deleted image]
--------------------------------------- added after 9 minutes
[deleted image]
--------------------------------------- added after 10 minutes
Look familiar. You and the walrus started this.
Next, I don't know what Lix does but I don't hide. My pics are from the last 40 years. Some are beauties, some are of a 66 yr old, saggy titted old lady but one thing for sure, they are true me
This is me two tears ago at age 66. Hope that fat assed bitch of yours can look like it at that age
/j9qam9s245pxpic.html
only registered users can see external links
--------------------------------------- added after 3 minutes
How did Sasquatch end up on this thread?
only registered users can see external links
--------------------------------------- added after 3 minutes
No problem but how is one "prominent" and get a boy attached to that?
Referring to a member a "walrus" was something that admin did not like. As I said, the prominent member refers to me as "IT" and ANGEL refers to me as "BITCH WITCH". Apparently, those names are okay. So rather than referring to a member by their screen name, it appears to be okay to refer to them as "IT" or "BITCH". I hesitate saying that BITCH WITCH only because members might think you're referring to me. As for lix, I do refer to her as "the prominent member" because of the clout she carries. She has the most friends as well as being the moderator of 99% of the groups. And as for her partner, I referred to him as a boy, short for boy-toy. That 20+ year age difference creeps me out.
I showed you what was said in Aussieman's thread, is that what you're asking? But if I'm not mistaken, another member alerted you prior to me.
I'll tell you what I will do. I'll block you for 48 hrs and then you can disappear along with your fat assed wife.
And YOU KNOW, that ANGEL is a gutter fighter and that's why the profile she created, under the name of mandy658 or 652 was deleted by admin.
New Comment Go to top