Laughably Small Penis?
Enlarge it At Home
Using Just Your Hands!

Want a bigger penis?
Enlarge it At Home
Using Just Your Hands!

Become an expert in
pussy licking!
She'll Beg You For More!

Male Multiple Orgasm
Discover your full Abilities!

STUFF, JUST STUFF

Discussion Forum on Show Your Dick

Page #2

Pages:  #1   #2   #3   #4   #5   #6   #7   #8   #9   #10   ...#837

Started by bella! [Ignore] 20,May,18 18:36  other posts
Please feel free to post miscellaneous subject matter, aka STUFF in this thread.

Please attempt to remain somewhat respectful to other members, ninnyhammers, dummies and folks you just don't like. Thank you.

New Comment       Rating: 11  


Comments:
By bella! [Ignore] 25,Jul,26 07:33 other posts 
What will they think of next!? Clothing HACKS from the Far East. I was especially impressed with the “tank top” and the hijab!

only registered users can see external links
By dgraff [Ignore] 25,Jul,26 20:15 other posts 
Wow I like the granny panties turned into a bra
By bella! [Ignore] 25,Jul,26 20:49 other posts 
The content poster considered that a “tank top”. I think that if I saw someone walking around in that type of “tank top” I might just shake my head and think to myself that that yo-yo is using their underwear as a top. And after I got done laughing, I might wonder whether they were new or used!


By bella! [Ignore] 24,Jul,26 06:20 other posts 
Trying to enjoy the great outdoors and you are bothered by mosquitoes?

only registered users can see external links
By dgraff [Ignore] 24,Jul,26 08:03 other posts 
Interesting it might be worth a try
By bella! [Ignore] 24,Jul,26 10:04 other posts 
Do you spend much time outdoors? What’s the mosquito situation like in your neck of the woods? As far as I’m concerned, mosquitoes were much worse in Michigan vs Florida! Shoot, at night I would get “attacked” between the time that I left my car until the time I got into my house and if I let one of those bastards in, they buzzed around as they circled my head as I tried to sleep!

It is worth a try if you have some ground coffee. I was reading some of the 1200 plus comments and a number of them said that “used” coffee grounds could be used after they were completely dry. I was actually trying to find anything that supported “why” an aluminum foil bowl was needed. I did read a post where someone said they used a plate but my best GUESS is like a candle, having more wax/wick below the flame will ensure a longer burning time.
By dgraff [Ignore] 24,Jul,26 10:41 other posts 
When I drank heavily mosquitoes left me alone I guess they didn’t like the Yukon Jack blood but now they go after me and I live in the woods so they are plentiful 24/7
By bella! [Ignore] 24,Jul,26 16:34 other posts 
If you have coffee grounds please give this a try and let me know if you think it works. I wonder whether one bowl of smoking coffee grounds will work or if 3, 4, 5 or more containers would be ideal!
By dgraff [Ignore] 24,Jul,26 18:17 other posts 
I’m going to try it one evening


By bella! [Ignore] 24,Jul,26 16:36 other posts 
Hey, phart, here’s a tater recipe for you! This seems like a recipe geared toward bachelors and that’s why I didn’t include dgraff!

only registered users can see external links


By bella! [Ignore] 21,Jul,26 15:43 other posts 
This is an AMAZING before and after of a young man that had a toupee installed!

only registered users can see external links
By t-rex [Ignore] 21,Jul,26 21:48 other posts 
How much glue did they use ? I take it that was glue ?
By bella! [Ignore] 22,Jul,26 00:20 other posts 
The Toupee Queen does AMAZING work, doesn’t she!? Her videos always show her smearing glue on the toupee and on the man’s freshly shaved head. Quite often she will tug on the toupee to show just how secure they are. I BELIEVE that she has mentioned that the application lasts 2 to 3 weeks but I’m not clear whether the guy can reapply himself or if he has to have it professionally taken care of.
By t-rex [Ignore] 22,Jul,26 09:11 other posts 
I would think that would drive your scalp crazy being on there that long


By bella! [Ignore] 21,Jul,26 05:55 other posts 
I find it difficult to believe that this young lady is a Brazilian model that works out to stay fit.

only registered users can see external links
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 21,Jul,26 06:24 other posts 
It's possible; sumo wrestlers also work out.
They just need to eat a lot, to stay 'in shape'.
By bella! [Ignore] 21,Jul,26 07:12 other posts 
I understand the parallel between sumo wrestlers needing to workout because there is physical exertion in their profession. But it is alleged that the model spends one hour daily cycling for the cardio benefit plus an additional two hours daily in the gym! What they fail to say is that she spends the remainder of her day eating.
By phart [Ignore] 21,Jul,26 13:45 other posts 
what does she model? Parachutes? Billboards? Good Lord she must be 350 pounds!
By bella! [Ignore] 21,Jul,26 15:42 other posts 
phart, in the beginning of the video it says she is over 450 lbs! Just as men and women of average or smaller sizes wear clothes, men and women of larger sizes wear clothes, too. I guess I was not aware that manufacturers of larger clothes for larger folks found a need to advertise their wares by way of models. Yeah, the young lady seems to wear a good deal of active wear, she’s seen wearing a tennis skirt and even a string bikini! As for what she “models”, I believe that those garment are featured at the end of the short video.
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 22,Jul,26 05:46 other posts 
Indeed, even a garbage bag looks good on a Victoria's Secret model.
If they actually want to show off a dress for very large sizes, they need her.

Big women are very much annoyed if a brand only uses those skinny models.
If they still want to sell clothes, to more than 10% of women, get with the times.
That doesn't mean to only use models like her, that means to diversify.


By bella! [Ignore] 20,Jul,26 23:26 other posts 
Is this guy’s butt for real!?

only registered users can see external links
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 21,Jul,26 03:37 other posts 
That's how those Instagram girls build asses like that.
Apparently, it works on guys too.


By dgraff [Ignore] 15,Jul,26 16:41 other posts 
So what happened to all the squawking democrats on fox morning news
Hakeem Jeffries
Chuck Schumer
Gavin Newsom
Mandammuslem mayor of New York
I don’t hear a word out of them anymore or did they get put in there place by big daddy trump
By CAT52! [Ignore] 16,Jul,26 13:45 other posts 
Probably they think it's a waste of time trying to convince narrow minded fools to wake up and see where the Clown is leading us to. Seriously, does anyone believe w are better off than with Biden?
By phart [Ignore] 16,Jul,26 13:56 other posts 
we are no worse off that's for sure.
By CAT52! [Ignore] 16,Jul,26 15:04 other posts 
Price of gas? Price of groceries? American kids dying in a fools war? A deficit that will take over a 100 years just to pay the interest? A constipated Pentagon? A department of health that doesn’t know what to do about diarrhea?
Sure Phart, I believe you.
By dgraff [Ignore] 16,Jul,26 16:21 other posts 
Crime rates are down
Lower mass shootings
Less over doses
Less drugs on the streets
Just to name a few
So yeah we are much better off now
Can you imagine what it would be like if Kamala had won
She would have gave Iran billions to keep enriching uranium
While she was out drinking and driving
By phart [Ignore] 16,Jul,26 16:51 other posts 
Drinking and sucking off the secret service agents! presidents aint allowed to drive once they get the office, thanks to kennedy running off and hiding from the secret service to get some ass, before he was shot
By CAT52! [Ignore] 16,Jul,26 17:39 other posts 
The crime rates have been coming down since Covid. It doesn’t matter who is president

“ The latest preliminary 2025 data from the FBI Crime Data Explorer shows an estimated 9.3% decrease in violent crime compared to 2024, alongside an 18.1% drop in murders and a 12.4% drop in property crimes. This follows steady, year-over-year declines since the spike observed during the COVID-19 pandemic.”
By CAT52! [Ignore] 16,Jul,26 17:42 other posts 
Mass shootings represent 1%
of all gun violence in America.
60% of gun deaths are suicide and 37% are homicide — including the 1% of mass shootings. The remaining 3% of gun deaths include law enforcement involved shootings, unintentional shootings, and those that were undetermined.

How about getting rid of guns?
By dgraff [Ignore] 16,Jul,26 19:54 other posts 
I think not how about we keep the guns and get rid of democrats instead
By CAT52! [Ignore] 16,Jul,26 17:44 other posts 
National data and seizure reports suggest that the visible supply of certain dangerous illegal drugs, particularly fentanyl, has declined in many U.S. communities over the last year, contributing to historic drops in overdose deaths. However, law enforcement and public health officials report that the overall street drug landscape remains volatile as cartels rapidly shift to synthetic substitutes and stimulants.
By CAT52! [Ignore] 16,Jul,26 17:46 other posts 
Well, it’s good to know all that stuff is down. I mean, as we starve because we can’t afford food, it’s good to know we won’t be a victim of a mass shooter. Especially since I can’t afford the gas to run away from it
By CAT52! [Ignore] 16,Jul,26 17:48 other posts 
Dgraff, Phart, give it up. We are no longer worried about Biden or Harris. We are worried about the Clown with dementia.
By dgraff [Ignore] 16,Jul,26 20:00 other posts 
I seen a clown 🤡 with dementia running around his name is chuck shumer
By phart [Ignore] 16,Jul,26 23:43 other posts 
By CAT52! [Ignore] 16,Jul,26 23:53 other posts 
You want to compare Schumer with Trump? 🤣🤣🤣
Go right ahead. Hahaha.
By phart [Ignore] 16,Jul,26 23:45 other posts 
Yea, I know, you forgot how we GOT here,and you don't like the route the new man is using to get us ELSEWHERE.
The house is built by laying the first brick, driving the first nail. When Trump got in the second time, the house was 4 foot out of square.
By CAT52! [Ignore] 16,Jul,26 23:55 other posts 
I know where we were on January 20, 2025.
CRIME
The crime decline began before Trump returned to office in January 2025. The large drop in murders started after the COVID-era spike:
2020–2021: major increase in homicides.
2022: homicide began falling.
2023: large declines continued.
2024: another major decline.
So the 2024 improvement was already underway before any Trump administration policies could have had a national effect

MASS SHOOTINGS
Yes, some measures show mass shootings were lower in 2024 than in the peak years around 2021–2023. But that decline began before Trump took office, so it cannot reasonably be credited to Trump policies.

OVERDOSE DEATHS
The same applies. The decline started before 2025:
Overdose deaths peaked around 2022.
Declines accelerated through late 2023 and 2024.
The CDC specifically noted that deaths had been declining since late 2023.
Possible contributors researchers point to include:
- wider naloxone availability,
- expanded treatment access,
- changes in the illicit drug supply,
- public health interventions,
- changes in fentanyl patterns.
What did Trump do to cause it? Essentially NOTHING, because most of the data period occurred before his second administration began.

DRUGS ON THE STREETS
That is not something the data clearly shows. Overdose deaths are down, but that does not automatically mean fewer drugs are available. The decline in overdose deaths began before Trump took office and is likely due to multiple factors: more naloxone access, changes in the illicit drug supply, treatment efforts, and public health interventions. Trump did not cause the overdose decline that began in 2023–2024.
His administration has emphasized border enforcement and drug interdiction, but there is not yet evidence that those policies produced a measurable reduction in
drug availability.

Here's some negative data that he ACTUALLY CAUSED:

• National debt increased by about $7.8 trillion during Trump’s first term.
Trump signed the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which reduced federal revenue, while spending continued to rise. The Congressional Budget Office estimated the tax cuts would add about $1.5 trillion to deficits over 10 years (before accounting for interest).

• Federal deficits increased before COVID.
The deficit rose from about $585 billion in 2016 to about $984 billion in 2019. This happened before pandemic spending and was driven partly by the Trump tax cuts and increased spending.

• Tariffs increased costs for American businesses and consumers.
Trump imposed tariffs on hundreds of billions of dollars of imports, especially from China. Economic studies found that the cost was largely paid by U.S. importers and passed on through higher prices rather than being absorbed by China.

• Farmers lost export markets because of Trump’s trade war.
After Trump imposed tariffs, China and other countries retaliated against U.S. agricultural exports. The administration responded with about $28 billion in taxpayer-funded aid to farmers to compensate for losses caused by the trade dispute.

• Emergency preparedness funding was reduced or targeted for cuts.
The Trump administration proposed reducing FEMA preparedness grants by about $646 million and eliminated the BRIC disaster mitigation program, which had funded billions of dollars in pre-disaster projects. These were direct administration policy decisions.

• Public health preparedness was targeted for major cuts.
The Trump administration proposed large reductions to CDC programs, including about $3.6 billion (around 44%) in discretionary funding. These cuts would affect disease surveillance, outbreak response, and emergency preparedness.
By dgraff [Ignore] 18,Jul,26 06:29 other posts 
Did I ask you to send me a book I’m not reading all that crap 💩 opinions are like ass holes every one has one and most of them stink
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 20,Jul,26 04:20 other posts 
This is why it requires 'a book' to tell you how wrong you are:



Two people may have different opinions about whether it is raining, but whether water droplets are actually falling from the sky is not decided by opinion.


By bella! [Ignore] 20,Jul,26 01:39 other posts 
This content provider is ToupeeQueen and her transformations are absolutely AMAZING. As for her clients, this guy is unique, would you look at this fella’s “comb over”!?

only registered users can see external links


I will post the “after” as soon as she does!


By bella! [Ignore] 18,Jul,26 18:19 other posts 
Here’s another fine tee shirt!

only registered users can see external links


By bella! [Ignore] 18,Jul,26 07:41 other posts 
Does she or doesn’t she? Only her dealer knows for sure…….

only registered users can see external links


I THINK she said she hasn’t done crack in 5 years but I think she might be tellin’ a story!


By bella! [Ignore] 18,Jul,26 06:58 other posts 
Hey, people, today is dgraff‘s birthday and he told me that he “forgot”. Please stop by his page and wish him a “happy birthday”. Thank you!
By dgraff [Ignore] 18,Jul,26 07:03 other posts 
Yep today I’m 64 going on 25
By bella! [Ignore] 18,Jul,26 07:38 other posts 
64 going on 25, good for YOU!


By dgraff [Ignore] 16,Jul,26 08:54 other posts 
Today’s forecast for Pennsylvania is hot and hazy with lots of Canadian pine smoke
By bella! [Ignore] 16,Jul,26 09:49 other posts 
Although I’m not “home”, my “neighbors” have been squawking about the amount of smoke wafting from Canada.
Too bad that it's Canadian pine, that's highly unsuitable for smoking food.
If those foul trees are gone anyway, maybe they can replace them with fruitwoods
like Apple or Cherry, or nut-bearing trees like Pecan, for a mild smoke.
Actually, you might prefer the classic BBQ flavor, so they could please you by
replanting Hickory or Oak.
By dgraff [Ignore] 16,Jul,26 12:37 other posts 
I have all that kind of hard wood on my property and I have a smoker
By phart [Ignore] 16,Jul,26 13:58 other posts 
kinda hard to build homes and such with fruit woods. I can't understand why they can't seem to keep fires under control no better than this. alot of fires in the US at the moment to. When there is a woods fire around here,it gets put OUT soon.
--------------------------------------- added after 9 hours

I got to thinking,maybe if Canada spent more money on fire suppression than free health care, maybe these fires would get put out sooner
By Ananas2xLekker [Ignore] 17,Jul,26 11:06 other posts 
That's nonsense. First of all, there is no such thing as free health care. Governments can fund healthcare with taxes or let people pay premiums for health insurance. It's both funded by citizens, but a 'single payer' system is just more efficient and it enriches less people who don't contribute anything to healthcare.

It's impossible to keep wildfires under control, for a country like Canada, with ~347 million hectares of forest and hardly any road access to most of it. They spend about the same as the US, with 8.3 times less people. The US has ~310 million hectares of forest and about 10 times the number of wildfires.
Canada has roughly 9 times more forest per person than the U.S.
The area that is burned yearly is on average the same too. The only difference is that Canada has more large wildfires, occasionally. A single Canadian wildfire can burn hundreds of thousands of hectares. That's because they cannot get to it soon enough to put it out. Often, they chose to not even try. Why?
Imagine a lightning strike starts a fire 300 km from the nearest town. Sending dozens of aircraft and hundreds of firefighters may:
- cost millions of dollars
- put crews at risk
- have little chance of success if winds are strong
Instead, agencies prioritize fires threatening:
- communities
- infrastructure
- Indigenous communities
- power lines
- highways
- valuable timber

Canada is the second-largest country on Earth. About 90% of Canadians live within roughly 160 km (100 miles) of the U.S. border, while most of the country's forests lie far to the north. They simply cannot station enough firefighters and aircraft to immediately attack every remote ignition.

That doesn't mean additional investments in prevention, prescribed burns, aircraft, or staffing couldn't help, they likely would in some situations. But the idea that Canada's fires persist simply because it spends money on universal health care instead of firefighting doesn't match how wildfire management actually works. Weather, fuel conditions, terrain, and the sheer scale of Canada's wilderness are often the dominant factors.

It's not like the US is over-funding emergency services.
FEMA Non-Disaster Grant Programs: -$646 million, Proposed
Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities, (BRIC) Program eliminated (billions in future grants canceled)
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) ≈ -$491 million, Proposed
CDC Discretionary Funding ≈ -$3.6 billion (44%), Proposed
NOAA (overall) ≈ -26% Proposed cut
NOAA Office of Oceanic & Atmospheric Research ≈ -74%, Proposed
FEMA workforce ~200 positions eliminated, broader workforce reductions followed

If you implemented single payer, Americans would be able to afford more for wildfire
and other disaster prevention, response and relief.


New Comment   Go to top

Pages:  #1   #2   #3   #4   #5   #6   #7   #8   #9   #10   ...#837



Show your Genitals