Oh, this is really messed up, a TODDLER wielding a gun in Indiana. I've attached a 12 minute video which is a combination of police body cam footage as well as Law&Crime Network commentary. The Law&Crime coverage much more telling than anything else.
only registered users can see external links
ABC News coverage of the toddler in Beech Grove, IN.
Yea, I forgot ,liberals don't consider cocaine and meth to be dangerous .
And fentanyl, nothing but candy,
just ask the under 14's that have died from it recently.
only registered users can see external links
I've always thought of a toddler being in the age range of 2 to 4 years old. I actually Google'd the age range of a toddler and there doesn't really seem to be anything specific. Did you see the size of the "toddler"? He looks like he's the size of a 5 year old but he doesn't communicate like one and he looks like he's wearing a diaper. Regardless of his age or size, he should not have access to a gun.
I think the four year old should get life in prison and put on a chain gang while being beat and force him to babyiel labor road work no pasifirers allowed in prison
It is not ok for either 1 to do it. It shows a total lack of respect for the other person that has committed themselves to being your only lover and soul mate and partner.
But sadly it seems modern people just don't care about commitment anymore of either sex.
Free for all, fuck for all ,spread the disease's and pregnancy's and break hearts and move right along as if nothing is going on.
Then sit back and wonder why the world is in a mess.
Polygamy is the practice of marrying multiple spouses.
It's actually illegal in most countries. With the exception of the Solomon Islands, polygamous marriages are not recognized in Europe and Oceania. In India, Malaysia, the Philippines, and Singapore, the governments recognize polygamous marriages, but only for Muslims. In those countries, it's only the men who are allowed to have multiple spouses. Polyandry is a form of polygamy in which a woman takes two or more husbands at the same time. For example, fraternal polyandry is practiced among Tibetans in Nepal, parts of China and part of northern India, in which two or more brothers are married to the same wife, with the wife having equal “sexual access” to them.
Personally, I don't give a shit about the institution of marriage. I would give everyone the freedom to marry anyone, in any number, if those people were all able to freely make that choice. However, because we live in a world where people do not always have the freedom of choice, especially women, it's better to limit marriage to two people.
Marriage is not necessary for commitment or to prevent spreading diseases, (I guess you refer to unwanted) pregnancies or breaking hearts and move right along as if nothing is going on. Maybe marriage forces some people to stay together, but that is no guarantee for happiness. And seeing as divorces are plenty, it doesn't promote any commitment either.
There are lots of reasons to consider the world a mess, but in my opinion the freedom to have sex with any other consenting adult and freely start and end relationships, only made the world a better place. A freedom is only a problem, when it negatively affects other people's freedoms. These particular freedoms only do that, when people are not ready for that freedom. Then the people are the problem, not the freedom. Love is not a weapon. If people use it as such, than they are wrong, not love itself.
Most of the time, the religious views determine the law of the land.
I'm pleased that, in this case, most countries choose rationality over religious views.
I'm told that I'm racist for calling a Jew a dirty Jew. Not all Jews, mind you, just a particular, obnoxious Jew member after he started ranting he was a Jew and resented the putdown of Israel. Why am I bringing this up four years later? Because of this post in this thread.
"She’s at home licking woodys wound while she’s on the phone talking to a coon"
Members should keep in mind that everything is readable. Nothing is secret.👿
Not to change the subject, but does the leaves falling on my page irritate anyone as much as it irritates me I don't know why I have them on there, I guess it's something different. I'll remove them after I have my nervous breakdown
Sounds similar to a couple years ago when the plandemic was going strong,no where to keep the dead bodys.
Oh, this is really messed up, a TODDLER wielding a gun in Indiana. I've attached a 12 minute video which is a combination of police body cam footage as well as Law&Crime Network commentary. The Law&Crime coverage much more telling than anything else.
only registered users can see external links
ABC News coverage of the toddler in Beech Grove, IN.
only registered users can see external links
And fentanyl, nothing but candy,
just ask the under 14's that have died from it recently.
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
That dog has AIDS now
only registered users can see external links
Yea right, radicalized idiots is more like it.
Why is it ok for a man to practice poligamy but women are looked down upon if they do it?
👿
But sadly it seems modern people just don't care about commitment anymore of either sex.
Free for all, fuck for all ,spread the disease's and pregnancy's and break hearts and move right along as if nothing is going on.
Then sit back and wonder why the world is in a mess.
It's actually illegal in most countries. With the exception of the Solomon Islands, polygamous marriages are not recognized in Europe and Oceania. In India, Malaysia, the Philippines, and Singapore, the governments recognize polygamous marriages, but only for Muslims. In those countries, it's only the men who are allowed to have multiple spouses. Polyandry is a form of polygamy in which a woman takes two or more husbands at the same time. For example, fraternal polyandry is practiced among Tibetans in Nepal, parts of China and part of northern India, in which two or more brothers are married to the same wife, with the wife having equal “sexual access” to them.
Personally, I don't give a shit about the institution of marriage. I would give everyone the freedom to marry anyone, in any number, if those people were all able to freely make that choice. However, because we live in a world where people do not always have the freedom of choice, especially women, it's better to limit marriage to two people.
Marriage is not necessary for commitment or to prevent spreading diseases, (I guess you refer to unwanted) pregnancies or breaking hearts and move right along as if nothing is going on. Maybe marriage forces some people to stay together, but that is no guarantee for happiness. And seeing as divorces are plenty, it doesn't promote any commitment either.
There are lots of reasons to consider the world a mess, but in my opinion the freedom to have sex with any other consenting adult and freely start and end relationships, only made the world a better place. A freedom is only a problem, when it negatively affects other people's freedoms. These particular freedoms only do that, when people are not ready for that freedom. Then the people are the problem, not the freedom. Love is not a weapon. If people use it as such, than they are wrong, not love itself.
I'm pleased that, in this case, most countries choose rationality over religious views.
😅🤣
"She’s at home licking woodys wound while she’s on the phone talking to a coon"
Members should keep in mind that everything is readable. Nothing is secret.👿
New Comment Go to top