Page #1
Pages: #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9 #10 ...#820
New Comment Rating: 11 Similar topics: 1.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF 2.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF II 3.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF, ANY STUFF III 4.NEW STUFF, OLD STUFF,, ANY STUFF III 5.NEW MONGO STUFF, OLD MONGO STUFF, ANY MONGO STUFF III Comments: | ||
You must be logged in to post here. Log in
only registered users can see external links
But I must also say, I am very surprised that the son is still in jail with bail.
I thought they turned people back loose in california once arrested and cycled thru the system
The last thing that it means is being OK with murder.
Being OK with murder, that is only on your political side.
You celebrate it, justify it, or ignore it, except in some very specific cases,
when it involves some cult footsoldier, and when it helps your cult of hate.
8 of the top 10 states with the highest Murder & Manslaughter rates are RED states. California isn't even in that top 10, they are ranked 28th.
It’s how the system works
--------------------------------------- added after 39 seconds
As usual, you guys are talking out of your ass
Wow, need to watch it closely. Must be because the victims were liberals that the liberals are going to use the system. Had it been a conservative victim, i doubt they would have even bothered to look for the killer.
why don't you make it concrete?
California is your most successful state, and that is not caused by failures.
They are succeeding because of liberalism, not despite of it.
Approximately 74.35% of felony charges in California result in a conviction.
The National Average is roughly 70%.
In 2024, California reported 1,666 homicides and made 1,305 homicide arrests.
This indicates a clearance rate of roughly 78%, which state analysts describe as significantly better than the national average of 61.4%.
States with the Lowest Murder "Solving" (Clearance) Rates:
- Illinois: Preliminary 2024 data reported a murder clearance rate of 35.5%. While a slight improvement from 33.5% in 2023, it remains one of the lowest in the nation.
- New Mexico: Reports indicate New Mexico has some of the lowest violent crime clearance rates in the country as of 2024/2025. In 2023, the state recorded a homicide rate of 11.5 per 100,000 residents, the highest in the U.S. at that time.
- Georgia and Mississippi: These states were also identified in 2025 analyses as having consistently low violent crime clearance rates relative to other states.
Everything you are saying is 100% based on your indoctrination.
President Trump’s comment on Rob Reiner and wife’s murder:
"A very sad thing happened last night in Hollywood. Rob Reiner, a tortured and struggling, but once very talented movie director and comedy star, has passed away, together with his wife, Michele, reportedly due to the anger he caused others through his massive, unyielding, and incurable affliction with a mind crippling disease known as TRUMP DERANGEMENT SYNDROME, sometimes referred to as TDS."
President Donald J Trump
Did any prominent Democratic politician do that when Charlie Kirk was killed?
And yes anal licker many Democrats made horrible comments about Charlie
--------------------------------------- added after 76 seconds
More sarcasm than joke I believe
Trump has been a hateful narcissist asshole all his life.
Otherwise, I completely agree with the statement.
while he said that the first amendment is worth some people being killed.
2) Some Democrats or liberals pointed out that Trump was more concerned
with the construction of his new ballroom, when he was asked about the murder.
3) Some Democrats or liberals pointed out that his widow was not appearing
to be grieving that much, but mostly spending her time grifting off it.
4) Some Democrats or liberals pointed out that Charlie Kirk was not a honest debater,
who needs to be respected for how he engaged with the open marketplace of ideas.
No Democrat or prominent liberal made horrible comments about Charlie's MURDER.
Trump however blamed the victim for getting killed, for hating HIM.
That was not a joke, or a justifiable remark, that was Trump being a sick bastard.
I see no Democrats and liberals declaring war on you over this, like your cult did.
I asked you about which "Democrat or prominent liberal" made horrible comments about Charlie's MURDER, because there are OTHER NORMS for public figures,
than for any random Joe Schmo on the internet. Do you agree?
Pointing out things like point 1 to 4, are NOT horrible comments about a MURDER,
that is pointing out behavior or the morality of the person before the murder or other people after the murder. That is different than celebrating the persons murder or blaming the victim for their murder. You don't have to mourn the loss of a person,
to mourn their murder.
Although, there are norms for that, when it relates to elected representatives,
who are supposed to represent everyone, like THE FUCKING PRESIDENT!!!
It's his job and he's the worst at, of all your presidents, ever.
Yes, people got fired for re-posting one of these 4 points I mentioned.
None of them are violations of free speech. What fucking country allows people
to be fired over exercising their FREE SPEECH?
Are you not thinking "this might be a bit hypocritical", before you say shit like this?
I feel like explaining stealing is wrong, to a toddler.
only registered users can see external links
"First Time Buying My Wife Tampons"
only registered users can see external links
No, Nimesh, buying tampons is NOT like buying gasoline!
The men were probably thinking "Thanks for the info, dude."
only registered users can see external links
only registered users can see external links
“Repeated pics don’t look original or by self”
This wack-job was pissed that no one agreed with his lame referral and voted NO ABUSE. So in a true snowflake manner, he blacklisted each of the voting panel members. What a freakin’ pussy!
You’ve been a member for 4 months and have blacklisted 8 members! Really? And in the same 4 months, 4 members are have blacklisted you. Only one of the members that blacklisted you provided a reason and their reason was; “creep”. Odd that you call yourself Ratecommentinsult and you get upset aka insulted because members don’t agree with you? This site is for adults, you are 30 years old, don’t you think it’s time to grow up?
Allow me to explain something that your momma and daddy should have told you 25 years ago; everyone is not always going to agree with you.
In the case of your referral, 5 people did not agree with your assessment of lunar883. Suck it up buttercup, you were wrong, now take it like an adult.
Think of the two space shuttles that exploded. One was on the way to space and one was on the way home from space. I would rather be on the one going home.
nakedme , a member for 8 months and with 7 photos in her gallery, submits a picture that is found on the internet! Heck, 3 of her 7 photos can be found on the internet!
nakedme is referred to the Evaluation Panel and with a sense of fairness, a voting member comes along, freezes the voting process and for this reason; "She almost convinced me she's real. I sent her a last warning. I freeze it for 24 hours and I'll wait for her reply. If she doesn't reply, I agree that we should get rid of her." Yes, she must be real, she almost had your dumb dick convinced with the other 4 pictures.
I tried Google and never get anything. This is after i find out it's internet (I look at a pic and see some good quality and some poor quality, but, the subject matter is pretty universal. Open pussy, closed pussy, pussy dripping cum, pussy getting fingered, pussy sunning by the pool, pussy on bed)
There's a few,they haven't put any of these sites(Syd/syc/SIO) name on it....
Or shown different verification pics....
The burden of proof is less for some...
You are enrolling on a fresh, new site, why not post fresh, new pictures? I'm having a difficult time understanding why 4 of the 7 pictures, 57% of the posted pictures in her gallery, come back with multiple hits elsewhere on the internet. The 4 fellas that verified her best be concerned.
Just a username is nothing,cuz it doesn't show where it's for..
Needs this sites name on it somewhere...
She thought she could insult you and when you questioned her rude post, she declares it was "all in fun"! I wonder if she would accept that sad ass excuse when she feels insulted?
What gives you the right to call my post rude?
Who said it was an insult?
It was in fun. Haven’t you ever said “ Don’t be an asshat”? jesting?
And last, you who have insulted my way of being to the point I call you a “ sweet dog in heat” want to know if I can take it?
HAHAHA
So no verification from me.....
New Comment Go to top