No way! Like I hoped that I explained, this only affects my Netflix app on my mobile device. There's no issue watching Netflix on my iPad or my laptop, just my phone.

With the social distancing and self quarantine, lately and weather permitting, I will go down to our boardwalk, watch the freighters, people watch and sometimes watch "TV". Right now, I'm thoroughly engrossed in The Last Kingdom and dammit, my phone holds a charge better and longer than the iPad so that is my device of choice for that purpose and that location.

So you don’t think I have to go on a fly killing war path

My thing at the moment is not so much flies . but post through the door . Do I sanitize the letter/package . Do I sanitize the contents . I have washed my blinking hands that much they now look like prunes . . The next big thing I guess will be a shortage of electronic fly zappers in the USA . Along with . Face masks and Bog paper. And in Michigan snow shovels .

There's no worries as long as you wear underwear

Hahaha don’t forget money something I handle many times a day one of the dirtiest thing on earth

"And what about name of new member and his pecadilo?" WTF is that supposed to mean? Are you asking me who I referred? I referred Exposedfantasy, his gallery of 34 pictures were of transgender women, pictures "borrowed" from the internet.

Hey, I have an idea. Since you seem to have such a tight rapport with admin, why don't you suggest that you and all the other members be given "viewing privileges" of the Evaluation Panel? That way you won't miss a beat and you can see what goes on, how people vote, etc.

What's "a lot"? 2, 20, 200?

An interesting thought but the person already decided to turn a blind eye to admin's initial warning.

As I mentioned to Scorpio69, the full conversation can be found on or around page #27. This post made by admin can be found there;

"The site is not supposed to have internet pics. And it's a violation of copyright laws to intentionally host copyrighted materials without their owners permissions. As long as they are occasional, within fair use, etc. - it's not a problem but for that they should not be a majority, just a minor portion. Also, I simply don't want this site to be something that it's not. It was made for people to share their photos. This site will be overwhelmed with internet pics if all members think they are ok.

If members want to share their favorite internet pics they can do it on their own page without placing them into categories. Or even for friends only."

That's what I thought, too, however ANGEL1227 seems to be a bit disgruntled because I used the term of "an abundance".

She was right on it, gave my post a (-1) and posted this; "Abundance is a broad amount. 2,20,200? And what about name of new member and his pecadilo?"

My guess was that there were 4 or 5 referrals yesterday and 3 at the time that I made my post today. That seems like "an abundance" to me.

In my opinion, you "get it". As a rule, I do NOT care whether members post internet pictures or not because there are a number of members that do.

In the past, I've voted that abuse was not valid, froze the voting and contacted the member MYSELF and requested that he/she remove the picture(s) from their gallery. As I said to Scorpio69, admin's warning is visible and printed in red each time a member uploads a new picture. In the case of the current reported member, his "several +" uploads of internet pictures has garnered him 6 TOP OF THE MONTH awards and hundreds of extra points and for what? Because he posted internet pictures that were well received by the numb-nuts members? Hell yeah, I'm going to vote to delete him and I'm okay with my reasons why.

Oh, I can't remember the exact date, it was mid December and aoneeyedmonster said something about the chicks with dicks appearing on the Popular page (the full conversation with input from admin is currently found on page #27).

This is a copy & paste of your post; "They MUST be from the internet. Afterall... What's the odds of knowing more than one chick with a dick, considering I don't know of even ONE. I agree though, if they aren't claiming to be that person, no harm no foul. Otherwise, you'd have to take action on those posting birds, cheetahs, etc. that they didnt personally take. That being said, I made the front page, i can't believe it! 😁"

Yes, he is a 5 year member, yes, he appears to have many more genuine and lack luster photos in his gallery but being a 5 year member, he should have known better and each and every time he uploaded an internet picture, he was "reminded" that he better be be posting his own picture(s). This member didn't upload the internet pictures under "miscellaneous", he uploaded them under "dick" and based on that exposure, and the multitude of members that don't give a rat's ass if it's an amateur photo of a "regular guy" or a commercial photo of a "professional model", he received a SHITLOAD of comments and votes that translated to 6 TOP OF THE MONTH awards. Look at his page. In the 5 years he's been here, he has 14 gifts on his page and 6 of those were awards for him posting internet pics. So what, you say. So look at his Activity Meter, it's 0, he doesn't interact with anyone, so in my opinion, he's expendable. So rather than being deleted, you that suggest a lesser consequence like being able to delete some pictures. Okay and forfeit the awards, too? Are you going to contact him and suggest that he edit his gallery or are you expecting Mr. admin to do the "dirty work"? Look, I was aware of what the guy was doing, I didn't report him but someone else did so now I will address the matter as a voting member of the Evaluation Panel.

Here's a copy & paste of what can be seen each and every time you upload a new picture. This looks different then what we would actually see because admin posts the warning in RED.

"Upload Your Nude Photo
You are logged in as bella!. Logout. To Main Page
1. Posting photos of nude people under 18 years old is a criminal offence in most of countries, even if those are photos of your own body.

2. Posting nude photos of other people without their consent is a criminal offence in many countries too. No joking, you can go to prison for that. "Revenge porn" laws, identity theft laws and copyright laws are applicable.

So post only your own photos or photos of people you have their explicit permission to post, all should be over 18 years old at the moment of shooting."

I agree that is right about were I am at this point

The voting process on the referral you made yesterday really made me smile. One of the NO ABUSE reason/comments made was something like, "where's the proof?" or "where's the link?" DOI! Open your eyes because across the top of each picture was the website the pictures were "borrowed" from.